Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

17 Percent of Wisconsinites Favor Disbursing Retirement Benefits to Gov't Workers Before Age 60

Emily Ekins | 5.29.2012 12:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

According to the latest Reason-Rupe poll of 708 Wisconsin adults on landline and cell phones, only 17 percent favor disbursing lifetime retirement benefits to retired government workers before age 60. In fact, 50 percent prefer government workers wait until age 65 before becoming eligible to collect retirement benefits.

In many states, government workers may retire and begin receiving lifetime retirement benefits before age 60. However, in the state of Wisconsin, 79 percent of residents think public employees should wait until at least age 60 before becoming eligible to receive retirement benefits.

Differences across political and demographic subgroups emerge with raising the retirement benefit eligibility age to 65. Whereas 52 percent of private sector workers want to raise the eligibility age to sixty-five, 41 percent of public sector workers agree. Notably, half of retired former public employees think the eligibility age should be raised to at least age 65. Majorities of Republicans and Independents want to increase the eligibility age to 65, compared to 44 percent of Democrats.

These results match up with previous polling done in Wisconsin. For instance, a 2011 Rasmussen poll asked likely Wisconsin voters to consider several hypotheticals. Rasmussen asked:

"Suppose someone becomes a teacher right out of college and stays for 30 years until they retire at age 52. Should that person receive a full pension for life at age 52 or should that person find another job and wait until they retire at around age 65 to receive their full pension?" 60 percent said the teacher should wait until about age 65 to receive their full pension.

"Suppose someone joins the police force at age 20 and stays for 25 years until they retire at age 45. Should that person receive a full pension for life at age 45 or should that person find another job and wait until they retire at around age 65 to receive their full pension?" 65 percent of Wisconsin voters said the police officer should wait until about age 65 to receive retirement benefits.

These Reason-Rupe poll results of Wisconsin residents suggest the public is open to reforming the terms of public sector workers' contracts and the age at which public employees become eligible to receive lifetime retirement benefits. 

Full poll results can be found here and cross tabs here.

ORC International conducted fieldwork for the poll, May 14th-18th 2012 of both mobile and landline phones, 708 Wisconsin adults, margin of error +/- 3.7%.  Likely Wisconsin voters (609, MOE +/-4%) include registered respondents who said they are absolutely certain to vote or very likely to vote in the June 5th recall election for governor.

Emily Ekins is the director of polling for Reason Foundation where she leads the Reason-Rupe public opinion research project, launched in 2011. Follow her on Twitter @emilyekins.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article stated 17 percent of Wisconsin residents favor disbursing retirement benefits to government workers before age 65, the post should say before age 60.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A. Barton Hinkle on the U.S. Government's Latest Attempt to Fix the Obesity Epidemic It Started

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute.

PoliticsPolicyGovernment employeesPublic UnionsWisconsinRetirement
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Concerned Citizen   13 years ago

    Are there enough bridges in Wisconsin to house these oppressed State Workers?

  2. John   13 years ago

    I don't know about the states but as a fed, it takes 30 years before you can even think about retiring and really 40 years to get a decent return. So that puts you pretty close to 60. Military retirements kick in after 20. But those are different. People retire from the military often with military only skills and physically broken. So I don't have a problem with that, although I would prevent military retires from going to work for the feds and double dipping.

    1. ?Ex Nihilo?   13 years ago

      I would prevent military retires from going to work for the feds and double dipping.

      But why John. Shouldn't they be allowed to work if they have the skills and get through the interviews. The one thing I would do is prevent them from drawing disability and working at the same time.

      1. John   13 years ago

        Because they are already being paid by the feds. I would go back to the pre-9-11 days where your total compensation from the feds is limited.

        1. ?Ex Nihilo?   13 years ago

          Because they are already being paid by the feds. I would go back to the pre-9-11 days where your total compensation from the feds is limited.

          I disagree, just because they are being paid by the feds is no valid reason for limiting thier compensation. I don't think they should get vet's preferrence though.

    2. Brandon   13 years ago

      If fed employees were paid market rates, without the gold-plated pensions, I'd have no problem at all with ex-military going to work for them for as long as they want. Fix that first part and you solve a lot of other problems.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trad Wives and Tallow Fries: How the Wellness Wars Flipped Health and Food Politics Upside Down

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the July 2025 issue

The Trump Administration Just Created Hundreds of Thousands of Illegal Immigrants

Autumn Billings | 6.13.2025 4:15 PM

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' Military Parade Is a Big, Ugly Waste of Millions of Dollars

Billy Binion | 6.13.2025 3:53 PM

Neighbors React to ICE Raid at San Diego Italian Restaurant: 'It Could Happen Anywhere'

Eric Boehm | 6.13.2025 3:10 PM

Masked ICE Agents Are a Danger to Both the Public and Themselves

Joe Lancaster | 6.13.2025 1:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!