Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Sixty Two Percent of Americans Prioritize Spending on Roads Over Public Transit

Emily Ekins | 1.4.2012 3:34 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Although most Americans drive their cars to work each day, a sizable amount of policy debate centers on public transportation, especially as cities embark on urban planning. A recent Reason-Rupe poll of 1,200 adults on landline and mobile phones finds that 12 percent of Americans take public transportation at least a few times a week and 63 percent say they never take public transit.

Correspondingly, 62 percent of Americans prioritize transportation funding for roads and highways over funding for public transit. Nevertheless, 30 percent—substantially more than those who frequently use public transportation—would prioritize funding for public transit. However, it is unclear whether those who do not take public transit but want to prioritize its spending would personally use public transit if expanded or if they would just want others to use it to reduce traffic congestion.

When getting specific, a third of Americans say public transit funding should be commensurate with the percentage using it; in other words, government should spend the same amount of money per person who takes public transit as those who take roads. Another third believe government should spend more dollars per person using public transit than individuals using roads. In comparison, 15 percent would spend disproportionally more per person using roads. Among those who frequently use public transit to get to work, nearly half believe that more dollars per person should be spent on those using public transportation than those using roads. In contrast, 33 percent of those who primarily commute on roads and highways would rather government spend more dollars per person using roads.

Americans overwhelmingly believe tax dollars spent on transportation are spent ineffectively (65 percent), whereas only 23 percent believe the money is spent well. Interestingly, there are substantial differences between those who take public transit and roads and perceptions of government wastefulness. Sixty six percent of those who commute on roads believe government spends transportation dollars ineffectively, while only 21 percent disagree. In contrast, 41 percent of public transit users believe government does spend effectively.

Find full Reason-Rupe Q4 2011 poll results, question wording, and methodology here.

The Reason-Rupe Q4 2011 poll collected a nationally representative sample of 1,200 respondents, aged 18 and older from all 50 states and the District of Columbia using live telephone interviews from December 1-13. Interviews were conducted on both landline and mobile phones. The margin of sampling error for this poll is +/- 3 percent.

Follow Emily Ekins on Twitter @emilyekins

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sixty Two Percent of Americans Prioritize Spending on Roads Over Public Transit

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute.

PoliticsPolicyReason-Rupe SurveysGovernment SpendingTransportation PolicyPublic transportationRoads
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mark Korman   13 years ago

    "We the people" don't always know what's best for us-look at our average education- that's why this is a representative democracy. We need better transportation all around.

    1. Grego   13 years ago

      Who's "we"? Stop talking like a collectivist. I am an INDIVIDUAL, I know what's good for me. Private transportation such as my car, taxis, and private shuttle companies are good for me because I go where I want and get there when I want (assuming there's not too much traffic).

      Public transportation SUCKS. The seats are uncomfortable, the waiting for the train or bus to arrive is tedious, I have to worry about them closing if I'm staying out late, and unless I live in a city like Chicago or New York, they just don't make sense.

      The reason most Americans favor roads is because most Americans drive cars. It's OUR MONEY that comes from our gasoline taxes, we should have a say on where it goes.
      http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

      1. John Spragge   13 years ago

        Will you then pay the full value (rather than the value estimated by governments in eminent domain proceedings) for the additional space your chosen means of transport requires? See http://tampabayonline.net/bguard/home.htm

        1. Grego   13 years ago

          John, that article from Tampa Bay is ridiculous. America has always had roads, whether they were dirt roads, stone roads, or asphalt, it's the natural condition of a civilized people to have roads.

          The only mistake we allowed was letting the federal government develop the interstate highway system, that killed the trains more than anything else.

          The solution is to privatize the run, some states are even leasing highways to private companies who manage to operate them at a profit with HOV lanes, tolls, and other devices while providing maintenance without evil union workers.

          Really John, not everything is an either or solution. If you want public transportation, write a business plan, get a group of investors, and start your transportation company. But don't tell me I have to pay higher gasoline taxes so wetbacks can get from point A to point B.

          1. Jay   13 years ago

            You had a compelling argument until you used a racial slur, pig. I hope you get hit by a bus.

  2. Ken   13 years ago

    This is not rocket science. I don't know the exact numbers, but I estimate that more than 62% of Americans will never have "Public Transportation" close enough to them to be of any real benefit. It will be used casually at best and doesn't represent the best use of the tax payers money.

  3. Dave Imrett   13 years ago

    The big difference between public transit and cars that people miss is how much of the cost is born by the taxpayer vs. the user.
    For cars the taxpayer pays for the roadway. The user pays for the car, the fuel, the driver and the maintenance. Most of the cost is born by the user.
    For transit the taxpayer pays for all of it: the roadbed, the rolling stock, the operator, the fuel and the maintenance. The user pays a very small entrance fee that usually amounts to less than 10% (often less than 5%) of the system cost.
    This means that the cost to the taxpayer for transit is very high compared to cars, even if the per person cost of transit is lower overall. This fact makes building and providing transit politically difficult, because people are (often with good reason) reluctant to trust the government to use their money efficiently to provide a service that they depend on.
    To convince the taxpayer that they are getting bang for buck with transit, you need absolute honesty, education, transparency, tremendous professionalism and efficiency. And you need to provide all of that consistently over a long period of time so that the public believes you when you tell them you need more money.
    Sadly, given the state of government, we are a long ways from getting or deserving that level of trust the taxpayers and the folks who run these systems.

  4. John Spragge   13 years ago

    How many people would support giving roads designed for private cars priority over public transit if the surveys mentioned that the greater space required by private cars meant greater use of expropriation (eminent domain) by governments?

  5. C. S. P. Schofield   13 years ago

    I wonder if the numbers would change much if the question focused on improving bus routes. I have lived in several cities that had, or were planning, expensive and showy light rail systems. Some of them went from where nobody in their right mind lived to where nobody in their right mind wanted to go (I'm looking at YOU Baltimore). Most of them cost a great deal more than was promised, took in much less than was projected, and were used less than the most pessimistic public projections.

    For some reason, Politicians seem to love light rail. The public doesn't. I have to wonder what the numbers of the poll would look like if the question was posed in such a way as to exclude spending on light rail.

  6. ghd hair straighteners   13 years ago

    It's sad to see how America is declining right in front of the rest of the world

  7. GHD Kiss Pink IV Styler   13 years ago

    ask them since they blame Obama for the state of the economy, and expect the unemployed to just get a job out of thin air

  8. timberland shoes   13 years ago

    That's up there with pretending the people with real power always look out for the little guy.

  9. north face outlet   13 years ago

    To better understand what Americans think about unemployment

  10. ski jackets   13 years ago

    Gingrich Slides But Maintains Slight Lead Among GOP

  11. Dr Dre Beats   13 years ago

    Correspondingly, 62 percent of Americans prioritize transportation funding for roads and highways over funding for public transit. Nevertheless, 30 percent

  12. the north face   13 years ago

    expanded or if they would just want others to use it to reduce traffic congestion

  13. Beats By Dr Dre Custom   13 years ago

    Most of them cost a great deal more than was promised, took in much less than was projected, and were used less than the most pessimistic public projections.

  14. my tedata   9 years ago

    The trouble with tolls is they never go away. I'm OK with a toll that sunsets when the bonds to finance the project road are paid off. Unfortunately, once the road's paid for, the toll just becomes another endless tax typically used for everything but road maintenance. - - ????? 2017
    - ????? ??????

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Las Vegas Police Arrest TikTok Livestreamers and Tell Them 'You Should've Shut Your Mouth'

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.16.2025 5:41 PM

Virginia Man Faces 12 Months in Jail, $2,500 Fine for Drawing a Crosswalk With Chalk

Autumn Billings | 6.16.2025 4:34 PM

Whether or Not Trump Invokes It, the Insurrection Act Is Antiquated and Dangerously Broad

Jacob Sullum | 6.16.2025 3:55 PM

Trump Is Slapping a 50 Percent Tariff on Home Appliances

Jack Nicastro | 6.16.2025 3:30 PM

Josh Hawley Wants To Raise the Minimum Wage

Jared Dillian | 6.16.2025 12:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!