Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Nick Gillespie in Daily Beast: GOP Must Go Young - and Libertarian - or Go Home!

Nick Gillespie | 6.4.2013 6:52 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
hipsterlibertarian.com

I've got a new column up at The Daily Beast, which is about the new report released by the College Republican National Committee. Based on national surveys and focus groups of 18 to 29 year old voters, it's a clarion call for the GOP to go libertarian if it wants to have a future.

Snippets: 

What do young voters want? More than anything, a shot at working and thriving in a growing economy. Yet even though only 22 percent of Millenials thought "Obama's policies had made it easier for young people to get a job" and "only 29 percent thought they were better off as a result of the stimulus package…Democrats held a 16-point advantage over the Republican Party among young voters on handling of the economy and jobs (chosen as the top issue by 37 percent of respondents)."

That's because young voters are turned off by the GOP's emphasis on tax cuts uber alles and habit of embracing big businesses rather than scrappy entrepreneurs. They are equally turned off by the GOP's constant thumping on gay marriage, which more than any other social issue has emerged as a "deal breaker," or an issue that will cause a voter who agrees on everything else with a candidate to vote for his or her opponent. Abortion, immigration, even health care are less important in this regard, according to the CRNC….

Millenials, says the report, don't care much about abstractions such as that favorite Republican bogeyman, "big government." But they are into cutting government spending and reducing national debt, as they realize both things are strangling their future before it begins. Fully 90 percent agree that Social Security and Medicare need to be reformed now, 82 percent are ready to "make tough choices about cutting government spending, even on some programs some people really like," and 72 percent want to cut the size of government "because it is simply too big." Only 17 percent want to increase spending on defense and just 30 percent said that "marriage should be legally defined as only between a man and a women," with 44 percent saying same-sex marriage should be legal everywhere and 26 percent saying it should be up to individual states.

You don't need a decoder ring to read the libertarian strain in such responses. Often described as socially liberal and fiscally conservative, libertarians argue for keeping the government out of the boardroom and the bedroom. They tend to favor more-open borders for people as well as goods and services, agitate for legalization (or at least decriminalization) of drugs, and push for choice in whom you can marry as well as where you send your kids to school.

More here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bitcoin Roundup: Losing Its Edge? Or Selling Its Soul?

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsRand PaulWorldNanny StateWar on DrugsPolicyEconomicsCivil LibertiesCultureScience & TechnologyBarack ObamaRepublican PartyLibertarianismYoung People
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (110)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

    "You don't need a decoder ring to read the libertarian strain in such responses."

    Two responses are always available (and understandable) for the libertarian...

    Fuck off slavers

    No, fuck you, cut spending

    Modify to a polite form as needed. Or not.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      i for one like using my decoder ring.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        I suspect yours is a bit more decorative than the one I got - it looks like a cereal box reject.

        1. vopiwobypacA3   12 years ago

          Micah. I just agree... Jesse`s bl0g is amazing... last wednesday I bought a brand new Volkswagen Golf GTI since I been making $7305 this-past/5 weeks and-over, 10 grand last munth. this is certainly the most rewarding I've ever done. I started this nine months/ago and immediately started earning minimum $75 per hour. I went to this web-site..... grand4.com
          (Go to site and open "Home" for details)

          1. Mongo   12 years ago

            micah be playin a fool
            jesse dont kno shit mane

      2. Pope Jimbo   12 years ago

        Well your decoder ring is fun in that it wasn't made to be worn on your finger...

        1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

          Mine vibrates.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    WRONG. Christian fundamentalism is where it's at. Drive hard to the religious right. It's worked in the past. Carefully select all candidates from the central power in DC and make sure they hit the family values talking points at the expense of anything else. Stay the course, GOP. You're due for a rebound.

    1. Jerryskids   12 years ago

      That's just stupid - focusing on the religious right and 'family values' is what has hurt the GOP and you think they need more of that???

      Obviously if getting thumped by the Dems teaches you anything it's that in order to win you gotta be like the Dems.

      Forget driving hard to the religious right, just do the same thing as the Dems. Maybe just advocate not quite so much quite so fast - that's the winning formula.

      1. PS   12 years ago

        I'm with Fisty, the next GOP candidate should make prayer in schools and the rollback of the teaching of evolution his or her primary focus, it's a guaranteed winner.

        1. Gbob   12 years ago

          The big issue is people having sex. The GOP should be proud of it's core values and declare that it's against sex, except twice a month, and only for reasons of procreation. They also need to clarify their stance on acceptable sexual positions. Some of them are a little too liberal when it comes to non missionary positions.

          Other than that, it's also important they declare that their economic positions are the same as the Democrats.

      2. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        I with Jerry - as Jeff Goldstein dubs it "Team Losing-More-Slowly"! How could you not flock to that banner!

      3. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Did anyone else just hear a loud "whoosh"?

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          Like I was on the beach at St. Maarten.

        2. Isaac Bartram   12 years ago

          Suggest you reread the last paragraph. I thought someone's Sarcasmometer was out of calibration too until I looked at it again.

      4. Bill Dalasio   12 years ago

        Don't worry, Jerryskids & Fist of Etiquette, the GOP will find a way to do BOTH!

      5. fish   12 years ago

        Sarcasm impaired.....tragic.

        1. fish   12 years ago

          Oooh soory Jerryskids....fish is subtle impaired!

    2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      oh Fisty you are a satirical dog

    3. wareagle   12 years ago

      Fist channeling his inner Buttplug? Needz moar christfag. And Bushpig.

      1. fish   12 years ago

        Fist channeling his inner Buttplug? Needz moar christfag. And Bushpig.

        I wonder what a first timer to reason.com would make of this sentence.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          What first timers? Aren't we the same 15 guys, with multiple accounts?

          1. SeaCaptain(Yokeltarian)   12 years ago

            This, and make it 16 guys with multiple accounts.

            1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

              He'd become a last-timer.

    4. A Secret Band of Robbers   12 years ago

      Yeah, when was the last time a candidate won national office thanks to their religious right legislative agenda? Probably never. Failing to lose because they didn't write off the religious right a la Reagan and GWB is another thing.

      The religious right exists almost entirely as pushback against what religious people consider to be secularization enforced by the government. On the defensive, it's extremely powerful, but on the offensive, extremely weak. Virtually no one actually wants mandated prayer in schools, and although it's been on the religious right's agenda since 1962, it hasn't been reinstated anywhere.

      I know this sounds crazy, but I think libertarians could win significant portions of religious conservatives by proving that we can effectively prevent creeping secularization. Champion the rights of religious institutions against anti-religious cultural Marxism, especially in education and healthcare, win reliably, and be proud of winning those battles, and they won't complain about libertarianism. Not with any enthusiasm, anyhow.

      1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

        Report for sarcasm-o-meter recalibration.

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          ...and take Jerryskids with you for the 2-for-1 special.

          1. Isaac Bartram   12 years ago

            Jerryskids deserves a reread. I think you'll find it in the same vein as FOE's.

            1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

              Jerryskids was very subtle sarcasm.

        2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          My original comment was flip because of my dislike of values voters but unfortunately he is right about the significant contingent of them. It's a valid consideration.

          Let's face it, the youth vote is unreliable. I wish reason was right about the solution being moving to libertarianism, that won't get the GOP many votes. At this point, I don't know what will. They have their reliable base of voters, just like the Dems, but in the middle are people who either want to vote against the other party or vote for the party that promises them their entitlements are untouchable.

          1. Tonio   12 years ago

            Yes, the youth vote as a whole is unreliable. But this is a position being pushed by the Young Republicans. The politically-active young are reliable voters, and will remain so. This is a message from these kids about what candidates and issues they are going to support, and which ones they're going to walk away from. The numbers of young voters may be small relative to other cohorts, but these are the kids who go out and knock on doors and do the other grunt work of their party.

            1. SugarFree   12 years ago

              The most effective strategy would be to kill the enthusiasm in that cohort. Convince them voting is for suckers and caring about stuff is stupid.

              Bring back the 1990s. It was a Golden Age of Apathy.

              1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

                Well it's good that Obama's pretty much doing that with the lefty kids.

              2. Tonio   12 years ago

                Our most subtle and dangerous mind.

              3. CE   12 years ago

                Didn't they just do that, with Obama vs. McCain?

          2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            They're unreliable because their opinions are still changeable. The "unreliable" voters are exactly the ones you should focus on wooing.

            1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

              I say unreliable because they don't seem to consistently show up at the polls when it comes time to vote.

              1. CE   12 years ago

                Old people vote. Old people live in Florida. Florida is a swing state.

                Hence Medicare Part D.

              2. Robert   12 years ago

                That plus the fact that when they do show up, they're often distracted by some shiny object.

          3. EternalOptimist   12 years ago

            Wait until the young who voted for Obama find out they will be forced to accept an Insurance mandate with relatively high premiums, or be fined if they refuse. The whole concept of Obamacare relies on forcing this entire demographic to subsidize old and sick people at nominal cost. Add in the fact that they cannot obtain a decent wage, and that tax increases are also a part of the left's strategy, and I think it will be pretty easy to win them over!

            1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

              By "relatively" you must mean "motherfuckin".

      2. Inigo M.   12 years ago

        AB-SO-LUTE-LY. What you say does not sound crazy at all!

        The GOP blows it again and again by thinking that the only way they can appeal to the religious right is by loudly professing to share even their dumbest beliefs while everyone else shakes their heads at ludicrous stuff like "selective conception" during rape and a 10,000-year-old Earth. So instead of small government candidates winning, we get winning candidates who believe equally insane and asinine stuff, except their false beliefs are about government and economics. ("We need to spend our way out of debt," and "We need to pass a bill to find out what's in it." -- beliefs that are just as IDIOTIC and much more harmful to more people than anything Oral Roberts could dream of). We need Libertarian leaders who will get the fucking government out of EVERYONE'S hair -- from fundamentalists to atheists and everyone in between.

    5. inquisitionssuppositions   12 years ago

      The GOP should just run this man and then we will all be saved:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GGsBqw6uaE

  3. WomSom   12 years ago

    Sounds like a very solid plan dude.

    http://www.WorldPrivacy.tk

  4. WTF   12 years ago

    Millenials...are into cutting government spending and reducing national debt, as they realize both things are strangling their future before it begins.

    And yet, they mostly voted for Obama.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      young voters are turned off by the GOP's emphasis on tax cuts uber alles

      Also, teh gays.

    2. Inigo M.   12 years ago

      Very true, but I'd bet it wasn't because they liked that Obama wanted to increase spending and amass even more debt.

      For them, it was strictly a personality thing. Obama is like the cool, hip, mixed race friend who will come by your house, shoot some hoops with you and then spark one up (which he will gladly share with you). McCain and Romney are the kind of guys your grandfather takes golfing and then goes to the Olive Garden with for dinner and takes advantage of the early bird special there.

      For the vast majority of youths, that choice is a no-brainer.

      1. Bryan C   12 years ago

        So, in other words, the yutes are mostly idiots who have severed the tie between the act of voting and the outcome of voting. I agree.

      2. CE   12 years ago

        Plus, McCain and Romney were going to spend and borrow just as much as Obama, more or less.

    3. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Actually most of us didn't vote. A plurality may have voted for Obama.

    4. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

      Because Rmoney, the out-of-touch millionaire is just as leftist as Obama, but belongs to a wacky religious cult. Not much of a choice. If I couldn't have voted Libertarian (and they tried in court to get the Libertarians off the ballot in PA)I would have voted for Obama just to say "Fuck you!" for all the shit they pulled on Ron Paul during the primaries. I mailed back the Republican fundraising letters with exactly that message with no cash and let them pay the postage.

  5. wareagle   12 years ago

    what's with the Daily Beast thing? That site is half a moonbat from being Dem Underground; most of the crowd hears 'libertarian' and, predictably, thinks 'Somalia.' Maybe Tina Brown has figured out that the current version of liberalism is a loser in both a political sense and as a media business model.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      nice comment you posted in The Other Place

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Daily Beast is an even worse memory hog than H&R. I don't know how many times I started furiously pressing the Escape key to get the page to stop loading, only for some antisocial networking shit to try to start loading itself again. It looked like the Livefyre commenting platform, which is even worse than Disqus, which I hate with a passion for prolonged browser freezes on every single site that uses it

        And why the fuck is Nick not linking to the single-page version?

    2. buddhastalin   12 years ago

      Well, the moonbats aren't coming here for information or other points of view, so we have to take it to them.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        Or ignore them. You can lead a horse to water...

  6. creech   12 years ago

    OK, the term "big government" is worn out and ineffective with some.
    Can we come up with a better term to use for this age group? "Cradle to Grave Government?" "Nanny Government?" "Intrusive Government?"
    "Busybody Government?" What do you in that age group think would work better than "big government?"

    1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      I'm not a millennial, but what about "arbitrary government"?

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      Why not ask the kids?

      1. Inigo M.   12 years ago

        Yes, ask them.

        FWIW, I like "Big Brother" and the "Government of Narcs and Nannies".

    3. JW   12 years ago

      "Bloody Government."

      1. DEATFBIRSECIA   12 years ago

        Buzzkill Government

        1. Suellington   12 years ago

          Insatiable Government

  7. Rich   12 years ago

    The Republicans simply have to change their nickname and logo.

    The "Grand Old Party" is bullshit. No young person wants to belong to the "Old" party! And who says "Grand" anymore?

    The elephant reminds young voters of a dinosaur, just compounding the problems with the nickname.

    1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

      Quick - get zombie Thomas Nast on the job!

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        He says to replace "The Stupid Party" with The "Brains".

    2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      "The Republican Party...to the extreme!"

      "We're with it! We're total hep cats!"

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        "The Republican Party -- Can you dig it?"

        1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          "We're where it's at!"

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            "The Republicans: RIGHT On!"

          2. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

            The GOP is the Cat's Pajamas

      2. Tonio   12 years ago

        Extreme liberty. You're welcome.

      3. Thomas O.   12 years ago

        And whatever commercials they do MUST include music by Ted Nugent and Kid Rock!

  8. eyeroller   12 years ago

    Seems unlikely that the Anti-libertarian Party would "go libertarian." I ain't saying they won't TALK libertarian from time to time.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Uh, both the major parties are anti-libertarian, just depends on which parts.

  9. SugarFree   12 years ago

    For every idea point the GOP might gain with the young in a shift to libertarianism will be wiped out by the 1,000 cool points they lose every time Santorum or Huckabee or Palin open their mouths. And you can kick and scream all you want, but "cool" matters.

    The GOP is a damaged brand with the young, identified with the voices of stupidity, racism, homohate, and misogyny that the mainline party either cannot shut up or don't want to shut up. It needs to break apart and the libertarian-leaning elements need leave the goober faction with the poisoned "GOP" moniker.

    1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

      Huckabee is cool! He plays bass! That's cool, isn't it?

    2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      If millennials think Republicans are racist and sexist, it's because of things like affirmative action, abortion and compulsory birth control. Not really libertarian issues (except abortion where libertarians are seriously divided).

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        State sanctioned marriage.

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      You might get them to vote GOP ironically.

    4. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

      Yes, unfortunately, ^this^.

      I also wonder if we're seeing youth being concerned with "cool" far deeper into adulthood than before. I certainly notice it in my own life. But the point being that you can't just hope these youth will turn into practical, completely unselfconscious adults that can look past the "cool" factor.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Cool matters until you start making your own money, which happens later and later in life at this point.

        1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

          I imagine having kids also hastens the process. I hope it does.

      2. Tonio   12 years ago

        That trend has been accelerating since the sixties. Basically, you try to act young until you get dropped off at a nursing home.

    5. Not a Libertarian   12 years ago

      How many election cycles of Democratic dominance would then ensue until equilibrium is reached again?

      A decade or perhaps two decades?

      Or are you perhaps also suggesting that after only a few cycles where the Democrats win 75%-80% of the House and Senate, that _they too_ would begin to break apart?

      Having only one party at the national level is perhaps unstable.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        That is the hope. At a certain point Democrats will longer be able to claim that the shithole they've built out of America is someone else's fault and a portion would cleave away. There are plenty of "libertarian" Democrats that will never join anything with the GOP brand.

    6. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

      That's an impossible fight to win. There's always one asshole in every movement, and the statist media is dedicated to making that asshole disappear from their side, and making him the face of the party on the other side.

    7. CE   12 years ago

      Just have the first primary in Nevada instead of Iowa.

  10. Rich   12 years ago

    Another approach, for prospective male Republicans.

    1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

      is a prospective male Republican a pre-op transexual?

  11. Malcolm Excellent   12 years ago

    Millenials, says the report, don't care much about abstractions such as that favorite Republican bogeyman, "big government."

    72 percent want to cut the size of government "because it is simply too big."

    Which is it? Do they care, or not?

    1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      I think the point is that GOP politicians tend to use the phrase "big government" like it's some magical incantation that must just be repeated in that exact fashion as many time as possible, instead of just discussing what they intend to do.

    2. alan_s   12 years ago

      Whatever man. Government's, like, too big and stuff, but I'm sick and tired of always listening to The Man talk about it being too big all the time. Like seriously, who cares?!

      1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

        We wanna ride our machines without getting hassled by The Man. And we wanna get loaded.

  12. JW   12 years ago

    Democrats held a 16-point advantage over the Republican Party among young voters on handling of the economy and jobs (chosen as the top issue by 37 percent of respondents

    That snippet alone should invalidate any answers given by those 37%.

    Note that the reverse would also invalidate them.

  13. Not a Libertarian   12 years ago

    If by some miracle of mind control the GOP platform (such as it exists) was replaced with that of the Libertarian party, would the GOP enjoy a similar electoral success as the Libertarians?

    Or would all things not be equal, in that the *GOP would still have some financial, media and organizational advantages that the Libertarians can't match- at least for an election or two?

  14. Not a Libertarian   12 years ago

    What happens if in 2016 with an economy in no better shape than now, a Candidate Rand Paul actually manages to do worse against Candidate Hilary Clinton than Romney did against Obama- WITH THE YOUNG VOTERS?

    The hypothetical that he does worse overall is too unsettling this morning.

    1. chorizo   12 years ago

      If the hypothetical you propose actually turned out that way, then I agree it's a hopeless situation. But with your hypothetical, I think Rand would win in a landslide. Hillary has never had much popularity apart from her association with the first first black president. In 2016 she'll be older, more tiresome and tainted by Obama's foreign policy. Rand Paul is poised to sweep up way more young voters than any Republican in decades, especially if he gets good at knocking down progressive strawmen by saying "States can do whatever they want; I just think that policy is inappropriate (or unconstitutional as the case may be) at the federal level." More awareness that federalism does not equal supporting slavery. It's not 1860.

  15. Loki   12 years ago

    The CRNC report notes that 88 percent support safety-net programs that help people temporarily and 86 percent favor trimming regulations but maintaining ones "that keep us safe."

    Define "safety-net programs that help people temporarily." Most of our current safety net programs were pitched as exactly that, a temporary "hand up, not a hand out." Yet how many people seem to end up stuck or trapped on welfare, either because of their own inertia or because of the nature of the programs being a band-aid instead of actually correcting the root cause of the problems they're supposedly intended to fix.

    Also define regulations that "keep us safe." There's a lot of regulations that are presumed to do that but really don't. Many fall under the category of keeping us safe from ourselves, such as Bloomberg's large soda ban, or the ban on the sale of raw milk. I suspect that a lot of non libertarians fall into that 88 and 86 percent because of the imprecise nature of the terms used.

  16. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

    So the yutes support Social Security, Medicare, the social safety net and the regulatory state. I'm really optimistic about the supposedly social liberal, fiscal conservative yutes of the future.

    In what world is Rand Paul "cool"?

    1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

      In a world that Romney and McCain exist.

  17. lap83   12 years ago

    Anyone who thinks the GOP can win the next election by trying to be "cool" is either hopelessly naive or secretly wants them to fail. There is no way the GOP can become cooler than the DFL unless the definition of cool changes. In that regard, there could be a glimmer of hope. One word: entrepreneurship. I think there will be a big movement toward self-employment for this generation. The GOP needs to articulate, loudly, that government makes it hard for anyone who wants to "build that". They need to appeal to the brain. The Dems have the heart covered. But heart doesn't make you employed.

    1. lap83   12 years ago

      Homeschooling is becoming increasingly popular as well, and not just for fundies. The GOP needs to stop peering over at the Dem playbook and taking pointers. They need to show how their way is better, for everyone. For example, Medicaid and Medicare do not help health outcomes......social security is a welfare program for rich older people. Republicans might need to say "fuck you" to the wealthy old crony segment of the voting base, who btw are a much bigger threat to this country than Christians.

      1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

        You're talking about a Venn diagram that is a circle.

  18. XM   12 years ago

    This kind of article reminds of me polls that find most Americans actually identify themselves "conservatives" - but a lot of them vote for dems.

    No one LIKES the concept of a "big government" or runaway spending. If the question was "would you like to work and the government to cut down on spending", of course the kids will offer libertarian responses. But in practice, they all favor activist government that responds to the needs of the people.

    Brand loyalty dies hard. Latinos and young voters switch allegiance only if some paradigm shifting event awakens them from their illusions. And that's outside of the GOP's control.

  19. Ray   12 years ago

    That's because young voters are turned off by the GOP's emphasis on tax cuts uber alles

    HAHAHA lol.

    Fuck off, slaver.

  20. Knoss   12 years ago

    The GOP should go after FICA and Social Security. These are taxes that low income, young people pay for the benefit of older wealthier people. They should also look at tax simplification or flat personal income tax designed so that small businesses and people of moderate income do not have to file a tax return, like New Zealand were 60% of taxpayers do not file a return.

  21. SeaCaptain(Yokeltarian)   12 years ago

    That's because young voters are turned off by the GOP's emphasis on tax cuts uber alles and habit of embracing big businesses rather than scrappy entrepreneurs.

    There's Gillespie's inner fucking cosmotarian coming out again.

    The first article I ever read on Reason was about how the GOP focused too much on small business! How about we defend ALL business instead of trying to appease the fucking progtards at the cocktail parties at the Daily Beast.

    1. gaoxiaen   12 years ago

      Businesses that practically run the government don't need much "defense". A large part of them are called exactly that.

  22. flashgordon   12 years ago

    But all the young people voted for Obama. I understand what Nick is saying but it's not happening. You would think young people would be a natural libertarian constituency but they're not. They don't read Nick's articles about inter-generational robbery or they don't understand them. My personal theory is we aren't going to get back to the America we all know and love until the women come around. Most women I know have a few "Deal Breaker" things about Republicans and that's it. They can balance their check book to the penny but they don't care if the Federal gov't spends a trillion dollars it doesn't have or commits to unfunded liablilities that will break the country. I don't understand it. I hope Rand Paul can bring the women back into the libertarian fold but I'm not so sure. When you say "gov't health care" to most women, they say "That's a good thing.".

  23. briannaeric7   12 years ago

    my neighbor's step-mother makes $76 an hour on the computer. She has been out of work for 10 months but last month her payment was $15443 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site Go to site and open Home for details
    http://WWW.JOBS34.COM

  24. owen   12 years ago

    http://mallsjersey.blogspot.com/
    Cheap NFL Jerseys, NHL Jerseys, MLB Jerseys, NBA Jerseys Online,
    Authentic 2013 New Style, Wholesale and Custom, Fast Delivery?
    Free shipping fee http://modernjerseys.org/

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!