Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Brickbat: Justice Is Blind

Charles Oliver | 7.19.2013 6:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The St. Louis police department fired officer Rory Bruce after he was caught on video punching a handcuffed suspect. Prosecutors charged him with assault. But a judge found him not guilty of that charge without ever looking at the video. Now, Bruce and his union are fighting to have his job restored.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Police Photographer Who Released Photos of Boston Bomber Manhunt Reportedly Relieved of Duty

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

PolicyCivil LibertiesPolice AbusePublic UnionsCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (34)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. WTF   12 years ago

    But a judge found him not guilty of that charge without ever looking at the video.

    Due process was served, he was charged by DA, totality of the circs, NO double standard.
    hth

  2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

    "Police officers have to make split second decisions in life and death situations and I don't think that folks over at the Circuit Attorney's office or folks up in Internal Affairs should second guess them based on their brief impression of a video tape," says Jeff Roorda with the SLPOA. "It doesn't tell the whole story," he says.

    So now getting a handcuffed 16 year old out of a van while in the company of your friends is now a split-second, life and death situation.

    When your hiring pool is pussies of average intelligence, it's not surprising you get the results you do.

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      I just wonder how Roorda can say that shit with a straight face. I guess pathological liars have certain abilities.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      I had to make a split second decision at that intersection, ossifer. You know those types of decisions can't be scrutinized.

      1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        I wonder if shooting an intruder in the face when he breaks into your bedroom during a no-knock raid counts as a split-second, life and death decision for the shooter. No, actually, I don't wonder. Hyper-deference for the cop, strict liability for you. It's only fair.

        1. WTF   12 years ago

          But there's NO DOUBLE STANDARD - dunphy has told us this over and over! I guess we just don't get it.

          1. Almanian!   12 years ago

            Cops are held to a higher standard. I'll never cite an actual example or provide a link, and even if I do, it's the exception, not the rule. Gotta run - powerlifting, surfing and then acting lessons with a Morgan Fairchild poster.

            SMOOCHES.

    3. Flyboy   12 years ago

      Below average intelligence. Remember, the courts have ruled that having a maximum IQ score is perfectly legal. If you artificially cut off the top of the bell curve, your average will be below the population average.

  3. Almanian!   12 years ago

    AND NOTHING ELSE HAPPENED. Isolated Incident.

  4. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

    The St. Louis Police Officers Association says it was a defense tactic.

    Punching a handcuffed kid in the face is self defense. Seems legit.

  5. wareagle   12 years ago

    as more than one poster has said, baboons with guns. I used to have a great deal of respect for law enforcement having known a good many solid men and women in the profession. But way too many stories like this one have eroded that respect; if the profession refuses to weed out the morons, if not criminals, in it, then you can't take it seriously because it doesn't take itself seriously.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      This. I learned this a few years ago when my wife applied to be a cop. She was weeded out after the psych eval because she did show enough deference to authority. She's also way too smart to be a cop but she really wanted to be a detective.

      1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

        Don't you mean she didn't show enough deference to authority?

        I thought the whole thing was that you do what you're told without question, even if it is illegal, and in time you'll have the chance to order your underlings to commit illegal acts.

        And nothing else will happen.

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          yeah, that's what I meant.

  6. Ted S.   12 years ago

    Take out ads on local TV showing the video.

    1. Bean Counter   12 years ago

      They won't accept the ads because they are controversial...yada yada yada.

  7. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Judges give cops a pass because they know that if they get pulled over for driving drunk or whatever, the cops will not give them a citation. Now if judges started convicting cops, then they might actually get a citation the next time they drive drunk, brandish a firearm, or break some other law.

    What goes around comes around.

    1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      I keep wanting to run for judge, but then I remember that the Lawyers have it all sewn up. They actually require you be licenced to practice law in the state which requires (for New York) that you attended law school.

      Personally I think Lawyers should be BANNED from being judges because the purported purpose of a judge is to enforce the law, while the role of a lawyer has always been to pervert the law.

      Also, a ban on lawyers holding public office.

      1. Floridian   12 years ago

        I think banning a group of people from office for their profession violates their right to free association.

        1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

          Treat them like felons.

          1. Floridian   12 years ago

            I don't agree with treating felons different after they have served their time.

            Disclaimer: private companies can hire or not hire whoever they want. The government shouldn't be able to create a group of second class citizens.

        2. Bean Counter   12 years ago

          "Ends justify the means."
          "You don't understand, this is an exception."
          "The Constitution is a living document."
          Libertarian means not having to be consistent...... and so on and so forth.

          1. Floridian   12 years ago

            There are NO exceptions!!! Except for special cases obviously.

        3. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

          Then banning me from being a judge because I'm not a lawyer violates my rights.

          1. Bean Counter   12 years ago

            Yeah, it's discrimination to require that the person making rulings on legal arguments and procedures be educated in....legal arguments and procedures. I think it's called a BOQ - Bonafide Occupational Qualification.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Also, a ban on lawyers holding public office.

        Probably unconstitutional, of course. I'd like to see a setup in which the DAs and AG can't run for further office, but I'd bet that's unconstitutional, too.

  8. Floridian   12 years ago

    I think this makes the case to privatize the police. If your local peace officers are abusing their employers then when the contract is up at the end of the year don't renew Bob's security and contract with Cory's security.

    1. Bean Counter   12 years ago

      But, what about the police union? Then they wouldn't have the power to force the city to knuckle under to their demands. OH, THE HORROR!!!

      1. Floridian   12 years ago

        I know giving the people a direct choice is not democracy. Now letting a percentage of the eligible voting population pick from a special class of people from two parties, that is real democracy.

        1. Bean Counter   12 years ago

          It's gratifying to see that you understand. You can get up off your knees now. As soon as we've tasered you a few times to make sure you fully absorbed your lesson, you're free to go...until next time.

  9. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    I guess justice is also alt-text blind.

  10. Loki   12 years ago

    Remember folks. there's no double standard for cops. In fact, they're aften held to a higher standard than civilians are. Blah blah blah, totality of circs, something something fact pattern. /hth

  11. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

    AnonBot, we're going to update your posting algorithm, okay?

  12. Jack the Reaper   12 years ago

    AnonBot forgot is /sarcasm tag.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Ukraine's Drones Just Took Down a Chunk of Russia's Bomber Fleet. What Does That Mean for America?

Matthew Petti | 6.3.2025 11:00 AM

Starter Homes Live in Texas, Die in Arizona

Christian Britschgi | 6.3.2025 10:45 AM

The SEC (the Sports One) Is Acting Like It's Invincible

Jason Russell | 6.3.2025 10:30 AM

The Tariff Downturn

Liz Wolfe | 6.3.2025 9:30 AM

Did Bill Buckley Really Lead a Successful Revolution?

Brian Doherty | 6.3.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!