Video Evidence Helps Get South Carolina Deputy Fired For an Off-Duty Arrest Attempt
Interesting story about how citizen video can help in getting justice when cops get out of line, out of Columbia South Carolina.
As reported by WISTV 10, a local TV station:
On October 7 at Buffalo Wild Wings on Devine Street, Derrick, 49, approached 23-year-old Brittany Ball, a female soldier at Fort Jackson, in an apparent attempt to calm her down after she became emotional.
But it's not clear why Derrick thought it was necessary to go out to his truck get his handcuffs, gun and badge and return to the bar, where he handcuffed her and began shouting at her.
WIS first heard last week that video of the incident existed and that it was likely going to be a serious problem for Derrick.
On Tuesday, WIS learned that Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott decided to fire Derrick, apparently for violating department policy in handcuffing and detaining Ball….
"It made me angry, and then it made me sick and disgusted that any law enforcement officer would act that way, particularly a Richland County deputy," Lott said Wednesday during a news conference. "There's absolutely no excuse for his behavior and what he did that night. He interjected himself into something that he should of never gotten involved in."
Citizen video for the win:
The video, showing Derrick shouting at Ball as he yanked and twisted the handcuff chains, sparked outrage from many who saw it.
It also played a role in a decision by Columbia police arriving at the scene to order Ball released while they took Derrick into custody, charging him with assault and battery.
Sheriff Lott may be disgusted now, but he wasn't at the start:
Last week, Lott disagreed with the police action, saying Derrick had authority to make an arrest and suggesting Ball may have been resisting.
Police State USA reports allegations that the off-duty deputy's interactions with Ball began with an attempt to pick her up, but those allegations are not specifically sourced.
The citizen video in question:
See Jess Remington here on Hit and Run earlier this week on why it's a good idea for cops to wear cameras recording what they do at all times. Maybe we need to apply that to off-duty cops as well.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Journalists r smrt!
To be fair, they were quoting the police chief, so it may have been an accurate quote. Nobody uses (sic) anymore since the young people fresh out of grad school don't know what it means...
I am pretty sure he didn't spell it wrong in a quotable way at a news conference.
I've heard that phrase enunciated in such a way that that it is very clearly "of" instead of "have". This being South Carolina, it wouldn't stun me if that were the case. In which case the journalist may have transcribed it as such in the interest of accuracy. Of course, this being South Carolina, the journalist may not have known it was non-standard or that "have" would have been the proper usage.
As a South Carolinian I can testify to the veracity of this statement. Also, our newspapers don't have editors.
Ha! As a SC native of sorts, I know whatcha mean.
Good grief, there is no proper form of pronunciation for a colloquialism. The reporter should've transcribed it into 've' not 'of'.
Which is why it seems that the reporter did make an error.
Irregardless, its not journalist's job to make these kind of corrections.
Irregardless
icwutudidthar
That's not the journalist...
Hopefully, he'll try and get it right next time.
Well at least they don't split the infinitive.
Wait, are you saying the cops had a different story before they discovered there was video? I'm stunned.
Yeah, something tells me that knee jerk reaction would have been the only reaction had that video evidence been erased in a timely fashion.
To paraphrase sarcasmic: people who are hungry for power seek positions of power
Uh, sarcasmic offers similar sentiments, but you're paraphrasing me, and I WANT APPROPRIATE CREDIT. You'll be hearing from my lawyer. ProL, sue him!
Pro Lib is your lawyer? That's an awful choice. He won't even practice space law.
It was either him or Barry Zuckerkorn, and ProL was cheaper.
Yeah, but Barry actually skews younger than Pro Lib.
You know, with juries and such.
He is busy working on my lawsuit against the Reason Foundation for Trademark infringement.
Image of ProL "working".
Needs more pythons.
"All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptable. Such people have a tendency to become drunk on violence, a condition to which they are quickly addicted."
--Frank Herbert
Yeah, but how do we know who is right, when a heroic second responder uses excessive force to arrest a heroic defender of our freedoms, who then resists arrest and endangers officer safety? I guess we criticize the guy who didn't follow procedures by making sure no civilian interlopers were recording the proceedings?
I guess this is good. Next step is to actually bring charges against these people. You know.... like assault, trespassing, robbery, harassment... the kind of stuff the plebs can get.
guess I didn't read it all. taking a lap.
Holy crap. The sheriff actually doesn't understand what the law allows his officers to do?
Dude, most cops don't understand what the law allows them to do. This is not new.
Not all of them are accomplished legal scholars like Dunphy...
What happened to our Morgan Fairchild humping, surfing god anyway? Haven't seen him in a while. Been nice around here.
The only reason he had time to comment was because he was out on disability. I assume he's back to work, milking the taxpayers of a several thousand dollars worth of overtime every month.
He's too busy have adult conversations with the other intellectuals at Volokh.
...or sending perverted texts to 11 year old girls?
Cops don't care what the law allows them to do, because as a practical matter it doesn't matter. They do what they want. Incidents like this where they get fired are outliers. 99.9999999% of the time they get away with it, and they know it.
Indeed. And they pretty much only occur (though still rarely) in VA, NC, or SC, and a few other states with incredibly weak public employee unions.
That can't be right - Southern cops are tobacco-chewing hillbillies who lynch uppity minorities on their days off and speak with an accent. As opposed to the professionals in NY and California where all those "social liberals" make sure police abuses don't happen. Don't you remember from the 60s how progressives deeply oppose police brutality?
Cops is cops.
Maybe there would be fewer complaints about cops in the North if they spent more time chasing bootleggers down country roads and less time tasing city-dwellers. You never hear of them Duke boys getting tasered, because they can't be outrun.
Have to agree with "cops is cops."
An off duty Seattle officer gets in a fight at a bar. On duty cops called. Both guys (including mr. off duty) are handcuffed, but only the "civilian" is laid out on the ground. Mr. off duty is walking around and then seen on video kicking the head of the cuffed and prone guy.
There was a trial. He was acquitted.
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/115682874.html
Was that at least in *South* Seattle?
Not sure, but probably.
Hey, wait! I see what you did there...
Adjust your sarcasm detector.
Don't anyone forget that Leon Lott is the proud commander of the "Peacemaker" tank...
As for the "of" instead of "have," this is so typical of The State newspaper. Truly a rag. I lived in Columbia for years. I also like how they specified that Brittany Ball is a "female soldier." We might have been confused if they had just identified someone with a woman's name as a soldier without making the connection for us.
I read a story in The State the other day about a "stand your ground" case that recently occurred in Columbia. It was so poorly written, I couldn't even understand what happened.
The journalism school at the University of South Carolina used to claim, back in the day (the 80s) that it was a top-ranked J school, whatever that is supposed to mean. That was my original major (at USC) and it was a shite program. I assume the very worst grads of that program are getting jobs writing for The State which explains something.
Here's the stand your ground article: Hyperlink Code
The comments to that article are pretty sweet.
Are you able to make sense of what actually happened?
Was dead kid following the homeowner's daughter home along with the..."women thugs"...? I guess that's part of what's in question. It seems like they tried to present both sides of the story rather than gather any facts.
Exactly, like the reporter isn't there to make sense of things at all.
I'm sure the part where she's gasping in pain to the point she can't scream really got him off. His inch-and-a-half erection was mighty indeed.
The only reason he was charged was because he was out of uniform.
You can also hear a bystander shout "He's been drinking alcohol!" in the video.
Eh, he was charged because of the video, and because he's a Richland County deputy who was acting in Columbia (city) police territory. Jurisdictional issues (even though Columbia is within Richland Co.)
There was also that police officer in Charlotte who was charged for killing the former FAMU player. Police unions nationwide are shocked and dismayed.
Kudos to the good samaritan for recording this only for the victim's benefit who apparently was a stranger.
Police State USA reports allegations that the off-duty deputy's interactions with Ball began with an attempt to pick her up, but those allegations are not specifically sourced.
STOP RESISTING MY ADVANCES! STOP RESISTING MY ADVANCES!
It also played a role in a decision by Columbia police arriving at the scene to order Ball released while they took Derrick into custody, charging him with assault and battery.
Hey, hats of to Columbia police. If I could buy you a beer, I would.
They could take the deputy's beer - he left it on the table unconsumed (tho it was probably his second or third).
why it's a good idea for cops to wear cameras recording what they do at all times. Maybe we need to apply that to off-duty cops as well.
Off duty cops are technically civilians. Seems like a dangerous and unconstitutional precedent to require civilians to wear government cameras at all times.
Well then, they should be subject to EXACTLY the same treatment as other civilians from law enforcement and the courts.