Canadian Hate Speech
Victory for free expression.
Talk about mission creep. Established in the 1970s to stop discrimination, Canada's human rights commissions soon took to policing offensive speech.
In one notorious case, covered in reason's June 2009 issue, the Western Standard had to go through an expensive two-year process to defend its right to reprint the notorious Jyllands-Posten cartoons mocking Muhammad. The Standard eventually won that case, but not every defendant has been so lucky.
At least now there will be fewer defendants. In June the country repealed Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which allowed the commissions to regulate "the communication of hate messages by telephone or on the Internet." It's a victory for free speech, but not a complete one: "Hate speech" is still a criminal offense in Canada, though it will not be as easy to bring charges now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
reason's June 2009 issue, the Western Standard had to go through an expensive two
June 2009 issue, the Western Standard had to go through an expensive two-year process to defend its right
13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which allowed the commissions