Spanish Lessons: Tax Breaks For Rich Foreigners
To understand how ass-backwards the immigration debate is in this Land of Immigrants, consider what Spain has been doing as our Congressional leaders have been sitting on their derrière refusing to expand—let alone eliminate—the annual cap on H1-B visas for highly skilled immigrants that forces thousands of foreign graduate students to return home after obtaining advanced degrees in American universities.
In 2005, Spain realized that it was having trouble attracting star soccer players and passed something called the Beckham Law. The law— named after (who else?) David Beckham who had joined Real Madrid, a professional soccer club in Madrid—gave athletes the choice of either paying resident or non-resident taxes. Residents pay 24 percent on a certain portion of their income rising to 43 percent subsequently, but are allowed personal allowances (or tax deductions). Non-residents, on the other hand, pay a flat 24 percent tax on their entire income but without any deductions. Also, residents are taxed on their worldwide income whereas non-residents only have to pay taxes on their income in Spain.
Beckham, no fool, did the math and opted for the non-resident tax as did a number of other athletes. The law was subsequently expanded to include other foreign workers. But the spectacle of super-wealthy foreigners paying a lower tax rate than many low-income Spaniards raised the ire of the nation's socialists who managed, last year, to suspend this option for any foreigner making over 600,000 Euros. However, skilled foreigners—athletes and non-athletes—who make under that amount can still avail of the non-resident rates.
That might be something of a setback, but what's clear is that, unlike in the U.S., Spain is at least trying to push the debate in the direction of how best to attract foreign executive and technical talent in order to make Spanish companies more globally competitive. Spain's government might be spending itself into oblivion, but at least it is trying to get its immigration policy right—which is more than one can say about Uncle Sam.
A tiny sliver of silver lining in the GOP's otherwise sordid debate on immigration actually is Mitt Romney. He has been demagoguing poor Rick Perry for signing a totally sensible (and, at the time, completely uncontroversial) law letting children of taxpaying (illegal) immigrants in Texas pay in-state tuition to attend college, as Matt Welch pointed out this morning. However, when it comes to highly skilled immigrants, Romney has been making some of the right noises, including calling for raising the H1-B cap.
But even he wouldn't dare call for giving tax breaks to skilled foreigners which is why, as I wrote here, America's immigration problem going forward is not going to be how to stop smart immigrants from flocking to our shores, but how to prevent foreign competitors from wooing even the existing ones away.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I watched metric football once. Woke up very refreshed.
But certainly, skilled immigrants are a blessing to the country and showing them the out-door is illogical.
That might be something of a setback, but what's clear is that, unlike in the U.S., Spain is at least trying to push the debate in the direction of how best to attract foreign executive and technical talent in order to make Spanish companies more globally competitive.
I think the difference here is that apparently not enough were pining to work in Spain, whereas the United States is still a huge draw.
Hmm. Spain huh? I think I know where my next vacation will be. I've heard it's beautiful though my Spanish teacher in high school (from Spain) didn't want to go back.
Three reasons to visit Spain:
1. Tapas
2. Spanish architect Anton Gaudi
3. Toledo: a city where ever block has at least five sword shops
Manganeses de la Polvorosa
"Resident" for tax purposes isn't just about your citizenship. While I wouldn't be surprised if there were a carve-out for star athletes/performers, for everyone else I would bet your standard 183-day test applies. Even H1-B-ers are subject to worldwide US tax once they meet the 183 day test, and will be US residents for tax purposes for all years but their first (and last) in the US.
Durr. I bet your Beckhams et al. just don't spend enough time in Spain to exceed the days of presence test, and if their other facts and circumstances didn't support Spain as their domicile, they could keep up their non-resident status for tax purposes. For other non-Spaniards actually taking a medium-term assignment there though, this would be a limited time offer.
The football season is from August to May plus preseason. Obviously players like Beckham would leave occasionally for international breaks plus European club fixtures but it would still be hard to be under 183 days without some creative traveling.
I was thinking maybe he spent most of his time in the UK when he wasn't playing. And in cases where it's not clear where you're a tax resident of (maybe the UK wants to tax him as a resident too) if there's a treaty there's usually a "tie-breaker" provision. Larger point being, of course, that determination of residency status for tax purposes is far from simple.
Exactly. I think that would be just the purpose of the law: to give non resident status to foreigners who would be residents by time of stay, as footballers would be.
Exactly. I think that would be just the purpose of the law: to give non resident status to foreigners who would be residents by time of stay, as footballers would be.
We aren't a "Land of Immigrants."
True. We're a land of immigrants, and a few generations of their descendants.
I hired a couple of writers this year. Three promising candidates were from other countries, but I decided not to take the risk of hiring them, because I was worried regulations on hiring non-Americans. As a start-up, I can't absorb that risk or afford a lawyer to navigate the regulations for me.
Here you can choose more new products, enjoy more discounts, so you get favorite products while saving money.
refusing to expand?let alone eliminate?the annual cap on H1-B visas for highly skilled immigrants that forces thousands of foreign graduate students to return home after obtaining advanced degrees in American universities.
The dumbest part of this is that the logic is if we keep all the foreign scientists out, more American kids will rise up to fill their place.
As stopping the smart people from coming to America will make American kids smarter.
Instead of raising the H1-B cap, which simply increases the number of high-end indentured servants in the U.S., why not greatly expand legal immigration, so that immigrants could compete freely for jobs, instead of being dependent on a single employer? Read this article in the New Republic (yeah, the New Republic) to learn how the current programs can be exploited.
http://www.tnr.com/article/pol.....n-teachers
Your essay is good, I like it very much. Here I would like to share with you some things :
Ugg Boots On Sale http://www.uggsukmall.com. ----- ercai
Posting the spam that Spaniards won't post.