Online Gambling

Imagine How Much Preet Bharara Could Accomplish If He Had Even Fewer Resources

|

USDOJ

In comments to the New York County Lawyers' Association yesterday, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara complained about sequestration's impact on his office, which handles federal prosecutions in the Southern District of New York:

A prolonged hiring freeze and continuing budget cuts could ultimately work irrevocable harm to the fundamental mission of my office…

Unless something changes, our office will simply get smaller and smaller every year….

If the blanket cuts continue, we will be forced, in the not too distant future, to make supremely difficult choices…

Something has to give.

Sounds like good news to me, since Bharara's understanding of his mission includes pernicious uses of taxpayer money such as prosecuting people for helping New Yorkers play poker online, for connecting drug suppliers with consumers, and even for passing out pamphlets about jury nullification. If anything, Bharara's office would benefit from the prioritization that budget cuts require. Even in the speech where he whines about not having enough money to protect the public, he brags about "shut[ting] down a major on-line currency service used by criminals [Liberty Reserve, presumaby] and the world's largest underground website for drugs and contraband [i.e., Silk Road]." A look at Bharara's recent press releases reinforces the impression that sequestration so far has left him plenty of resources to prosecute people for things that should not be crimes:

Former Branch Manager At Manhattan Bank Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Assisting Leader Of International Sportsbook With Structuring Financial Transactions

Demolition Company Operators Found Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court Of Scheme To Underpay Employees In Violation Of Federal Prevailing Wage Law

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces Arrests Of Five Defendants For Conspiring To Import 100 Kilograms Of North Korean Methamphetamine Into The United States

Two More Defendants Plead Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court In Connection With Russian-American Organized Crime Gambling Enterprise

Defendant Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Being An Organizer And Leader Of An Illegal Sports Gambling Business

Court Authorizes IRS To Issue Summonses For Records Relating To U.S Taxpayers With Offshore Bank Accounts

Equity Research Analyst Pleads GuiltyIn Manhattan Federal Court To Insider Trading Charges

SAC Capital Management Companies Plead Guilty To Insider Trading Charges In Manhattan Federal Court

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces Civil Action Seeking Forfeiture Of Four Bank Accounts And 47 Cars Tied To Auto Export Scheme

Eleven Members Of Yonkers Gang Charged In White Plains Federal Court With Narcotics Trafficking And Firearms Offenses

Co-Founder Of Liberty Reserve Pleads Guilty To Money Laundering In Manhattan Federal Court

And that's just November. Bharara says his "fundamental mission" is "to keep our homeland secure, our streets safe, our markets fair, and our government honest." With the possible exception of "fair" markets, which presumably is how Bharara understands the goal of criminalizing buying and selling securities based on forbidden knowledge, one is hard pressed to see evidence of this mission in these cases. 

"What choices am I supposed to make about which categories of big cases we can and cannot do?" Bharara asks. How about focusing on actions that violate people's rights?

To be fair, Bharara does prosecute real crimes from time to time. But imagine how much he could accomplish if he had fewer resources.

[Thanks to Nick Sibilla for the tip.]

NEXT: SpaceX Launches Its First Commercial Satellite into Orbit

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. …”we will be forced, in the not too distant future, to make supremely difficult choices.”

    Boo, hoo! Yes, Mr. Public Servant, act like a manager and make the tough choices. That’s what managers are PAID for.

  2. How difficult a choice? Does it involve retiring to his study with a revolver and a bottle of whiskey? Maybe it should.

    1. Disgusting.

      1. Yes, yes he is. Blue Tulpa agreed with me!

        1. He thought you meant that the bottle would be shot and the whiskey wasted.

  3. Yeah, if I could think of one person who I’d be delighted with getting a LOT fewer resources, it’s Preet Bharara. The guy’s a first class sleeze who pushes the limits of the law to grab headlines and target the unpopular.

    1. ^^^^Yes!

  4. This guy sounds like a frontrunner for the Atty Genl spot in President Christie’s cabinet.

  5. If you want to be further outraged by this federal prosecutor’s words, read the following:

    -due to the combination of general budget austerity and sequestration, the federal public defender system?a model of effective indigent defense for the past 40 years?is being decimated.

    A decrease of nearly 10% in the federal public defender budget for 2013 has already resulted in layoffs and up to 20 days of furloughs in many federal defender offices.

    So whatever harm the sequestration has inflicted on this poor fellow, it seems to have fallen worse on his already comparatively underfunded adversaries.

    1. By the way, all but the first and last sentence is from the Volokh Conspiracy, link here:

      http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/…..er-system/

    2. Am I supposed to be outraged by that?

      1. I’d go for keeping the Pub Def harmless and cutting the prosecution.
        Like incumbent politicos, the prosecution holds a lot of power simply by representing the all-powerful government.

  6. So this shithead wants to be the next Elliot Spitzer? Making a big name for himself with high-profile unjustified prosecutions, expensive symbolic civil suits, and general overreach.

  7. Preet Bharara is more of a publicity whore than anything else. If you look at his history of procecutions, he always goes for the low hanging fruit rather than the heavyweight culprits or the actual trouble makers. Catching these petty thieves will not eradicate the crime or the root of it. He does not have the balls or the wherewithal to go after the heavyweights. I have no respect for this scum.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.