Obama's 'Absolutely Critical' Investments Include the Violent Suppression of Politically Incorrect Drug Habits
In my column yesterday, I cited President Obama's proposal to increase the budget of the National Endowment for the Arts as evidence that he is less than fully committed to making the "hard choices" and "difficult decisions" he says are necessary in light of "the fiscal realities we face." The Drug War Chronicle notes another example that's even more disheartening because it involves a program that is not just pointless but pernicious: Obama wants to raise federal anti-drug spending from $25.2 billion this fiscal year to $25.6 billion next fiscal year. The increase, 1.6 percent, is not big, but if ever there were a program that was begging for cuts, the never-ending, always-failing war on drugs surely qualifies. Obama even wants to increase spending on interdiction, probably the most futile part of this pharmacological crusade.
Previous coverage of Obama's drug control budgets here and here. More on his more-of-the-same drug policy here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Seriously, can we do nothing until after a total meltdown? I thought we were supposed to be the advanced species on Earth.
politics means never having to admit when you're wrong.
If we could just get back to holding people accountable, we'd see dramatic improvements.
I still believe that if people actually knew what their elected officials were doing, they would be dragging them out in the streets and hacking them to death with machetes. I hope that becomes a reality some day, but, sadly, most people don't want to know the truth.
your faith in the proles is troubling
I believe most people don't care, and the ones who do care know that they would be gunned down if they tried.
Heck, they might be charged with sedition for simply talking about it.
Well, people won't take it forever. But, Americans have too much to lose right now. If they had nothing to lose, they would be ready to take back their freedom by force.
If it comes to taking by force, it will be a socialist type revolution where the other guy's stuff is being taken, not our freedom.
In America, the anti-commies have a lot more guns and attitude than the socialists. Don't forget that.
Being the advanced species led to us being the arrogant species. Next comes humble species and then I think we might get back to being the productive species, but maybe the apocalypse-causing species instead.
So long, and thanks for all the fish.
I guess so. I'll deliver our surrender to the dolphins the next time I see one.
Looking to bring more bisexual passion to your life? Welcome to=== Datebi.C/0/M ===, the world's largest bisexual community for no strings attached encounters. Hundreds of thousands pretty girls and handsome guys eager for hookups, bisexual stands, and discreet affairs are active here. Come in and discover the excitement you deserve! u_u
Commander Jerjerrod: "We shall redouble our efforts."
(You guys all know the response, so don't bother.)
How much will be budgeted to kill Perez?
no, no, that's the best part, the cartels have already agreed to fund the hit!
A joint MS13-CIA operation.
*singing (badly)*
Send in the drones.
If we could just get back to holding people accountable, we'd see dramatic improvements.
It's funny (in the not-at-all-humorous sense of the word): the blamethrowers are perpetually set for full dispersion, yet nobody is actually affected.
All you hear is laughter echoing in the hallway as the "combatants" leave the arena arm in arm after the deathmatch.
Exactly. This problem is on we the people. If we'd go apeshit on politicians, the parties, or the government as a whole when they do bad things, bad things would happen less frequently. It's not like politicians are tough guys. Make it clear that we'll toss them out of office for even minor ethical, legal, or moral transgressions, and we'll seem some change right away.
Right now, these guys just refusing to cut spending should, in a rational America, mean just about a complete rejection of all incumbents.
Make it clear that we'll toss them out of office for even minor ethical, legal, or moral transgressions, and we'll seem some change right away.
And they'll be replaced by the next crop of dirtbags.
The problem is the kind of people who are attracted to power.
People who could be trusted with it rarely if ever seek it.
well, start treating public office like Jury Duty. You get selected. You don't get to "run for office."
I've often thought a lottery would be better than elections.
a complete rejection of all incumbents.
Devoutly to be wished.
Even doing this one time could shake up the establishment. But no, we must allow the big scam to continue.
Except for maybe MNG, have any of our resident liberals complained about Obama's continuation of the WOD status quo?
That makes a lot of sense when you think about it. Wow.
http://www.anon-dot.tk