Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

New Mexico Supreme Court Rules Gay Marriage Constitutional, NYC Gym Teacher Claims Being Discriminated Against for Being Heterosexual, Transgendered Model to Feature in Elle Canada: P.M. Links

Ed Krayewski | 12.19.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Elle Canada
(Elle Canada)
  • not a kardashian
    Elle Canada

    The remaining imprisoned members of Pussy Riot are two of the thousands of Russians released or expected to be released after the passage of an amnesty law in the country. Meanwhile in the land of the free, President Obama commuted the sentence of eight people convicted of crack-cocaine offenses who had each spent at least 15 years in jail already.

  • Hillary Clinton says she will make a decision on running for president again sometime next year.
  • Moody's downgraded the debt outlook for New Jersey from stable to negative over concerns about its ballooning pension obligations, despite Chris Christie's efforts at reform.
  • New Mexico's Supreme Court ruled the state could not prohibit same-sex marriages.
  • The city of Cleveland settled for $6,750 with a gun owner who accused the police department of seizing his firearm despite there being no charges filed against him.
  • A gym teacher at a private school in New York City claims in a lawsuit that he was discriminated against for his heterosexual lifestyle.
  • A transgendered model previously disqualified from participating in the Miss Universe competition for being born a man will feature in a photo spread for an upcoming issue of Elle Canada. She will also star in a reality show called Brave New Girls airing on E! Canada.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. 

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Figure-Skater Brian Boitano Comes Out of Closet

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (335)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Hillary Clinton says she will make a decision on running for president again sometime next year.

    We'll know when Bill starts getting his digs in on Obama.

    1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      I think she will get elected because people will vote for her, in descending order:

      1) people who want to vote for "the first woman president" (most voters)

      2) people who vote for Hillary because they want Bill back in the White House (lots of people)

      3) people who think Hillary will do a good job (50-100 people nationwide)

      1. wareagle   12 years ago

        1) citation please. I don't see "most voters" believing that Hillary is the choice.

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          No citation, just speculation of course. But do you really think she will be beatable? The Rs will need to put up someone really compelling to overcome the "it's time for a woman president" mentality. We saw the juggernaut that "It's time for a black president" was, and how many people voted for BO solely for that reason.

          1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

            I think you missed the sarcasm. The citation required is for evidence that Hillary really is a woman.

          2. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

            You are assuming people will be as excited to make Hillary the first woman prez as people were to make Obama the first black prez. I don't agree.

            1. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

              Mike Huckabee says your welcome

      2. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

        That's what people assumed the last time she ran, but she could easily be shitcanned again if a black woman runs against her.

        -jcr

  2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    The city of Cleveland settled for $6,750 with a gun owner who accused the police department of seizing his firearm despite there being no charges filed against him.

    They'll let him down again, I'm sure.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      They should have listened to Drew Carey.

  3. db   12 years ago

    Saab beats Boeing for $4.5 billion Brazilian fighter jet contract. NSA spying cited as being a strong factor in the decision to ditch Boeing, which had been considered the strongest contender for the contract.

    1. Drake   12 years ago

      "Was that worth 4 billion dollars?"

      Ouch.

      1. db   12 years ago

        Yes, I loved that part!

    2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      Cool. Hope that means Saab will stay solvent so that I can keep getting parts for my 1992 900 convertible.

      1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        Green?

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          Damn right it's green -- that was a great color. The evening of the day in 1992 I bought that car I miraculously found a parking place right in front of a popular San Francisco nightclub. Two very hot women saw me pull up and said "Ooh, is this your car?" When I nodded yes, they said "Can we touch it?" I told them to knock themselves out and went into the club.

          In retrospect they were sitting ducks, I don't know why I didn't capitalize then and there, but I was still pretty sober at that point and therefore not thinking clearly.

          1. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

            Hmmmm. I thought this story would have a happier ending like:

            "I asked the cutest girl out - and long story short - she's my wife and the mother to my 6 gorgeous daughters. Every year on our anniversary we make sweet love in the back seat of that dark green 1992 Saab."

            Next time go with my version.

            1. Agammamon   12 years ago

              Except - you married *both* the hot women who wanted to touch your car.

          2. Nooge.   12 years ago

            In retrospect they were sitting ducks, I don't know why I didn't capitalize then and there, but I was still pretty sober at that point and therefore not thinking clearly.

            Win.

      2. Bobarian   12 years ago

        I don't think Saab aircraft has any remaining relationship with the former car company.

        It's basically the defense contractor for Sweden.

        1. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

          Sweden has a defense?

          1. Agammamon   12 years ago

            It basically boils down to 'don't fuck with Sweden or you'll be out of hot blondes and knee-deep in ABBA', but you've got to have something to display at the airshows.

          2. db   12 years ago

            Yes, and the AK5 is one of the sweetest 5.56mm rifles out there (full disclosure: it's a Belgian FNC with special furniture).

          3. mr simple   12 years ago

            I think they're like pikeman or something.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Moody's downgraded the debt outlook for New Jersey from stable to negative over concerns about its ballooning pension obligations, despite Chris Christie's efforts at reform.

    Time to start whining to the federal government for money.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      If they want to be bailed out, they can give up their statehood and become a federal territory again.

      1. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

        They're a state? I thought they were a suburb of New York.

    2. Mike M.   12 years ago

      Everyone knows Warren Buffett and the gang at Moody's are just a bunch of ratfuckers.

    3. Paul.   12 years ago

      When was it not time to whine to the feds for money?

  5. Rich   12 years ago

    Hillary Clinton says she will make a decision on running for president again sometime next year.

    Probably *after* the midterm elections.

    1. db   12 years ago

      You can bet her name will be safely out of the news at that time. Then months later she can be the savior of a damaged and demoralized democratic party.

      1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        The only way that could possibly work is if she went against her instincts and repositioned herself through a series of Sista Souljah statements. If she runs on big government, more-of-the-same, I don't see her making it. The affirmative action benefits of "the first woman President" won't matter enough.

        On the other hand, I don't see her ticking off her base by repositioning herself in the center. I think she'll settle for sitting on boards and going to high-end parties and making millions for doing almost nothing.

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          She did get $450,000 for a one-hour speech the other day. I believe that's more than a President's annual salary. Hard to see why someone would give that up to be in the most stressful job in the world -- but I've never understood the aphrodisiac of power, so what do I know?

          1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            I think Obama may have destroyed the warm vision of being a lefty President for her.

  6. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    A gym teacher at a private school in New York City claims in a lawsuit that he was discriminated against for his heterosexual lifestyle.

    I guess they couldn't handle all the totally procreative sex he has.

    1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      It's like bestiality, ffs.

  7. Ted S.   12 years ago

    Figure-Skater Brian Boitano Comes Out of Closet

    Are there any straight male figure skaters?

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Seems like you come out as straight in that profession. Even more so than male cheerleading.

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        Male cheerleaders are big strong burly dudes who hoist up athletic, excited, sweaty girls. They drown in poon. They are geniuses.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Yes. If my son cannot do ballet for some reason until two years past puberty, I will push him towards cheerleading. But as the woman who introduced his mom and I is a ballet instructor, I think it will be no problem to get him in with the dancers.

          1. Warty   12 years ago

            I AM CAHMNING ALL ZE TIEM

    2. Agammamon   12 years ago

      If there was an openly straight guy in figure skating he'd just get the shit beat out of him in the locker room.

      1. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

        I thought figure skaters outsource their violence to cop wannabes and loser fiancees.

        -jcr

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      Jeff Skinner was a figure skater.

    4. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      Are there any straight male figure skaters?

      Was there anyone in the world who thought Brian Boitano might be straight?

      Nice cover-up Brian.

    5. Drake   12 years ago

      He was in the closet? Seriously?

      Best kept secret since Liberace.

    6. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

      Almost all Russian Male skaters but that is about it.

    7. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      Elvis Stojko?

    8. Paul.   12 years ago

      Figure-Skater Brian Boitano Comes Out of Closet

      He went straight?

    9. Cro's Innumerous Basterds   12 years ago

      So I guess we can now definitively answer the question as to "what would Brian Boitano do?"

      1. Sy   12 years ago

        He'd certainly pound an ass or two

    10. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

      Did anyone not know Brian Boitano was gay?

  8. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Robert Reich: America's Conscience

    The underlying issue is a moral one: What do we owe one another as members of the same society?

    Conservatives answer that question by saying it's a matter of personal choice -- of charitable works, philanthropy, and individual acts of kindness joined in "a thousand points of light."

    But that leaves out what we could and should seek to accomplish together as a society. It neglects the organization of our economy, and its social consequences. It minimizes the potential role of democracy in determining the rules of the game, as well as the corruption of democracy by big money. It overlooks our strivings for social justice.

    In short, it ducks the meaning of a decent society.

    Last month Pope Francis wondered aloud whether "trickle-down theories, which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness," Rush Limbaugh accused the pope of being a Marxist for merely raising the issue.

    But the question of how to bring about greater justice and inclusiveness is as American as apple pie. It has animated our efforts for more than a century -- during the Progressive Era, the New Deal, the Great Society, and beyond -- to make capitalism work for the betterment of all rather merely than the enrichment of a few.

    1. PD Scott   12 years ago

      I guess any idiot can call themselves an economist.

    2. a better weapon   12 years ago

      So many vague terms, undefined goals, and meaningless soliloquy. I don't even know where to begin to make fun of him.

      1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        Vague and undefined are all these things are to progressives. They're nothing but feelings.

    3. SForza   12 years ago

      We owe one another the threat of violence for not doing what others say we should do. And time in a cage for anyone who ignores those threats of violence. How could members of a decent and moral society owe each other anything less?

    4. Agammamon   12 years ago

      And, if nothing else, all the people over the last century who have advocated for accomplishing things 'together as a society' and the 'organization of our economy' have shown that that leads to worse outcomes and less 'justice and inclusiveness' than just letting people get on with their lives.

      1. #   12 years ago

        In lefty speak, sticking a gun to someone's head is "working together"

        1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

          WAR IS PEACE
          FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
          COERCION IS COOPERATION

    5. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      Still waiting for that copy of the social contract that I signed.

      1. Agammamon   12 years ago

        Its in the mail but you know, what with the funding problems USPS is having we're going to need you to cough up some more money and maybe put on this postal uniform and deliver some letters. No you have to use your own car and pay for gas, we don't have enough. Its for the good of society.

    6. MP   12 years ago

      But that leaves out what we could and should seek to accomplish together as a society.

      Nothing. There is nothing we should seek to accomplish together WHEN THE TOOL TO DO THIS IS FORCE.

      I really do fucking hate that troll.

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        It really is sickening. I can't imagine the rationalizations they go through to convince themselves they aren't advocating for a kinder, gentler Soviet Union.

    7. wareagle   12 years ago

      the man writes about capitalism yet has no idea what it is.

    8. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      No it doesn't duck anything. It's because you can't think in the abstract.

      Asshole.

      How's that for decent?

    9. NotAnotherSkippy   12 years ago

      It's just and fair to take from me with my 20+ years of education and long work week to subsidize some jackass who couldn't even finish high school or some precious snowflake that ran up $100k of debt getting a degree in underwater, neolithic French literature. 'Cause that's, um, just fair. I have seen extremely few cases of someone's life being controlled significantly by luck, good or bad. Take some fucking responsibility for yourself.

      True justice, or "just deserts" as Mankiw would call it, allows people to succeed or fail by their own efforts.

      And I'll say it again: A lynch mob is democratic. There is nothing magical about democracy by itself.

      1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

        Democracy is two men and a woman voting if rape should be legal.

        1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

          Party politics is the woman agreeing to make rape legal as long as it is those other people who are raped.

      2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

        Well said.

        underwater, neolithic French literature.

        LOL

    10. Chinny Chin Chin   12 years ago

      ...charitable works, philanthropy, and individual acts of kindness joined in "a thousand points of light."

      Newsflash, Bobby: that IS society accomplishing things.

  9. Brett L   12 years ago

    I hope Browner wins his suit against the NFL barring him from using a legal substance and discovery shatters the NFL's non-profit status. (SLD, contracts and all, but it would be nice to explode the pot PED myth.)

    The cornerback's agent, Peter Schaffer, told ProFootballTalk.com in a telephone interview that Browner will sue the NFL if other attempts at overturning the suspension are unsuccessful.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      (SLD, contracts and all, but it would be nice to explode the pot PED myth.)

      No; he went into this knowing MJ (I'm guessing that's what he tested positive for, without having read the article?) wasn't allowed. Now, I think it shouldn't be on the banned list either, but there's something about "lets just fuck the contract because it worked out in a way I don't like" that really bothers me.

      WADA is much, much worse because there basically is no contract.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Sure, but on the other hand, it wasn't like he could take a $100k/year paycut and have that taken from his contract.

      2. Firework Surprise   12 years ago

        His suspension stems from his four year absence in the NFL. While playing in Canada, he missed four years of mandated drug testing by the NFL, which placed him in their level three (one strike and your out) substance abuse program. He had no idea he was supposed to make himself available to the NFL for testing while working in another country.

        That is the basis of his suit.

    2. Firework Surprise   12 years ago

      From what I understand, he has a pretty solid case. Enforcing drug testing on a former employee for four years while not employed by the NFL can't stand a rational test can it?

    3. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

      Ha! That is awesome.

    4. alan_s   12 years ago

      Good luck with that one.

  10. Brett L   12 years ago

    State Obamacare Chief is the new Al Qaida second in command. Apparently, the problem was not the leadership, as most of those being shit-canned took extended vacations, to no avail.
    Four out of the 15 chiefs of Obamacare insurance marketplaces run by individual states and the District of Columbia have either quit or gone on leave since the botched Oct. 1 launches of their health exchanges.

  11. Agammamon   12 years ago

    "A transgendered model . . .will feature in a photo spread for an upcoming issue of Elle Canada."

    Well, given the amount of photoshopping done as a matter of course, its not like it matters if the model is even *human*, let alone what their gender/sex is - to the point that you wonder why they even bother with the *photoshoot* part.

    1. Bobarian   12 years ago

      Nice pose in the picture, got to hide the man hands.

      Obligatory:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSL4cmFW_GU

    2. Killaz   12 years ago

      I recall one of the Bond girls in the 80s being post op. Posed for Playboy. Pretty face, but the hips were still all wrong.

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        For Always Sunny fans, this is appropriate here.

      2. paranoid android   12 years ago

        I think Snopes did an article on this one...she wasn't a "Bond girl" in the sense of being the female lead, she was like an extra in the background of a pool scene or something.

    3. Homple   12 years ago

      Might they now have to change the name of the magazine to something like "ce", "cela", or "?a"?

      Can someone who parlays vou say what the new name should be?

  12. Andrew S.   12 years ago

    What would Brian Boitano do if he were here today?

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      A triple axel?

      1. Sudden   12 years ago

        A triple axelanal?

        FIFY

    2. Mokers   12 years ago

      When Brian Boitano was in the alps, fighting grizzly bears, he used his magical fire breath, and saved the maidens fair.

    3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      He'd make a plan and he'd follow through, that's what Brian Boitano'd do.

    4. T. Monocle Underbitington   12 years ago

      I think he'd kick an ass or two... that's what Brian Boitano would do.

  13. Brett L   12 years ago

    Old lead is the best lead.

    All lead mined on Earth naturally contains some amount of the radioactive element uranium 235, which decays, over time, into another radioactive element, a version of lead called lead 210. When lead ore is first processed, it is purified and most of the uranium is removed. Whatever lead 210 is already present begins to break down, with half of it decaying on average every 22 years. In Roman lead almost all of the lead 210 has already decayed, whereas in lead mined today, it is just beginning to decay. (Of course, many lead 210 atoms have already decayed in this ore, too, but the supply is constantly replenished by uranium in unprocessed lead). "The longer since it was originally processed, the lower its intrinsic radioactivity," Gonzalez-Zalba says.

    1. PD Scott   12 years ago

      I'm sure the EPA won't seize on this as another reason to ban lead bullets.

      It's not going to stop dedicated reloaders from melting down old pipe, lost wheelweights, etc. Might drive it underground ("Yeah, I need some 'pencils', say 38 'pencils', you know?") but it's not going to stop them.

      1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

        I thought pencils have graphite in them, not lead.

        1. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

          Not 38 pencils, you know what I mean?

      2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        Wheel weights in California are now made of steel. I have to order lead ones from out of state suppliers who don't know the lead ones are illegal here, because those who do won't ship them.

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          Because everything is 'known by the state of California to cause horrible things to happen'.

          1. Mokers   12 years ago

            I'm surprised they even let us wipe our own asses. Although I shouldn't give them any ideas.

  14. Brett L   12 years ago

    Anarchist Cookbook author no longer angry, hopes his book will fall out of print.

    To paraphrase Aristotle: it is easy to be angry. But to be angry with the right person, at the right time and to the right degree that is hard ? that is the hallmark of a civilized person. Two years ago, I co-authored a book entitled Becoming an Emotionally Intelligent Teacher. Although written for educators, the book serves as an implicit refutation of the emotional immaturity of the Cookbook. The premise is that all learning takes place in a social context, and that teachers with a high degree of emotional intelligence construct relationships with students that enhance learning. I continue to work hard, in an Aristotelian sense, to be more civilized.

    1. PD Scott   12 years ago

      Considering all the misinformation in it, it probably deserves to be out of print. Now, the Improvised Munitions Handbook, OTOH...

    2. hamilton   12 years ago

      I continue to work hard, in an Aristotelian sense

      Wait, what?

  15. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Ambitious mission to map billions of stars launched

    Europe has launched the Gaia satellite - one of the most ambitious space missions in history.

    The 740m-euro (?620m) observatory lifted off from the Sinnamary complex in French Guiana at 06:12 local time (09:12 GMT).

    Gaia is going to map the precise positions and distances to more than a billion stars.

    This should give us the first realistic picture of how our Milky Way galaxy is constructed.

    Gaia's remarkable sensitivity will lead also to the detection of many thousands of previously unseen objects, including new planets and asteroids.

    Separation from the Soyuz upper-stage was confirmed just before 10:00 GMT.

    The satellite is now travelling out to an observing station some 1.5 million km from the Earth on its nightside - a journey that will take about a month to complete.

    Gaia has been in development for more than 20 years.

    It will be engaged in what is termed astrometry - the science of mapping the locations and movements of celestial objects.

    To do this, it carries two telescopes that throw light on to a huge, one-billion-pixel camera detector connected to a trio of instruments.

    Gaia will use this ultra-stable and supersensitive optical equipment to pinpoint its sample of stars with extraordinary confidence.

    They should be able to spot those Vulcans before we destroy ourselves in WWIII.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Wow.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      ...a huge, one-billion-pixel camera detector connected to a trio of instruments.

      Who's going to fly up there to pull the SD card?

      1. Agammamon   12 years ago

        More like - who's going to fly up there to put the SD card *in* because they forgot to do so before launch.

    3. Death Rock and Skull   12 years ago

      I read "Amphibious Mission" first.

  16. Brett L   12 years ago

    So Pajama boy is a full-time OFA employee. Which only confirms everything I've ever believed about the hipster idiots who make up that group.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      "Ethan Krupp", no less.

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        Sound like a villain from Kafka.

        1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

          He's the Scott Evil of the Krupp family.

        2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          There's nothing evil about the name "Krupp"!

          1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            I think William Manchester and numerous slave laborers might disagree.

            1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

              Did you have your sarcasm detector off?

              1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

                Apparently so.

    2. a better weapon   12 years ago

      HA! And here I was giving him the benefit of the doubt as just some guy who does a little bit of commercial modeling.

      Nope, he wasn't just playing a douche, he IS a douche. It's probably why it transmitted so well through the photo. He wasn't acting at all!

    3. db   12 years ago

      How is that not violating some campaign finance rule again?

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        Really? Section 69.666 of the Federal Elections Code clearly states: FYTW

    4. a better weapon   12 years ago

      I can't wait until this guy gets interviewed! I bet he speaks in the shallowest of platitudes and is as insufferable as I imagine him to be.

    5. Warty   12 years ago

      He likes Love Actually. Really.

      1. db   12 years ago

        "The tunnel of Love, Indubitably"

      2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        Ok, I realize I risk WARTY VIOLATION but I actually like that movie too...i have no idea why either.

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          Because you also 'secretly' like WARTY VIOLATION?

        2. paranoid android   12 years ago

          Terrible movie.

          Wonderful aphrodisiac.

        3. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

          You know how I know you're gay?

          You like Love Actually.
          (NTTATWWT)

      3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        I'm straighter than a statue mile and I liked that film. The dark-haired women that didn't speak English and was in love with the guy who didn't speak her language was HAWT!

        1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          statute

    6. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

      Look under "And his friends thought it was pretty cool too." - evidently the "free world" has a single ruler, despite the fact that it wouldn't be 'free' were that the case.

    7. Paul.   12 years ago

      So I was right, he is a typical, low-information Obama supporter.

    8. derpman   12 years ago

      OFA.BO -- I find that domain name vaguely racist.

    9. mr simple   12 years ago

      Cubs fan. 'Nuff said.

      1. Knarf Yenrab (prev. An0nB0t)   12 years ago

        Looks to be the sort of Cubs fan who doesn't know who Mark Prior is.

        Much like a White Sox fan who, upon being asked to name one of his favorite ChiSox players growing up, replied, ""You know, uh, I thought that, you know . . . the truth is that a lot of the Cubs I liked too." And who throws like a girl while wearing mom jeans.

  17. Brett L   12 years ago

    England fights off plan for EU military.


    The Prime Minister has told a Brussels summit that there can be no question of British support for proposals from Baroness Ashton and the European Commission for the EU to run its own military.

    1. LynchPin1477   12 years ago

      Nato is the "bedrock" of defence in Europe.

      What he really means is the U.S. is the bedrock of defense (with an s) in Europe. Because God forbid they pay for it themselves.

      1. Agammamon   12 years ago

        Well to be fair, *The United Kingdom* (not England) doesn't want the EU to have a military because that would destroy what little remaining vestige of sovereignty they have left.

        They're already to the point that Brussels makes laws that the individual governments must then implement without changes or discussion. Give the EU a military and any pretense of it being a federation goes right out the window.

      2. NotAnotherSkippy   12 years ago

        What was that about running out of other people's money?

  18. PD Scott   12 years ago

    Pew-pew-pew news: HEL-MD takes out mortar (shells) and UAVs with vehicle mounted LASER.

    Intended to demonstrate the potential of directed-energy technology for protecting troops against rockets, artillery and mortars (RAM), as well as UAVs and cruise missiles, the multiple test events saw the HEL MD successfully engage over 90 mortar rounds and several UAVs. Army officials say mortars and UAVs are representative of the threats faced by US and allied forces in the battlefield. The tests involved a 10-kW class laser, however, this will be replaced by a 50-kW laser in the future before that is in turn upgraded to a 100-kW class laser for subsequent demonstrations.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Awesome. Now all we need is the open source version to make very effective anti-drone Technicals. Using 'Murican Ford Rangers as the traditional Hilux is hard to find.

      1. PD Scott   12 years ago

        I wonder if incredibly loud car sound system power sources would work, hmm... Add a whole new section to the SEMA show.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          All you have to have is have a really hefty alternator to charge the giant capacitors. Of course, if you accidentally bridge the airgap on a capacitor rated for this sort of thing, it would be bad.

          1. db   12 years ago

            Alternator, hell. Just put a 5kW gas genny in the bed with the unit.

            1. Brett L   12 years ago

              But you have a 120 kW gas or diesel generator under the hood.

              1. db   12 years ago

                Yeah, so, you mean a BIG alternator on a PTO.

              2. Paul.   12 years ago

                This.

              3. Paul.   12 years ago

                But you have a 120 kW gas or diesel generator under the hood.

                I mean this.

          2. db   12 years ago

            If it could be powered at low voltage or with a voltage transformer, one could use ultracapacitors for.storage. they hold a hell of a lot of charge in a little space.

      2. Agammamon   12 years ago

        Isn't it the Toyota Tacoma over here?

    2. db   12 years ago

      In other "pew-pew-pew"news...

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        That's great.

      2. PD Scott   12 years ago

        I LOL'd.

        1. Drake   12 years ago

          Took me a few seconds then me too.

        2. db   12 years ago

          We should see if we can get a group buy together with the reason logo on one side and a monocle on the other.

        3. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          Awesome.

      3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        Took me a second to notice.

    3. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

      Can they be mounted on sharks?

    4. Paul.   12 years ago

      It's time to demonstrate the true power of this Battle Station.

    5. NotAnotherSkippy   12 years ago

      Wonder when they expect to get to 100kW. We've been struggling to achieve that in a solid state laser. This unit looks big enough though that maybe they could just go to a CO2 laser.

  19. DJF   12 years ago

    Terminator: Phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range.

    Clerk: Hey, just what you see pal.

  20. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Feminist defends punishing Colorado boy for sexual harassment

    Whiny little girls?

    Difficult, demanding mothers?

    Discrimination against boys?

    That's absurd. Children have to learn to respect other people's boundaries and listen to their words when they are little. The younger the better because the consequences get more serious the older we get.

    According to another study released earlier this year, one in 10 people between the ages of 14-21 have already committed an act of sexual violence. The most insightful finding, however, was that children who engage in these behaviors feel no sense of responsibility for their actions. That makes sense, since one of the defining characteristics of people who abuse other people is a sense of entitlement. It just happens that our entitlements are gendered and we cultivate a deficit of empathy in boys.

    That kid is a future rapist! He must be snuffed out now!

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      how exactly is "sexual violence" being defined to have such a high incidence rate? And feminists wonder why so many people don't take them seriously.

      1. Agammamon   12 years ago

        A woman is sexually assaulted if a man she doesn't find attractive ogles her.

    2. DesigNate   12 years ago

      That blogger has no sense of irony since feminists have a giant sense of entitlement.

    3. mr simple   12 years ago

      It has to be exhausting to be so upset about everything.

  21. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Dear Prudence: Help! I know my boss is cheating on his wife and she invited me to have Christmas dinner with them!

    For 10 years I've been an assistant to a very successful man. He is an extraordinary manager and I feel very loyal to him. Last year, I accidentally found out he had a fling with a colleague at a conference overseas. Subsequently, for the first time, his wife invited me to spend Christmas with them, a sign of high esteem.

    Over the course of the following year, however, my boss has continued this affair and seems obsessed with his mistress. They attend conferences all over the world and take glamorous side trips. They are constantly in touch. He is incredibly cheerful when he comes back from these events. I've been invited for Christmas again this year, and it breaks my heart to think of looking into the eyes of his wife and his mother-in-law, who are both warm, affectionate people...

    I feel I have been complicit by keeping silent. I am estranged from my family and don't spend the holidays with friends, and my boss knows this. If I go, I would feel tempted to pull the wife aside and tell her, or else just burst into tears, which would be the end of my job. But if I don't go, it won't be very good for my job, either. What should I do?

    Lady, MYOB.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Decline politely. STFU.

    2. db   12 years ago

      Don't go! The wife is planning a masacre of all those complicit in her betrayal!

    3. Agammamon   12 years ago

      Simple - tell the boss you know about his affair and want a raise.

      1. Paul.   12 years ago

        No shit.

      2. alan_s   12 years ago

        Winner.

    4. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      Suggest a threesome?

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        Hallmark Classics Presents: A Christmas Orgy

        1. PD Scott   12 years ago

          "HO HO HO!"

          1. Bobarian   12 years ago

            Sounds like there'd only be two HOs.

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          The Passions of Carol

    5. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      Also, if he really is rich and successful who's to say the wife isn't banging her tennis pro or gym trainer while he's off on his business trips?

      She has no idea what their personal life is like.

      1. db   12 years ago

        Yeah, this. Maybe the wife is hot for her?

      2. db   12 years ago

        She doesn't care
        Whether or not he's a good man
        She doesn't care
        Just as long as she still has her friends

        They laugh, they make money
        He's got a gold watch
        She's got a silk dress
        And healthy breasts that bounce
        On his Italian leather sofa

    6. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

      I am estranged from my family and don't spend the holidays with friends

      Maybe it's because you don't know when to keep your fucking yap shut?

    7. mr simple   12 years ago

      A few days before Christmas, my closest girlfriends and I will dine out at a fancy restaurant. We are seven young women who were college classmates who now live in different cities. We keep in touch, but we rarely ever get a chance to be all together. It has taken a lot to schedule the date and we all can't wait to see each other in person. Plus, I have an important personal announcement to make, and I'm sure that I'm not the only one. However, one member of the group just announced that she will bring her husband along. She didn't ask, she has just dropped a line to one of us saying, "He's coming." When my friend called her and gently told her we'd rather keep it "girly," she got annoyed and said: "Either he's coming, or I'm staying home." He could be heard in the background saying, "Tell them I'm coming, period." He's got jealousy issues, and he rarely lets her go out on her own. She accepts this without complaint. The rest of us would really prefer he stay at home. Is there a polite way out of this, or are we forced into having him and making small talk all evening, instead of our usual hilarious chit-chat?

      What a creep. Besides, I couldn't imagine a more boring night than being stuck with my wife and her girlfriends all night as much as I love her and like them.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        He's a fag. Not in the homo way. As in asshole.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Have him, but still act "girly".

  22. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    The city of Cleveland settled for $6,750 with a gun owner who accused the police department of seizing his firearm despite there being no charges filed against him.

    I feel let down.

  23. Warty   12 years ago

    The comment that sums up Jezebel pefectly.

    YourblackfriendUErin Gloria Ryan11L
    Fuck the world. I'm tired of all this exclusion, assumption, neglect,misrepresentation with Black Woman and Any other POC. I'm fat, black and tall fuck everyone who doesn't like me. I'm still going to exist as much as you don't want me to. Now time to eat some cookies before I start my my juicing fast tomorrow and watch Netflix all night.

    FUCK EVERYONE. 3 minutes ago

    1. Agammamon   12 years ago

      Meanwhile everyone around her is going 'who *are* you again?'

    2. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

      Pretty sure I wouldn't like her.

      Pretty sure it's not because she's 1) fat, 2) black or 3) tall.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        Because she's a juicer?

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          No, I still talk to Warty.

          Oh, wait, you meant... never mind.

    3. Flatulent Monkey   12 years ago

      POC? What do points of contact have to do with this?

    4. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      Now time to eat some cookies before I start my my juicing fast tomorrow and watch Netflix all night.

      "Juicing fast" = guzzling five 2-liter bottles of Orange Crush.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        Followed by fasting until lunch time?

        1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          Whoa, slow down there! You gotta ease into this. Only fast until brunch.

          1. db   12 years ago

            Then you switch to grape flavor.

  24. Andrew S.   12 years ago

    http://scienceblogs.com/insole.....tarianism/

    Progressive ScienceBlogs writer, usually somewhat smart, cherry picks Reason comments to rip us commenters. But he did praise Bailey.

    1. Warty   12 years ago

      Libertymike deserves all the ripping he gets. Fuck that fucking solipsistic moron.

      1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

        Don't disagree there, but he's doing an amazing amount of cherry picking to make like we all think like that.

        1. Warty   12 years ago

          Yeah. There were only two or three anti-vaccine retards in that thread, and a bunch of people who were against forced vaccinations. I imagine that the latter offend this jerkoff almost as much as Jenny McCarthy does.

          1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            They don't want to put the gun to your head. Really! Things would be so much easier if they didn't have to make you cooperate.

          2. alan_s   12 years ago

            You are correct Warty:

            "How about 'I DON'T WANT TO!? That's about as libertarian as it gets. There is no such thing as a positive obligation in libertarian philosophy and that includes an obligation to be vaccinated.'

            Which is as good a reason as any as to why I shucked my Libertarian tendencies. (Well, that, and my increasing realization over the last 15 years that an 'unfettered' free market is not a panacea.)"

            1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

              You're an authoritarian piece of shit alright. No argument there.

          3. alan_s   12 years ago

            Also this:

            "It boils down to, basically, 'Screw you. I don't care if my decision affects others.' Come to think of it, a whole lot of Libertarianism boils down to this in actual practice."

            1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

              Oh, he's got it. The only way to play nicely with others is, obviously, by using force to make them do things your way.

          4. LynchPin1477   12 years ago

            Yeah, for them to characterize people who were arguing against forced vaccinations as anti-science is extremely disingenuous. Almost everyone went out of there way to state that they personally thought vaccinations were a great thing.

            1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

              Yeah, for them to characterize people who were arguing against forced vaccinations as anti-science is extremely disingenuous.

              If it weren't for disingenuousness, they'd have nothing.

        2. Paul.   12 years ago

          Yeah, the irony was that there was a disagreement on H&R.

    2. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

      I am willing to bet there are far more anti-vaccine people who are liberals than libertarians. There may be some libertarians who are anti-vaxxers but the overwhelming majority fall into the Bailey camp.

      1. Paul.   12 years ago

        Absolutely. Abso-fucking-lutely.

        When I was but a youngster, I had never even heard of an anti-vaccine philosophy, and it came from a raging lefty.

        Plus, Vashon Island.

        Argument is done.

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

          Nearly everything the left says about libertarianism is pure projection.

          1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

            Yes, this right here. So fucking irritating.

          2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

            Nearly everything the left says about everything is pure projection.

        2. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

          Even when I heard about anti-government stuff came from raging lefties.

          1. Paul.   12 years ago

            Boy, those days are over.

      2. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        I would bet the same.

        Yeah, that guy was cherry picking to make his point.

        He wasn't out to engage in a thoughtful debate I reckon.

        But he did succeed in preaching to his choir.

        So. Mission accomplished.

    3. Warty   12 years ago

      The other Good That Shall Never Be Questioned is utter unfettered individual rights without consideration for others.

      This guy claims he was a libertarian, but appears to know nothing about it. This is my shocked face.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        He's the kind of guy who was a progressive but called himself a libertarian to be cool, but then ran back to progressivism when someone called him out for being a "heartless" libertarian.

      2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

        He called himself one, because Bill Maher.

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

          Yes. Screw that guy. I am going to start asking people "Are you a Bill Maher libertarian or a Penn Jillette libertarian?" and when they don't know the answer, assume the former.

          1. NotAnotherSkippy   12 years ago

            Maher calls himself libertarian?! Is it because he agrees with them on legalizing pot and absolutely nothing else?

            1. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

              Well, he agrees on the hookers, too.

      3. alan_s   12 years ago

        Libertarian. You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

    4. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      I never realized until now there was a Facebook commentariat about Reason articles. I think I'll stay here, thanks.

    5. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      And don't read the comments if you want to stay sane. Especially those from "Stu", whom I'm pretty sure read a bunch of progressive cliches about libertarianism and decided to spew every single one of them.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        Yes. I tried to read the comments but I just couldn't get through them. They started giving me rage, and I have work to do.

    6. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Who the fuck wastes there time blogging about blog commenters?

      Also, is the reason facebook page usually that active? Are the commenters there some alternate universe version of us here?

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        I once got mentioned in a whiny blog post about why there are no female libertarians. #WINNING

      2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        I "Like" Reason on Facebook but never comment when they post links to their articles.

        The commentators there are like strangers. Then again Facebook is more public while what we do here is like the masquerade orgy from Eyes Wide Shut

        1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

          LOL... love the analogy. You are quite right, sir. Different damn breed around these parts.

    7. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      Vaccines are, by and large, a benefit thing, however there are risks associated with taking them. People should be able to evaluate the benefit to risk and decide for themselves whether they should use such medicine.

      I am baffled as to why the above is apparently controversial.

      1. Heedless   12 years ago

        Herd immunity is non-excludable and non-rivalrous.

  25. robc   12 years ago

    Update from yesterday

    Fun with small city politics. Im just trying to stay out of it.

    1. robc   12 years ago

      I mentioned a while back that Bowling Green had passed Sunday sales but that it had to go thru a second vote. That passed too, and Sunday sales went into effect earlier this week, I think.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        "went into effect earlier this week, I think."

        Probably on Sunday, I'm guessin?

  26. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

    SoCon Radio Host and Guest Applaud Jamaica's Anti-Homosexuality Law

    "Janet Mefferd, among right-wing talk radio's most rabid promoters of homophobia, endorsed Jamaica's anti-sodomy law, falsely suggesting that it was essential to combatting the spread of HIV.

    On the December 17 edition of The Janet Mefferd Show, Mefferd invited extreme anti-gay activist Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH) to discuss his recent trip to Jamaica, where he advised supporters of Jamaica's gay sex ban in light of calls for its repeal. LaBarbera praised the "moral clarity" of the ban's supporters, and Mefferd left no doubt that she also supported the criminalization of homosexuality. LaBarbera asserted that such laws help fight HIV, lamenting that in the U.S., people "talk all about rights of homosexuals and never about, you know, stopping this dangerous behavior." Mefferd agreed, calling it "really unfortunate":

    "Mefferd's support for a policy that's both an affront to fundamental liberties and damaging to public health further demonstrates her extremism - her syndicator's assertion that she's "mainstream" notwithstanding. Her vicious anti-LGBT smears, however, haven't stopped conservative celebrities and media figures like Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Brian Brown, and Stephen Jimenez from appearing on her program."

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/2.....nti/197329

    1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      What happened Bo?

    2. Paul.   12 years ago

      Anti-gay people support foreign anti-gay laws.

      *makes notes*

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

        Well, we often hear from defenders of social conservatives that none of them want to make homosexuality a crime, they just do not want government recognized SSM. Not all of them, obviously.

        1. Paul.   12 years ago

          I have been very clear about my feelings about not believing in making gay marriage legal, but instead making straight marriage illegal.

          Who will think of the straights?

    3. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      Well, there's no question that less anal sex would mean less HIV, but of course laws are not going to do much, if anything.

    4. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      Not *the* Janet Mefferd?

      Wait, who's Janet Mefferd?

      1. Paul.   12 years ago

        If we haven't heard of her, then any discussion here is essentially giving her publicity.

    5. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

      I have never heard of either of these twats ever before.

  27. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Don't worry, Pajama Boy, TNR has your back

    While this is a ritual mockery that's ostensibly about Obamacare, what it really reveals is a long-boiling, deep-seated fear on the right of the moment when a more beta-appearing man becomes the mainstream notion of masculinity.
    [...]
    You can see this newly dominant, subtler definition of masculinity in pop culture's heroes, the men Americans look up to and imitate. So where we once had Broadway Joe Namath, now we've got quiet Eli Manning. Wilt Chamberlain was most famous outside of basketball for having bedded more than 2,000 women, as Kevin Durant is for wearing a backpack. Drake whom a man once described to me as "fucking Joni Mitchell, basically," is broodingly perched atop a hip-hop world that used to belong to Biggie Smalls and DMX. The novelist who wrote the Big Book that made every other novelist in New York tear out his hair with envy is the shy, Midwestern Chad Harbach, who doesn't go in for Maileresque brawls with other literary dudes, but pitches in for friendly Saturday Prospect Park football games with them. In last year's 21 Jump Street, the odd-couple buddy cops return to their high school only to discover that the macho guy (Channing Tatum) can't get in with the cool crowd. That's up to schlubby Jonah Hill, who is down with their environmental awareness and fluid conception of sexuality.

    1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

      ...when a more beta-appearing man becomes the mainstream notion of masculinity.

      Good luck with that.

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        "When a grotesquely obese woman becomes the mainstream notion of femininity..."

    2. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      "Conservatives Mock Obamacare's Pajama Boy Because They're Scared of Him"

      If by 'scared of' they mean 'creeped out', then yeah.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        Annoyed. Condescension + righteousness + ignorance = annoying. Which is progressivism in a nutshell.

      2. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        I'm scared of him.

        I think aggression (the good kind) is closely linked to competition. The desire to be the best. The need to not suck that has spurred mankind higher and higher up the evolutionary ladder.

        I'm not so sure celebrating mediocrity is a good thing.

    3. tarran   12 years ago

      This is funny. They actually think that douchy man-child is an example of masculinity.

      People aren't afraid of beta males getting all the chicks. No, it's a visceral dislike of seeing someone achieve physical adulthood yet still be have like they are a child i.e. a cultural neoteny.

      1. Drake   12 years ago

        The real visceral reaction comes when I realize people like him are in charge of my healthcare and the 1/3 of my income seized by the government.

      2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        Progressivism is a sign of arrested development.

      3. Agammamon   12 years ago

        That's my thing - I was repulsed by the image of a *grown man* wearing those pajamas 'non-ironically'.

    4. a better weapon   12 years ago

      You can see this newly dominant, subtler definition of masculinity in pop culture's heroes

      Which is why the super hero genre is straight gangbusters right now? Billions of dollars are being made by simply delivering the most Alpha entertainment possible.

      In last year's 21 Jump Street, the odd-couple buddy cops return to their high school only to discover that the macho guy (Channing Tatum) can't get in with the cool crowd. That's up to schlubby Jonah Hill, who is down with their environmental awareness and fluid conception of sexuality.

      He didn't actually see this movie, did he? Channing Tatum wasn't the butt of the joke... the culture of beta glorification was.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        People like Thor for his softer side.

        1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          To be fair, there are some women (like my wife) that prefer Loki to Thor.

          (though that article is still insane)

          1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

            Loki has more of an effeminate look, but I wouldn't call his character effeminate. Egotistical and somewhat insane, yes. Effeminate, no.

            1. Agammamon   12 years ago

              Loki is a suave ladies man - Thor is a 'we're going to have sex whether you say yes or nor, so you may as well say yes' type.

    5. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

      In what world is Eli Manning a pop culture hero?

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        Seriously. Peyton Manning is by far the most marketable and popular QB in the NFL and he portrays a very masculine but humble and polite image.

        Being Alpha doesn't automatically mean you're an asshole or a braggart.

        1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          Likewise, women swoon for Mike Rowe. No one's swooning for PJs boy.

        2. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

          Not exactly relevant, but from what I've heard, Eli is an asshole IRL. A friend of mine's mom was helping with physicals for the NYG, and she said while most of the players were nice, Eli was a prick. This is third-hand information so take it for what it is.

          1. Sevo   12 years ago

            Could also have been a bad day.
            By comparison, Steve Jobs was a prick day in and day out, 25/7/365.

            1. Sevo   12 years ago

              Yes, he was a prick *25* hours each day.

              1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

                Just recently watched movie "Jobs", and God what an asshole, if even half of it was true.

                Plus for you all in the know. IN the movie, it portrayed Jobs for coming up with GUI system. I thought both Apple and Microsoft borrowed it from Xerox.

                1. Sevo   12 years ago

                  ..."I thought both Apple and Microsoft borrowed it from Xerox."

                  "Borrowed" isn't the term I'd use but Xerox PARC never protected it, so have a ball!

                2. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

                  Yes, they did. Also, any statist asshole who claims the free market would not have come up with the Internets should be forced to watch Robert Cringely.

                  And then beaten by cops who detect furtive movement.

                3. Paul.   12 years ago

                  I thought both Apple and Microsoft borrowed it from Xerox.

                  Yes, and I don't think that was ever a big secret or conspiracy theory.

                  Steve Jobs in an interview more than a decade ago told the story about how he visited Xerox Parc, they showed him this fancy new mousy-interfacey thingy and he said "This is the future". And it was the future.

                4. NotAnotherSkippy   12 years ago

                  Well PARC got a lot of it from Englebart at SRI a decade earlier, so... *shrug*

                  1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

                    It is why the scene piss me off so much. Jobs on the phone cursing at Gates for stealing muh software.

        3. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

          Being Alpha doesn't automatically mean you're an asshole or a braggart.

          Never disturb the narrative. The borg doesn't like it when you disturb the narrative.

        4. mr simple   12 years ago

          Yeah, they have no idea what alpha means, but to be fair, neither do most guys who call themselves alpha. That kid is more epsilon than beta.

    6. Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

      Beta schmeta. The correct term for Pajama Boy is "man-child".

      "Boy", actually.

      And, what do you know, it says it right there in the title.

    7. Irish   12 years ago

      That's up to schlubby Jonah Hill, who is down with their environmental awareness and fluid conception of sexuality.

      Yeah. Now if you asked a random woman watching that movie who they'd rather sleep with, are they going with Jonah Hill or Channing Tatum?

    8. Tejicano   12 years ago

      "fluid conception of sexuality."

      Hhm... The way I see it any "sexuality" that doesn't get to "fluid" cannot reach "conception".

      Was I supposed to read that differently? And why?

  28. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

    "A transgendered model previously disqualified from participating in the Miss Universe competition for being born a man will feature in a photo spread for an upcoming issue of Elle Canada."

    And that helps people to envision what the fashions look like on an actual woman, how?

    1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      The people who run the fashion industry are largely gay men. Why do you think most fashion models are built like skinny teen boys?

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        THIS.

      2. db   12 years ago

        L. Ron Hubbard had the thesis that gay fashion designers were conspiring to dress women so hideously that men would gravitate away from them.

        1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

          Like many of his ideas, there's perhaps a grain of truth, but on balance, he's wrong again.

      3. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        I am aware of that and almost posted a comment on it. However, the customers of these fashions are biological women, so it would seem prudent to use actual women as models.

        1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

          She looks more feminine than I'm sure many of their customers do. I'm not sure what your point is, no models look like their customers.

          1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            People in creative professions often work to impress one another, not to actually sell things for their clients and employers. Hence cutting-edge but uncomfortable buildings, awkward clothes, commercials that win awards but that don't sell products, etc.

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      "And that helps people to envision what the fashions look like on an actual woman, how?"

      If people wanted to see what clothes look like on an 'actual' woman, fashion rags would be out of business.

    3. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      I assume a number of transgendered people buy the latest fashions.

      1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        And the percentage of the customer base is

    4. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Huh? People look at models so that they can visualize fashions?

      My wife finds stuff in her crochet magazines she wants to make. She then shows them to me and asks me what I think. All I can see are the models. Have you ever seen the models in crochet mags? They are stunning. I have no idea what the crochet stuff looks like.

      1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        LOL

  29. Numeromancer   12 years ago

    Ohio Senate wants CPS to interview every child before allowing parents to home-school them.

    Because one boy died at the hands of his "home-schooling" mom's boyfriend. Never let a good tragedy go to waste!

    1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      neighbors, friends, family, police, teachers and others knew Teddy was suffering ongoing abuse.

      Didn't ANYONE have the fucking brains to accuse someone in the house of selling teh drugz?

  30. Sevo   12 years ago

    BTW, SusanM found this and posted it in the Masshole O'care thread:
    http://news.yahoo.com/obamacar.....00078.html
    Looks like in some cases, O'care provided the 'you can't go bankrupt from medical costs' by simply bypassing bankruptcy and seizing property.
    I could be wrong; anybody?

  31. Warty   12 years ago

    The NYT has its panties in a bunch. This is my surprised face.

    AnnMaineNYT Pick
    I have had it with reference to Second Amendment Rights. Perhaps it's time for people who are so concerned with that to join the military. The argument is getting old, and I truly do not understand why people feel the need to own an assault type weapon.

    I grew up in a family of hunters. There were guns around all the time. Not once did children have access to them, nor did we want to. When a child was old enough, and if they wanted to,he/she was taught to hunt, care for and respect the gun. Gun, not weapon. It had a purpose and that was to take into the woods and hunt.

    We are no longer under the control of another country. The Revolutionary War took care of that. We now have a very strong military to take care of an invasion. We have police forces to uphold the law and protect us. That Sheriff, is what you were hired to do, so do it.

    We're not occupied by a hostile government?

    1. Sevo   12 years ago

      ..."We have police forces to uphold the law and protect us."...

      Ann doesn't have a dog, I see.

      1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        Ann has obviously never called the police.

        1. Sevo   12 years ago

          'When seconds count....

    2. Warty   12 years ago

      Steve SingerChicagoNYT Pick
      Not so very different from the refusal by local law enforcement to either follow the law or protect the civil rights of "coloreds" and "negroes" in the American South during the 1950s and '60s after de jure racial segregation was declared unconstitutional by the Warren Supreme Court.

      Remember the defiant depredations of Sheriff "Bull" Connor and his ilk?

      Remember the mayhem that they either caused or turned a blind eye to?

      People forget.

      These modern day nullifiers, what they actually are, will ultimately be swept aside just like Sheriff Connor and similar Klu Klux Klan/White Citizens Council posses trying to maintain de facto racial segregation through violence and terror were. It will, however, take time, and possibly some bloodshed, to accomplish this.

      I bet you can't wait for bloodshed, can you, Steve Singer? Those fucking teabagging neoconfederate racist nullifiers will finally get what they have coming to them.

      1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

        The left just loves to make that argument every single time somebody questions whether government is right. I get a similar one all the time when talking about jury nullification.

        1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

          You'd think that with Obama regularly nullifying and not enforcing laws, leftists would think twice before arguing against that sort of thing in principle.

      2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        Poor Steve doesn't have a Klu.

      3. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        I wonder what Steve-O would have to say about the states that refused to enforce the Fugitive Slave Acts?

      4. Suthenboy   12 years ago

        Hmmm I suspect things wont turn out the way Steve thinks they will.

      5. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

        Damn it Warty that post contains toxic levels of irony. 'Herp Derp government has done evil things it should disarm us Herp'.

    3. Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

      I truly do not understand why people feel the need to own an assault type weapon.

      Well, there you go. I believe you. You could have stopped right here.

      1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        I don't understand why women think they need so many shoes.

    4. Warty   12 years ago

      PaulNorth CarolinaNYT Pick
      This is one of the problems with the stepwise, piecemeal approach to advancing gun control through legislation. To solve America's gun violence problem, what is needed is a complete overhaul of the Second Amendment paradigm.

      We need to wrest the Second Amendment out of the irrational, deranged, obscene stranglehold of the NRA to restore order and public safety. I think a constitutional amendment modifying the Second Amendment to make it more suited to the 21st century is needed now that democracy is well-established and our revolution is over. The Second Amendment made sense in the context of a nation that had just thrown off the bonds of tyranny and was in an uncertain early stage of a newly formed, never before tried government. Today we resolve our disputes through the democratic process, no matter how ugly and inefficient. We have well-established protocols for the transfer of power while maintaining a stable democracy. Therefore, we don't need a "well-regulated militia" of armed private citizens to ensure it.

      The Second Amendment doesn't need to be repealed, but it definitely needs to be changed to reflect the legitimate vs. illegitimate reasons for gun ownership TODAY, not the late 18th century. It took more than 40 years from the start of the women's suffrage movement until the 19th Amendment was passed. Changing America's gun culture will also probably take generations.

      1. db   12 years ago

        Just like the NSA has a few suggestions for "updating" the First and Fourth Amendments for the 21st century.

      2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

        They would shit their pants, if the clarification went the other way. With so many states that are controlled by Republicans(38 I believe), amendments can be had. How many states would be needed for 3/4 majority?

        1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

          Like I said above, this confrontation they want so badly to force everyone into complying with their demands wont turn out like they think.

      3. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        The willful misunderstanding of the intent of the 2nd amendment by these types never ceases to amaze me. Even when they say the 2nd has a place, they still only see in the context of serving the country in a war. It's as though they have no concept of self-defense against the state or other criminals.

        1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

          "We are no longer under the control of another country. "

          That is from AnnMaine above. What she misses is that when the revolution began we were not under the control of another country. The government we rebelled against was the legitimate government by our own countrymen. That is why it is called 'revolution'.

          It is beyond her that it may come to that again, and that that is the very purpose of the second amendment.

          1. Ayn Random Variation   12 years ago

            The unarmed blacks in S. Africa weren't under the control of another country either. How did that work out for them?

        2. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

          It's as though they have no concept of self-defense against the state or other criminals.

          My wife is basically defenseless without a gun. They would leave my wife to the mercy of the stronger. Hell, in many cases, they would leave me powerless to defend myself. I mean, do even guns stop Warty when he is in full rut?

      4. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        Why do they think tyranny cannot happen here?

        LOOK AROUND MAN!

    5. Warty   12 years ago

      brmidwestNYT Pick
      Yes, sheriffs should be enforcing the laws, but they are also raising good points here. How does a cop know whether a magazine was purchased before or after a ban with a grandfather clause went into effect? How do you arrest someone for carrying a concealed firearm when the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently ruled that carrying a firearm is a Constitutional right?

      There is only one way to end this madness: Repeal the Second Amendment. Unless and until that happens, any attempt to control firearms is doomed to failure.

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        Most progressives can't handle he inherent truth of that statement, so they take refuge in delusions.

      2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

        If they repealed the 2nd, is when I get my first gun. Actual implementation of confiscating fire arms would be shit storm.

      3. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

        At least that one is intellectually honest. I'd be more than happy to get in a shooting conflict with people like this, but it's not any of the half-assed "I still support the 2nd Amendment with modifications" fakery.

        "SUBMIT TO THE STATE OR GET FUCKED!!" That's an unequivocal principle I can respect, even if I know that if it has to come down to him or me, he's going down like a dress on prom night.

    6. Tejicano   12 years ago

      "Perhaps it's time for people who are so concerned with that to join the military"

      So if I've already checked that box or are part of the militia (males age 18-45, up to 60 for veterans) then I believe I should be able to keep a weapon similar to the one they trained me with.

  32. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    From Reuters - a woman in Israel, with the support of the Israeli Justice Department's Legal Aid department, goes to the Supreme Court to challenge a rabbinical tribunal's order. The rabbis, in the contect of a divorce case, told her to circumcize her son. She claims the rabbis lack jurisDICKtion. (Oops)

    http://reur.rs/19cC5FJ

    1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      http://reut.rs/19cC5FJ

    2. db   12 years ago

      Don't forget to tip your waitress...

      1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        I see what you did there.

        AND I DON'T LIKE IT!

  33. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Hey

    What'd I miss today?

    1. db   12 years ago

      ...he asks, right below a burgeoning circumcision thread.

  34. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    It got dusty in here

  35. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    I enjoyed the new hobbit film.

    There, I said it.

    1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

      The one starring Kim Kardashian?

      1. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

        I don't think it's her. Are you making a jest?

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

          http://www.southparkstudios.co.....b=featured

      2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

        Bitch, why you not a Hobbit?

    2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

      Good. I watched the first one, and it was kind of meh, but then again I enjoyed the 2nd Lord of Rings movie, better than the first.

      1. Irish   12 years ago

        The second Hobbit is also kind of meh. It's kind of entertaining, but it's definitely a step down from the Lord of the Rings movies.

        1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

          Yes, but it has dragons, which Game of Thrones has been promising forever. All they do is rub their wieners together.

        2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

          Yes, but it has dragons, which Game of Thrones has been promising forever. All they do is rub their wieners together.

          1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

            Don't worry, the dragons are coming.

        3. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

          It's hard to make the stakes feel high when we know what's going to happen in the Lord of the Rings.

    3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      Going Monday night.

  36. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

    Here's some statist butthurt over BitCoin from Charlie Stross.

    http://boingboing.net/2013/12/.....hould.html

    Bitcoin is bad because carbon footprint, lack of regulation leading to 'hideous' markets, and damage to the fabric of civil society!

    1. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

      Progressives hate progress. Imagine that.

      1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

        I've said it before-they should be afraid. Cryptocurrency is going to fuck up their world. It will do for economic statism what the 2A movement has done for gun control in the past quarter century, times a hundred. There entire paradigm is going to get trashed.

  37. Michael Ejercito   12 years ago

    I am surprised that the New Mexico Supreme Court, in striking down the sex restriction on marriage, did not cite the state constitution's own ERA.

  38. RishJoMo   12 years ago

    These dudes seem to know whats up.

    http://www.PrivaWeb.tk

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!