Snowden May Be Immune to Extradition
Political offenses are excepted from extradition treaties
The case of Edward Snowden, the admitted NSA leaker, creates a dilemma for the U.S. government. Ordinarily, a person who commits a crime in the U.S. is formally charged with the crime or crimes committed. If the accused has fled the country, those charges form the basis of a request for extradition to the U.S. to stand trial. Snowden has yet to be formally charged. What makes Snowden's case unusual is that charges involving unauthorized disclosure of classified information could trigger the "political offense exception" to extradition. And therein lies the rub.
The political offense exception is found in most international extradition treaties. It is based on a concept, developed in the nineteenth century and still applied today, that political offenders – a term that lacks a universal definition – should be shielded from extradition. The extradition treaty between the U.S. and Hong Kong (where Snowden is believed to be) contains such an exception. This concept is distinct from that of asylum based on fear of persecution or mistreatment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They can't charge Snowden because they, the DOJ & NSA and others keep claiming that they are not monitoring phone calls or emails. If they aren't then Snowden has only made a false claim and is not a leaker, whistle blower, or a traitor who can be charge with anything. The second they charge him proves he is telling the truth. It's one hell of a catch 22.