Eric Holder

After Spying on Media, Eric Holder Attempts to Woo Them With "Remorse" and Face Time

|

DOJ

Shortly after the Huffington Post ran a front-page call for Attorney General Eric Holder to resign, personal allies of the DOJ's top man turned to Daniel Klaidman at The Daily Beast (whose sourcing in the Obama administration is some of the best around), to anonymously get the apology tour started. First stop? Holder's brain:

Now came the Post's discovery of the Fox affidavit, which was part of a three-year-old FBI investigation into a State Department contract employee who had allegedly leaked highly classified information about North Korea. And this case had an ominous wrinkle that the AP case had lacked: in the affidavit, investigators had indicated that the reporter himself, James Rosen, might also be guilty of a crime—for simply soliciting the information.

DOJ officials, realizing the issue could turn into a press feeding frenzy, went into damage-control mode. Over the weekend they scrambled to prepare their response, including readying a press statement assuring that Justice had no plans to indict Rosen.

But for Attorney General Eric Holder, the gravity of the situation didn't fully sink in until Monday morning when he read the Post's front-page story, sitting at his kitchen table.

Quoting from the affidavit, the story detailed how agents had tracked Rosen's movements in and out of the State Department, perused his private emails, and traced the timing of his calls to the State Department security adviser suspected of leaking to him. Then the story, quoting the stark, clinical language of the affidavit, described Rosen as "at the very least … an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator" in the crime. Holder knew that Justice would be besieged by the twin leak probes; but, according to aides, he was also beginning to feel a creeping sense of personal remorse.

Emphasis mine. Years after Holder approved an investigation into Rosen, he was beginning to feel bad. Why'd it take so long? That's not important. What's important, a friend of Holder told Klaidman, is that "Eric sees himself fundamentally as a progressive, not some Torquemada out to silence the press." Now Holder et al. will try to get the press to see the attorney general the way he sees himself, and they're going to do that by hosting the same kind of flattering, private meetings that recently inspired a group of liberal bloggers to throw career IRS employee Lois Lerner under the bus.

Politico's Mike Allen reports this morning that "[t]he Justice Department began contacting D.C. bureau chiefs of major print and broadcast news organizations yesterday to set up a meeting with Attorney General Eric Holder to discuss changes to the department's guidelines for subpoenas to news organizations."

Here's more from Allen's Morning Playbook:

"The A.G. realizes that things might have gotten a little out of balance, and he wants to make changes to be sure the rules fully account for the balance between the First Amendment and law enforcement," the source said. The first media meeting will be held at main Justice, likely later this week. A later meeting will include First Amendment advocates.

A Justice Department official tells Playbook: "Attorney General Eric Holder will hold meetings with several Washington bureau chiefs of national news organizations in the next two days as part of the review of existing Justice Department guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters. This review, which was announced by President Obama last Thursday, is consistent with the Attorney General's long standing belief that protecting and defending the First Amendment is essential to our democracy. These meetings will begin a series of discussions that will continue to take place over the coming weeks. During these sessions, the Attorney General will engage with a diverse and representative group of news media organizations, including print, wires, radio, television, online media and news and trade associations. Further discussions will include news media executives and general counsels as well as government experts in intelligence and investigative agencies."

That's one way to shift the conversation away from the growing number of people who think Holder should lose his job.

NEXT: Privately Funded Telescope to be Sent to Moon

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Is it remorseful angst, or angstful remorse? Do he and Obama hang out, while discussing NOTHING ABOUT POLICY EVER REALLY, and share each other’s pain?

    Tyranny is tough on the conscience.

  2. “The A.G. realizes that things might have gotten a little out of balance, …”

    Yeah, that’s the ticket!

  3. Translation. We only went after the evil Fox News. But don’t worry, we are going to change the rules so no Republican ever goes after a respectable news organization.

    Holder is a fucking hack. I don’t doubt he is surprised by the reaction. Hating Fox News and thinking it is okay to go after them by any means necessary is part of the air Holder breaths. Given that, I am sure he is shocked that liberal news organizations would have a problem with this.

  4. “Eric sees himself fundamentally as a progressive, not some Torquemada out to silence the press.”

    These two things are not mutually exclusive.

    1. No. Holder is one of the good guys. He meant well. Only now is he realizing that the power he used might some day be used by bad people against his side.

    2. I’d make the argument that it’s like saying, “Eric sees himself as a Nazi, not some Jew-hating fascist.”

    3. If there should be disloyalty, it will be dealt with with a firm hand of stern repression.

      -Woodrown Wilson, the Progressive President

  5. “The A.G. realizes that things might have gotten a little out of balance, and he wants to make changes to be sure the rules fully account for the balance between the First Amendment and law enforcement,” the source said.

    Ah, the old ‘balance’, thats when you know a cryptofascist is about to blow sunshine up your ass. They simply declare that your fundamental rights guaranteed in the constitution need to be ‘balanced’ against whatever thing they are pushing this week. Left unasked is why such a ‘balance’ needs to occur in the first place. They start out the conversation with freedom losing.

    1. Let me guess – you’re one of those right-wing ideologues that refuses to compromise even on completely reasonable legislation that 90% of the American people support, ain’t ya?

      Or are you one of those paranoid delusional conspiracy nuts who can’t grasp that the government is us and we’re only here to help you become more free by unshackling you from the constraints of being forced to make choices?

      1. Oooooohhhhh, that’s good sarcasm. My head almost exploded until I reread your post several times to be sure.

    2. I’m going to sue the DoJ. When I read that quote my blood pressure went so high my ears started to ring. If Eric Holder gives me a stroke in my 30s I will absolutely lose my ever-lovin’ shit.

      “…things might have gotten a little out of balance…” Ya think? The Khmer Rouge might have gotten a little too insecure about potential political dissent.

  6. OT: Teapot looks like Hitler

    http://www.nbclosangeles.com/n…..95301.html

    This time I know I’ll make PM Links.

    1. covered in the AM links. Please do try to keep up 😉

  7. …he was also beginning to feel a creeping sense of personal remorse.

    Creeping up all the way from back in his Clinton White House days. Like this asshole isn’t very well used to the tactics he’s been using against ideological opponents and those who would dare report on the administration. What Holder isn’t used to is a suddenly racist press calling for his head because they’re racist now.

  8. And the lap dogs will lap it up. They will kiss and make up then things will be back to normal again.

    All that is needed is a little bit of marriage counseling.

  9. This guy was evil incarnate when he was US Attorney in DC. I’m shocked – SHOCKED – he’s still just as evil now (maybe moreso).

  10. Attorneys General seem to be some of the slimiest people because they are essentially at the pinnacle of a disturbing career: that of a prosecutor who has spent his or her life studying the law and finding the best ways to use it to screw the little people. Everything they do is legally justifiable–not in a moral sense but in the sense that they can explain it all away as within the written law. Ask yourself whether you’d rather have one of these people living next door to you or a registered sex offender.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.