Pension Crisis

Politically Motivated Investment Guidelines Making Bad Public Pension Programs Worse

Even as funds lose money, leaders call for decisions based on politics, not success

|

Public sector unions don't need guns to rob people when they've got pension fund managers.
Credit: Horst Gossman at Dreamstime.com

Poor returns be damned, California's biggest public pension fund managers are taking a moral stand against the profitable world of gun manufacturing and selling off investments in Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. and Sturm, Ruger and Co.

Matt Welch noted in January similar politically motivated pension decisions in New York City and Chicago. Smith & Wesson's stock value dropped in mid-December, but that drop was from a record high and it's climbing its way back. The same holds true for Sturm, Ruger and Co. Looking at five-year charts shows them both go be good, solid investments.

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) reported a dismal 1 percent return for the fiscal year that ended last June, but has since rallied, getting the numbers back up to 13 percent by the end of 2012. For the first six months of this fiscal year, they're sitting at 7.1 percent, which is still below the 7.5 percent benchmark.

Steve Malanga at Public Sector Inc., a blog of the free-market non-profit think tank Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, took note of the many political guidelines that have hamstrung California's public employee pension funds:

One of the funds' earliest divestments was of tobacco stocks, just before they began their long upward march. A 2008 Calsters report estimated the fund missed out in $1 billion in appreciation of shares it previously owned in the sector, according to this story. The funds also refused to invest in shares of companies in countries whose labor practices the board of Calpers didn't approve of, including China and India, missing out in growth in these rapidly developing economies.

Socially responsible investing is not just about what you divest, but what you buy with the freed up dollars. According to the Bloomberg story I link to above, Calpers and Calsters redirected some of their funds into California real estate in an attempt to bolster the homeland economy. That investing ramped up between 2004 and 2006, just as the California real estate bubble was inflating. Over time Calpers real estate bets went from bad to absurd. When the whole thing fell apart, Calpers real estate portfolio declined by whopping 42 percent, according to a Feb. 11, 2011 story in the Los Angeles Times.

Of course, it's easy for government employee pension managers to moralize over where to invest the money. There's no consequence for pension members if the funds lose money. States and municipalities (by which I mean taxpayers) are obligated to make up the difference. For those who manage their own retirement funds, there are a host of socially responsible 401(k)s. For those who wish to potentially reduce their potential gains in favor of avoiding certain industries, that's their own call, not a pension board's.

The Illinois Policy Institute reports that the Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund lost more than $38 million last fiscal year, ultimately adding more than $800 million to the city's unfunded liabilities. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is one of the politicians urging pension funds to divest from gun companies. That's something to keep in mind when he talks about his city's budget crisis and how to fix it.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

13 responses to “Politically Motivated Investment Guidelines Making Bad Public Pension Programs Worse

  1. Hey, let’s invest in that new Solyndra company!

  2. And this, gentleman, is the joker in their whole system.

    What will Calpers do with these funds? I can tell you what they won’t do, what they can’t do, what is impossible to any honest or responsible investor these days–get interest yield from any kind of conservative savings instrument or dividend stock. Bernanke has kept the federal leviathan afloat by making it impossible to save money, but his money printing has pushed stock values beyond any connection to reality; do you think Calpers will move quick enough to buy the top of the market?

    If I were managing that much money in this environment, I would have most of it parked in MLPs (the only place you can get any good and consistent yield these days). That Calpers instead chose to use retirement investments to speculate on real estate is just another insidious, destructive effect of central banking and Keynesianism.

  3. That gun picture frightens me.

    1. But props to Scott on the alt-text. Perfect.

      1. Well that doesn’t pay for my therapy or dry my underwear.

        1. (tosses a $20 bill at FoE’s feet and walks away)

          1. WHICH AM I SUPPOSED TO USE THAT FOR?

  4. I have a number of clients who, being the nice, liberal yuppies they are, insist on putting the bulk of their funds in a combination of SRI (socially responsible investments) and “Green”-Tech (alternative energy)…

    I, being the evil, greedy, merciless capitalist that I am, show them a 10yr comparison chart of investments in these Warm Fuzzy Funds… versus MY collection of tobacco, alcohol, pornography, gambling, and weapons investments. Oh, and Monsanto of course. And precious metals.

    They get evil real fucking quick.

    1. Can you add a hypocrite fee for those folks?

      1. My fees are the same for all =

        I DRINK YOUR SOUL AND SWIM IN THE BLOOD OF YOUR CHILDREN!!

        Oh, and .60bps of AUM annually. Even evil capitalists have expenses.

  5. HAHAHAHAHHAHAH

    “Say Jim, you know the one part of our portfolio that’s done well over the last five years?”

    “yes sir, the firearms stocks?”

    “Right. Sell them all immediately.”

  6. Well, CalPERS probably made money on that skyscraper in Houston it just sold.

    CalPERS: Invest in the economy of places that run far away from your model.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.