Long-Awaited Death of California Eminent Domain Abusers Continues
A Los Angeles government agency with a long history of fraud, theft, graft, blight, abuse, corruption and failure is winding down quickly, and there may be no way state or local officials can rescue it.
The Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles (CRA/LA) will cease operations and lay off 192 government employees at the end of this month, under terms laid out in a law signed last year by California Gov. Jerry Brown and upheld in December by California's supreme court.
CRA/LA board member Madeline Janis, with characteristic self-dramatization, confirms the glorious news that she will be out of a job come February 1. Janis, who has managed a comfortable existence as a union lawyer and anti-business activist, concedes that she will lose only power, not money. But she sheds hilarious tears for the CRA employees who must now find other ways to drain $109 million a year (the projected cost to the city of taking over CRA's blight-creating tasks) from taxpayers.
Rescue from the city does not appear to be in the cards. Nor does rescue from Los Angeles County. A county politician, who has his own two-decade history of involvement with a large failed CRA project run by a corrupt local developer, concedes as much to the L.A. Times:
"The liabilities associated with redevelopment in the city of Los Angeles are just too big for the county to absorb," said Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, a former Los Angeles city councilman.
Readers know I will not believe the CRA is dead until I can refuse to piss on its smoldering ashes. So please note that State Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Pacoima) is already trying to slide through a bill that would delay the termination of the Golden State's redevelopment agencies (RDAs) until April 15.
But that train may (just may) have left the station. Although RDAs remain favorites of politically connected developers, chambers of commerce and lawmakers from both parties, the California Redevelopment Association's lawsuit attempting to block the new law ended in a decision that destroyed the rescue package Brown and other Democrats had cobbled together for them. Under this plan, RDAs would have been able to lay dormant for a few years and return to destroying wealth in the future. By suing, the RDAs ended up negating their own rescue package.
The suit also exhausted the patience of Brown and probably other Democrats, all of whom have no appeal from the broken condition of city, county and state finances throughout California. And it exposed the arrogance with which thugs like Janis have been operating for decades. This is an appropriate end. RDAs do not deserve a decent burial.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The only truly satisfactory conclusion would be if all of these criminal thugs were thrown in jail. Simply losing their jobs is not enough.
No jail would be to good for these people. The people they screwed should be given the chance to bury them up to their necks and used for soccer practice!
Will that be on the soccer field that CRA and Concerned Citizens of South L.A. were somehow unable to build in eight years?
These things take time. When you rush the machinery of government, something gets gummed up.
Somebody oughta learn these CRA guys a thing or two about broken bones and internal bleedin.
Each of the CRA should be buried in a separate CRA unused (misused) property and allow the city to sell off those lands to recoup a little of their money.Each new building will have a cornerstone with said buried CRA and how much they cost for that property. Then their names will be permanently removed from the cornerstone plaque, never to be mentioned again.
Why does everyone want to give the CRA a public burial? Why don't they just go the way of Jimmy Hoffa: Gone with the entire country asking, "I wonder where they went? Oh well..."
Funny what no money can accomplish.
Also, from Tim's giddiness, I'd wager he typed this with one hand.
I am enjoying watching your glee. Please continue posting updates. However, I admonish you not celebrate by TPing Madelaine Janis's house.
Bi-sexual information?Seeking for the people have the same sexual orientation. please consult the site "Datebi.com", you will find the like-minded people!
Hello,my friends!Here's the most popular dating site for now__SeekCasual*com, a place for people who wanna start a short-term relationship.And also for finding soul mates.Over 160000 happy members are waiting their lovers.Join free and have a try,nothing to lose!``