Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Shooting at LAX Airport, Birth Control Mandate Struck Down, Drone Strike in Pakistan: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 11.1.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | lookcatalog / Foter.com / CC BY
(lookcatalog / Foter.com / CC BY)
  • You can always buy it yourself.
    lookcatalog / Foter.com / CC BY

    A gunman opened fire at Los Angeles International Airport. Information is still sketchy in the media, but reports say a TSA agent was killed. The gunman has been reported both in custody and dead and several others were injured.

  • A federal appeals court has struck down the mandate that health insurance provided by employers must cover birth control.
  • Nasdaq is having more tech problems, which shut down trading today.
  • A U.S. drone strike in Pakistan has killed a Taliban leader, which may well sabotage peace efforts between Pakistan and the terrorist group.
  • More part-time college professors are joining unions, which will help inflate that education bubble quite nicely.
  • Turn your clocks back an hour on Sunday because the government told you to.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Pakistani Official Accuses US of Sabotaging Peace Talks

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (271)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A U.S. drone strike in Pakistan has killed a Taliban leader, which may well sabotage peace efforts between Pakistan and the terrorist group.

    They don't call him the droning president just because he likes the sound of his own voice.

  2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    A federal appeals court has struck down the mandate that health insurance provided by employers must cover birth control.

    Struck down by Janice Rogers Brown, no less. The liberal feminist apoplexy should be delicious.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      She's post-menopausal. Therefore she's no longer a real woman.

      1. R C Dean   12 years ago

        I don't think most of your Movement Feminists are really gonna want to use that line.

    2. Dead or In Jail   12 years ago

      Will someone hurry the fuck up and put her on The Supreme Court already?

      If we had had her appointed instead of that BleedingCunt John Rogers, then this whole ACA mess wouldn't be happening right now. Instead of taking someone with a fidelity to liberty and the Constitution, we took some anus whose loyalty is split between law journals and the press corps.

      Heckuva job, Bushie.

      (In an effort to him remember our nation's colonial/Common Law history, John Roberts should be tarred and feathered.)

      1. John   12 years ago

        She is a black woman libertarian. She cannot be allowed to exist. All libertarians are racist and sexist. She must be destroyed.

      2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        Hey, give John Roberts a break.

        You would've folded to if Axelrod promised to publicize picture of you fucking a goat.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A federal appeals court has struck down the mandate that health insurance provided by employers must cover birth control.

    Cue a slutty, 30-year-old student telling us how the courts have virtually outlawed birth control.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Now that I'm recently single, they go and make sure I can never have sex again. Damn activist judges.

      1. Gbob   12 years ago

        Are you kidding? This is your chance to be a hero! "Don't worry baby. I know those evil Rethugligans have waged war against your constitutional right to free birth control. I'll pay for it." You can then whip out your condoms (which the left believes cost around a hundreds dollars a piece, or some sum out of the reach of the poor) or even offer to pay for her pills at the pharmacy (don't let her hear the cashier telling you the price is five or ten bucks!). You get to seem like a big spender! Use the money you saved on dinner to buy some monocle polish.

        1. GILMORE   12 years ago

          " I know those evil Rethugligans have waged war against your constitutional right to free birth control. I'll pay for it

          NOPE = patriarchy. Pay for it? Way to go and COMMODITIZE THE POON. Objectifier!! You support a system by which women are held hostage to male dominance of control of their bodily blah blah blah and phallocentrism.

      2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        Put it in her butt. Solved.

        1. JW   12 years ago

          EDG understands.

        2. Aloysious   12 years ago

          Hey!! Fun butt stuff!

    2. GILMORE   12 years ago

      NOSTERGILMORE SPEAKETH =

      I FORESEE THIS COURT CASE WILL BE LATCHED ON BY THE MEDIA TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM HOW FUCKED UP THE ACA IS IN SO MANY OTHER WAYS.... Now it will be about, as noted many times elsewhere today...how

      Its court decisions like this that truly highlight how out of touch Right-Wingers are and how much they truly hate Women, The Poor, and Minorities.
      (tm)

      1. Michael Ejercito   12 years ago

        Yeah, the other side loves women so much that they make them spend tens of extra dollars in premiums every month just to cover something they can buy at Walgreens or CVS for less than ten dollars.

  4. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Turn your clocks back an hour on Sunday because the government told you to.

    My desire for an extra hour of sleep outweighs my disdain for government edicts.

    1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

      Yeah. But sunset will be a 4pm out here.

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        I prefer that way. November is my favorite month of the year because it gets noticeably darker and colder. Plus my birthday is at the end of the month nicely sandwiched between Thanksgiving and Christmas.

        1. Dweebston   12 years ago

          Buh. I despise it. Not only do I leave work as the sun is setting, by the time I'm out of class it's fully night and cold. Brutal.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

            One day man will colonize the surface of the sun. I don't know if it will happen in my lifetime, but on that day we will finally no longer have to deal with this daylight saving time BS.

            1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

              I don't think so. Ever since the dawn of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun.

              1. Terr   12 years ago

                +1 giant sun shade stored inside a mountain

    2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      And my desire to not leave work when it's pitch black out overrides my disdain for your disdain. But technically we're putting the clocks back to where they should be.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        Why not just set them back a half hour and split the difference year round?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          WHY NOT MANDATE AN AXIAL TILT OF ZERO DEGREES?

          1. hamilton   12 years ago

            That is a BRILLIANT idea which you should never mention to any politician ever.

            1. JW   12 years ago

              The Guamonians will never survive such a thing!

              1. nothinghead   12 years ago

                Didn't Guam already tip over?

        2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          Why not just set them back a half hour and split the difference year round?

          Sure would make trying to deal with people in other countries quite difficult (What time is it out there? Do I add six and a half hours, or five and three-quarters?" But, I guess we could get an app for that.

          1. BuSab Agent   12 years ago

            Just ask a Newfoundlander.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        In theory, we could pick any time zone we wanted. Some of them just make more sense than others.

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      During the spring/summer when there's a lot of daylight, I'd prefer to have more of it after dinner and not in the wee hours of the morning.

      Something about the libertarians' reflexive anti-DST attitudes strikes me as eye roll-inducing.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        I'd prefer that in the winter too. Just keep them on DST all year.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          I'm not a fan first thing in the morning of having to search in the dark for the dog's chain to put her out to do her business.

          To be fair, though, once you get below a certain number of hours of daylight you're going to have to deal with darkness no matter what you do.

          1. Tonio   12 years ago

            So, because getting up earlier is more convenient for you, you're willing to impose that on the rest of us. You just don't get this freedom from government coercion thing, do you Teddy?

        2. Rhywun   12 years ago

          Hear, hear. I couldn't care less about going to work in the dark - it's not like I'm awake then.

        3. JW   12 years ago

          Just keep them on DST all year.

          So this. I'm asleep in the morning when it's dark out anyway.

      2. Tonio   12 years ago

        Ted, nobody objects to you choosing to get up earlier or later during certain times of the year. And nobody objects to your employer having summer hours and winter hours. What we object to is the government mandating this for everyone.

        What if the government decided to change the system of weights and measures twice a year to manipulate gasoline consumption?

        1. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

          "The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it."

        2. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Don't they already mandate different blends during different seasons?

          Or am I missing your sarcasm?

          1. Tonio   12 years ago

            Yes they do, and that is objectionable. But not as objectible as changing fundamental units of measure. Also, see above at 4:51.

      3. Zeb   12 years ago

        Especially since the government tells us what time it is with or without DST. Unless you have some sort of very clever watch with GPS that sets itself to absolute local time.
        I wonder if such a thing exists. Wouldn't be terribly useful unless you were an astronomer or something, bu tit would be clever.

        1. Tonio   12 years ago

          Some clocks sync up with the NIST atomic clock in Boulder. NIST has a special radio frequency allocated specifically for time broadcasts.

      4. hamilton   12 years ago

        Look, if you like your local time, you're going to be able to keep it. The law won't affect any of that.

        1. Tonio   12 years ago

          Nice.

      5. Warty   12 years ago

        I'm fucking sick of timezones. MANDATE UTC FOR EVERYONE

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          But how will I determine my longitude?

          1. Warty   12 years ago

            With a telescope and careful measurement of the moons of Jupiter, you idiot. Or with a chronometer that shows GMT and a compass, but that way's for chumps. So, wait, do that.

          2. hamilton   12 years ago

            Do it by staring at the sun with a sextant like real men used to do. The polish off a few pints of grog and head belowdecks for buggery time.

            1. Warty   12 years ago

              That's latitude, you fool. God. People like you deserve to run aground on some rocks off Sicily.

              1. Warty   12 years ago

                Scilly. Not Sicily. Scilly.

                1. hamilton   12 years ago

                  Oh you lucky bastard I was just about to come down on you for that. "From Ushant to Scilly 'tis 35 leagues". And you got longitude by shooting the sun for local noon and threatening anyone who fucked with the hourglass with death, if I remember right.

                  Now report for punishment.

        2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          Beijing time for everyone!

          1.351 billion people can't be wrong.

        3. Tonio   12 years ago

          Fun fact. We have standardized time zones because of the railways. Before coast to coast rail transport each town used to set local time based on longitude.

          1. Warty   12 years ago

            And not all that long ago, counties and cities were free to observe DST if they wanted to.

          2. Brett L   12 years ago

            I'm about to go to the westernmost Eastern timezone point in FL. It is easily 30 miles west of the rest of the time line. Because the St. Joe paper company wanted to be all in the Eastern time zone.

            1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

              The St. Joe owns that section of the panhandle. Quite literally.

      6. JeremyR   12 years ago

        I know

        With DST, it would be daylight at 4 am in the Summer where I live

    4. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      Obviously you're not a says admin or developer.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        This. Thank you.

        Also, the incredible lost productivity of doing this. Idiocy!

  5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    More part-time college professors are joining unions, which will help inflate that education bubble quite nicely.

    Combine a product government subsidizes as a necessity with collective bargaining and a liberal workforce, and you've got the makings of an epic bursting.

    1. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

      Ever since the Lady's Garment Workers got their own union, the entire notion of collective bargaining has been gotten rather silly.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The gunman has been reported both in custody and dead and several others were injured.

    THE GUNMAN WAS A WALKING AR-15 ASSAULT RIFLE. Spread the word.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Well, if dead I bet the government has the corpse, so not mutually exclusive.

      1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

        What you said is redundant. According to some guy on HuffPo the other day, "AR" stands for "assault rifle". So no need to say it twice, FoE.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          I'll drop the AR before I drop the assault rifle!

          1. GILMORE   12 years ago

            Drop the AR!

            Pirate says = "You'll never get me to drop me Arrrrrrrrrrs!"

            Bostonian says = "Ahhs? Waatya meen ahhs? We dohnt haaav anee ahhhs to begin with"

        2. GILMORE   12 years ago

          "According to some guy on HuffPo the other day..."

          This is just another way of saying, "Something factually untrue was claimed recently"

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR15

          1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

            According to some guy on HuffPo the other day..."

            This is just another way of saying, "Something factually untrue was claimed recently"

            Yikes! I guess I need to use the /sarc tag more often. Of course it's not true! But it is amazing how many fools buy into that...

  7. Brett L   12 years ago

    SR-71 and SR-72 scramjet engine cycle porn.

    1. db   12 years ago

      Porn via slideshow? You monster.

    2. trshmnstr   12 years ago

      What do they need a new high altitude recon plane for? Do the Chinese already have all of our satellites accounted for and tracked?

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Yes.

      2. Not an Economist   12 years ago

        It is not the altitude it is the speed. Our spy satellites do not cover the entire world and while you can move them, that takes time and it may be impossible to move one where you need it.

        A plane, especially a fast one, is more flexible that a satellite and may be repurposed once in the air a lot easier than a satellite.

    3. Gene   12 years ago

      Very cool.
      But how much and why?

  8. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Two Greek men shot dead outside fascist party headquarters

    Greek police say two men have been shot and are believed dead in a drive-by shooting outside an office of the far-right, Nazi-inspired Golden Dawn party in Athens.

    A party statement says two men aged 20 and 23 have been shot dead and a third man was injured in the attack.

    A police official says the men were shot by two men on a motorcycle in the Iraklio neighborhood late Friday. It was unclear whether the victims were Golden Dawn members. The official spoke on condition of anonymity.

    No arrests have been made.

    Golden Dawn's leader and two lawmakers have been jailed pending trial on charges of forming a criminal group. The party has denied any wrongdoing.

    1. BardMetal   12 years ago

      What exactly makes fascism or national socialism far-right?

      Seems like being far-right in Europe means you're just as socialist as the other parties, but you're opposed to immigration, and the EU.

      1. #   12 years ago

        Pretty much. It's the fight between national socialism and international socialism.

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          This. Having a nationalist platform is ostensibly far right.

          Of course, you probably don't want to look into what countries like Vietnam did with their ethnic Chinese minority after their victory. (Among other examples)

          1. #   12 years ago

            The few people in Europe who actually want restrictions on government are generally still refered to as liberals.

            The rest of the political spectrum is just what kind of socialsm you want.

    2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      A return to traditional Greek values, you say...

      1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        You have some tzatziki on your toga. Wait... THATS NOT TZATZIKI!!!

    3. Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

      Two men were literally murdered and all you glibertarians can do is whine about national socialism. Bunch of manbabies, you.

      *straight face*

  9. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    I hate cycling my clock back.
    This means it's going to be dark by 5PM until March.

    1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

      This. The farmers don't need it anymore, so stop the idiocy.

      1. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

        That's funny, my parents always told me it was the city folk who wanted it because they needed morning daylight for the kiddies to walk to school.
        Since kids don't walk to school anymore, what's the point.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      After WW2 it was the retail merchants who lobbied to keep this.

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      On the other hand, do you like not having sunrise until 8:00 AM? As I said above, once you get to having not much daylight, you have to make a tradeoff somewhere.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        Wow, are you presuming to define my needs, Teddy?

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          If everybody acted as though I was always right, the world would have a lot fewer problems.

          Note that this doesn't require I actually be right; just that people act that way.

      2. BuSab Agent   12 years ago

        Having lived for many years in a place without the daylight savings silliness (until the Indiana lege got another attack of teh stoopid), I can say that it's much better without. It gradually gets darker more and then lighter more over the course of the year and you don't even fucking notice it. Now that our benevolent overlords have got us fiddling with our clocks like everyone else, now we too can deal with a bunch of sleep deprived idjits on icy roads.

  10. Brett L   12 years ago

    I don't think Chris Frates is going to be on Obama's salon invites.

    Senate Democrats voted unanimously three years ago to support the Obamacare rule that is largely responsible for some of the health insurance cancellation letters that are going out.

    In September 2010, Senate Republicans brought a resolution to the floor to block implementation of the grandfather rule, warning that it would result in canceled policies and violate President Barack Obama's promise that people could keep their insurance if they liked it.

  11. rts   12 years ago

    First Nations declare victory against Taseko's B.C. mine

    The site, 550 kilometres northeast of Vancouver in the Chilcotin region, is the tenth-largest undeveloped gold-copper deposit in the world.

    The company has estimated the New Prosperity mine would generate 550 direct jobs and $340 million in gross domestic product annually.

    Taseko's original proposal received provincial approval in 2010, but the federal government rejected the plan, which would have drained a lake of cultural significance to First Nations for use as a tailings pond.

    1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Do they own the lake? If this was a free market and the government didn't own all waterways they'd still have to buy the lake and if the tribe put a cultural value on the lake that the mining company wasn't willing to pay then too bad. The problem here is the government owning the lake in the first place.

      1. rts   12 years ago

        Agreed. But I cut the quote short:

        Taseko then submitted a new plan for the site in the Chilcotin region 550 kilometres northeast of Vancouver and said it would save Fish Lake and prevent contamination from groundwater seepage from a tailings pond that it would instead locate several kilometres away.

        1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

          Unsurprising. Just looked up pictures of the lake, it's gorgeous. I imagine in a free market Taseko would never have considered using the lake in the first place because it would be too expensive. If only we had an environmental system using property rights rather than regulations.

    2. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

      A tiny little beuaracracy stopped it, which makes a joke of the Conservative's claims to be limiting government.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        "Conservatives'"?

        1. Winston   12 years ago

          This is Canada. Place were Obama is more popular than he is in the US and where private healthcare is a fringe opinion.

      2. Gene   12 years ago

        Yeah true enough but his plan to reform or abolish the senate by appointing the likes of Wallin and Duffy just might work for him.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Are they going to get rid of the Senate entirely, or come up with a horrid second elected house?

    3. BardMetal   12 years ago

      Anyone else think the term "first nations" sounds a little arrogant?

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        Meh. Less confusing than Indians.

        Oh, the Washington First Peoples NFL franchise....

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          This. I actually like it, despite it's PC origin, because it identifies exactly who the speaker is talking about.

          Also, they were actually here before everyone else.

        2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          Someone talking about the Redskins issue on TV the other day actually brought up the ridiculous old myth that our tribes were called "Indians" because Columbus was confused and thought he had landed in India. Really? I thought that one was long gone.

          To refresh, there was no place named "India" in 1492. What we now know as India was regions that were known as "Hindus" or
          "Hindustan".

          Columbus saw these indigenous people and thought they were creatures directly from God. So he called them "endio" or "endios", essentially "people/children of God."

          If I were Native American, I'd much prefer being known as Indian thinking I was a "child of God." That even sounds better than being one of God's "chosen people." So I don't understand why there would even be an issue of "Native American" (which sounds so generic) vs Indian.

          1. rts   12 years ago

            Wikipedia disagrees

            Europeans at the time of Christopher Columbus's voyage often referred to all of South and East Asia as "India" or "the Indias/Indies," sometimes dividing the area into "Greater India," "Middle India," and "Lesser India."[1] The oldest surviving terrestrial globe, by Martin Behaim in 1492 (before Columbus' voyage), labels the entire Asian subcontinent region as "India".[2]

            1. rts   12 years ago

              Further:

              However, as the writer David Wilton noted in his book Word Myths: Debunking Linguistic Urban Legends, this phrase [en Dios] does not appear in any of Columbus' writing. Wilton also says that since Greek and Roman times, more than a millennium before the voyages of Columbus, many European languages used variations of the term "Indian" to describe the peoples of the Indian subcontinent.[6]

              1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

                Interesting. I learn something every day in the comments section here, sometimes even the extent of my own ignorance.

                Fascinating that this whole perception was likely the work of Russell Means. Thanks for setting me straight.

              2. The Heresiarch   12 years ago

                Yeah - The term "India" goes back a long way. That's why Arrian of Nicomedia's work on India was called the "Indica."

  12. Zeb   12 years ago

    For the past several years I have intended to just leave my clocks on DST so I can get up earlier and get home before it is completely dark out. But then every year an extra hour of sleep seems like a better idea when I get right down to it.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Well you get an extra hour once a year, and you lose an extra hour once a year, so net zero.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        Well, obviously. I'm talking about my state of mind next Monday morning.

      2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        Almost without exception, I wake up when I damned well feel like it and I go to sleep when I damned well feel like it. I don't get a fetid dingo's kidney what the clock says.

      3. font_of_stupidity   12 years ago

        What happens if I die before I get that extra hour back? Then I got screwed!

        We've got to do something to avert this looming crisis. Not just for me, but for the children too.

  13. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    You Are Stupid and We Will Take the Things You Like and Pay For, Pt MMLVIII

    So let me recap:

    Currently, my wife and I have a plan where we pay $315 per month. We don't need referrals to see specialists, we have out of network coverage, and we have an $8.000 in-network deductible (another $8,000 max out of pocket if we go out of network).

    How about the new plan Anthem is offering me? $581 per month (84% increase), $10,000 deductible PLUS 20% co-insurance after that up to a $12,000 out of pocket maximum. Also, it's an HMO so I need to see my primary care physician for referrals, and oh by the way, the network of doctors has shrunk and my local hospital is out of network. There are no out-of-network benefits.

    That's what we call the triple whammy ? higher premiums, higher deductibles, less access. Lose, lose, lose.

    I smell satisfied customer and future Dem voter...

    1. Juice   12 years ago

      Welcome to the party, pal.

  14. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Whatever Mayor ROB FORD was doing with a crack pipe on the video, he wasn't smoking it insists lawyer.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      SLD: Crack, of course, should not be illegal.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        Meh. That's not a standard libertarian disclaimer, Teddy. Legal pot is a standard. Legalizing cocaine in all its forms is mainstream, but arguable.

        Teddy, srsly, why are you here? Are you a single-issue "libertarian" and if so what's that issue?

        Freedom is the freedom to make bad choices. Freedom is the freedom to not have to support other people who have made bad choices.

  15. Brett L   12 years ago

    Is Biden dumb enough to go nucular?

    Just minutes after the swearing-in of New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker, the Senate dove headfirst back into a standoff over executive and judicial branch nominations.

    "I think it's worth considering it," Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., said of changing Senate rules on nominees after Republicans filibustered two nominees.

    Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's pick of Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., to become the top housing finance regulator, and Patricia Ann Millett's nomination to fill one of three vacant seats on the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals. Watt was blocked on a 56-42 vote for cloture, while Millett failed on a 55-38 vote. Sixty votes are needed to avoid a filibuster. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid voted "no" to preserve his right to reconsider the vote.

  16. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    You Are Stupid and We Will Take the Things You Like and Pay For, Pt MMLV

    Recently, I wrote that our health insurance system needs reform, and that I thought the Affordable Care Act couldn't possibly make our current system worse. An important point in that post was that while I am a fan of free markets, Healthcare is already not a free market: the Government is involved enough, regulating it enough to completely screw it up. I concluded that some more Government involvement probably couldn't make it any worse. I believe that I was mistaken.

    Does anyone remember this key promise from The President?

    That whole "you can keep your plan ? you can keep your doctor" foundation that was used to "sell" the Affordable Care Act to the American People? To me, that's a pretty important foundation for this reform: the whole point is to add options for those who need it, while maintaining current choices for those who don't wish to make a change.

    Well guess what ? I'm finding out in a hurry that this core foundation of my support for Obamacare was a fantasy. I ? the individual healthcare purchaser (in New Hampshire) ? am about to get royally screwed.

    The message is coming through loud and clear, don't you think?

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Aww, does his little butt hurt? Welcome to the party, pal.

      1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

        yep. Fuck him.

      2. fish_remote   12 years ago

        This guy is crazy...Amanda Marcotte told me so!

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      ..."I concluded that some more Government involvement probably couldn't make it any worse."...

      This guy *IS* too stupid to buy his own insurance!

  17. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    America's Angry White Men

    Yet deny it we do, often by assuming that these outbursts are motivated by anything at all -- mental illness, access to guns, video games, whatever -- other than gender. We'd notice, of course, if it were poor black girls pulling the triggers in school shootings, or women who walked into their workplaces with semi-automatic guns firing, or all Asians or Jews or Latinos who were shooting up our movie theaters and political rallies. But white men? Must be some other factor.

    It seems so obvious, and yet so startling to see middle-class white American men, arguably the most privileged human beings on the planet (excluding, of course, hereditary aristocracies and the upper classes) fuming with such self-righteous outrage. (The comedian Louis CK gets this sense of privilege: "I'm a white man," he says, "How many advantages can one persona have?"

    So, to research my book, Angry White Men, I traveled the country and interviewed scores of these guys -- from "men's rights" activists who think white men are the victims of the new discrimination, to the "white wing" on the rightward fringes of the American political spectrum, who believe they are watching "our" country being snatched away from them.

    How hard could it possibly be to write a book that offers so little insight or originality?

    1. BardMetal   12 years ago

      "(The comedian Louis CK gets this sense of privilege: "I'm a white man," he says, "How many advantages can one persona have?""

      As a white man I never quite understood this sort of self-hating way of thinking.

      1. BardMetal   12 years ago

        I also don't know how you guys are able to add italics, or that little side bar to show that are quoting someone.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Start here. Someone else probably has a better reference but it's all about wrapping things in pointy brackets.

          1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

            No offense, Brett, I think W3 school is better. BardMetal (I won't use the abbr unless you piss me off), look up "blockquote", "italics", and "bold".

            Alternatively, if you're using Chrome as a browser, just download this, and you'll have a shortcut.

        2. Tonio   12 years ago

          They are called HTML tags. Google the phrase "basic html tags".

      2. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

        It's not really self-hating in his case. He's just a prick who realized that he can get away with anything he wants to, as long as he slams white men and observes liberal pieties once in a while.

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          Yes, this is a guy who did an entire comedy routine once about watching this toddler daughter bend over, spread her butt cheeks, and pop a turd out of her "little pink asshole." His words. I am not making this up.

          So yes, I'm sure he has to pray to the PC gods sometimes to not be a major controversy, much less getting nominated for Emmy awards.

  18. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    You Are Stupid and We Will Take the Things You Like and Pay For: Marcotte Edition

    Have you been seeing media stories sounding the alarm about how Obamacare is creating "rate shock" and causing people's health care costs to go up? Don't worry, folks[?]Basically, the plans that are getting cancelled are getting cancelled because they were, to be blunt, rip-offs. They had high deductibles, didn't cover shit, and often had caps. The new plans have to cover essential services and cannot have caps. Some of the rates the insurance companies sent out are, in fact, really high. But for many people who got those rates, if you go onto the exchange, you'll find that you can get a better rate for the same plan there. Many people will also qualify for subsidies. It's as simple as that[?]

    High rates are a problem and we need to fix them, but we can't even begin to have that conversation unless we agree to compare apples to apples. Wingnuts screaming about how unfair it is that men have to pay into a system that covers maternity care?as if men don't benefit from having been given birth to and play no role in the act that makes babies happen?is just noise and should be ignored

    If you like your plan, you can keep it are a misogynist teabilly.

    1. Sevo   12 years ago

      When a third party sticks its nose in a transaction between two willing actors, nothing good will come of it.

    2. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Shorter Marcotte ; "Dont believe your lying eyes."

    3. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

      Basically, the plans that are getting cancelled are getting cancelled because they were, to be blunt, rip-offs. They had high deductibles, didn't cover shit, and often had caps.

      But, you stupid cunt, that's exactly what I wanted. Let's see, $75 for a doctor visit whenever I need it and catastrophic coverage for, well, catastrophes... or, a crapton more in premiums every fucking month, plus a copay to see the fucking doctor anyway.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        No, you stupid prick, that's what you thought you wanted only because the free marked led you into false consciousness.

    4. font_of_stupidity   12 years ago

      as if men don't benefit from having been given birth to and play no role in the act that makes babies happen

      Marcotte seems to be arguing that men should also have a voice in whether or not his child gets aborted. I KNEW Marcotte was a Teathuglican Christfag!

  19. rts   12 years ago

    Environment: Waste production must peak this century

    But by extending current socio-economic trends to 2100, we project that 'peak waste' will not occur this century. Unless we reduce population growth and material consumption rates, the planet will have to bear an increasing waste burden.

    I've heard this story before...

    1. Zeb   12 years ago

      Well, some projections suggest that population will peak this century, so that may well happen.

      Do they really think that all trends are linear?

      1. Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

        No, they think all trends are exponential.

    2. R C Dean   12 years ago

      by extending current socio-economic trends to 2100, we should leave no doubt that we are complete idiots.

      1. rts   12 years ago

        Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976? If these trends continue... A-y-y-y!

  20. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Kimi Raikkonen says he may not take part in the final two races of the season if his Lotus team do not solve a financial dispute.

    He hasn't been paid all season he claims.
    Also, if Lotus finish just happen to finish behind Ferarri (his new team), they get more money next season.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      How's he going to make it rain with a different dozen women every week?

  21. Warty   12 years ago

    Since the TSA thread is dead, I'll repost my comment from there.

    Gawker's comments are everything I hoped for. But you knew that already.

    lampost451UGonecountry919161L
    pfft, look at that nub AR15. Carry handle? You need at least a holo sight, Surefire light, that angled fingerhold thing that's hot now, breacher impact tip to use the barrel like a hammer and like, 7 more mags. And laser. How can I defend myself without parity to the world's finest armed forces? Just because they're soldiers and I'm not doesn't mean I don't deserve military grade weaponry. Today 1:33pm

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Why? Why would you go there?

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        Some men pay women lots of money to dress up in latex and burn their genitals with cigarettes. I also go to Gawker sometimes.

        1. Zeb   12 years ago

          Whose genitals? I suppose it could go either way.

        2. Brett L   12 years ago

          But... okay.

        3. Dead or In Jail   12 years ago

          I want you to have my gay babies

    2. Zeb   12 years ago

      THe funny thing is, if I assume that that is not sarcastic, I pretty much agree with what it says. I should be allowed to own military grade weaponry. At least the sorts of thing that an infantry soldier would have.

      1. BardMetal   12 years ago

        Why be limited to just what an infantry soldier could carry?

        Would most other stuff be outreach simply because of the costs regardless of the law?

        And if I happen to be some billionaire in North Dakota with a thousand acres who wants to cruise around my property in an M1 Abrams tank, why the hell not?

        1. BardMetal   12 years ago

          That was supposed to be "wouldn't most other stuff be out of reach simply because of the costs regardless of the law?"

      2. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

        I'm having trouble telling one way or the other, to tell the truth. It reads like it's sarcastic, but whoever wrote it actually seems to know a bit about ARs, which is extremely rare amongst antigunners. So maybe it wasn't sarcastic? I don't know.

      3. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        My position on gun rights has been that -- at a minimum -- whatever a policeman is able to requisition, I should be able to own under the presumption that a policeman's duties directly overlap with all of a citizens rights and obligations in a free society.

        We can reasonably discuss what else I am entitled to purchase for my self-defense beyond these things, but that should be the starting point IMO.

  22. Sevo   12 years ago

    "Nasdaq is having more tech problems, which shut down trading today."

    See?! See?!

  23. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    You Are Stupid and For God's Sake Will You Just Get With the Program Already?!

    Since insurers have begun informing beneficiaries that their health care plans do not meet the new federal requirements of Obamacare, and will be either cancelled or significantly altered, the media has profiled countless middle class Americans who claim that the new health care law will force them to pay more for coverage.

    Deborah Cavallaro, for instance, a real estate agent from Los Angeles, was enrolled in an individual plan that cost her just $293 per month. Under Obamacare, Cavallaro says she'll have to pay over $400 for coverage she doesn't need or want. But a higher premium doesn't tell the whole story: while Cavallaro may spend more each month, she'll be buying more comprehensive insurance with fewer out-of-pocket costs, better benefits that will cover more and cost her less if she actually falls ill, and much more robust consumer protections.

    Their commitment to fiddle playing whilst all burns around them is most impressive.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      she'll be buying more comprehensive insurance with fewer out-of-pocket costs,

      citation needed. Many stories have higher OOP maximums and higher deductibles.

      1. a better weapon   12 years ago

        ...if she falls ill

        I believe she is qualifying that fact in a very poorly structured sentence.

        Real fucking stupid, but yeah, she thinks she can get away with it.

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      Again, when a third party sticks its nose in a transaction between two willing actors, nothing good will come of it.

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        COLONEL
        Whose
        side are you on, son?

        JOKER
        Our side, sir.

        COLONEL
        Don't you love your country?

        JOKER
        Yes,
        sir.

        COLONEL
        Then how about getting with the program?

        Why don't you jump on the team and come
        on in for the big win?

    3. R C Dean   12 years ago

      better benefits that will cover more

      treatment that it may be literally impossible for her to ever need?

      Does she have kids? If not, why is pediatric coverage a better benefit for her?

      Is she still in her child-bearing years? If not, maternity coverage, etc.

      Does she have, or is she planning to have, a drug problem? If not, substance abuse treatment, etc.

      1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        As I said in an earlier thread, if men have to pay for mammograms, then they should go to the doctor and get them. How can the doctor say no? Men can get breast cancer too. Tens of thousands of men getting mammograms would be a great political expression.

      2. Sevo   12 years ago

        R C Dean|11.1.13 @ 4:50PM|#
        "better benefits that will cover more"

        Hey, nobody said the benefits were for HER!

    4. Ted S.   12 years ago

      while Cavallaro may spend more each month, she'll be buying more comprehensive insurance with fewer out-of-pocket costs,

      As I said a few days ago, you can either pay a bit more each month, and then not pay the radiologist for your mammogram, or you can pay a little less each month and pay the radiologist directly.

      Yet there are politicians who will scream that if you allow women this choice, you want to take away their mammograms and have them die.

      1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        I offer free mammograms daily. My patients seem satisfied.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Tactile examination of moobs is not the same thing as mammograms.

        2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          I didn't realize your hands were radioactive.

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            I beat you to the punch! :-p

            Or would it be beating you to the fondle in this case?

            1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              We went in totally different directions with that joke. You didn't beat me to anything.

              1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

                Gentlemen, please! Stop beating each other.

                1. RightofCenter   12 years ago

                  +1 off

    5. GILMORE   12 years ago

      Its exaggerations like this that truly highlight how out of touch Right-Wingers are and how much they truly hate Women, The Poor, and Minorities.
      (tm)

    6. Juice   12 years ago

      just $293 per month

      This shit kills me. I see left and right people talking about these bills that I would not feel comfortable with like they are such a great deal.

  24. kinnath   12 years ago

    http://www.salon.com/2013/11/0.....us_better/

    It is difficult, and it will never be any other, to be an American and write in an American publication that the best thing to befall our great country would be a series of resounding defeats. It is upside down. It is bitter. And it is time.

    Patrick Smith used to write the "Ask the Pilot" column back with Salon was 50% liberal crap and 50% interesting stuff. He shows up every now and then to remind me just how bad Salon as become.

    1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

      Talks to establish a Trans-Pacific Partnership and an EU?U.S. Free Trade Agreement are both fated to end in tears, precisely because of their primary intent: to impose Anglo-American neoliberalism on everybody, or ? great phrase on the radio the other night ? "to dollarize the world economy."

      Sounds like Liberal crap.

      His hope for American foreign policy failure is...interesting. Depending on how that failure manifests, he might not like what America does. There would probably be more drone-bombings given that, contrary Smith's wishes otherwise, it has been a hugely successful policy.

      1. Metazoan   12 years ago

        Besides, plenty of people around the world seem to notice the value of "Anglo-American neoliberalism*"

        *what a silly phrase

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          "Neoliberalism" seems to be the replacement for "fascist" as a generic derogatory economic term.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        Yup. It's like T Sowell likes to say: the operative question when someone claims that a certain policy would have a "good" or "bad" outcome should be, "compared to what?"

      3. kinnath   12 years ago

        When he writes about airplanes, airlines, and seeing the world, he is mostly interesting. When he delves into politics, he can be annoying (he clearly tends liberal).

        But he has railed against security theater and other government overreach in the past

        1. Paul.   12 years ago

          security theater and other government overreach in the past

          When Bush was in office?

      4. kinnath   12 years ago

        Note that the core of his complaint here is American Cultural Imperialism. I have never seen actually state that we should become more European, so he doesn't generally come across as a whiney progtard.

        1. Paul.   12 years ago

          It's a fine line. Some people who bitch about American Cultural Imperialism are bitching about other countries wanting stuff like cars and movies, not so much our constant direct political interventions into their regional policies *cough*Hillary*cough*.

        2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Who cares, American culture is great -- if people abroad like Coke and other American cultural exports, who are you to say they shouldn't have them?

          We just need to get enough Hispanics in here to teach y'all how to dance, play a little merengue, and cook *good* food, then you're golden. (Oh, and perhaps to convince you to eschew your barbarous tongue in favor of something that slides off the tongue with more ease -- doesn't have to be Spanish; anything in the romance languages will do.)

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            Maybe we can switch to French, then the Acad?mie fran?aise can whip us into shape.

          2. BardMetal   12 years ago

            Romance languages are snooty. Stick to Germanic languages.

            1. Calidissident   12 years ago

              The only Romance language I would describe as snooty is French. And aside from English (just cause I've grown up used to it), Germanic languages really do just sound awful.

              1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                Agree with Cali. How do Spanish, Portuguese (my personal favorite romance language) or Italian sound snooty?

                I prefer romance languages for ease of use and how they sound; Anglos don't realize how counter-intuitive and strange their language is if you weren't born into it.

              2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                Argentine Spanish?

          3. Acosmist   12 years ago

            Having lived in Miami and heard that awful mongrel dialect of Latin, uh, no, Spanish is not the first, or thousandth, thing that would come to mind. Shrill language.

  25. Tim   12 years ago

    Will this shooter turn out to be another voices hearing maniac that should have been recognized months ago?

  26. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    More on ObamaCare:

    Take a quick look at those purple bars: that's the "most poverty-ish" group. Once you take into account the tax subsidies and cost sharing, the monthly premiums for the Bronze plan are $0. But what about that $11,500 deductible for a family of 4? How do you afford that if you're making $ 23k a year? Is that where cost sharing comes in? (I don't know these answers)? So let's check the silver plan: $36/month and a $ 1k deductible? That's not horrible coverage, actually, right? I think there must be a typo in these purple bars, though: the silver plan wouldn't have a higher deductible than the gold plan would, right? That would make no sense? I'm going to assume those two are reversed, and that it's really a $ 2k family deductible for the silver plan. $ 2k is probably a lot of money for those in this bracket ? probably not very "affordable" when you're only making $ 23k a year or less? We'll see, I guess?

    Someone really needs to explain to me what the natural constituency for ObamaCare is. It's not the poor (who are already covered by Medicaid). It's not the elderly (who are already covered by Medicare). It's not the lower middle class (whose subsidies are pitiful). It's definitely not the "young invincibles", the middle class, or the rich (who are all getting shafted to varying degrees).

    [Cont]

    1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      As far as I can tell, the only people who really stand to gain in an objective way are the very sick ? those with pre-existing conditions and such. But that group is very small. How do the Dems expect to make this work politically when the only group unambiguously in favor is so small, and the groups negatively affected so large? I know you all want to characterize this as another free shit bill that will never get repealed, but here the free shit is large and limited to a very small group which everyone else pays for. Everyone else is left status quo or worse off than they were before -- and this is without considering what happens to insurance markets once the death spiral hits.

      1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

        You seem to have missed the whole point of Obamacare and single payer. Both are a giant boot.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Right, but "Vote for Giant Boot" doesn't bring out the pom-poms and ticker-tape parades come election time.

          "Vote for Security" or "Vote for Free Stuff"? Sure. "Vote for 'Fuck you, we will make your decisions for you and give you shit'"... doesn't. And it seems like that is the strategy they are going for.

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            The people who voted for this thought they were fucking somebody else over.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              They don't think that anymore. Reality is a harsh mistress.

      2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

        As far as I can tell, the only people who really stand to gain in an objective way are the very sick ? those with pre-existing conditions and such. But that group is very small.

        Exactly. And probably the best way to solve the problem of the uninsurable with pre-existing serious problems would have been to extend Medicare to this group. It would have been a fairly minor act in its impact and cost, and it likely wouldn't have ended up being a very big deal. But no, the Bringer of Light wanted to "completely reform the American health-care system" rather than actually solve any problems.

    2. Tim   12 years ago

      Sign me up for the brown, runny plan.

    3. John   12 years ago

      There isn't one. That is why I keep telling the people who claim "the free shit brigade is going to make sure this stays forever" they are wrong.

      These assholes managed to fuck up millions of people's health insurance in a program that appears to benefit almost no one. The only constituency this thing has beyond the assholes who created it is the "but it is Obama's signature achievement" crowd. That is it.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        I will admit that a lot of people are finding out that the free shit fairy is skipping their house, and they are surprised.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        Exactly. Somehow, I don't see the electoral calculus of ObamaCare working out in the Dems' favor...

    4. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      "Someone really needs to explain to me what the natural constituency for ObamaCare is."

      Our asshole president's ego. He needed to prove he could do what Hillary couldn't.

      And that's it.

  27. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

    A U.S. drone strike in Pakistan has killed a Taliban leader, which may well sabotage peace efforts between Pakistan and the terrorist group.

    AMERICAN FUCK YEAH

    1. flye   12 years ago

      I think he was saying "kiss me, kiss me."

  28. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Ladies and gentlemen, I give you hard-hitting legal analysis from Jezebel commentators

    Every pro life meatbonnet should be forced to pay double the tax that people with brains do. The "pro life Moron Tax" should go directly to programs for low income mothers, benefits for babies and children and food programs in schools.

    Because the life they are forcing to be brought into this world doesn't end at birth and that precious little bundle of joy doesn't just feed/clothe/mind itself.

    But let's not charge the mothers pumping out babies.

    So, they can just overturn a ruling that a judge made because they don't like it? I wonder if they were all men. Total bullshit. I'm sick of this war on women.

    Yes, those male judges retired to their chambers, male gazed and harassed their female assistants and law clerks, and wrote an opinion to destroy wimmenz freedomz!

    When I see people with "we vote pro-life" stickers on their cars, I just want to ram into them as hard as I possibly can.

    ....just sayin.

    Someone needs help.

    Sorry, but that isn't someone "disagreeing with me." That's someone saying that they view me as a less than fully autonomous human being and that they take steps to actively limit my legal rights as such. So, yeah, I kind of want to ram them, too.

    Wow.

    1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      It probably speaks to my terrible online reading haunts that I am not fazed by any of this in the slightest.

    2. Metazoan   12 years ago

      MY BODY MY CHOICE unless it's any issue other than abortion.

    3. John   12 years ago

      Because the life they are forcing to be brought into this world doesn't end at birth and that precious little bundle of joy doesn't just feed/clothe/mind itself.

      We joke. But they really hate poor people. and poor children in particular. They are a bunch of upper class white women doing their best to make sure the poor don't breed.

      1. BardMetal   12 years ago

        Wasn't that always Planned Parenthood's mission? Can't have inferior people breeding.

    4. flye   12 years ago

      To be fair, there are a number of bumperstickers that make me want to run people off the road. "Coexist" is near the top.

      1. BardMetal   12 years ago

        This times a million. I fucking hate those smug little Coexist bumper stickers.

        1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

          I prefer this version.

          1. flye   12 years ago

            I went from not knowing that existed to an intense desire to own one in about 3 seconds. You should get a commission.

          2. BardMetal   12 years ago

            Nice

        2. font_of_stupidity   12 years ago

          "Loving Truth is my Religion" - Dalai Lama

          "We must be the change we wish to see in the world" - Ghandi

          "I'm Ready for HILARY!"

          These are three of my ram-worthy bumper stickers.

    5. Ted S.   12 years ago

      But let's not charge the mothers pumping out babies.

      Except of course those women only got pregnant because they got hit by a bus.

    6. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Because the life they are forcing to be brought into this world

      I didn't realize that pro-lifers were all rapists.

  29. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Meanwhile...in Russia...

    An elderly shepherd in Russia's North Caucasus survived a bear attack by fighting off the animal with kicks and headbutts, local television reported.
    Yusuf Alchagirov, 80, also tried to stab the bear when the beast approached him in a raspberry field in Kabardino-Balkaria, but said the animal knocked his knife away.
    The ensuing tussle culminated in the bear, enraged by the headbutt, throwing Alchagirov off a cliff and walking away, the man said on the regional affiliate of VGTRK television.
    Alchagirov was briefly hospitalized with bruises, bite wounds and four broken ribs. His family baked him three traditional pies to celebrate his survival.
    "I got off easy. It'd have killed me if I'd chickened out," Alchagirov said on television. The incident took place last week, but was not reported by federal media until Wednesday.
    Locals will not be hunting the bear down because they believe he was only playing with Alchagirov, Russian media said Wednesday.

    Anyone who lives to be 80 in Russia must be pretty hardcore.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Locals will not be hunting the bear down because they believe he was only playing with Alchagirov

      Obviously, the guy lived.

    2. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Those sure are some steely balls you have there, Yusuf.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Probably it was his giant balls hitting the bear in the snout that saved him.

    3. Rich   12 years ago

      Anyone who lives to be 80 in Russia must be pretty hardcore.

      Well, to be fair, they do get free healthcare.

      1. GILMORE   12 years ago

        They used to get free vodka. Thems were the days.

  30. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    British man lusts after model Kelly Brook; gets gets thrown out by wife after leaving comment on Daily Mail article

    A furious wife kicked her husband out of the family home after he offered to leave her and his kids for one night with Kelly Brook.

    The man made the remark in the comments section of the Mail Online over a feature showing photos of the model in sexy lingerie.

    He posted: "She is so sexy, I would leave my wife and kids for one night with her!"

    His comment sparked criticism from others with many giving it a negative rating.

    Unbeknown to him, one user was his wife who decided to post a message herself.

    She wrote: "My idiot husband forgot his comments are linked to his Facebook account.

    "You don't deserve our beautiful kids and I hope your brother has room on his sofa because I'm having the locks changed."

    I presume the wife is also English, so maybe not a complete loss?

    1. tarran   12 years ago

      Methinks that I need to make sure that my next marriage contract has an Ornella Muti rider so I cannot be sued for breach of contract. 😉

      1. CE   12 years ago

        What, you don't have a list of 5 celebrity free passes already?

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      I can't imagine why he'd want to leave her. Certainly not because she's a crazy bitch.

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        Brett - note that Kelly Brook is a British woman, then, if you haven't, take a look at her. Please modify any future comments you might have on British women thusly.

    3. Paul.   12 years ago

      A furious wife kicked her husband out of the family home after he offered to leave her and his kids for one night with Kelly Brook.

      I'd leave his wife and kids for one night with Kelly Brooke.

      1. JW   12 years ago

        Yeah, I think this falls under "Madam, if I were your husband, I'd drink the poison."

    4. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Is Sarcasmic British?

    5. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      I presume the wife is also English, so maybe not a complete loss?

      Might I recommend British men?

  31. Winston   12 years ago

    Okay so previously we were wondering about how come there is no Mencken at this time but I think Tom Friedman is somewhat close.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/mag.....et/306393/

    But this new democracy that thus arose in Germany was not, of course, a democracy in the American sense, Or anything colorably resembling it. It was founded upon no romantic theory that all men were natural equals; it was free from the taint of mobocracy; it was empty of soothing and windy phrases. On the contrary, it was a delimited, aristocratic democracy in the Athenian sense?a democracy of intelligence, of strength, of superior fitness?a democracy at the top. Its prizes went, not to those men who had most skill at inflaming and deluding the rabble, but to those who could contribute most to the prosperity and security of the commonwealth.

    1. Winston   12 years ago

      In the practical business of operating the state, in its units and as a whole, the final determination of all matters was plainly vested, not in politicians or in majorities, but in experts, in men above all politics, in the superbly efficient ruling caste. The professional mayor, aloof from party passions, unreachable by intrigues, remains today a characteristic German figure: the supreme triumph of intelligence over mere voting power. And one recalls, too, such typical representatives of the new order as Rudolf Virchow, for years a hard-working Berlin city councillor, and Wilhelm Koch, the greatest bacteriologist in the world and Germany's general superintendent of public health, her pre-Gorgasean Gorgas. Koch rid Germany of typhoid fever by penning up the population of whole villages and condemning whole watersheds. It was ruthless, it was unpopular, it broke down and made a mock of a host of 'inalienable' rights?but it worked.

      1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

        Wow, little Tommy is an unabashed authoritarian. And an idiot.

        Winston, I am going to assume your Mencken comment was sarcasm.

        1. Winston   12 years ago

          Um that quote is from Mencken.

          1. Suthenboy   12 years ago

            I stand corrected.

        2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          The quote was from Mencken, not Friedman. It was his 1914 article supporting the German side in WWI and praising Germany as in many ways the embodiment of Nietszchean ideals.

        3. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Winston is quoting Mencken's thoughts on Wilhelmine Germany (which were Friedman-like in their stupid).

          The way you can tell it's not Friedman is that there's no mention of golf courses, no tortured and/or mixed analogies, and the writing is not nearly vapid enough.

          1. Winston   12 years ago

            From this article I can see that Mencken was quite the writer. However his contrariness went a bit too far I think. I mean, contrary to his defenders, he isn't writing in the 1930s or 1940s and comparing Imperial Germany favorably to Hitler nor is he is applying a moral equivalency between Germany and the Allies or the US. He is outright praising Germany for behavior he attacked in the US because I guess they had Real TOP MEN unlike the Progressives or the Fundamentalists.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              Like I said, Friedman-like in its stupidity.

      2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        I have some more of Mencken's lesser-known gems here:

        http://reason.com/blog/2013/11.....nt_4103439

      3. Winston   12 years ago

        The last few paragraphs on WWI are quite something:
        I come to the war: the supreme manifestation of the new Germany, at last the great test of the gospel of strength, of great daring, of efficiency. But here, alas, the business of the expositor must suddenly cease. The streams of parallel ideas coalesce. Germany becomes Nietzsche; Nietzsche becomes Germany. Turn away from all the fruitless debates over the responsibility of this man or that, the witless straw-splitting over non-essentials. Go back to Zarathustra: 'I do not advise you to compromise and make peace, but to conquer. Let your labor be fighting, and your peace victory.... What is good? All that increases the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself in man. What is bad? All that proceeds from weakness. What is happiness? The feeling that power increases, that resistance is being overcome.... Not contentment, but more power! Not peace at any price, but war! Not virtue, but efficiency! ... The weak and the botched must perish: that is the first principle of our humanity. And they should be helped to perish! ... I am writing for the lords of the earth. You say that a good cause hallows even war? ... I tell you that a good war hallows every cause!'

        1. Winston   12 years ago

          Barbarous? Ruthless? Unchristian? No doubt. But so is life itself. So is all progress worthy the name. Here at least is honesty to match the barbarity, and, what is more, courage, the willingness to face great hazards, the acceptance of defeat as well as victory. 'Ye shall have foes to be hated, but not foes to be despised. Ye must be proud of your foes... The new Empire has more need of foes than of friends. Nothing has grown more alien to us than that "peace of the soul" which is the aim of Christianity.... And should a great injustice befall you, then do quickly five small ones. A small revenge is better than none at all.'

          Do we see again those grave, blond warriors of whom Tacitus tells us?who were good to their women, and would not lie, and were terrible in battle? Is the Teuton afoot for new conquests, a new tearing down, a new building up, a new transvaluation of all values? And if he is, will he prevail? Or will he be squeezed to death between the two mill-stones of Christianity and Mongol savagery? Let us not assume his downfall too lightly: it will take staggering blows to break him. And let us not be alarmed by his possible triumph. What did Rome ever produce to match the Fifth Symphony?

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      By all means, Tommy, let's have a new technocracy like the Chinese.

    3. Paul.   12 years ago

      a democracy of intelligence, of strength, of superior fitness

      We don't have that here.

    4. Winston   12 years ago

      Mencken on Bismarck:
      Did he wage a war upon the Catholic Church? Then it was because he saw all organized and autonomous religion, with its tenacity to established ideas and its hostility to reforms from without, as a conspiracy against that free experimentation which alone makes for human progress. Did he do valiant battle with the Socialists, the Liberals, the whole tribe of political phrasemongers and tub-thumpers? Then it was because he knew how puerile and how futile were the cure-alls preached by these quacks?how much all political advancement was a matter of careful trial and stage-management, and how little it was a matter of principles and shibboleths.

      1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        Thanks for posting these passages. Interesting. I'll have to read Mencken now.

        1. Winston   12 years ago

          Like how he glosses over the kulturkampf, the Anti-Socialist laws, the welfare state and ruling without a budget?

  32. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Rand Paul responds to Gattaca-gate

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says in a new interview that charges that he has plagiarized Wikipedia in his speeches are an effort by "haters" to bring him down.
    MSNBC's Rachel Maddow first accused Paul of lifting passages from Wikipedia's summary of the movie "Gattaca." Other reports suggest he has used Wikipedia's verbiage while describing the movie "Stand and Deliver."
    Paul said during an interview with Fusion that he sufficiently credited the movies rather than Wikipedia and that his speeches are not supposed to be meticulously footnoted academic papers.
    "We borrowed the plot lines from 'Gattaca,' the movie, and I gave credit to the people who wrote the movie," the potential 2016 presidential candidate said. "Nothing I said was not given attribution to where it came from.
    "I didn't claim that I created the movie 'Gattaca'; that's what's absurd about this."
    [...]
    Paul also targeted Maddow and others who have pushed the story.
    "The rest of it's making a mountain out of a molehill from people I think basically who are political enemies and have an ax to grind," Paul said. "This is really about information and attacks coming from haters. The person who's leading this attack -- she's been spreading hate on me for about three years now."

    Oh the pettiness of politics and punditry

    1. Warty   12 years ago

      bobfbell
      10/31/2013 11:46 AM EDT
      As much as I am opposed to Mr. Paul and his beliefs, to make a mountain out of this mole hill is a distraction. Let's continue to criticize him for his out of touch ideas and his zeal to return the nation to an agrarian Utopia where every man is independent and the invisible guiding hand of the free market heals all ills. If he wants to pirate a few quotes from Wikipedia, cut him some slack;
      LikeLiked by 3 readers ? Reply ? Share
      ? Report Abuse

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Not the fucking -gate suffix again!

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        "What would you call a scandal about water?"

        1. Swiss Servator, Burn a B??gg   12 years ago

          "Whitewater"

  33. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    New book about the 2012 campaign, *Double Down,* gets bad review from reporter who didn't read it and doesn't want anyone else to read it, either.

    http://thinkprogress.org/polit.....k-talking/

    1. Somalian Road Corporation   12 years ago

      CTRL-F'd article for mention of Kochtopus; was disappointed. I was under the impression that was editorially required at ThinkProgress.

  34. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Vatican investigating to see whether to declare a new saint:

    "This Italian teenager was only 15 years old. He was passionate about animals and computers. In October 2006, he passed away from leukemia. The teens name was Carlo Acutis, and in a matter of years, he could be declared a saint....

    "Carlo Acutis was not raised in a Christian environment. According to his parents and his classmates, the teen helped them better live out their faith, by earning their respect through his coherent approach to life....

    "One of the standout attributes Carlo had was his devotion to the Eucharist. He would go to Mass each day. He also used his computing knowledge to create a web page that assembled Eucharistic miracles from all across the world."

    http://www.romereports.com/pal.....nQfv1P9ypr

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      It's hard enough to keep track of all the saints you currently have, particularly when you start factoring in the ones from semi-autonomous churches in communion with the Pope.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        In honor of All Saints' day, here's a partial list:

        http://www.americancatholic.or.....yname.aspx

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          Totally disappointed in the description of St. Catherine of Siena, the ecstatic saint with an index finger relic.

          1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

            Well, the good news is that, depending on the outcome of this investigation, nerds may get their own patron saint.

            1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              I is confused you've already got a patron saint of lost causes (Jude) and a patron saint of virgins (Agnes), no? Why would nerds want for anything more?

              1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                Noted.

  35. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Michael Barone - Americans keep Moving to States With Low Taxes and Housing Costs

    "Timothy Noah, writing in the Washington Monthly, professes to be puzzled. He points out that people have been moving out of states with high per capita incomes -- Connecticut, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland -- to states with lower income levels.

    ""Why are Americans by and large moving away from economic opportunity rather than toward it?" he asks.

    "Liberals like Noah often decry income inequality. But the states with the most unequal incomes and highest poverty levels these days are California and New York. That's what happens when high taxes and housing costs squeeze out the middle class....

    "This leaves a highly visible and articulate upper class willing, in line with their liberal beliefs, to shoulder high tax burdens and a very much larger lower class -- many of them immigrants -- available to serve them in restaurants, landscape their gardens and valet-park their cars."

    http://townhall.com/columnists...../page/full

  36. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Rand Paul introduces Senate resolution saying Obama should "directly address the serious allegation whether his administration monitored the calls of Pope Francis or the conclave selecting the Pope."

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....questions/

  37. MJGreen   12 years ago

    Hahahahaha, I just now saw the context of Tony's "hit by a bus" comment. That is gold.

    GOLD, Jerry!

    Easily the funniest thing I've seen this week.

  38. Juice   12 years ago

    More part-time college professors are joining unions, which will help inflate that education bubble quite nicely.

    Psshh. There's no correlation between how much adjunct professors are paid and tuition. NONE.

  39. Agammamon   12 years ago

    "Turn your clocks back an hour on Sunday because the government told you to."

    No, because in *my* state, the government tells you not to.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!