Maybe October Will Be Better for the NYPD
The Village Voice has a summary of what a rough September it was for the New York Police Department. Tying the public and media outrage noose (ideally) tighter is the fact that Deputy Commissioner of Public Information (described as the "main mouthpiece" of the NYPD) Paul Browne has been less than forthright about some high-profile incidents which do not reflect highly on the professionalism of the NYPD. In most cases, video disproves or casts serious doubt on Browne's version of events.
The incidents related include the pepper-spraying of contained Occupy Wallstreet protesters (the video of which went viral), the bystander who might have been killed by a police bullet during an exchange with a criminal, the harassment and detaining of two black New York officials, and the killing of John Collado:
A plainclothes detective in Inwood arresting a suspected pot dealer shot and killed 43-year-old grandfather John Collado. According to Browne, the undercover officer had clearly identified himself, yet Collado, who belonged to a pro-cop Facebookgroup and wasn't involved in the drug buy, nonetheless put the detective in a choke hold. "The cops who responded described [the detective] as barely conscious," Browne said. "He was nearly choked out, and his limbs were numb." But the family's lawyer, Patrick Brackley, told reporters that he has seen surveillance video showing that the detective hadn't identified himself, and that while Collado was trying to break up what he thought was just a fight between his neighbor and a stranger, he was not choking the detective.
The article suggests, somewhat hilariously, that these "might mark the end of the NYPD's scandal-proof status."
Read the whole thing here.
Reason's police round-up, (as it were), including Jacob Sullum on the NYPD's habit of arresting people for supposed-to-be-misdemeanor weed possession.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He was nearly choked out,
And I'm sure there are photographs of the bruises on his neck, which would be taken as a matter of course during any investigation.
Right?
The article suggests, somewhat hilariously, that these "might mark the end of the NYPD's scandal-proof status."
Uh...WHAAAAAAAA? Amadou Diallo? Abner Louima? Sean Bell?
Pfff. Ancient history.
Among 13-year-olds, the NYPD has a flawless reputation.
Hell, even that one the NYPD arrested on the Brooklyn bridge didn't look very peeved.
Maybe they mean that they got a free pass on scandals for a while because of 9/11?
You sir, are indeed cynical. Astute observation, however!
Paging Occifer Dunphy
A 43 year old grandfather? I guess it is physiologically possible.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/.....andmother/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....unger.html
Oh, the second link is so worth it for H&R fans.
yuppers...excellent photo caption.
Wonder if he is going to comment on this...
That. Was. Awesome.
Really 43 isn't strange at all. My grandparents on both sides were about that age when their first grandchildren were born. They both got married straight out of highschool.
42ish when my grandson was born.
"42ish"?
Come on, you are among friends here.
I'm 54, I can't remember if my grandson is 12 or 13 yet. (I'm a guy, I barely remember my wife's birthday)
My own granpa.
Have a kid at 22. Your 21 year old has a kid at that age. You're a grandfather at 43. Nothing really odd about that.
Becoming a grandparent at 23 is a bit different.
Damn... too slow.
"In gypsy culture virginity is greatly prized and women are married young so that new husband's can be sure their new wives are virgins."
No comment... I'm just gonna let that marinade a little...
See also: America's Greatest Poet http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeIsxXDyjlc
He totally stole that from Phillip J. Fry.
"I did do the nasty in the pasty."
"If you come in peace, surrender or be destroyed. If you're here to make war, we surrender. "
"?The important thing is I'm meeting new people."
Leave the pepper spray, take the canoli.
That doesn't happen when you're getting choked out.
Then you're doing it wrong. If you stick with it, then it's totally worth it.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=11876706
1 Billion dollars in 10 years.
I googled around for more info on the Collado story and found an interesting study on media bias:
Half the stories refer to Collado as "a grandfather." The other half as "a former professional wrestler."
The difference in association isn't even very subtle, is it?
Unless your Grandpa was beefier than mine were.
Both of my grandfathers were Golden Gloves title holders in their respective cities (Boston and NY).
That was back during the Depression, but I'm sure they could whup ass when they were 43.
As a Sergeant in the NYPD, I am responsible for some of these incidents. Rest assured, these are isolated incidents. Thankfully, there is only one of me in the NYPD. I would like to apologize to the civilians of New York City. I have violated my vow to protect and serve you, and I accept whatever discipline is appropriate and necessary.
Up to and including a few months of paid suspension until the shit blows over.
Nobody, it appears.
""'Who's going to catch us, and who's going to punish us if they do?'"""
Yeah, along with the taxpayer is the one that pays, not the NYPD.
I'm a big fan of the idea that any payment from a lawsuit comes directly out of the police budget.
Should come from the union, and be part of any contract negotiation. They're the ones that make it so hard to discipline the bad apples, they should suffer the fucking consequences.
It is true that the unions make it harder to discipline, but it should directly go against the department. Not a proxy.
One could argue that the citizenry is responsible for not hold their elected officials responsible for not enacting laws that would change how the department operates. While I do agree with that, a more direct form of punishment is in order.
If the department's budget gets toasted by lawsuits, they'll just come crying to the city and the press, saying that they can't afford to protect citizens from murderers and pedophiles anymore, and the budget will just go up. If it falls on the union, the taxpaying public is much less likely to give the tiniest shit.
America's largest, most popular city is a statist-infested zone with a police force of over 30,000. It's an army unto itself, and it couldn't give less a shit -- they're paying with other people's money, and they're not being punished for any of it.