Everyone knows the Olympics are an advertising bonanza for the event's corporate sponsors. That's been true since the 1984 games in Los Angeles. What isn't as well known is that the urban authorities today do not merely promote the Olympics' officially approved commercial speech; they suppress commercial speech that does not have the games' approval. Kosmograd reports:
The most carefully policed Brand Exclusion Zone will be around the Olympic Park, and extend up to 1km beyond its perimeter, for up to 35 days. Within this area, officially called an Advertising and Street Trade Restrictions venue restriction zone, no advertising for brands designated as competing with those of the official Olympic sponsors will be allowed. (Originally, as detailed here, only official sponsors were allowed to advertise, but leftover sites are now available). This will be supported by preventing spectators from wearing clothing prominently displaying competing brands, or from entering the exclusion zone with unofficial snack and beverage choices. Within the Zone, the world's biggest McDonald's will be the only branded food outlet, and Visa will be the only payment card accepted.
This brand apartheid is designed to prevent "ambush marketing", the gaining exposure of an brand through unofficial means. One of the best known examples of this was in the World Cup in 2010, where a bevy of 36 Dutch beauties in orange dresses provided by Bavaria beer gained considerable media attention, to the chagrin of the official World Cup beer, Budweiser. At London 2012, branding 'police' will be on hand to ensure that nothing like this happens, with potential criminal prosecutions against those responsible. Organising committee LOCOG will also take steps to ensure that no unofficial business tries to associate itself with the Olympics by using phrases like 'London 2012', even on such innocuous things such as a cafe menu offering an 'Olympic breakfast'….And it's not just London. All the venues for the 2012 Olympics will be on brand lockdown. In Coventry, even the roadsigns will be changed so that there is no reference to the Ricoh Arena, which is hosting matches in the football tournament. Even logos on hand dryers in the toilets are being covered up. The Sports Direct Arena in Newcastle will have to revert back to St. James Park for the duration of the Olympics.
Via Gawker, which adds: "Expect running street battles between brand police and guerrilla marketers to rage throughout the Games." Occupy Marketing!
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
My sister Cathi Clore Frost, who has done a ridiculous amount of genealogical research, tells me that we are 6th or 7th cousins of the Clore family with the canoe business.
Clearly ridiculous, a perfect example about how big businesses and government can be a toxic mix. The fact that one is not even allowed to used the words "London 2012" makes me hope that the London olympics becomes another big olympic financial disaster.
The Olympics also ban government speech, which is not necessarily a bad thing, since it also means European athletes don't get to wear a EU flag on their shirts.
Yeah, there's no way that Bavaria was taking attention from Budweiser because it doesn't taste like urine. People will find what they want to see.
This has more to do with product exclusion than advertising exclusion. The former is just the next natural step. I don't think they will ever actually ban brands of clothing at events, as it's too cumbersome and intrusive, but prohibiting stores from selling stuff is a lot easier, as they're fewer in number and stationary. It's for the same reason the copyright system will collapse long before the patent system will: those most directly affected by copyright infringement laws are billions of relatively poor consumers, while those affected by patent infringement laws are thousands of relatively rich companies.
Nothing pissed me off more, being done in South Africa for the World Cup, than only having shitty, warm Budweiser available for 3 times the price of the local beers. (Disclaimer: I was working for SABMiller at the time. But that has nothing to do with my anger.)
It's interesting that one of the bigger complaints about the Olympics is that they are too commercialized. Outside the arenas and stadiums that's true--there are all sorts of corporate tents and banners of the Officially Licensed sponsors. But inside the arenas around the playing surface, the only company name visible was "Omega", and that was only on the clock. I guess at the concessions stands you would also see the Coke logo. But nothing on the scoreboard, no rotating signs, no digital advertising on the arena decks or on the court surface. It's sport wrapped almost entirely in nationalism, with no commercialism aside from a manufacturing logo on the participants' uniforms.
(My comments are exclusive to just the two summer Olympics I've been to (Sydney/Beijing) so it's possible the winter games or other summer host cities have not used this model.)
Sounds like a pretty good plan to me dude.
http://www.Privacy-Nerds.tk
Fuck off, slaver anonbot
Anonbot is an official sponsor.
Has hosting the Olympics been a positive for any city selected to do so?
Olympia, circa 900 B.C.? Maybe?
Lake Placid got a movie named after it.
Fuck Lake Placid and every one of those black flies. They're probably out in record numbers this spring due to the Al Gore winter.
Don't you talk smack about that movie, either. It starred many national treasures.
Berlin?
Did you just Godwin me?
You know who else ran an Olympics plagued by scandal?
Romney?
Jesse Owens?
Jackie Joyner Kersey?
Captain Caveman? Oh wait that was a laffalympics
Atlanta?
The AOC did so well that the Olympics put in rules that prevent cities from running on the Atlanta model anymore.
Stadiums having to change their names for international tournaments is nothing new.
Yes, and that is, like, totally what this article is about!
In the spirit of the Olympic Games?, why would anyone expect that there would be [brand] competition?
http://www.nolanchart.com/arti.....mpics.html
Dan, are you related to the Clore family that runs the canoe outfitting business? If so, hometown shoutout!
Tonio:
My sister Cathi Clore Frost, who has done a ridiculous amount of genealogical research, tells me that we are 6th or 7th cousins of the Clore family with the canoe business.
So what if you happen to live/own a business within that range?
It's called eminent domain. The need of the mummy outweighs the need of the one.
Dont they have a different name for it in wee Britain?
Like the queens privelage or the Paul Hogan rule or something?
"For the common good" is often preferred.
"Compulsory purchase," I believe.
Am I a bad person if I fail to give a shit about this?
Yes. Fuck these censors in their spleens.
OTOH, I look forward to the onslaught of half-neekid guerrilla advertsing.
Is it OK for the Boy Scouts to exclude gay members and Christian groups to exclude atheists?
That's not half-neekid, not even 1/4... but pleasant nonetheless.
Clearly ridiculous, a perfect example about how big businesses and government can be a toxic mix. The fact that one is not even allowed to used the words "London 2012" makes me hope that the London olympics becomes another big olympic financial disaster.
Before we make up our minds about this, I think it would be a good idea to remember the value of advertising.
Stephen Root is one of the most underrated and underemployed comedic actors of our time.
The Olympics also ban government speech, which is not necessarily a bad thing, since it also means European athletes don't get to wear a EU flag on their shirts.
Yeah, there's no way that Bavaria was taking attention from Budweiser because it doesn't taste like urine. People will find what they want to see.
This has more to do with product exclusion than advertising exclusion. The former is just the next natural step. I don't think they will ever actually ban brands of clothing at events, as it's too cumbersome and intrusive, but prohibiting stores from selling stuff is a lot easier, as they're fewer in number and stationary. It's for the same reason the copyright system will collapse long before the patent system will: those most directly affected by copyright infringement laws are billions of relatively poor consumers, while those affected by patent infringement laws are thousands of relatively rich companies.
Well if they did not want McDonalds, Coke and Bud advertising all over their towns they should not have lost World War Two.
Nothing pissed me off more, being done in South Africa for the World Cup, than only having shitty, warm Budweiser available for 3 times the price of the local beers. (Disclaimer: I was working for SABMiller at the time. But that has nothing to do with my anger.)
The fact the somebody was forcing you to buy and drink it probably made it even worse too.
Well technically they were because watching soccer without being drunk is one of the forms of suicide that's globally outlawed.
I guess it really must have sucked to be marched into the soccer match with a gun your back then.
It was actually a vuvuzela, but I THOUGHT it was a gun.
Does SAB count as a local beer in South Africa?
Sort of like people consider Miller an American beer in the US?
It's interesting that one of the bigger complaints about the Olympics is that they are too commercialized. Outside the arenas and stadiums that's true--there are all sorts of corporate tents and banners of the Officially Licensed sponsors. But inside the arenas around the playing surface, the only company name visible was "Omega", and that was only on the clock. I guess at the concessions stands you would also see the Coke logo. But nothing on the scoreboard, no rotating signs, no digital advertising on the arena decks or on the court surface. It's sport wrapped almost entirely in nationalism, with no commercialism aside from a manufacturing logo on the participants' uniforms.
(My comments are exclusive to just the two summer Olympics I've been to (Sydney/Beijing) so it's possible the winter games or other summer host cities have not used this model.)