Feds Raid Investigative Journalist Audrey Hudson, Seize Documents with Whistle Blowers' Information

Investigative journalist Audrey Hudson complained this week about a pre-dawn raid that federal and state agents conducted at her house. She claims that the authorities not only violated the terms of their search warrant, but that the whole incident was a deliberate intimidation tactic.
On Aug. 9, fully-armored agents from the Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, and Maryland State Police came to Hudson's house with a search warrant for unregistered weapons and a "potato gun." Several of Hudson's legal, registered firearms were seized.
A month later when she was allowed to retrieve her belongings, Hudson discovered that the agents had also seized five files, which contained personal notes from confidential interviews she had conducted with whistle-blowers. "In particular, the files included notes that were used to expose how the Federal Air Marshal Service had lied to Congress about the number of airline flights [they] were actually protecting against another terrorist attack," Hudson explained to the Daily Caller, which broke the story. A Fox report states that at some point in the ordeal, "the Coast Guard accessed her personal Facebook page."
Federal authorities claimed they took the files because some documents were labeled "For Official Use Only" and "Law Enforcement Sensitive." They later determined that Hudson had legally attained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act request.
"That explains the one file they took but does not explain why they took four other files with my handwritten and typed interview notes with confidential sources, that I staked my reputation as a journalist to protect under the auspices of the First Amendment of the Constitution," Hudson said. She told Fox News that "the search warrant did not allow them to walk out with those documents. They clearly violated the search warrant."
Explaining her belief as to why the incident occurred, Hudson said, "It's clearly intimidation." She added, "I want to make sure this doesn't happen to another reporter, because we can't just have the government coming into your house on a minor warrant and walk out with whatever files they please."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't know about you, but when the government raids an investigative journalist reporting on government corruption and incompetence, I always assume there's a valid explanation.
Also, that university wouldn't have given Kim Jong Un a doctorate in economics if they didn't think he knew what he was talking about.
Protecting their phoney baloney jobs is valid, right?
Harumph!
Crushing rats, kulaks and wreckers is a valid reason.
If Obama only knew what his officials were doing, he would sort this out in a heartbeat.
The emperor doesn't know!
Even their supposed made-up premise for the warrant must have had some kernel of truth and it is completely avoided in this article and the youtube. Why were they there looking for unregistered firearms and a potato gun??? I agree with the overreach, but at least she could offer a modicum of explanation aside from "conspiracy!"...
It's not a conspiracy when they don't bother to hide what they are doing.
Her husband cannot legally own firearms in corrupt, shithole Maryland b/c of a resisting arrest charge from the 90s. Somebody reported him with a firearm. That was the justification for the raid.
1986!
Basically, her husband was a convicted felon from a resisting arrest charge in the 80's.
Apparently he was a fire-arms enthusiast and became sloppy about keeping his hobby a secret.
Hence the raid to confiscate his firearms. The investigators claimed they stumbled across federal documents that were confidential and seized them opportunistically.
Fortunately some Federales just happened to be along to observe the execution of a search warrant to ascertain what weapons (if any) might be in the possession felon convicted several decades ago of violating a single state law.
How did he get a felony conviction for resisting arrest?
That's what the news says is on the search warrant. He pled guilty in 1986 to resisting arrest and is forbidden from owning firearms.
That is all I know.
But remember common sense gun restrictions like those in Maryland would never be abused by law enforcement.
I thought common sense had been made illegal in Maryland.
You can be shot on site just on suspicion of possessing it alone.
fully-armored agents ... came to Hudson's house with a search warrant for ... a "potato gun."
"Your Honor, we have reason to believe this woman possesses a toy that shoots slugs of raw potato."
"Very well, Officers. Here's your warrant. And I recommend wearing full armor in this case."
So when Obama leaves office will the excuse the major media gives for spending 8 years covering for his sorry ass be "we were terrified of what he might do to us if I were critical"?
And they will have learned their lesson, and be emboldened to righteously report on all the dailures of the subsequent republican administration.
You jest, but would it really surprise anyone if the administration was using extortion and blackmail against it's enemies and to keep the friendlies in line?
We've all see dubious prosecutions and baseless raids to disrupt the lives of people that aren't playing ball with them.
But no one wants to take the next logical step and say that these thugs are acting like thugs.
That also raising interesting possibilities for Sebelius's cryptic 'don't make me do this to" yesterday.
I thought it was 'don't do this to me'? Is there another cryptic clip from the white witch?
The only way that would surprise me is finding out that extortion was even necessary. Why extort someone when they will already lie for you?
You know, the craziest thing about Obama's cult of personality is that every reporter is seemingly on board with it, despite his administration treating them all like shit.
Just by random chance a few of them should be against Obama for personal animus or because the have ODD or as a counter positioning strategy. But none are - so maybe it's not all voluntary.
They are, amazingly, that conformist and stupid. Washington journalists are generally not very bright people.
We'll know soon enough when her sources are demoted, fired, and/or charged with espionage.
And get with the program, old school reporter lady who still uses a pencil. Anyone exposing the government will be investigated in an attempt to identify their sources. Has she not been keeping up with current events? Encrypt everything.
The new protocol for investigative journalists is to immediately scan the files, encrypt them and send them offshore with instrucs to take them public if the journalist is harrassed or detained.
Is? Or should be?
No, I'm pretty sure everyone has learned the lesson taught by Glenn Greenwald.
You're right, db, should be "should be."
But if they're doing nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide.
The cool thing is, once they're off U.S. Soil, they, and the person carrying them are fair game. Drone strike inbound.
DHS justified this under the FYTW Doctrine.
This country sucks a dick.
WTF was the Coast Guard doing on the raid?
Her husband, the dangerous felon, is a civilian employee of the U.S. Coast Guard.
I'd like to repeat ChrisO's question. I don't see how the two things are related. Do government agencies usually send someone along when state police serve a warrant on a civilian employee?
Because it was the biggest crime of the last forty years and everyone wanted to get in on the act.
Speaking of whistleblowers...So, maybe Snowden ends up in Germany?
Hans Christian Stroebele meets with Snowden in Russia
Only if the Green Party comes to power, which is less likely than Snowden getting a blanket pardon in the USA.
Visiting Germany would be a very risky move for Snowden; Germany and the US have an extradition treaty.
The... Coast Guard?
Nobody expects the U.S. Coast Guard!