Judge Rules Fla. Drug-Testing of Welfare Recipients Unconstitutional
State vows to appeal
A federal judge Tuesday ruled a 2011 law that requires those seeking welfare benefits to take a drug test is "unconstitutional," a decision Gov. Rick Scott immediately said the state would appeal.
From the outset, supporters of the law have faced a skeptical judiciary.
Two months after the drug tests became law, they were challenged in court by the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida on behalf of Luis Lebron, a 35-year-old veteran and single father who refused to submit to a drug test when applying for welfare benefits.
In Oct. 2011, a separate judge issued a temporary injunction preventing the state from enforcing the law. The state unsuccessfully appealed that ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The latest ruling, from the U.S. District Court in Orlando, permanently prohibited the state from enforcing the law.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
this ruling paves the way for welfare's 'morality'.
if they had ruled on the side of statists it would be further ammunition against welfare's morality.
seems like a long-term statist direction, versus short term.