Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Stop Worrying and Learn to Love Technology

From cell phones to 3D-printed guns, technology keeps making the world better.

John Stossel | 9.25.2013 12:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Invent something and the first thing that goes through some people's minds -- especially politicians' minds -- is what might go wrong.

3D printers now allow you to mold objects right in your living room, using patterns you find online. It's a revolutionary invention that will save time, reduce shipping costs and be kind to the earth.

But what critics see is: guns! People will print guns at home! Well, sure.

On TV, Rachel Maddow sneered about "a well-armed anarchist utopia, where everybody fends for themselves with stupid-looking plastic guns. … It's a political effort to try to do away with government."

Do away with government? If only we could do away with some! Big-government politicians and their cheerleaders in the media focus on threats posed by innovation because they fear loss of control. They move to ban things.

In Texas, Cody Wilson used a 3D printer to make a plastic gun. He called it "the Liberator" and posted its specs on the Internet. The State Department then ordered him to take the specs down. He did. But by then, 100,000 people had downloaded it.

Wilson takes pride in pointing out how his gun shows that gun "control" is an illusion. Being able to print a gun in your own home will render laws against purchasing guns unenforceable and irrelevant.

"I'm your full-service provocateur," Wilson told Kennedy, my TV show's correspondent. "Here's the printed gun. I'm not here to make you feel better about it. I'm here to say, 'Look, this space is occupied. Deal with it.'"

The "Liberator" didn't work well. It broke before Kennedy could fire a shot. However, printed guns will improve over time. Wilson's point: "prohibiting this is no longer effective."

Technological innovation constantly threatens centralized authorities.

Now we take the Internet for granted, but when it first became popular, people worried that it would mainly be used by terrorists, child molesters and money-launderers.

"Smash the Internet!" said a cover story in the conservative magazine Weekly Standard, illustrated with a sledgehammer smashing a computer screen.

Even today, after Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, eBay, Yelp, Craigslist, WebMD, YouTube and more have clearly made our lives better, Luddites in the media fret about problems.

"The Internet Is Making Kids Stupid" says PC Magazine. CBS's Bob Schieffer whines that in the absence of supervising editors, "ignorance travels as rapidly as great ideas."

There's some truth behind these complaints. The Internet does make some people isolated. It does allow ignorant ideas to spread. But so what? It also creates new forms of human interaction and allows the crowd of users to correct ignorant mistakes.

Schieffer is prematurely old, but even hip novelists like Dave Eggers and Jonathan Franzen worry about the Net. Eggers' latest novel suggests it creates "unnaturally extreme" needs, and a Franzen essay attacks "technoconsumerism." Comedian Louis CK gets laughs by worrying that cell phones just keep us distracted -- but not really happy or sad -- until we die. He'd prefer his kids didn't have them.

They are right that any activity can become a time-waster, but to all the fearmongers I say, stop whining! Overwhelmingly, innovation brings us good things. It's even changed the way Americans find love. A University of Chicago study says 35 percent of new marriages now start online.

We don't think twice about miracles like computer dating or email or the fact that, today, most everyone in the world has access to all the world's knowledge on a little phone. We take it for granted that we can put a piece of plastic into a wall and cash will come out -- and the count is always accurate. Government couldn't do that. Government can't even count votes accurately.

In a free market, a symphony of desires comes together, and they're met by people who constantly rack their brains to provide better services and invent solutions to our desires.

It's not a few people desiring guns that I fear. It's government getting in the way of all those new possibilities.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cop Shoots Puppy in the Head Despite Owner's Pleas With Police

John Stossel is the host and creator of Stossel TV.

PoliticsTechnologyScience & TechnologyCultureCivil Liberties3D PrintingRegulation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (91)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. DEATFBIRSECIA   12 years ago

    Is this the same guy who said we don't have to worry about NSA spying?

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Not exactly that. He said he worries less about that and more about government subsidizing alpacas.

      1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

        Actually he said the War on Drugs is worse you disingenious turd.

      2. Drake   12 years ago

        I thought food trucks were the primary thing to worry about?

        1. anon   12 years ago

          No, no, we need tire pressure monitoring systems mandated on all vehicles by 2009.

    2. Carolynp   12 years ago

      If you don't trust the source, go ahead and worry about technology. And gravity! And microbiology! And a whole list of other scary things...be afraid, be very afraid.

  2. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

    My familiarity with technology is what breeds my contempt for it.

    It is too often bent to the will of some egotistical programmer who thinks they know better than I do how I should be using my stuff.

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: UnCivilServant,

      My familiarity with technology is what breeds my contempt for it.

      "Back in my days, we used to open our cans of corned beef with our bear hands and not these fancy-schmancy electric can openers! Not that I don't know how to use them, of course!"

      1. Cyto   12 years ago

        Well of course, if you have bear hands pretty much anything can be opened by hand.

        1. OldMexican   12 years ago

          Re: Cyto,

          Well of course, if you have bear hands pretty much anything can be opened by hand.

          Yes, but would you then spit in the woods? Huh? Huh?

      2. anon   12 years ago

        Where does one obtain these bear hands outside of bear hunting season?

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          On the Internet, of course.

          1. anon   12 years ago

            Hey! You can't trick me! I'm not buying those Nigerian Bear Hands again!

            1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

              Now who's scared of technology?

            2. waffles   12 years ago

              If you had used Google, you'd know there are no Nigerian bears.

    2. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      As an egotistical programmer...

      Not sure where I was going with that.

    3. kinnath   12 years ago

      Make it yourself then.

      1. Carolynp   12 years ago

        I was thinking the same thing: open source, argument settled.

    4. Fluffy   12 years ago

      It is too often bent to the will of some egotistical programmer who thinks they know better than I do how I should be using my stuff.

      What you have to realize is that the programmer is used to dealing with dumbasses.

      I've designed applications for users in more than one industry, and the user is almost always ONLY interested in duplicating their current workflow in a new technological wrapper.

      The whole concept of using the computer to replace what a human being does escapes most people EVEN NOW. Even Xers and Millennials. So the programmer, who knows what technology can do, has to step on the desires of the user, who (often enough to be critical to the outcome) doesn't.

      1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        Works the other way too. The engineer/programmer has no idea what else I'm doing at the time and doesn't take that into consideration.

        Had a programmer want me to run through drop-down menus while flying an aircraft on a bomb run.

        1. PD Scott   12 years ago

          "Isn't that what the autopilot is for?"

          1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

            The autopilot can't look out the window and tell me if I'm being shot at.

            1. neoteny   12 years ago

              Sure it can; it just requires sensors & some SW to process the incoming data.

              Which I'm sure is happening on various warplanes; probably doesn't even require that the pilot checks the "evasive action" selection box.

              Of course there's an arms race going on between the guns, bullets & targets.

              1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

                🙂

                Got all that. Doesn't mean I don't look outside. Surviving combat is never about having one tool (Romulan Cloaking Device) that provides total security. It's a culmination of many individual efforts each bringing it's own little piece to lower the probability of dying. It's all about reducing probability.

                Sensors are only good for the threats they were designed to detect. One looking for a tracking radar does nothing to defend against an IR threat. Having a system that does everything costs way too much and would be frowned upon by many commenters here for that reason.

          2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            Isn't that what the autopilot is for?

            That drunk!?

      2. fold_left   12 years ago

        Gen "Z", the Xers kids, are another thing altogether, IMO. I think a lot of them don't make much of a distinction between the digital world and the "real" world.

  3. OldMexican   12 years ago

    CBS's Bob Schieffer whines that in the absence of supervising editors, "ignorance travels as rapidly as great ideas."

    I saw Stossel's show last week, and that quote from Schieffer made me laugh out loud. Schieffer laments that because of the internet we don't get only the information we should receive from our more knowledgeable betters - like him, for instance.

    1. Raven Nation   12 years ago

      I don't remember the details now, but about 18 months ago, Schieffer was being interview by someone and some story came up that had been making big waves in conservative & libertarian circles. Schieffer had not even heard of it, presumably because it had not bene reported in his favorite places.

    2. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

      In the good old days, we relied on the mainstream media to let ignorance drown out great ideas.

  4. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    Technology and scientific advance have done great things for humanity in general and could take us to something very like a post-scarcity society. We need to do everything we can to encourage such advances. Really, I don't entirely understand why the left is so often technology-adverse, as it's the obvious solution (in the long run) to their stated concerns about poverty.

    1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      The concerns aren't about poverty, but envy and control. Everyone being poor together would be just fine.

      Neo-ludditism should get interesting in the near future, especially with 3d printing and bitcoin. Can't wait to see the progs start railing against those.

      Reading Postrel's "The Future and Its Enemies" right now, very interesting that some of the fights from '96 are still very relevant. It's like the crypto fights paused, but are right back.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Yeah, I agree. That's why I said I don't "entirely understand."

        I thought VP's division between stasists and dynamists was a useful one for some purposes. I found that more interesting than her later focus on aesthetics.

        1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

          I'd say it's very useful, really shows up a lot today.

          It's funny, too, with things like a journalist shield law being debated. Which would serve entirely to protect the incumbent media.

          Oh yea... and all these new technologies will take away JERBZ!!

          1. kinnath   12 years ago

            New technologies always make winners and losers out of different kinds of people.

            New technology tends most often to make losers out of the people at the bottom of the stack. Work that involves rote repetition is a prime target for automation.

            Even worse, it makes winners out of the nerds and dweebs that design and build and use technology. That offends both brute labor and talentless philosophers.

            1. anon   12 years ago

              it makes winners out of the nerds and dweebs that design and build and use technology.

              Did nobody tell them that nerds and dweebs have been winning for at least the past 100 years?

              1. kinnath   12 years ago

                It is something that most of them start to figure out a short while after departing compulsory education at the age of 18 or so.

              2. Brett L   12 years ago

                And then they marry hot chicks and make pretty, vapid children. Except the Dysons. Their genius appears to breed true.

                1. kinnath   12 years ago

                  My kids are not vapid. We made them live a "lord of the flies" type existence from a very early age.

            2. np   12 years ago

              Even worse, it makes winners out of the nerds and dweebs that design and build and use technology.

              The meek geeks shall inherit the earth.

              1. Anomalous   12 years ago

                "...but not its mineral rights."
                - J. Paul Getty

              2. Lord at War   12 years ago

                In a 3 X 6 plot, just like everyone else.

    2. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

      It's odd since a dominant strain of Progressivism is very fond of Technocracy, where experts determine how much salt you take in. I guess they're only opposed to technology held outside the government.

    3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      I don't entirely understand why the left is so often technology-adverse, as it's the obvious solution (in the long run) to their stated concerns about poverty.

      Technology requires energy. Energy kills Gaia.

      1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        They also have some weird romantic notions about blacksmiths, buggy whip manufacturers, and manual labor. Technology sometimes makes an unskilled or low-skilled job redundant, and that's just horrible to the left because they think everyone should own their job and get to do it forever no matter how pointless it is. The only proper way to get rid of a job isn't with cold heartless technology, but via a committee of cold heartless bureaucrats.

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

          It really is a philosophy that having a job is all that matters. It does not matter if it is an awful job that is low skill low wage, it only matters that they can say that that person has a job.

          1. neoteny   12 years ago

            It does not matter if it is an awful job that is low skill low wage

            Yes it does matter that the job should provide a living wage.

          2. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

            They also think that work has inherent value, no matter what is being put to. They find the idea that not all work produces similar value emotionally distressing.

            1. Gorilla tactics   12 years ago

              it's a vestige from their marxist days, which in turn is a leftover from Adam Smith (he was wrong about the labor theory of value).

        2. mtrueman   12 years ago

          I'm not sure where this idea that leftists are technologically adverse comes from. Where Leftists have held the most sway, Stalinist Russia and Maoist China, there was a positive mania to develop technology. Tens of millions died as a result of the enforced industrialization of agriculture. I'm a little surprised that readers here need to be reminded of this.

    4. mtrueman   12 years ago

      "I don't entirely understand why the left is so often technology-adverse"

      Can't answer for the left, but my problem with technology is that it almost invariably leads to intensification of energy use, and greater division of labour.

      And I'm not convinced that technology will lead to a post-scarcity society. We already produce more food than at any other time in human history, or pre-history, yet the number of undernourished has also never in history been higher: almost a billion or one in eight, I believe. Scarcity of food is not a technological problem. It's a problem of distribution, even, most notably, in India which has enjoyed relative peace, a functioning democracy and Liberal economic policies for decades.

  5. OldMexican   12 years ago

    The Internet does make some people isolated. It does allow ignorant ideas to spread.

    For a moment there, I thought that Stossel was talking about high school...

    1. anon   12 years ago

      I think it's an argument worth exploring. We can point to a million terrible ideas that just won't die today.

      Good ideas usually displace bad ideas though, unless it's politics we're talking about.

  6. Raven Nation   12 years ago

    OT: it's from Team Red's cheerleading news source but, if true, the Libyan fallout just gets better:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....urces-say/

    1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      What difference, at this point, does it make?

    2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      I looked at the comments.. my eyes burn. TEAM is in force.

      OBAMA took the richest country in the world, with the most freedom and turned into a 3rd world Marxist Regime.

      This guy doesn't realize that every president has been doing this for decades. Obama just makes it obvious because if his lack of leadership abilities and overall incompetence.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        If the GOP weren't complicit, they'd have gutted Leviathan when they were in total control of the government from 2001 - 2007.

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

          Exactly. I really don't know how these TEAM RED guys can honestly make the argument that the majority of repubs would actually cut anything if in charge. They are as big a statists as TEAM BLUE when they have the power.

        2. Drake   12 years ago

          Yep. The GOP was just slightly lighter on the government accelerator. Hardly a big sales pitch.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            The only thing they have in their favor right now is that some of them are making the right noises. And those are mostly people who weren't around for the last round of Full Republican Statism. Even so, I don't trust the current party leadership even a little bit, and the fact that Boehner and McConnell are the GOP leaders in the houses shows that the libertarian arm ain't calling the shots.

            1. anon   12 years ago

              Even so, I don't trust the current party leadership even a little bit, and the fact that Boehner and McConnell are the GOP leaders in the houses shows that the libertarian arm ain't calling the shots.

              If I were a Republican congressman/senator, it'd give me great joy to tell either of them to go fuck themselves.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                I think I'd have custom T-shirts made to that effect.

              2. Carolynp   12 years ago

                Looks like that is precisely happening.

            2. Raven Nation   12 years ago

              Yeah, it's interesting the level of disillusionment with the GOP on the part of Republican voters; not total or even majority but certainly high. I think there were studies in 2006 that a lot of the reason the Ds won congress was b/c Repub voters stayed home. I think it was also a factor in some of the support for RP last year. Sadly, a lot of Republican voters think that re-inventing the party means voting for someone with a mentality life Santorum's.

              On the other side of the aisle, I don't see a lot of Democrats criticizing Obama or giving up on the party. Having said that, the public attacks on Bush came AFTER he left office so maybe that will happen with Obama.

              1. PM   12 years ago

                I don't see a lot of Democrats criticizing Obama or giving up on the party.

                To the extent you ever do, it will be to take him to task for failing to seize enough power and ram through his will on this unwashed den of swine who never deserved his excellence. What has Obama done that would piss off his supporters? I mean you're always gonna have the "Why the fuck didn't he burn down the white house, nationalize the oil companies, send the teabaggers to reeducation camps and publicly hang the Banksters?!?!" types. But in terms of what is reasonably achievable for a president, there's not much to criticize him on if you're the type of totalitarian scumbag for whom the advancement of the state above all else constitutes "progress".

                1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

                  PM, could you please remove your email address link from your username. It is messing with everyone's reasonable. Replace it with a link to a website or something.

                  Thanks.

        3. Carolynp   12 years ago

          I'm sick of this argument. Bottom line: Obamacare/socialized medicine is the far end of opposite of what libertarians want. If we have any hope of getting rid of it, we must back Republicans. Doesn't make me happy as a twenty five year libertarian, it's simply the truth. Last year many of us blindly repeated this tripe about how there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats and guess what? Next week Obamacare is slated to begin. That's the freaking ballgame for statists. You gave them the win because you want to bitch about things that are unimportant. Socialized medicine here in Oregon sends out questions about whether or not you own a gun and asks about your sexual practices, among other things. Do you think government under the Republicans was intrusive? You ain't seen nothing yet. So, hey, keep voting for Democrats because they seem young and cool, but quit whining about big government when you're complicit in your own demise.

  7. Being Waterboarded   12 years ago

    I see the fear of the internet by our betters as analogous to the fear of printing Bibles in languages other than Latin by the Catholic church in the middle ages. Ignorance of the masses makes for a more malleable populace. The reformation of the church is similar, in some respects, to the liberation of information (owed largely to the internet) in many middle eastern countries and its correlating effect on civil disobedience and uprising. It does not good to those in power for their subjects to be learned - regardless of whether the powerful are Popes or Emirs.

    1. Being Waterboarded   12 years ago

      *It does no good

    2. Carolynp   12 years ago

      That is a perfect analogy.

  8. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

    Have I mentioned I like Stossel?

    1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      He is fabulously mustachioed.

      1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        And a snappy dresser.

  9. PM   12 years ago

    Inb4:

    "ARPANET! WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW LIBERTARDIANS!!! HURRRR DURRRR"

    I think Tony's too preoccupied with the gay marriage thread. Shreek, you up to it?

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      Shriek is too busy lobbying to turn health insurance companies into public utilities to bother popping in here.

      BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT AUTHENTIC CLASSICAL LIBERALS DO

  10. Brian   12 years ago

    "The Internet Is Making Kids Stupid" says PC Magazine. CBS's Bob Schieffer whines that in the absence of supervising editors, "ignorance travels as rapidly as great ideas."

    Yeah, it must have been great living in the good ol' days before the internet, when no one was ignorant, and everyone agreed on everything important. You know: like during the red scare, before and during the civil rights movement, Vietnam, etc. Not an ignorant thought or ill-informed voter to be found in those days.

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Brian, could you please remove your email address link from your username. It is messing with everyone's reasonable. Replace it with a link to a website or something.

      Thanks.

    2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Brian, could you please remove your email address link from your username. It is messing with everyone's reasonable. Replace it with a link to a website or something.

      Thanks.

      1. Brian   12 years ago

        Really? In what way? How do I see this effect?

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

          In the list of most recent commentators it replaces your name with a bunch of random numbers and symbols that span the entire bottom of the page. This just started on the weekend.

          I don't know what the squirrels did but something has changed.

      2. Lord at War   12 years ago

        Smilin Joe-

        How much is it worth to you?

  11. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

    Apparently there are still people out there mucking up Reasonable with their email associated monikers.

    1. neoteny   12 years ago

      What's this Reasonable you guys keep talking about?

      1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        It's an extension for Chrome written by, I believe, one of the commentariat, to interact with Reason and provide more blogging enjoyment.

        It's initial purpose was to block trolls back in the Mary Stack/White Indian days but it does other things like highlighting the new comments each time you reload so you can immediately see new responses. It provides a history box that shows what threads you've responded to and it shows who the last five commenters were (that's the part that is fucking up BTW). It provides link quote bold italic and strike buttons so you don't need to type in the ASCII codes to get bold and italic... You can unthread the comments if you'd rather see them by time stamp...

        Once you use it, you'll miss it if you don't have it.

        1. neoteny   12 years ago

          Thank you.

        2. cmace   12 years ago

          Where can I get this reasonable?

    2. Brian   12 years ago

      Apparently there are still people out there mucking up Reasonable with their email associated monikers.

      That's always my favorite response to a bug: just tell the users to use around it.

  12. lap83   12 years ago

    I hate luddites, don't get me wrong. But I'm not in the "all technology is indisputably awesome" camp either. Such an absolute statement about a broad subject is going to be severely lacking in critical thought or wisdom.

  13. Carolynp   12 years ago

    I keep wondering why we could possibly still be debating gun control. If I can make it in my home with my handy dandy printer, you aren't going to prevent me from having a gun. Debates over.

  14. amyebrinton   12 years ago

    my buddy's half-sister makes ,$77, every hour on the computer. She has been unemployed for 8 months but last month her income was ,$21889, just working on the computer for a few hours. Check Out Your URL....

    http://www.Works23.com

  15. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    No, there's definitely a sea change and a power struggle going on. Who will prevail is anyone's guess, but the real opportunity is with the limited government folk. There's some weariness with the way Washington operates, even among nonconservatives and nonlibertarians.

  16. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

    The fact that libertarian Republicans are being elected is a good sign. Paul and Cruz are obviously positioning themselves for Presidential runs in 2016, and, depending on how the primary shakes out, a Paul / Cruz (or Cruz / Paul) ticket isn't a fantasy.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court

Autumn Billings | 6.5.2025 3:05 PM

Nathan Fielder's 737 Stunt Involved Elaborate Workaround of Ridiculous 1,500-Hour Rule

Christian Britschgi | 6.5.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!