90 Sheriffs and Two Sheriffs Associations Have Pledged to Ignore "Obama Gun Control"
If Oath Keeper Sheriff Richard Mack is to be believed, the number of sheriffs who are now refusing to enforce new federal gun regulations is up to 90.
Last week, Reason's Ed Krayewski noted that a handful of sheriffs around the country had pledged to ignore new gun regulations being pushed by President Obama. If Oath Keeper Sheriff Richard Mack is to be believed, the number of sheriffs who are now refusing to enforce new federal gun regulations is up to 90.
"Sheriffs have risen up all over our great nation to stand up against the unconstitutional gun control measures being taken," Mack wrote on the site for the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA). "I applaud these public servants for their courage and conviction. I would encourage other Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers to add their voices to the growing numbers of faithful protectors of our freedom."
As I wrote when covering Mack's primary run against big-government Republican Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, Mack founded the CSPOA to
enlist and train sheriffs and peace officers (a term Mack prefers to "law enforcement officers") to "understand and enforce the constitutionally protected Rights of the people they serve, with an emphasis on State Sovereignty and local autonomy."
Mack's list of anti-gun regulation sheriffs links to dozens of letters to Vice President Joe Biden, in which sheriffs not only argue against the constitutionality of new gun regulations ("The Second Amendment guarantees each of us the right to keep and bear arms to protect ourselves from anyone who would seek to cause us harm. This includes the federal Government."), but also make explicit promises of non-compliance.
"Any rule, regulation, or executive order repugnant to the constitutional rights of the citizens of this County will be ignored by this Office, nor will this office, or the citizens, allow enforcement of unconstitutional activities by federal officers," reads a letter from Sheriff Gil Gilbertson in Josephine County, Oregon.
Sheriff Chuck Heiss of Johnson County, Missouri, wrote
As the duly elected Sheriff of Johnson County, Missouri, it is my sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitutions of theUnited States of America, and the State of Missouri against all enemies both foreign and domestic. This means I not only have the duty to protect my constituents from incidents of crime, but I also have a duty and responsibility to protect and preserve the individual rights and liberties afforded and guaranteed to every citizen by our constitutions. This, Mr. President is a duty I fully understand, appreciate, and will carry out with great vigor and conviction. I will most certainly urge my fellow Sheriffs in the State of Missouriand across this great nation to rise to the defense and aid of all Americans should the federal government attempt to enact any legislation, or executive order that impedes, erodes, or otherwise diminishes their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. I will use all means legal to meet this solemn and sacred responsibility.
It's worth highlighting that while Mack has been tarred as a "small government extremist" by the Southern Poverty Law Center, the refusal of CSPOA members to comply with new federal gun regulations is not so different from the Seattle Police Department's refusal to enforce federal marijuana laws; or, the refusal of local law enforcement agencies in sanctuary cities to help ICE enforce federal immigration laws. Also worth highlighting: There are over 3,000 counties in the U.S., meaning the 90 county sheriffs who have signed on with the CSPOA represent, uh, three percent. (Thanks to the emailer for pointing this out!)
You can see the full list of signatories to Mack's pledge after the jump:
LIST OF STATE SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATIONS
2. New Mexico Sheriff's Association (30 out of 33 sheriffs)
LIST OF COUNTY SHERIFFS
1. Sheriff Glenn E. Palmer - Grant County, Oregon
2. Sheriff Gil Gilbertson – Josephine County, Oregon
3. Sheriff Tim Mueller – Linn County, Oregon
4. Sheriff Adam Christianson – Stanislaus County, California
5. Sheriff Brad A. DeLay – Lawrence County, Missouri
6. Sheriff Charles M. Heiss – Johnson County, Missouri
7. Sheriff Steve Cox - Livingston County, Missouri
8. Sheriff Jon Lopey – Siskiyou County, California
9. Sheriff Craig Zanni – Coos County, Oregon
10. Sheriff John Hanlin - Douglas County, Oregon
11. Sheriff John Bishop – Curry County, Oregon
12. Sheriff Larry Blanton - Deschutes County, Oregon
13. Sheriff Jim Hensley – Crook County, Oregon
14. Sheriff Denny Peyman – Jackson County, Kentucky
15. Sheriff Roy Klingler – Madison County, Idaho
16. Sheriff Blake Dorning – Madison County, Alabama
17. Sheriff Justin Smith – Larimer County, Colorado
18. Sheriff Al Cannon – Charleston County, South Carolina
19. Sheriff Ana Franklin – Morgan County, Alabama
20. Sheriff Andy Hughes – Houston County, Alabama
21. Sheriff Stacy Nicholson – Gilmer County, Georgia
22. Sheriff Robin Cole – Pine County, Minnesota
23. Sheriff Bill Snyder – Martin County, Florida
24. Sheriff Ed Kilgpore – Humboldt County, Nevada
25. Sheriff Tom Bosenko – Shasta County, California
26. Sheriff John D'Agostini – El Dorado County, California
27. Sheriff David Hencraft – Tehama County, California
28. Sheriff Dean Growden – Lassen County, California
29. Sheriff Dean Wilson – Del Norte County, California
30. Sheriff Mike Poindexter – Modoc County, California
31. Sheriff Thomas Allman - Mendocino County, California
32. Sheriff Mike Downey - Humboldt County, California
33. Sheriff Larry Smith - Smith County, Texas
34. Sheriff Kieran Donahue - Canyon County, Idaho
35. Sheriff Margaret Mims – Fresno County, California
36. Sheriff Pat Garrett – Washington County, Oregon
37. Sheriff Dan Staton – Multnomah County, Oregon
38. Sheriff Scott Mascher - Yavapai County, Arizona
39. Sheriff Micahel A. Helmig - Boone County, Ohio
40. Sheriff A.J. Rodenberg - Clermont County, Ohio
41. Sheriff Terry Maketa - El Paso County, Colorado
42. Sheriff John Cooke - Weld County, Colorado
43. Sheriff Scott Berry - Oconee County, Georgia
44. Sheriff Frank Denning – Johnson County, Kansas
45. Sheriff Stan Hilkey – Mesa County, Colorado
46. Sheriff Terry Box – Collin County, Texas
47. Sheriff Chuck Wright - Spartanburg County, South Carolina
48. Sheriff Greg Hagwood - Plumas County, California
49. Sheriff Frank McKeithen - Bay County, Florida
50. Sheriff Roger Garrison - Cherokee County, Georgia
51. Sheriff Tony Desmond - Schoharie County, New York
52. Sheriff Richard Devlin Jr. – Otsego County, New York
53. Sheriff Bruce Haney – Trinity County, California
54. Sheriff Wayne DeWitt - Berkeley County, South Carolina
55. Sheriff Bob 'Big Block' Colbert – Wagoner County, Oklahoma
56. Sheriff Joel W. Richardson – Randall County, Texas
57. Sheriff Mike Scott – Lee County, Florida
58. Sheriff Mike Winters – Jackson County, Oregon
59. Sheriff Brian Wolfe – Malheur County, Oregon
60. Sheriff Cameron M. Noel – Beaver County, Utah
61. Sheriff Tom Rummel – Sanders County, Montana
62. Sheriff Jeff Christopher – Sussex County, Delaware
63. Sheriff Brad Rogers, Elkhart County, Indiana
64. Sheriff David Edmunds – Summit County, Utah
65. Sheriff James Tracy – Utah County, Utah
66. Sheriff Robert Dekker – Millard County, Utah
67. Sheriff Frank Park – Tooele County, Utah
68. Sheriff J. Lynn Yeates – Box Elder County, Utah
69. Sheriff G. Lynn Nelson – Chache County, Utah
70. Sheriff James Cordova – Carbon County, Utah
71. Sheriff Jerry Jorgensen – Daggett County, Utah
72. Sheriff Todd Richardson – Davis County, Utah
73. Sheriff Travis Mitchell – Duchesne County – Utah
74. Sheriff Greg Funk – Emery County, Utah
75. Sheriff James D. Perkins – Garfield County, Utah
76. Sheriff Steven White – Grand County, Utah
77. Sheriff Mark Gower – Iron County, Utah
78. Sheriff Alden Orme – Juab County, Utah
79. Sheriff Lamont Smith – Kane County, Utah
80. Sheriff Blaine Breshears – Morgan County, Utah
81. Sheriff Marty Gleave – Puite County, Utah
82. Sheriff Dale Stacey – Rich County, Utah
83. Sheriff Rick Eldredge – San Juan County, Utah
84. Sheriff Brian Nielson – Sanpete County, Utah
85. Sheriff Nathan Curtis – Sevier County, Utah
86. Sheriff Jeff Merrell – Uintah County, Utah
87. Sheriff Todd Bonner – Wasatch County, Utah
88. Sheriff Cory Pulsipher – Washington County, Utah
89. Sheriff Kurt Taylor – Wayne County, Utah
90. Sheriff Terry Thompson – Weber County, Utah
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has pledged to ignore 90 sheriffs and two sheriffs associations.
True, but they don't have the manpower to keep the clamps down on 90 counties without help from the locals.
I think Obozo has handed off enforcement of this to Napolibutchitano.
So that's where the 1.2 billion rounds of ammo went.
This is all well and good, but the gun control push petered out just as expected, and I doubt anything will come from it. Last week CNN was literally a homepage of nothing but GUNN KONTROLL, and I just went and looked and there isn't a single thing about gun control that I could see any more.
And even better, all gun owners will remember this in 2014. Way to blow your wad again, gun control scum. HA HA HA HA
the Post was the same way. it was front to back gun control for a month. every letter to the editor was pushing gun control, with a token opposition thrown in. and then, crickets.
What are they going to remember? I don't know of anyone up for election in 2014 in anything but the bluest constituency who said anything positive about AWB or magazine restrictions.
The biggest traitor was Bob Casey, but he's not up for election till 2018 and is clearly trying to become a player on the national Dem scene at this point anyway.
They'll remember freaking out about coming gun control, and then a lot of prospective candidates will play up their 2nd Amendment bona fides to remind them more. It'll have an effect.
Maybe. I'm just looking forward to all the $400 ARs we'll be seeing in the coming months if the gun control tide ebbs.
That makes two of us.
Shit. Demand is going up dammit.
At some point the bubble will burst, and those who spent thousands will be kicking themselves in the head.
As am I.
Not so fast, y'all...here comes DiFi and she's galloping up on the hobby horse with a new AWB measure "to be introduced Thursday."
Does she still own guns, though? [which makes her a hypocrite, but that's okay if it's For The Children.]
I wonder whether it will be voted on before the three-year-overdue budget.
I don't trust it anyway. This may be the calm before the storm. I'm keeping Toomey's, Rothfus', and Corbett's feet to the fire anyway.
They're not quite done yet. Harry Reid has to hold a token vote so his conservative guys can get some cover by joining the Republicans to vote down cloture 60-39.
peace officers (a term Mack prefers to "law enforcement officers")
It ticks me off when people use those terms as synonyms. They are not.
A peace officer is someone who helps crime victims, while a law enforcement officer is someone who victimizes those who disobey legislation.
One is out to help people, the other is out to hurt people.
Not the same thing.
I don't believe that we have the former, anymore, in this country. They are all law enforcement now.
Also, these sheriffs forgot to mention that they do plan to keep officers puppy shooting for target practice, perfectly legal.
I think a few peace officers do exist. I met one once. Gave me a ride home in a snow storm without even asking my name. I was expecting to be questioned and run for warrants, but he didn't even ask my name. Just gave me a ride home. I was shocked.
So at least one exists.
Then again that was almost twenty years ago.
My friends and I once skipped school to go to Indianapolis, get drunk, go record shopping, and run around. We were driving home, and my friend's car pooped out on I-70. The local sheriff drove by and stopped. He gave us rides back to our homes, didn't notice (or care) we smelled like a brewery, and wished us well as we left. That was 1986. So, yeah...
So he didn't care that you were endangering the other users of the road with drunk driving?
So he didn't care that you were endangering the other users of the road with drunk driving?
Driving drunk does not automatically put people in danger. I'd rather share the road with a young person who has had a few drinks than the average elderly person.
Then you're a fool. There are way more collisions caused by drunk drivers than by elderly drivers.
Then you're a fool. There are way more collisions caused by drunk drivers than by elderly drivers.
You do know that if a sober person runs a red light and hits someone who has had a few drinks, that the accident is blamed on the guy who had a few drinks?
I know. I was on my bicycle after a few drinks and some kid ran a red light, leaving me unconscious in the middle of the road. There were witnesses and everything. Cop told them to scram and gave me a DUI. The guy who ran the red light walked away without a ticket.
So just because they say a collision was caused by the person who had been drinking doesn't mean it's the truth.
So should any level of drunkeness be legal for driving?
He probably couldn't do anything about it since he didn't actualy see them driving. They were broken on the side of the road, remember? And he probably figured giving them a ride would at least get them off the road.
*broken down
That doesn't work. If it did, you could never get charged with DUI when cops found you drunk when they responded to the scene of a collision.
A car on the side of a frequently patrolled road where parking is not allowed is assumed to have been driven in the recent past. Which kind of makes sense.
On our way back from a concert in Cincy, when I was maybe 17 years old, we were all drunk as hell, all under age, and stoned also, with pot in the car. We stopped at a gas station because we were lost and one of the guys had gotten out of the car to go in, get some soda, and ask for directions.
Next thing I remember, I looked over and he was talking to a cop who had pulled up almost right beside of us. I thought, oh shit, we are busted. Cop gave him directions, and told him he looked like he needed to go home and get some sleep. That was it.
Har dee har.
You schmucks are the reason the MADD prohibitioinists got so much power.
You schmucks are the reason the MADD prohibitioinists got so much power.
No they arent. They got so much power because:
1. The politicians gave it to them
2. Lightner didnt burn the org to the ground when she was done.
But mainly #1.
And what pray tell caused #1 to happen?
Fuck off, nanny-bot!
That was to Tulpa.
There you go
Libertines are just as much a threat to liberty as puritans.
HARCOURT FENTON MUDD!
HM, are you saying Tulpa looks like this?
I thought that was already proven.
Libertines who dont harm others are ZERO threat to liberty.
On the other hand, Puritans who dont enforce their puritanism on others via the law also dont harm others.
Hey, Tulpa... still think it's a crime to flash your lights at oncoming drivers to warn them of speed traps [aka "purely about raising ticket-fine revenue", not "public safety']?
Absolutely. It's naked interference with a police investigation. Just like warning a car thief in the process of breaking into a car that a cop is coming, so he can run away.
Lying in wait is now an "investigation". The more you know....
Sarc, there are some in the central part of northern Illinois. I've met a couple in person. Rare, but not extinct.
I even remember cops coming up to me in court, when I did traffic and misdemeanor stuff at the SAO and they would say honest things and ask if I would dismiss tickets to people they could not remember or realized they had effed up the charge, etc. One even apologized to a kid in open court for an incorrect ticket (back when IL got 'mandatory seat belt' laws). Might have hurt my jaw, it hung so slack.
I don't believe that we have the former, anymore, in this country. They are all law enforcement now.
I'm happy to say I know more peace officers than LEO. In TN they would shine a light on the high schoolers painting graffiti after football games, I spent an evening doing ride-alongs, acted in plays with a couple officers, and got a tour of the SWAT unit. In TX every one of them were great guys and in NC, the officer who taught my handgun class was amazing. He was all about protecting yourself and carrying at all times whenever possible.
I have met some real assholes too (and this is only personal experience), but so far, the peace officers are winning.
"Peace" means non-military, not bleeding heart victim helpers. It arises from the time when an organized law enforcement force other than a militia or army was a novelty.
While I'm not happy with the current state of police abuses, they weren't exactly ignorers of victimless crime when the term "peace officer" was more common.
While I'm not happy with the current state of police abuses
Yet you defend them at every turn.
Liar.
*snort*
LAOLWHAT?
Anyone looked at Drudge lately? Hillary looks like Rosanne Barr in those pics. It's pretty funny.
Drudge is in his glory with Hillary in the spotlight.
Didn't Obama choose not to enforce immigration laws? Seems like laws don't really bind anyone anymore.
"As the duly elected Sheriff of Johnson County, Missouri, it is my sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitutions of the United States of America, and the State of Missouri against all enemies both foreign and domestic."
No way a branch of gov't could be a domestic enemy of constitutional rights. Unpossible
Has anybody asked these guys where in the Constitution the government is given the power to prohibit drugs?
^^THIS^^
Commerce Claus
Santa's evil brother? He comes down your State's chimney and deposits a great big Federal shit under your tree?
I thought he came down your chimney and seized all your assets?
"Commerce Claus"
Assuming you meant clause....bullshit. It does no such thing. More like what sarcasmic said...fuck you thats why.
I hope this is sarcasm, but it's hard to tell when Tulpa is in cop-fellating mode.
Unsure what cop fellating has to do with federal drug laws.
State drug laws don't need constitutional justification as states have general police powers.
"Fuck you, that's why" clause
LIST OF COUNTY SHERIFFS
WHY DON'T YOU JUST PUT UP AN INTERACTIVE MAP TO THEIR HOUSES, RIGGS??? I should probably see what my county sheriff thinks of the pledge.
Not a single one in PA? With the level of shooting enthusiasts in this state, I'd think our Sheriffs would be taking advantage...
I have been told privately by two elected sheriffs here that they have no intention of enforcing any gun control laws beyond what they do now. I suspect every elected sheriff in Louisiana, barring Orleans and Jefferson parishes are the same. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
Maybe only 90 sheriffs nationwide wrote letters, but you can bet the vast majority sympathize.
I also asked them what they intend to do if the feds try to implement it themselves. Answer; "We will cross that bridge when we come to it."
I dont see them standing idly by while the majority of their tax-paying voters and supporters are harassed, stolen from and shot at.
Municipal police chiefs...a different story. It could all get very interesting.
The majority of sheriffs in PA seem to be pro-RKBA; most have no problem issuing carry permits or signing off on NFA paperwork. There are a small few who drag their feet and issue carry permits only after the longest delay allowed by law. But as far as passively withholding assistance for or presenting active resistance to confiscation or registration efforts, that's likely another story.
Personally, I'm amazed at how much better Pgh is on this issue compared to Philly. It's just as deep blue but I got my permit in less than a week, while Philly is a relatively arduous process with an interview and shit.
Did they actually contact your references? Most sheriffs do in PA, but I know of at least one that didn't, at least back in the '90s.
"Any rule, regulation, or executive order repugnant to the constitutional rights of the citizens of this County will be ignored by this Office, nor will this office, or the citizens, allow enforcement of unconstitutional activities by federal officers"
Unstated but implied was the disclaimer, "Unless the law says we get to kill people's dogs and spend their money on fancy guns, in which case, game on!"
I was wondering when Sheriff Bob 'Big Block' Colbert (Wagoner County, Oklahoma) would finally weigh in on this issue.
I hear he torques a good game on gun rights.
Compare Mike Rigg's post (and the attached comments) here to his post in 2008 when Cook County sheriff was refusing to enforce foreclosure evictions.
So what principle distinguishes the laws that Sheriffs are allowed to not enforce and the ones they are allowed to ignore?
OBEY!!!
[the first word choice of any good authoritarian]
Federal gun control laws are unconstitutional. To give one reason
And who decides which laws are and aren't constitutional? The individual sheriff?
Yes. It's really not that complicated!
Next question? Yes?
Well, Thomas Dart decided evicting people from homes they no longer owned was unconstitutional, so I guess we should all be okay with that then.
Overall, I think we're better off if law enforcement didn't obey every dictate from DC. And in this case, it doesn't take a legal genius to know that gun control is unconstitutional
You're missing my point. The question isn't whether the gun-control sheriffs are right or not. The problem is that sometimes people act wrongly. If we allow Sheriffs to not enforce ANY laws they disagree with, what stops them from not enforcing constitutional laws? If we only allow Sheriffs to not enforce SOME laws, who determines which laws can be ignored and which can't?
I understand exactly what you're saying. And I'm saying that to me, the possibility of some sheriffs not enforcing certain constitutional laws is a hell of a lot better than the scenario of them blindly enforcing every unconstitutional dictate coming from the federal government. I don't know why the prospect of not enforcing constitutional laws is so much more frightening than the (far more common) enforcement of unconstitutional laws.
BTW, what are your thoughts on the marijuana legalization in CO and WA? Should the cops there ignore the state law and enforce the unconstitutional federal laws?
the constitution, perhaps?
Well there's a difference between theft and exercising a constitutional right.
No one's rights are violated by me continuing to have a gun.
I agree that gun rights are good and failing to enforce property rights. The problem is, I'm not the sheriff. If Sheriffs are allowed to ignore laws they don't like, there's going to be as many Thomas Darts as Richard Macks.
I noticed David Weaver - Douglas County, CO is not on the list. In related news, guess who's not getting my vote for re-election.
I can argue that someone like William Howard Taft was a "small government extremist," which means that the smear attempt by P'takh's... sorry, Potok's SPLC is pretty meaningless.
I don't think you could argue that William Howard Taft was a small anything.
lol, I guess they are smart enough to realize that silly laws are for honest folk.
http://www.Anon-dits.tk
32. Sheriff Mike Downey - Humboldt County, California
Yes! You're the man, Downey?in the good sense. You do us proud in the Emerald Triangle.
If only these sheriffs were just as concerned about the fourth amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures...
Another for you list: Sheriff Jack Brandes from Austin County Texas - http://patriotstatesman.com/20.....ol-agenda/