CISPA

CISPA DOA in the Senate, For Now

They'll try, try again

|

where's the cispa go?
jurvetson/foter.com

A representative of the Senate committee that would have to hold hearings on the cybersecurity bill CISPA, passed last week by the House, said the committee won't be taking the legislation up, according to U.S. News. President Obama has threatened a veto, though the Democratic chairman of the committee Jay Rockefeller, certainly echoes the administration when he says CISPA is nevertheless important.

The White House's veto threat, meanwhile, isn't couched in a call to limit federal power, nor even in a defense of privacy, but to make sure corporations are "held accountable." The White House is satisfied that the legislation charges the federal government with protecting privacy, essentially policing itself, but also wants corporations to be required to remove certain personal information from data shared with the federal government.

But the problem with CISPA is the sharing of data itself; terms of service govern the privacy of data shared voluntarily between consumers and corporations. As supporters of CISPA claim those corporations want this legislation, the solution would seem not to require it. Companies are free to include provisions in their privacy policies allowing for data sharing with the governments, just as consumers are free to reject them. As for the companies themselves, their cybersecurity would seem to be their responsibility, not an excuse to extend federal powers into the private sector. Hacking and other cyberattacks are already federal crimes after all.

NEXT: Jerry Brito on How Government Regulations Distort the Television Airwaves

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Whew, dodged yet another bullet on this one. Have to keep making a fuss and applying pressure every time it comes up though.

    1. Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job Ive had. Last Tuesday I bought a gorgeous Lancia Straton from earning $4331 this – 5 weeks past. I began this 7-months ago and right away started to earn at least $69, per-hr. I use this website,, http://goo.gl/4z9pn

  2. Is Rand Paul against CISPA? I know he’s against the internet tax, but as far as CISPA as a whole I’m not sure of his position.

    1. Of course he’s against CISPA. http://www.latimes.com/busines…..1025.story

      Is it possible for the Senate to introduce Justin Amash’s amendment? Or, once the house has voted it down, is it dead?

      1. Charlie. although Jacob`s rep0rt is amazing… on sunday I bought a top of the range Buick sincee geting a check for $9503 thiss month and-just over, 10/k lass month. without a doubt it is the nicest job Ive ever done. I began this seven months/ago and practically straight away startad earning more than $77, per-hr. I use this web-site wow65.com
        (Go to site and open “Home” for details)

  3. cybersecurity

    Lake Superior State College needs to add this to their list of banned words this year.

  4. Good glad to see CISPA is DOA!

    http://www.GotzMyAnon.tk

    1. Good glad to see CISPA is DOA!

      For now.

  5. If you think Marcus`s story is good,, four weeks ago my cousins step mom also recieved a check for $6933 workin a 10 hour week an their house and the’re buddy’s mom`s neighbour done this for 4 months and brought in over $6933 in there spare time online. apply the guidelines available at this link… http://www.wow92.com

  6. This is one area where the incompetence and unwieldy nature of government works in our favor. Just like the Pentagon is always fighting the last war, and box cutters were outlawed after 9/11, this bill is close to being already obsolete. Any savvy user can already limit the amount of info he shares, and privacy apps will soon be de rigueur. If this bill had passed ten years ago, it would have been much more of a threat. Of course, it did not pass this time either, thank goodness.
    Everybody click on the link anonybot routinely posts. I am not saying buy it, but read the info at least. It does give a crash course in online privacy concerns. Then be aware of what your phone apps are doing. The phone apps are, IMHO, the worst threat. Make sure you are not sharing location, browsing history, etc., which are often set to “share” by default.
    For example, cell towers only pinpoint your location to a general area, but if you have enabled GPS or wifi, then your location is pinpointed to within 6 feet. Only turn those functions on when you need them, for instance when using GPS to navigate. Then turn it off again. An added bonus is that this will extend your battery life a lot.
    Remember, they can’t share info you haven’t given them!

  7. just as Monica responded I am dazzled that anyone able to get paid $6795 in a few weeks on the internet. have you seen this web link and go to home tab for more detail— http://googlejobs.org.qr.net/kiYJ

  8. what Jamie explained I cant believe that any one can get paid $7446 in one month on the internet. have you read this site link
    go to this site home tab for more detail http://WWW.BIG76.COM

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.