NSA

Big Brother Is Watching You

Politicians may be fine with the surveillance state, but they can't force you to be.

|

Late last month President Obama told the American people the War on Terror should start winding down. Unfortunately he forgot to tell the NSA.

But the president's oversight was no mistake. As Robert Higgs documented in Crisis and Leviathan, government uses crises to amass powers that it continues to wield long after the crises have passed. Higgs' insight was not original – he simply provided historical support for William Pitts' observation ("necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom") and Madison's admonition ("free men must guard against the old trick of turning every contingency into a resource for accumulating force in government").

On Friday, the president insisted the federal agencies conducting dragnet surveillance of U.S. electronic communications were not listening in on Americans' calls. This would be more reassuring if past administration reassurances had contained more truth – if, for example, a YouTube video actually had provoked the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi. Or if the IRS' harassment of Tea-Party groups really had been nothing but a renegade operation by low-level rogues (the Cincinnati office "had no autonomy at all through the process," said IRS agent Elizabeth Hofacre on Friday). Or if the administration really had not imposed any taxes on middle-income families, as the president had promised. Or if Obamacare really did let everyone who likes his current insurance policy keep it.

Or if Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Jr. had not lied when, in a congressional hearing, he was asked whether the NSA collects "any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans." His answer: "No sir."

The president also sought to reassure the public about dragnet surveillance by pointing out that it was not a renegade operation, either. In fact, it requires regular approval by judges. Members of Congress also receive regular briefings.

This is supposed to make people feel better?

The Bush administration conducted warrantless wiretaps without court approval and kept lawmakers in the dark. When news of that program broke, the public could take some comfort in knowing the activity had been conducted without approval or oversight by the other two branches of government. Now the public is led to understand that under Obama, all three branches are condoning what was once so widely condemned. Oh joy.

And condone it they have: The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the annual number of warrant requests for domestic electronic surveillance has tripled since 9/11, to about 1,700 per year – and the approval rate hovers around 99.97 percent.

Leading members of Congress are defending the surveillance as well. Sen. Dianne Feinstein – one of the original sponsors of the PATRIOT Act – says the surveillance accesses only "metadata," not the contents of conversations, so no biggie. Besides: "It's about protecting the country." (Cf.: Pitt, Wm., op. cit.)

But as Sun Microsystems engineer Susan Landau told The New Yorker, metadata can tell you a lot. For instance: Metadata lets you "see a call to a gynecologist, and then a call to an oncologist, and then a call to close family members." After that, you can fill in the blanks.

That Obama has extended Bush-era war power he once deplored has infuriated many liberals. Meanwhile, some conservatives are applauding. Karl Rove, for instance, supports what the intelligence community is doing. Then there is GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, recently heard wondering whether the First Amendment applies to bloggers. (FYI: It does.)

Graham says he is "glad" the NSA is monitoring phone traffic. He doesn't mind the government tracking his calls, he says, because he isn't talking to terrorists. And nobody else who isn't talking to terrorists has "anything to worry about" either he says.

Graham's argument seems to be that it's okay to spy on you if you're innocent. And since it's obviously okay to spy on the guilty, then it's okay to spy on everyone, all the time. Graham also is likely being disingenuous. Since he hasn't stolen any cash, would he mind if you looked through his wallet? He very well might.

Then again, maybe not. Let's assume Graham really doesn't mind the government invading his privacy. He can even consent to a strip-search, if he wants to. What he can't do is consent to one on your behalf. Just because he doesn't mind the government invading his own privacy doesn't give it the authority to invade yours. But he seems to think otherwise—and he has a lot of company on both sides of the aisle.

In recent years we have heard a lot of hand-wringing over "divided government." Isn't it just awful, say many well-meaning folk, that Republicans and Democrats in Washington cannot seem to come together and unite for a common purpose?

As it turns out, they have: Many are united for the common purpose of spying on the American public. The result, says Yale law professor Jack Balkin, is a surveillance regime that is now "a permanent fixture of American security policy." Be careful what you wish for.

This column originally appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

NEXT: Rep. Franks: Rape Rarely Leads to Pregnancy

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. On Friday, the president insisted the federal agencies conducting dragnet surveillance of U.S. electronic communications were not listening in on Americans’ calls.

    Is that what he said? Or did he just say that this program wasn’t for listening to phone recordings? These people have using weasel words down to an art, so their vague assurances are as useless as their answers to direct questions.

    1. And when weasel words won’t cut it they simply lie.

    2. This is certainly the nicest-work I have ever done.. Earn 10 to 80$/hr working from home with Google! On Saturday I got a gorgeous Ariel Atom after earning $6292 this ? four weeks past. I began this six months/ago and right away began to make at least $80.. per-hour. I work through this link, http://www.Bling6.com

  2. the public could take some comfort in knowing the activity had been conducted without approval or oversight by the other two branches of government

    I get what you’re trying to say here, but poor word choice.

  3. What agency is “conducting dragnet surveillance of U.S. electronic communications”? The NSA is archiving phone records. That’s not surveillance.

    1. IceTrey| 6.12.13 @ 5:29PM |#
      “What agency is “conducting dragnet surveillance of U.S. electronic communications”? The NSA is archiving phone records. That’s not surveillance.”

      Uh, you really have a new definition of the word “is”?
      If you don’t, you’re full of shit.

      1. Hey hey, IceTrey’s right, we should just trust Obama on this.

        It definitely won’t be like those Green Energy loans, Tarp bailouts, DoJ/Holder obfuscation on Fast & Furious, Benghazi attacks, IRS ‘holdups’ on Tea Party groups, or State Dept scandals.
        Et cetera.

    2. According to Webster:
      “Surveillance: close watch kept over someone or something.”

      Aggregating detailed phone records on millions of American citizen most assuredly is surveillance.

      1. If you think Dale`s story is neat,, 4 weaks-ago my cousins step dad also made $9053 sitting there eighteen hours a week an their house and the’re roomate’s step-mother`s neighbour did this for five months and got a cheque for more than $9053 part time at their pc. use the instructions from this website Click Here

  4. “Then there is GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, recently heard wondering whether the First Amendment applies to bloggers.”

    Just precious!

  5. Question: Does the Fourth Amendment protect corporations like Verizon? Could they have resisted the government’s shakedown for this megadata on such grounds if they had wanted to?

  6. MoMark| 6.12.13 @ 6:13PM |#
    “Question: Does the Fourth Amendment protect corporations like Verizon? Could they have resisted the government’s shakedown for this megadata on such grounds if they had wanted to?”

    Pretty sure A4 covers what the government does, *NOT* what is granted by the government to one entity or the other.
    But Verizon has a problem; the government (illegally, AFAIK) ‘grants’ them access to what should be property either owned by those who can afford it or, like air, subject to tort.

    1. Well, I would think a mom & pop store would be covered by A4 as a sole proprietorship, but I wasn’t sure if a corporation had “person” status and could claim a fourth amendment right. Also I think I heard tonight that the likes of Verizon were given blanket immunity for providing this data to big brother? I wonder why they would need immunity?

      And I wasn’t sure what you meant by “‘grants’ them [the government] access to what should be property either owned by those who can afford it or, like air”

      1. Of course corporations have 4A rights. The immunity the feds are granting is immunity from civil actions against them by customers that aren’t keen on having their private data forked over.

        I believe what Sevo meant is that the FCC grants wireless companies usage of chunks of the electromagnetic spectrum. I’m pretty sure it works differently for wireless spectrum–where the companies outright buy spectrum at auction–than it does for VHF TV frequencies–where broadcasters are granted a license to broadcast which must be renewed. I don’t believe that the feds can revoke “license” to wireless spectrum.

  7. Someone really needs to get around to updating that shitty “What Has Obama Done” site.

  8. Women cossack Tory Burch faddy as Tory Burch cardigan alternating with boots ugg abundant archetypal are a few of the a lot of accustomed due to its simple, adequate alternating with beautiful look. Children Tory Burch shoes and guys are appropriately able-bodied liked.what on apple is your form? Tory Burch happens to be women’s admired designers, Simple appearance and architecture and exceptional cheap tory burch handbags adore acclaimed support. Tory Burch Breely Apparent Thong Sandal blooming featured breeze dragon applique aloft top with gold-tone adumbration bowl center, elastic atypical and? had a new adapted attending for the adequate division by application covering straps and aswell signature emblem. You beam them aloft women’s anxiety everywhere. with all the blockhead weather, you can accept a attending with the accurate Tory Burch boots.

  9. Nevaeh. you think Jason`s storry is great, on thursday I bought Lotus Elise since I been earnin $6729 this-last/4 weeks and-more than, ten-k lass-month. it’s certainly my favourite job I have ever had. I began this 9-months ago and right away was making more than $73.. per-hr. I follow this website, Go to site and open Home for details
    http://WWW.JOBS34.COM

  10. very interesting details you made some clear points there it helped me very much

  11. keep writing this text is worth everyone’s attention thoroughly enjoyed your gardens

  12. i’m dealing with many of these issues as well very informative post like this blog

  13. great delivery topic i think this is a real great article your have good competence

  14. i liked it i’ve read and find good information from your articles informative article

  15. thanks for share continue the good work it helped me very much

  16. so many people will be thankful with your talking major thanks for the article post following this cool website

  17. i have some ideas from this thanks informative article i find it amazing that you give this information for free

  18. your have good competence i belive your content is high quality regards for helping out

  19. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value. Im glad to have found this post as its such an interesting one! I am always on the lookout for quality posts and articles so i suppose im lucky to have found this! I hope you will be adding more in the future… Survive In Bed Review

  20. It was wondering if I could use this write-up on my other website, I will link it back to your website though.Great Thanks. Language of Desire

  21. Thanks for this great post, i find it very interesting and very well thought out and put together. I look forward to reading your work in the future. buy cheap youtube views|get more youtube subscribers

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.