Rasmussen: 65 Percent Say No To NYC Large-Sugary Drink Ban
As Baylen Linnekin reports, not only are the usuals mocking NYC Mayor Bloomberg's plan to ban large-size sugary drinks, but also New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Christine Quinn, writer and healthy-food advocate Bettina Siegel, Jon Stewart, Jake Tapper, Matt Lauer, and The New York Times' editorial page.
Like these public intellectuals, the public also opposes such a ban. Rasmussen found 65 of Americans oppose a law that would ban the sale of any cup or bottle of sweetened drink larger than 16 ounces; 24 percent favor such a law. When asked about the constitutional authority to enact such a law, 9 percent think Bloomberg does have the authority to prevent people from buying sugary drinks, while 85 percent disagree.
Virtually all major demographic groups Rasmussen identified oppose the sugary-drinks ban in equal proportion. The only divergence appears for party identification. Forty-one percent of Democrats favor a ban and 45 percent oppose, in contrast 11 percent of Republicans favor and 80 percent oppose.
Click here for Rasmussen's methodology and question wording.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Glad to know the public opposes it. The ban would be both immoral and ineffective. People aren't driven to consume more sugar because it's cheap or comes in bigger portion sizes, any more than selling kegs of beer kill people with alcohol poisoning. (Note both fructose and alcohol are carbohydrates that are hepatic poisons and cause similar problems.)
For example, your tiny boy or very little lady may possibly be struggling with potty training, watching too a lot Tv, or needing a Hogan Outlet little bit extra attention from Mother and Dad. That awareness may perhaps only require to be an additional 15 minutes in Mom's lap, but it can make all the difference for your minor a person.
as Tammy answered I'm dazzled that any body able to get paid $8241 in 4 weeks on the internet. did you read this site link makecash16Com
In latest poll 35% of respondents outwardly admit to being morons.
Bloomberg is insane. There can be no other explanation.
Such a limitation would hurt poorer people. If I'm used to having 32 oz of coke, then I will buy two 16 oz cokes. Two 16 oz cokes cost a lot more than one 32 oz coke as most of us know. This obviously hurts the poorer people the hardest. Of course Bloomberg has $22 billion so no sweat.
super blogs thanks admins
sohbet
sohbet odalar?
thanks you very good nice admin room's comment's cinsel chat & chat sohbet