Who Said It? Ron Paul or Ron Paul?
Foreign Policy with a fun quiz demonstrating the longterm consistency of Ron Paul, from the 1980s to now, on gold, spending, foreign intervention, Austrian economics, Cuba, and the like.
An excerpt from their intro set-up:
Long before he was calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and arguing for friendship rather than war with Iran, Paul was the only member of the House of Representatives to vote against a 1981 resolution on U.S. efforts to resolve a conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization in Lebanon. "We need less meddling in the internal affairs of other nations, not more," he explained.
In fact, while Paul is now running as a Republican candidate (just how long the ideological strain he represents will remain in the party is unclear), he sounds remarkably similar to how he did in 1988, when he won less than half a million votes as the Libertarian Party's presidential candidate after temporarily leaving the GOP.
Take technology, for instance. In 1987, he told Texas Monthly that "we're going to start testing our TV in smaller states, on off-channels, and on cable television. People who are looking for ideas tend to be watching independent stations and cable." By the 2008 election, when cable television had long since gone mainstream, Paul was channeling his message through the next edgy, disruptive innovation: the web.
Or take this interview in 1988 with a 53-year-old Paul. Sure, he's younger. But if you close your eyes and ignore the references to communism, you might just lose yourself in time. There's the same ardent, amused, and slightly squeaky talk of honoring the Constitution, taking a wrecking ball to federal institutions (especially his arch nemesis, the Federal Reserve), reining in out-of-control government spending, restoring a bright future for the country's debt-saddled youth, doing away with foreign aid, and turning America's gaze back toward its own shores and national defense.
The history of Paul and more is explained in my forthcoming book Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
FIRST!
Fuck Ron Pual! I'm never posting here again!
Let me file that under I don't give a shit.
If you're new here, JL, a bit of back-story: Max has promised to never return so many times, he could fill a New York phone book with that phrase.
I wish you'd use better language, Honey, but it's good you're leaving a site that doesn't appreciate you.
Now come upstairs so I can check you for ticks.
I'll take care of this, honey... c'mere, y'little shit, lemme tuck you inta bed.
You haven't kicked that piece of shit out yet?
Let's pull a train on her while that little shit is asleep.
Y'know, the kid likes cock, too...
Room for one more? George says I'm great at rimming!
Fix your link, Brian.
since brian seems to be bad at this:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/a.....r_ron_paul
the link is fixed, though one would need to refresh the page if it was already up to see. Thanks.
President Paul!
No sweetheart, sorry.
Beats the fuck out of "president" Obama, Santorum, Gingrich, et cetera...
Top choices for the presidency: Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, a mangy dog, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, a chimpanzee with Down Syndrome, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum.
Same except reverse Gingrich and Santorum.
Reverse Gingrigh and Santorum? I'd say reverse "Mitt Romney, Barack Obama" and the chimpanzee with Down Syndrome. At least the chimp would institute a pocket veto of every harebrained scheme Congress comes up with. Plus the press conferences would be great. Chimps are funny.
How does Obama beat the chimp, honestly?
das racis'
The Chimpanzee Retard party adopted a pro-life platform this year.
LOL! Look like the list I'd make.
Right. Newt's the one with the sweethearts.
Can R. Paul start a Madonna-like tour?
Please.
Half-naked, muscled male dancers would sell more tickets.
A suggestion.
I'll consider it ... NOT!!
The link goes to the Ron Paul Forums, not Foreign Policy.
Bored yet?
http://www.bandnamefinder.com/
Abolish the wages system
Fun with Google Street View
more fun with Google Streetview
Good link, thanks.
holy shit, amazing!
Abolish the wages system
Abolish the wages system
.
Holy shit.
Pretty sure this is a maneuver not to be performed on a friendly base.
That didn't look fun at the end there.
I expect his OER after that was below center mass.
Stars & Stripes says the pilots may be facing criminal charges (quoting "online sources", but not confirmed by military officials), not just a sub-par OER.
I kind of figured it would be a little more trouble than that (sort of understated sarcasm). Thanks for the link.
Woe, my gash shits Beatles
and I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling kids.
Bias intimidation!
http://boston.cbslocal.com/201.....encounter/
Fuck... here we go again.
What's a Tebow?
He's the virgin Denver sacrificed to win a Superbowl.
merci
#WINNAH!
I hafta admit... I stole that line from Boortz. Props where props is due.
Who is the last Vice President people respected?
I'm going with John Adams, since it was before he got all "Alien and Sedition Act"-y
Coolidge?
Another libertarian view of Ron Paul and his racist newsletters:
"As someone who has written and commented widely and generally sympathetically about Ron Paul, I've got to say that The New Republic article detailing tons of racist and homophobic comments from Paul newsletters is really stunning. As former reason intern Dan Koffler documents here, there is no shortage of truly odious material that is simply jaw-dropping.
"If Paul didn't write those articles, who did? If he didn't know what had appeared in his newsletter, when did he find out and how did he deal with it? If the candidate is vague on these points, it will only fuel suspicions that he held those beliefs after all (or that he was willing to stay silent despite his disagreements because the newsletters brought in some cash)."--Jesse Walker
never change
So "never" in Max's reality is "under three hours."
If we had a dime for every "Ron Paul is a racist, and he sucks, and he's a racist, and he sucks" post Max has cut'n'pasted from his old posts... we'd have a shitload of dimes.
Then again, words like "odious" are far outside his vocabulary, so maybe someone else is writing them for him. Maybe in exchange for oral pleasures. Who knows? It's all suck to Max.
Then again, he's referencing The New Republic... maybe someone THERE wrote these posts for him. In exchange for blowjobs.
The sad (but kind of funny) thing is that in at least one of the issues with a semi-racist tone, I think the first one Powell wrote there was a huge ad for a home security system. So either Powell or the newsletter itself or was trying to scare people into buying them to make some money. Or to help out their advertiser.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6C-mU2dVy0
Out of 240 newsletters, 20 were problematic, all written when Ron Paul was out of politics and a doctor. Only a few actually had anything seriously objectionable. Saying MLK was not perfect is not racist.
The worst were probably written by James B. Powell since his signed column is similar to a few that were insensitive after LA riots. Murray Rothbard and I think Lew Rockwell are Jewish, speak their minds and are not for giving Israel or any other country with foreign aid. Some people interpret anything that does not support Israel 100% as anti-semitic, but Rothbard and Rockwell tended to say anti-zionist, "anti-Israel" stuff all the time. It should be ok for two Jews to say the US should let Israel take care of itself and not be anti-semitic.
Does someone want to sponsor me to move to your state?
http://www.winnipegfreepress.c.....61976.html
Totally prescient about the Soviet Union when people were saber rattling. Turned out to be right 3 years later. Just like he was right about exactly what would happen in Egypt and Libya (e.g. Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda) several months prior when everyone was blinded by the so-called Arab Spring.
Re: Morton Downey appearance on the FP page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxXwKPLZyVs
I don't know how anyone could have just sat there taking that, trying to argue back, without either walking off or trying to smack Mort or even some of the audience members...
I think that's the show when Paul starts arguing with an audience member about legalizing drugs.
Pauls says "I don't think the government should be able to to tell you what to put your body. Where does it stop? You look a little fat! Maybe the government should put you on a diet!"
Great.
So instead of Ron Paul, the Republicans are going to pick:
a) RumNuts
b) Scrotorum
c) The Grinch
[bangs head on wall]
Because everyone agrees that Ron Paul "is probably right" about the debt problem and money and government spending too much and it's too intrusive and gee, we should mind our own business at least a little bit more, and somebody really ought to go fix all this shit.
That's why instead, the Republicans are going to pick:
a) RumNuts
b) Scrotorum
c) The Grinch
It's enough to make one loose one's capacity to be a smart ass.
My ass now smarts.
Yeah, it's looking pretty grim. I've been shorting top hat and monocle stocks.
Who comes up with all this nonsense?
http://www.real-world-anon.tk
"reigning in out-of-control government spending"
There, FIFY.
What, Ron Paul is consistent? Well, that obviously disqualifies him to be president and makes him a kook besides. I'm sure our resident pragmatists would agree.
Guess you guys dont know anything about politics until you do your own reserach on candidates when is America going to wake up
At least i use this news source not MSM to get real info.. http://commonandsensepolitics.com