Wait—There's a Problem With Strip-Searching Students?
Iowa's Atlantic Community School District recently settled a lawsuit brought by the families of three girls who were strip-searched by a guidance counselor in 2009 after another student reported that her $100 had gone missing. According to the lawsuit, the guidance counselor, Heather Turpin, performed the searches under orders from Paul Croghan, then the assistant principal and athletic director at Atlantic High School. Evidently neither of them was aware that the state legislature had banned student strip searches more than two decades before. They also apparently missed the 8-to-1 decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Arizona public school officials violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a 13-year-old eighth-grader when they subjected her to a strip search because they thought she might be hiding ibuprofen in her underwear (thereby violating her school's "zero tolerance" drug policy). That decision came down two months before Croghan told Turpin to go underwear diving for cash. Croghan, who resigned from his position three months after the incident, is now the principal and athletic director of East Mills High School in Malvern, Iowa. Turpin, who was initially named in the suit but was later dropped from it, is still a guidance counselor at Atlantic High School. The Associated Press reports that the school district agreed to pay each family $100,000.
[Thanks to Mark Lambert for the tip.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
three girls who were strip-searched by a guidance counselor
FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP
Jesus Christ, finally somebody gets it!
You two guys are sick!
Go ahead and type "strip searched school girls" into Google Images if you really wanna see who the sick fucks are!
Oh, Yeah!! I'm sure that's workplace safe! Unless you work at Hustler, where it's called 'research'.
Why no criminal charges?
What would the charges be? I don't think battery or assault would work, so what do you suggest?
How about first degree sexual assault of a minor?
Assault would work just fine. And if they touched their titties or pooters, sexual assault, sexual misconduct and a litany of charges for exploiting a minor.
They would only be able to charge the female employee who actually did the touching, if any. Maybe that's why? How horrible would that be to charge the employee who carried out their assigned duty on the job, who is also female, but not charge the man at all. There wouldn't be much justice to that result.
The definition in Iowa: Sexual Assault: Sexual contact and touching in a nonconsensual manner that is offensive to that person. Sexual contact is any touching of the sexual or intimate parts of the body.
She vas only follink orders.
Conspiracy to commit sexual assault then. I'm also not sure why the supervisor can't be charged with the actual crime as well for ordering the assault.
Also, you know who else said they were just following orders?
Well then that's a slam dunk case. If any of the girls protested in any way, shape or form, this trial lasts about a day and the jury comes back with a guilty verdict.
And the guy culd have been charged with conspiracy to commit sexual assault of a minor x3.
Now, work with me here...couldn't the female employee have refused to do it because it ways, y'know, bullshit? Or are females incapable of moral judgement?
Sorry, but her job description does not include "commit any felonies as directed".
She should damn well have known better.
Pictures or I call BS.
So violating the law is not cause for, you know, getting charged with a crime?
How bourgeois of you!
Or losing your job.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
If you're a prole. The government class has different rules.
I like good news like this before dinner. Better news is better, but this is good.
It was all a scam. The girls, the accuser and the guidance counselor are all splitting the $300,000. I saw Wild Things.
The Associated Press reports that the school district agreed to pay each family $100,000.
The Yogi Press reports that a few taxpayers sued the rest of the taxpayers at Iowa's Atlantic Community School District and won. And nothing else happened.
Well, I'd certainly do a strip tease for $100,000
The necktie-only wardrobe is the new monocle.
Yeh, heh, heh.
I'll dance the hootchie koo on the White House lawn buck naked in front of CNN for a 100 grand!
I ain't gay, but if you agree to cover my legal bills as well, I'll even turkey slap the fuck out of the Federales they'll send to arrest me!
I Googled that shit, and yep, "turkey slap" means exactly what I thought it did. Thank you, Urban Dictionary!
I thought the YogiPress would be reporting on more pressing issues, like the lack of picnic baskets in Jellystone Park and Boo Boo's upcoming gender reassignment and name change to Bay Bay.
Boo-Boo is a terrorist, dude.
Harvey: Mr. Boo Boo, would you consider yourself a revolutionary?
Boo Boo: Well, no. But I do believe corporations rob us of our dignity and independence, and that these systems must be ripped down, burnt down, or leveled by any force necessary.
[jury gasps, long pause]
Boo Boo: But that's just one little bear's opinion.
Harvey: A cute, fuzzy little bear...
*ahem* It's pronounced "pic-a-nic" baskets, thank you very much.
And for the record, Yogi Bear was a godless sodomite.
Disgraceful.
Training the next generation of TSA agents.
lmfao...
And the next generation of air travelers.
How is this not sexual assault of minors?
I don't get how anybody would think being a guidance counselor or an 'athletic director' gives you the right to make children undress for you!
Apparently laws are for those not employed by the government.
Damn your quick fingers!
They would only be able to charge the female employee who actually did the touching, if any. Maybe that's why? How horrible would that be to charge the employee who carried out their assigned duty on the job, who is also female, but not charge the man at all. There wouldn't be much justice to that result.
The definition in Iowa: Sexual Assault: Sexual contact and touching in a nonconsensual manner that is offensive to that person. Sexual contact is any touching of the sexual or intimate parts of the body.
I don't see how that law could not be applied to all proprietors of the crime. Prosecutors love "interpreting" laws all the time. It works with underage sexting.
I still don't understand the whole sexting is illegal bit. If they're both above AOC and consent, then what the hell's the problem?
"proprietors of the crime" - somebody owns a crime? Do other people who sexually assault minors have to pay royalties? And, do they take credit cards?
I don't get how anybody would think being a guidance counselor or an 'athletic director' gives you the right to make children undress for you!
If your kid is about to enter a race for his high school's swim team, the swim coach would be incompetent if he didn't direct your kid to take off his shoes.
These assholes are the credentialed ones, right? I mean, they're the only ones qualified to prepare our children for adulthood, right? Fuck, $100,000 would have been my bail, not the settlement amount, if I'd found out my daughter had been strip searched by someone at her school.
I'll second that...
underwear diving for cash
Great blog name.
Sounds like a show on UHF.
Perfect follow-up to Wheel of Fish on Wednesday night.
School administrators can't seem to resist playing at law enforcement. If you suspect a crime has been committed, report it. Of course you enjoying lording your authority over a bunch of kids, but where do they get the idea they should be conducting a criminal investigation including strip searches.
but where do they get the idea they should be conducting a criminal investigation including strip searches.
Penthouse Forum?
Two reasons, the first is that there is a lower level of constitutional protections if the schools do it, they are basically "in loco parentis" and granted the same rights as a parent. Once the police get involved then nasty constitutional protections come into play.
The second is that even when they do violate a childs parental rights, few parents are aware of their legal options or rich enough to put up an effective legal defense.
grrrr, meant "child's constitutional rights".
They may be in loco parentis. But they attained that status by FORCING the children to go. I don't think there's any way to justify FORCING children to learn, and being taken out of the home for extended periods to do so, with minimal parental input into the curriculum.
I really don't see why the punishment for this wasn't that Heather and Paul had to be strip searched in the town square. Seems only fair.
Great idea! Though, I'd only force them to strip in front of the girls that they strip searched. That would be fun, and cathartic I would think, for the girls.
I wish I would have been strip searched in high school. I would have a supreme court case named after me, I would have college payed off, and I would have a fucken sweet portfolio.
I think that if something like that had happened to me at that age, I wouldn't have been able to resist the urge to cause massive physical damage to the apparatchik involved. I probably would have ended up in the clink.
-jcr
Anybody else wondering why a kid would be carrying $100 to school?
To buy drugs of course
No
What is unusual about carrying cash?
That's a large amount of cash for a school. Are they buying two hundred cookies at lunch or something?
It was just after payday is my best guess.
Almost noone under 30 (even in Ioway) carries money, it's all that magic plastic. I've seen people skip lunch because the card machine was down.
Anybody else wondering why a kid would be carrying $100 to school?
Back there in elementary school, I learned a lesson. An older kid, a ginger, in a row in front of me, had a photo of a nude gal that he took out of his pocket and showed to his mates. From the row behind, I chimed in and said "where'd you get that?". He socked me in the forehead and said "mind your own bee's wax."
(And yo, don't hit) what's a ginger?
pale skin, freckles, red hair
"Mad money."
Correct Answer:
C - None of your fucking business.
Wow. I can count on my state and federal governments to enforce pedophilia and give drug lords weapons.
I so want to watch this whole fucking species bite the dust.
Ayn Rand would be proud.
Clarification: of you. Not humanity.
Thanks for Jesus Christ
You are welcome, spammer. Now hold still while I press this smite button...
I always liked the part of Cecil B DeMille movies when Yahweh got around to smiting someone or something.
Yahweh was a really heavy smoter.
What did it look like? I've been deprived of DeMille films.
It has to be seen to be fully appreciated, but it usually involves lots of thunder and lightning and strong winds and big stones falling on people and water washing people away.
Kind of like Hurricane Katrina, only more personal.
too old.
School counselor Heather Turpin was dismissed as a defendant in the lawsuit because SHE FILED BANKRUPTCY so no financial judgment could be issued against her. She is hardly a "I was forced to follow orders; I was afraid for my job" type. She has openly and fiercely told anyone within ear shot that it was the right thing to do and she's proud of the fact she did it (yeah, so proud she filed bankruptcy to avoid a judgment against her. How's that the for the courage of your convictions? She's a chicken shit). She's as a big a Nazi, bully, cop-wannabe and child sexual abuser ("Strip girls, take that bra off! Pull down those panties!") as the Assistant Principal who ordered her to do it. The school district got off (pun intended!) cheap with only having to pay $100 grand to each kid.
Last time I looked you could not discharge judgements--civil or criminal--under bankruptcy.
You can discharge civil judgements if they arose from an unsecured creditor (e.g., credit card). In essence, once the debt is wiped off the books (assuming Chpt 7), there is no basis for collecting the judgment after that...I think...