Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) is mounting a push this week to defund the surveillance programs at the National Security Agency.
Amash said Monday that the Defense appropriations bill — which could come to the House floor this week — was a chance to stop the NSA's "unconstitutional spying on Americans."
"Most important bill this week: DoD Approps. We can defund #NSA's unconstitutional spying on Americans--if House leaders allow amendments, Amash tweeted Monday.
And how does Amash's leadership feel about this?
House Republican leaders are considering limiting amendments to the Defense bill out of concern for proposals that Amash and other lawmakers might bring forward.
Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) wrote to his colleagues last week that the panel might limit amendments, a departure from the open amendment process that's been used on the Defense bill since Republicans took over in 2011.
Iinterviewed Amashas part of a MarchReasonfeature package on liberty-friendly congressmen this term.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) wrote to his colleagues last week that the panel might limit amendments, a departure from the open amendment process that's been used on the Defense bill since Republicans took over in 2011.
Only Serious Amendments proposed by Serious People will be permitted.
What are they scared of, anyway? Most of the Dems will support his Holiness, the President, and most of the GOP will oppose anything that threatens national security.
See, this is the kind of thing Congress should at least threaten to do. Tell us what the heck is going on, or no funding at all.
Why should I vote for Republicans again? Even if they are genuinely part of "team freedom", they get shut down by the state-worshipping snotnoggins.
Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) wrote to his colleagues last week that the panel might limit amendments, a departure from the open amendment process that's been used on the Defense bill since Republicans took over in 2011.
Only Serious Amendments proposed by Serious People will be permitted.
Hey, you're A Serious Man; why don't you propose an amendment?
Elect me to Congress and I will.
I'm gonna need some Free Shit first.
What are they scared of, anyway? Most of the Dems will support his Holiness, the President, and most of the GOP will oppose anything that threatens national security.
and most of the GOP will oppose anything that threatens national security
so the GOP will go along with Amash then, and cut funding on domestic spying?
Perceived threats, of course. Not the real ones so much.
What are they scared of, anyway?
Men in heels, bearded women, and independent thought.
I assume Rep Sessions will apply this change to the pork appropriations that get stuffed into every Defense bill.
It's okay. They'll slip it into the classified appropriation and exclude Amash from access to it.
Maybe Peter King will stab Amash in the neck with a poisoned ice pick in the senate cloakroom. To save FREEDOM.
NOT ONE DOLLAR CAN BE CUT!!!