The Garden State Looks to Follow Portugal's Example
New Jersey legislators look likely to further the Garden State's withdrawl from the War on Drugs after proposing a law that would decriminalize the possession of marijuana. The bill was unanimously passed by committee, and could be voted on in the Assembly as soon as Thursday. The law would closely resemble the Portuguese decriminalization policy, whereby possession is not a criminal offense and punishable by a fine. The bipartisan proposal would be the latest in a series of policy changes that relaxes the fervor of the drug war in New Jersey. New Jersey has already reduced the size of drug-free school zones and legalized medical marijuana. After the successes of the Portuguese model, there is no reason to think that New Jersey will not enjoy similar successes, that is of course unless the administration decides to continue its own trend of overreach.
Like many laws that move towards a more liberal drug policy the New Jersey proposal is motivated in large part by the failures and costs of the war on drugs. Reed Gusciora, D-Mercer made the economic argument saying that, "The real crime is to taxpayers. It's really costly for taxpayers to prosecute that one joint when limited resources would be better served on bigger and better crimes." Jack Cole, a retired New Jersey State Police detective lieutenant and chairman of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, noted that the war on drugs has failed to reduce the rate of addiction, "$1.5 trillion has been spent over four decades and 46 million arrests made of nonviolent drug offenders — and that after all that, the same percentage of the population, 1.3 percent, is addicted to drugs as was in 1914 and 1970. Even more concerning is that police solve far fewer major crimes now than ever before,"
While it is encouraging that New Jersey legislators look prepared to let law enforcement professionals tackle serious crimes and reduce the number of prisoners in already overcrowded prisons, federal oversight could prove to be obstructive, especially if California's experience is anything to go by. If the Obama administration reacted so strongly to legal medical marijuana dispensaries it is safe to assume that New Jersey could see a similar response to the decriminalization of marijuana possession.
Obama, who began as someone who supported state rights with regard to drugs, has become one of the most aggressive perpetrators of the drug war. As the ReasonTV video below shows, such a drastic change in policy will only alienate many of Obama's usual supporters.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I think this was going to mean bankruptcy and rioting. *Insert your own jab at New Jersey here*
I thought...
such a drastic change in policy will only alienate many of Obama's usual supporters.
Wishful thinking. Most of his usual supporters are mindless TEAM BLUE drones who will vote for him or any other pol with a D after their name so long as those EVUL Rethuglicans don't get power again.
one of the most aggressive perpetrators of the drug war
Hyperbole, thy name is Matthew Feeney.
Serious, yes His Highness has his flaws. And is nowhere near the defender of the downtrodden that he implies. But "most"? c'mon. They've all sucked since LBJ.
"one of the most..."
I believe FATSo is going to VETO the law.
That's my guess. I have never heard him talk about drug issues, but I doubt a former federal prosecutor is up for decriminalization. Six months from now this bill would probably have a better chance.
Where is Christie on this, anyway?
"If the Obama administration reacted so strongly to legal medical marijuana dispensaries it is safe to assume that New Jersey could see a similar response to the decriminalization of marijuana possession."
Several states, including my home state of Ohio, have had decriminalized marijuana for more than 30 years. The feds have never had a problem with that. It is "safe to assume" that New Jersey would be treated the same way. In Ohio, you can possess up to 100 grams (3.5 oz) of cannabis and receive nothing more than a $100 fine.
THERE IS NO Congressional enacted federal criminal law that would PROHIBIT, FORBID, or make it a federal-crime to possess marijuana, cocaine, heroin, or 'controlled substances', whatever they are now or ever will be.
Or better yet, SHOW ME a Congressional enacted statute that the President of the United States has signed into Public Law that PROHIBITS, FORBIDS, or makes it a federal-crime to possess, manufacture, distribute, or dispense, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, or 'controlled substances'!