Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Pathetic Pot Prohibitionists

Legalization in Colorado reveals the intellectual poverty of the war on marijuana.

Jacob Sullum | 1.8.2014 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

On Monday, less than a week after Colorado's state-licensed marijuana shops began serving recreational consumers, the anti-pot group Project SAM thanked three public figures who "have galvanized our movement." One of them was Tina Brown, former editor of Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and The Daily Beast, whose contribution consisted of this insight, which she offered to her 75,000 Twitter followers last Friday: "Legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese."

This is what passes for smart commentary among pot prohibitionists. Colorado's path-breaking legalization of the marijuana business has revealed the intellectual bankruptcy of people who think violence is an appropriate response to consumption of psychoactive substances they do not like.  

People like Kevin Sabet, the former Office of National Drug Control Policy official who co-founded Project SAM. Sabet's main strategy for defending prohibition consists of pairing the word big with the word marijuana, based on the assumption that Americans will flee in terror from the resulting phrase.

"We're on the brink of creating Big Marijuana," Sabet warns. That's scary, he explains, because large, legal cannabusinesses will advertise their product and encourage people to consume it. Even so, they seem preferable to murderous drug cartels.

Sabet's group clearly needs all the help it can get. In addition to Tina Brown's tweet, it latched onto a pair of essays published the day after Colorado's pot shops opened. New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus, both of whom admit enjoying marijuana in their younger days, nevertheless oppose legalization because some people smoke pot too much, which is especially bad when those people are teenagers.

Brooks concedes that smoking pot with his buddies in high school was "fun," even that "those moments of uninhibited frolic deepened our friendships." Still, "being stoned is not a particularly uplifting form of pleasure." And then there was that time Brooks smoked pot during lunch and flubbed a presentation in English class, "feeling like a total loser."

While "I don't have any problem with somebody who gets high from time to time," Brooks says, "smoking all the time" is "likely to cumulatively fragment a person's deep center, or at least not do much to enhance it." Therefore the government should "subtly tip the scale to favor temperate, prudent, self-governing citizenship" by kidnapping people at gunpoint and locking them in cages for growing or selling marijuana.

Brooks, keen to protect his deep center and avoid embarrassing public speaking incidents, does not care for pot anymore. But Marcus not only admits that "I have done my share of inhaling"; she plans to "check out some Bubba Kush" the next time she is in Colorado.

Still, Marcus thinks she should not be allowed to do that—because of the kids. "The more widely available marijuana becomes," she writes, "the more minors will use it."

Marcus concedes that marijuana is less dangerous than alcohol or tobacco. "The reason to single out marijuana," she says, "is the simple fact of its current (semi-)illegality." In other words, marijuana should be illegal because it is illegal. I believe this is an example of what philosophers call the is/ought fallacy.

What Brooks and Marcus conspicuously fail to do is offer a moral justification for banning marijuana but not alcohol (which poses greater hazards when consumed to excess and is consumed by minors a lot more often), plus every other adult pleasure that Brooks deems insufficiently "uplifting." They do not even seem to understand that a moral justification is needed for using force to suppress an activity that violates no one's rights.

With allies and arguments like these, it's no wonder the prohibitionists are losing. A few days after Brown, Brooks, and Marcus galvanized the anti-pot movement with their thrilling defenses of the status quo, CNN announced poll results indicating that 54 percent of Americans think "the sale of marijuana should be made legal." 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Smoked Out

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyWar on DrugsMarijuanaDrug LegalizationColoradoDrug PolicyDrugs
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (58)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Steve G   11 years ago

    If, as they predict, we just end up fatter, dumber and sleepier, then we deserve to lose to the Chinese.

    1. Steve G   11 years ago

      ...and it'll have nothing to do w/ the pot.

    2. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

      If we should ban things that make us stupid, isn't banning Tina Brown a higher priority than banning pot?

    3. Rod Flash   11 years ago

      Plus, when I drink I tend to get sleepy. But when I smoke it tends to keep me awake. I think my personal anecdotal evidence pretty much blows theirs out of the water.

  2. aix42   11 years ago

    "They do not even seem to understand that a moral justification is needed for using force to suppress an activity that violates no one's rights."

    Their rights are violated by others choosing activities that might not be the most judicious use of their time. When the individual fails to support the collective society as a whole suffers!

    I know my weed dealers always checked for ID too, lol...

  3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese.

    Apparently there's no stopping the mary jane train, so the only thing for the America First anti-pot crowd to do is get China kids hooked on the weed.

    1. Jerryskids   11 years ago

      No, you idiot - if you wanna compete with the heaten Chinee you gotta get American kids to start smoking opium.

      1. OneOut   11 years ago

        China is developing a meth problem. I tried to post a link to an article about a recent bust of three tons but was informed the link wouldn't post because my post contained a word that was too long ( over 50 characters ) I'm sure you can google it if you want.

        We have nothing to worry about.

      2. DenverJay   11 years ago

        They already smokin' the HOPEium! heyaaah!

    2. waffles   11 years ago

      Apparently ketamine is the widely available drug of choice in China. I think a lot of what makes a recreational drug popular is (relative) safety, price, and availability. America grows massive amounts of pot. China has massive chemical plants producing grey (or black) market pharmaceuticals.

      Where do you think bath salts came from?

      1. Duncan20903   11 years ago

        I thought that bath salts came from Bed, Bath, and Beyond? Give me a minute and I'll go check the labels and make sure.

        1. VicRattlehead   11 years ago

          My mother did not understand the news article when it was banned, and subsequently threw out her bathing stuff thinking that was what was making people insane, when i explained it was a drug that made people that way she was confused as to why anyone would take it comparing it to sniffing bleach.

    3. Duncan20903   11 years ago

      Fist of Etiquette, that project is already under way:
      http://shanghaiist.com/2013/08.....police.php

      I must have been asleep and dreaming because I swear that I heard that the Chinese have eliminated all mind altering drugs except for drinking alcohol. Gosh, this story seems to support that assertion:
      http://shanghaiist.com/2009/08.....nk_dri.php

  4. John C. Randolph   11 years ago

    Today I learned that someone named "Tina Brown" is a waste of space.

    -jcr

  5. Jaybirdmojo   11 years ago

    Isn't that, um, racist?

    1. pan fried wylie   11 years ago

      jingoism.

      1. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

        Yellow Horde!
        Caahsukka!

    2. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

      Not if spoken by a Leftie. Had she made an anti-Mao statement, that would be racist.

    3. MisterDamage   11 years ago

      They think the people they're trying to convince are stupid so they're appealing to something they regard as stupid in order to convince those stupid racists they shouldn't smoke pot. Because the people framing the argument that way regard themselves as superior, they end up making stupid arguments in an attempt to convince their inferiors to do their bidding.

  6. Pompey   11 years ago

    Legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese.

    Shall we also emulate their education system, which emphasises rote, would further promote sitting time in an already sedentary America, and boost our stress-related emotional condition rate?

    You don't compete with "The Chinese", Tina, but I know how you can start: go in at the ground level and compete with one of those proletariat-grade whores in a $2 brothel sucking cocks and having unprotected sex with insistent patrons. Make sure to choose a provincial capital too, Shanghai is too upscale for you.

    1. Pompey   11 years ago

      Provincial in the backwoods sense.

      1. Calvin Coolidge   11 years ago

        I think you mean the backdoor sense....

        1. Pompey   11 years ago

          Ziing!

  7. Calvin Coolidge   11 years ago

    At least they have given up on the "marijuana is a deadly drug that will kill you or send you to the emergency room!" line that sustained them for most of the past 30 years.

    As they descend further into self-parody, they seem to have seriously adopted the "Strangers With Candy" scare tactics: "If you smoke pot, be prepered to spend a lot of time hanging out and laughing with your friends!"

    It really feels as if we have reached the same tipping point that we recently reached with respect to civil rights for homosexuals. What was just a pipe dream for decades is suddenly becoming something that is possible, not just in our lifetime but in the very near future.

    1. Duncan20903   11 years ago

      It's a done deal my friend. All that's left is dotting the Ts and crossing the Is.

    2. goneGalt   11 years ago

      What was just a pipe dream for decades...

      Heh, heh, I see what you did there.

  8. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

    Marcus concedes that marijuana is less dangerous than alcohol or tobacco. "The reason to single out marijuana," she says, "is the simple fact of its current (semi-)illegality." In other words, marijuana should be illegal because it is illegal. I believe this is an example of what philosophers call the is/ought fallacy.

    I would call it circular logic instead.

    You spin me right round, baby, right round, like that statist "logic," right round round round.

    1. Number 2   11 years ago

      Actually, I fear that this is an example that marijuana really does hurt one's brain. Marcus admits that she partakes, and this is the "thinking" that results.

      On the other hand, if she believes in prohibition, she has just admitted in public that she intends to violate federal law. I am sure she would appreciate it if the DEA picked her up after she samples what Colorado has to offer.

  9. RnW1015   11 years ago

    "CNN announced poll results indicating that 54 percent of Americans think "the sale of marijuana should be made legal." In this country, what the majority wants or expects no longer matters. It's all about what our "leaders" want. Just take a look at the "Affordable" Healthcare Act. Only when politicians find a way to personally profit from MJ will we see serious talk of legalizing it nationally.

    1. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Politicians would save a lot on money in the long run if marijuana was legalized. It leads to about half the bribes, cover-up money and bogus rehab they have to shell out for themselves and their family.

      1. Mike Parent   11 years ago

        Politicians don't want to savemoney, they want to distribute it to their friends.

        1. Tamfang   11 years ago

          Different kind of money. SugarFree is talking about the kind that would otherwise be in their own pockets.

    2. Mainer2   11 years ago

      It's been pointed out that there is a whole system of people (cops,prisons, judges, prosecutors, counselors etc) who make their living from pot being illegal.

      Wasn't it Mencken whos said something like, it's hard to make a man understand something when his paycheck depends on not understanding it.

      1. Calvin Coolidge   11 years ago

        Most of the opposition to the legalization initiative in California recently was funded by the prison guard's union.

        The goal has always been to have 1/3 of us incarcerated, 1/3 of us employed in the legal system arresting and procecuting us, and another 1/3 guarding the jails. Government economic stimulus, baby!!

        1. Duncan20903   11 years ago

          Wow! So why did they announce that they didn't care one way or the other about Prop 19?
          http://www.ccpoa.org/files/201.....-Final.pdf

          I think you're confusing them with the Police Chiefs. California only spends about $66 million a year for incarcerating cannabis law violators in the prison system.

        2. DenverJay   11 years ago

          Hocus Pocus, by Kurt Vonnegut.
          Also, the Prison Guards Union is the Spawn of Satan. Anybody who lobbies higher incarceration rates of their fellow citizens for their own job security ought to be drawn and quartered.

    3. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

      Once the right political supporters want legalization, politicians will have their Damascene conversion on the issue.

  10. Mike Parent   11 years ago

    Does anyone honestly believe that wasting $20 Billion and arresting 3/4 Million Americans annually for choosing a substance Scientifically proven to be safer than what the govt allows, is a sound policy?

    1. Duncan20903   11 years ago

      The people getting paid $20 billion/year sure believe it.

      Why doesn't anyone cout the interest we've got to pay every years to keep current the debt service of the nominal $trillion with a T that's been borrowed, squandered and yet to be repaid for prosecuting the war on (some) drugs over the last 4 decades or so? At 5% that's $50 billion with a B just to cover the vigorish.

    2. Juice   11 years ago

      Always Think Forfeiture

  11. FuriousFatMan   11 years ago

    "Legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese." - Tina Brown.

    i smoke weed on a daily basis and i can still run mental laps around ANY fucking whore w/ a degree, and i've proven it many times.

    -FFM

  12. Tony   11 years ago

    Joe Scarborough thinks he can out-argue and out-snark Matt Taibbi on this. He posted a stupid rant on Politico about how because he had friends who smoked pot and they seemed a little off, and because Matt had a privileged childhood, therefore, hey look over there! or something. I would love to see Matt give Joe a bucketful of the Friedman treatment. What a moron. What is it about being a squishy center-right talking head that makes one feel entitled to declare personal anecdote a meaningful contribution to this subject?

    1. Eggs Benedict Cumberbund   11 years ago

      Friedman is a babbling idiot.

  13. DFG   11 years ago

    "Legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese."

    Just look at Michael Phelps. Imagine what he could have accomplished is only he hadn't smoked pot. Poor guy.

  14. DFG   11 years ago

    if only

  15. thorax232   11 years ago

    Good thing we've got Reason. 🙂

  16. Paul Pot   11 years ago

    The Sabets of this world fail to acknowledge 2 things.
    Prohibition is a total lie.
    And most people have first hand experience with marijuana or the people who use it.
    And as reform spreads, more people have experience with it and so support for reform keeps growing.
    Mr. Sabet has chosen to side with the losing team.
    Now that we have three real world models for legal marijuana, it will be impossible to hide the lie of prohibition.
    Marijuana will be legal in most western nations by the end of the decade.

  17. Tamfang   11 years ago

    I've never beaten the Chinese at anything without a good night's sleep.

  18. Malcolm Kyle   11 years ago

    We are actually experiencing a de facto civl war between the majority (those who embrace reason and function in the real world of cause and effect) and the prohibitionists, who, numbed by their isolation and despair, are seeking meaning in a mythical world that can never, ever, be reality-based. A world of deceit and lies, of blood and corpses?a world of complete social and economic collapse.

    Prohibitionists are not only infantile, their insatiable need to inflict suffering on the rest of us and their greed for both money and power is a threat to every single civic institution of our "once proud and free" nation. Their final objective, a drug-free society, toward which all their deceit is directed, is not even obtainable in a single maximum security prison anywhere on this planet.

    Prohibitionists claim to be protecting society, but they would gladly destroy every single liberty guaranteed by the Constitution.

  19. thisismarcusxavier   11 years ago

    Pat Buchanan wrote an op-ed piece within the past week (and it's so intellectually deficient that I won't even link to it) in which he said that marijuana is a gateway drug to cocaine, heroin, etc. just as beer is a gateway drug to vodka, whiskey, gin.

    1. PatrickHenry   11 years ago

      Why do you, oh godly one, deem his comments "intellectually deficient"? Maybe he is right. Do you know everything? Are you sure?

      1. wickwam   11 years ago

        I'm sure - it's been widely established by numerous studies that the "gateway drug theory" is utter nonsense.

  20. PaulinePhelpsmee   11 years ago

    up to I saw the check of $8495, I did not believe ...that...my best friend actualy earning money part time from their computer.. there friend brother started doing this 4 only fourteen months and as of now cleared the dept on there appartment and got a top of the range Ariel Atom. website here
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    http://www.tec30.com
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    1. PatrickHenry   11 years ago

      Oh Pauline, there is only one way you can make that kind of money that easily. Pauline, you should be ashamed of yourself.

  21. PatrickHenry   11 years ago

    Marijuana smoke contains 50% to 70% more cancer-causing substances than tobacco smoke. One major research study reported that a single cannabis joint could cause as much damage to the lungs as up to five regular cigarettes smoked one after another. Long-time joint smokers often suffer from bronchitis, an inflammation of the respiratory tract.

    1. wickwam   11 years ago

      A much larger research study (Tashkin at UCLA) found no correlation between cannabis smoking and lung cancer. An enormous amount of recent research in fact finds that cancer seems to kill various kinds of tumor cells.

      1. wickwam   11 years ago

        sorry "cannabis seems to kill various kinds of tumor cells"

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Tariffs Are Already Raising Car Prices and Hurting Automakers

Joe Lancaster | 5.8.2025 2:35 PM

Trump's Antitrust Enforcer Says 'Big Is Bad'

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 2:19 PM

Trump's New Budget Is Another Blueprint for Big Spending

Veronique de Rugy | 5.8.2025 12:30 PM

The Microschool Revolution Is Just Getting Started

Michael Bindas and Erica Smith Ewing | 5.8.2025 10:15 AM

Rawdogging the Conclave

Liz Wolfe | 5.8.2025 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!