Happy National Cyber Security Awareness Month!
October is Cyber Security Awareness Month and official Washington seems a little too aware. Fleeting references to cyber security were made by both President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney in the course of Monday's third presidential debate. The issue remains a hot topic with members of Congress fearful of America's vulnerability to cyber attacks and acts of terrorism.
In August, Sen. Joe Lieberman's (I-Conn) Cyber Security Act 2012 failed to move past a filibuster after Republican opposition on the grounds that proposed security standards would lead to costly regulations for businesses. Despite this stumbling block, Congress and the Obama administration are said to be continuing with a "race" to establish cyber security standards for what it deems 'critical infrastructure providers.'
A White House executive order dealing with the issue is likely to instruct federal agencies, such as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, to enforce mandatory standards upon the companies they regulate.
Lieberman suggests that "some of them will be forced to spend some more money than they otherwise are spending now to defend themselves." Such executive orders and legislation won't just regulate businesses behavior; they will also enable the extensive collection, monitoring, and use of personal data by both the regulated businesses involved and the Department of Homeland Security, amongst a network of other government agencies.
The use of an executive order to mandate such actions is a particularly scary prospect considering the upcoming elections. Romney has stayed fairly quiet on the issue of cyber security, but his election white paper commits to updating the 2003 National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, the Bush-era legislation which granted the National Security Agency approval to wiretap Americans without the need for a warrant. Though the Romney white paper lacks specific details as to how Romney plans to update this he does continue to push for a 'much more coordinated effort' by the intelligence agencies and government departments. He's apparently not been deterred by the failure of the hugely expensive, highly intrusive and wholly ineffective "fusion centers" that wasted billions of dollars creating networks of intelligence-gathering that actively invaded citizen's privacy whilst failing to report or uncover any terrorist activities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That picture so deserves an alt-text!
What? No minesweeper guy?
1) AND no prone-position sniper-ish guy
2) AND none of them is handicapable*
*misshapen, bent, thin or otherwise showing signs of issues in the modling process....The Crips of the armies of my yute.
And an M48 tank with a droopy barrel.
OT - if already posted, screw you:
See, there WAS a reason we killed the youtube terrorists kid.
Isn't the state forcing business to do their dirty work for them--essentially deputizing these businesses--kind of like, uh, fascism? Because it's state control of what are still private entities.
Everyone knows how well competent programmers do in a bureaucracy. I'm sure they'll be signing up in droves to do their patriotic part to protect the cybersecurity of the US. Oh wait. No. Programmers go slowly mad when their good ideas get strangled by the management committee in favor of changing the the font and color scheme on the intranet homepage that nobody but the boss uses.