Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

Texas Teen Has Been in Jail for Months Over Bad-Taste Facebook Joke Taken for "Threat"

Brian Doherty | 6.28.2013 12:36 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

This particular idiocy just came to my attention today, via a KHOU.com Houston report from earlier this week:

Justin Carter was 18 back in February when an online video game "League of Legends" took an ugly turn on Facebook. 

Jack Carter says his son Justin and a friend got into an argument with someone on Facebook about the game and the teenager wrote a comment he now regrets. 

"Someone had said something to the effect of 'Oh you're insane, you're crazy, you're messed up in the head,' to which he replied 'Oh yeah, I'm real messed up in the head, I'm going to go shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts,' and the next two lines were lol and jk.," said Carter. 

"LOL" stands for "laughing out loud," and "jk" means "just kidding," but police didn't think it was funny. Neither did a woman from Canada who saw the posting. 

Justin's dad says the woman did a Google search and found his son's old address was near an elementary school and she called police. 

Justin Carter was arrested the next month and has been jailed since March 27. He's charged with making a terroristic threat and is facing eight years in prison, according to his dad. 

Daily Caller reports police reaction:

Authorities noted that recent school shootings like the one in Newtown, Connecticut have caused them to evaluate all potential threats seriously. Newtown was still fresh in their minds at the time of Carter's arrest.

"In light of recent situations, statements such as the one Justin made are taken seriously," said an Austin police detective in a statement.

Reason on a case earlier this month--one where grand jury ultimately failed to indict--of a kid's Facebook writings getting him arrested, in this case "violent" rap lyrics.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Anti-Obama Protests In Front of Mandela Hospital Ahead of President's Visit

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

Civil LibertiesCultureScience & TechnologyNanny StateSocial NetworkingPolice AbuseSandy Hook School ShootingFree SpeechCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (39)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. RBS   12 years ago

    Neither did a woman from Canada who saw the posting.

    If you see something, say something.

  2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    We really need an alien invasion or something to help us get some perspective. I can see taking crazy kids more seriously now than in the past, but that's maybe investigating or checking the background of the kid, not imprisoning him. I mean, come on.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      Seriously, everything gets you thrown in jail these days. It's insane.

      1. Duke   12 years ago

        How else are prison stocks so supposed to go up?

    2. Suthenboy   12 years ago

      Can you imagine what a boost it is to a cop's career to be able to say "I stopped the next Sandy Hook!"

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        How they got to fifty terrorist incidents stopped finally makes sense to me. Here's one.

    3. Brett L   12 years ago

      Reminds me of a fire-fighter friend during the 1st anthrax scare. Little old lady in a working-class neighborhood in Houston reports a "suspicious letter", triggering a callout of my buddy's engine. The head guy on the call listens to the lady for a couple of minutes and says, "go get that 'decontamination gel' we have right on the dashboard, spray some in a bucket with a gallon of water and dip the letter in it. The only thing on the dashboard was a thing of Dawn dish-soap.

      This should have been the same. Knock on the door, "listen kid, some bint called us out about your Facebook status. Tone it down some, huh? Or at least defriend so-and-so."

      1. Bones   12 years ago

        Do people really set their Facebook settings to public? Only my friends and their friends can see my posts. How did "some Canadian woman" get wind of this?

        1. Voros McCracken   12 years ago

          She was this kid's "girlfriend" that none of his friends know.

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            "Her name is Alberta/ she lives in Toronto/ my girlfriend who lives in Canada"

        2. Brandybuck   12 years ago

          She probably had friends in the NSA

        3. Agammamon   12 years ago

          He's posting it on the LOL Facebook page - everyone else who posts there can see each other's posts.

  3. Duke   12 years ago

    I posted this article in the comment thread earlier. No h/t? Not that I'm worried about it or anything.

  4. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    "LOL" stands for "laughing out loud," and "jk" means "just kidding," but police didn't think it was funny. Neither did a woman from Canada who saw the posting.

    Justin's dad says the woman did a Google search and found his son's old address was near an elementary school and she called police.

    The Canadians hate us for our freedoms.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      And I hate them back because of Cytotoxic.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Not Brian Boitano?

        1. Bones   12 years ago

          Did he convert to Canadianism?

          I hate them for Nickelback and Justin Beiber. But appreciate Michael J. Fox and Alex Trebek. Can we stop importing their musical artists? Working Man is one of my favorite songs, but I'd give it up if we had to cast a wide net to keep out their shit.

        2. Loki   12 years ago

          Don't fuck with Brian Boitano. If he were here right now I'm sure he'd kick an ass or two. He doesn't take shit from anyone.

  5. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Neither did a woman from Canada who saw the posting.

    Why was this crazy old broad cyberstalking that kid, and why does she remain at large?

    1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      Forget it Brooks, it's Canuckitown.

  6. Gojira   12 years ago

    I think this brings up an interesting question.

    Not in this case specifically, since it's obvious the kid wasn't making an actual threat, but theoretically, when do statements stop being free speech, and become actual threats punishable by law?

    I'd personally say, "never". Until you've actually done something, there is no crime. But that ignores the idea that perhaps you actually did cause harm to someone by making them terrified to leave their house, etc.

    So what say you all? And nothing gay.

    1. cw   12 years ago

      I thought torts did a good job with that.*

      *So long as there's loser pays - you should have to prove there was harm before a judge, or it gets tossed.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      I think we have a credible threat doctrine already. Ascertaining means, motivation, and opportunity to carry out a specific action would be a good start.

    3. Zeb   12 years ago

      I'd say it should become criminal when it rises to the level of assault. I think merely uttering words that can be interpreted as a threat shouldn't always be criminal. But I'm OK with the traditional definition of assault. If you make a threat with the ability and intention of carrying it out, that should be a crime, even if you have not yet physically harmed anyone.

    4. Rrabbit   12 years ago

      They should become actual threats punishable by law if a) carrying out the threads would be illegal and b) a reasonable person would believe that you have the intend to carry out the thread very soon and c) you actually have the means to carry out the thread.

  7. Luddite   12 years ago

    Since the woman has had the kid imprisoned for expressing his right to free speech, has she not terrorized him?

    Put her in jail, utilizing the NDAA provision for indefinite detention, since she's obviously one of them. (/goddamnit)

    1. Brandybuck   12 years ago

      Someone should charge her with bullying, see how she likes it in prison.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      Throw in a cyberbullying charge too.

  8. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    "Free speech" means people should never have to hear things which make them feel uncomfortable or unhappy.

    1. Gojira   12 years ago

      I think this is a serious question, Brooks. Since even minarchists generally admit that actions which cause harm to others should be punished, where is the line drawn?

      In other words, how does one decide whether or not some sort of mental/emotional damage has been done to someone? Do we only count physical damage? The existence of PTSD is enough to show that there is such a thing as non-physical damages, IMO.

      1. sgs   12 years ago

        "In other words, how does one decide whether or not some sort of mental/emotional damage has been done to someone? "

        In this particular case, she chose to harm herself. No one forced her to read anything.

        On the whole? Prove real damages. Real mental trauma is accompanied by real life disruptions of some kind.

  9. Loki   12 years ago

    police didn't think it was funny. Neither did a woman from Canada who saw the posting.

    Fucking "Cuntnuck" should mind her own fucking business. That's the worst thing about Facebook: it means the busy bodies can fuck with people in another country. Before they could only make their neighbors lives miserable.

    1. Zeb   12 years ago

      Nah. The worst thing about Facebook is learning how stupid all your friends are about politics.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        I'm better at the internet than 99% of them. So they pretty much hate that I have a credible article to refute their stupid assertions about "people are saying" some stupid shit that nobody is saying.

        1. Zeb   12 years ago

          I gave up on it completely sometime before the last election.

    2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      Cuntnuck is my new favorite slur for Canadian women! So thanks for that.

  10. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    I need a "dislike" button for that alt-text.

  11. StacyKay   12 years ago

    I think League of Legends is to blame here.

    That game can get you RAAAGED.

  12. Vincent Milburn   12 years ago

    Don't remarks like this happen constantly online?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!