Police Tell Woman to Pay Son's Bail in Cash, Then Steal it
Here's a Wisconsin story that needs more attention, care of former Reasoner Radley Balko:
On Feb. 29, a judge set [Joel] Greer's bail at $7,500, and his mother called the Brown County jail to see where and how she could get him out. "The police specifically told us to bring cash," Greer says. "Not a cashier's check or a credit card. They said cash."
So Greer and her family visited a series of ATMs, and on March 1, she brought the money to the jail, thinking she'd be taking Joel Greer home. But she left without her money, or her son.
Instead jail officials called in the same Drug Task Force that arrested Greer. A drug-sniffing dog inspected the Greers' cash, and about a half-hour later, Beverly Greer said, a police officer told her the dog had alerted to the presence of narcotics on the bills -- and that the police department would be confiscating the bail money. […]
The Greers had been subjected to civil asset forfeiture, a policy that lets police confiscate money and property even if they can only loosely connect them to drug activity. The cash, or revenue from the property seized, often goes back to the coffers of the police department that confiscated it.
The good news: The Greers eventually got their money back. The bad news: This kind of organized police theft of property from people who are not even charged with a crime is common nationwide.
Read all about it in Balko's February 2010 Reason feature, "The Forfeiture Racket: Police and prosecutors won't give up their license to steal."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I believe John covered this in the Morning Links.
And don't you have a book to be shamelessly promoting?
I believe John covered this in the Morning Links.
It can never be said enough "Don't trust the cops!!"
It underscores the message of "don't interact with the cops unless you have a lawyer and/or recording device with you".
Careful with those recording devices.
/Resident of MA
I can't wait to follow that link to the whole story so I can find out how the officers were then held accountable for their actions.
And how their superiors were completely unaware of the racket and are stepping down, and how their unions are going to castigate them, and how the task force is going to disband during an internal investigation. Yeah, I can't wait to hear all about it.
And how the stolen property was returned, the policemen involved were prosecuted for abuse of power and locked up in general population. Can't wait!
Dunphy? You here?
You can't post that picture without the song, Matt. That's just wrong.
And of course the Junior Murvin version. Is it too early for a Red Stripe?
5:00 somewhere in the world. In 15 minutes, it will be 4:20 somewhere, too.
Screw waiting until 5:00, its 4:00 somewhere.
I've never been able to figure out the rationale behind confiscation of personal property, especially money, in most situations. It seems to me that any property confiscated should have a high standard of proof that it is necessary, to avoid further crime by its owner. Also, if property is confiscated, and a person is released, either on bail, no charges filed, or after proof of innocence, their property should go with them, without further delay or fees.
Property is supposed to border on the sacred in this country, but the police can permanently confiscate based on some dog thinking something smells funny?
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it"
? Frederic Bastiat
Cops should just stand next to the ATM with a drug-sniffing dog (read: regular dog that "alerts" to cues from the handler), and seize each person's cash as they withdraw it.
http://www.coachoutletonline-five.com
http://www.ccoachfactoryoutletonline.com