Edward Snowden

Snowden May Be Immune to Extradition

Political offenses are excepted from extradition treaties

|

The case of Edward Snowden, the admitted NSA leaker, creates a dilemma for the U.S. government. Ordinarily, a person who commits a crime in the U.S. is formally charged with the crime or crimes committed. If the accused has fled the country, those charges form the basis of a request for extradition to the U.S. to stand trial. Snowden has yet to be formally charged. What makes Snowden's case unusual is that charges involving unauthorized disclosure of classified information could trigger the "political offense exception" to extradition. And therein lies the rub.

The political offense exception is found in most international extradition treaties. It is based on a concept, developed in the nineteenth century and still applied today, that political offenders – a term that lacks a universal definition – should be shielded from extradition. The extradition treaty between the U.S. and Hong Kong (where Snowden is believed to be) contains such an exception. This concept is distinct from that of asylum based on fear of persecution or mistreatment.

NEXT: Federal Reserve Stays the Course on Stimulus

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. They can’t charge Snowden because they, the DOJ & NSA and others keep claiming that they are not monitoring phone calls or emails. If they aren’t then Snowden has only made a false claim and is not a leaker, whistle blower, or a traitor who can be charge with anything. The second they charge him proves he is telling the truth. It’s one hell of a catch 22.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.