I highly recommend reading probably the most libertarian speech ever given by a sitting politician in America. It is Jerry Brown's second inaugural address, back in 1979. It has some fire-breathing, anti-Lord Keynes kind of comments and it will shock the modern reader. California has been spending itself into oblivion for a really long time. The more local you get, the worse it gets. It's very telling that a lot of the official thumb-sucking class in the L.A. Times and elsewhere say that the problem is the ten Republicans left in the state and if they can just get rid of these obstructionists, we'll repeal Prop. 13 and all will be good and gravy.
In the short term, it's about pensions and fixing the giveaways to public sector unions. Schwarzenegger, who was a great disappointment as a governor, finally did a little bit of reform at the tail end of his term and Brown has talked about it but hasn't really done much.
Curious about that 1979 Brown speech (which I will confess to describing hyperbolically above; there have surely been more libertarian speeches)? Though I've linked it before, I'll link it again. Here's an excerpt:
[The tax revolt] has without question inspired the hopes of many. Plain working people, the poor, the elderly, those on fixed incomes, those who cannot keep up with each new round of inflation or protect themselves from each subsequent round of recession, these are the people who are crying out for relief.
But in their name and in the name of misfortune of every kind, false prophets have risen to advocate more and more government spending as the cure – more bureaucratic programs and higher staffing ratios of professional experts. They have told us that billion dollar government increases are really deep cuts from the yet higher levels of spending they demand and that attempts to limit the inflationary growth of government derive not from wisdom but from selfishness. That disciplining government reflects not a care for the future but rather self-absorption. These false prophets, I tell you, can no longer distinguish the white horse of victory from the pale horse of death.
Reason on the always-interesting Jerry Brown here.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
"Always-interesting," indeed. Sometimes he talks great sense, and at other times... not so much. I recall seeing an interview with him on MTV in the early '80s in which he explained that the high cost of college was due to a plot to keep minorities out.
Are you claiming you were misquoted? Because Hit & Run misquotes me all the time.
For instance, this comment. It's not at all what I typed out.
It's a bit condensed. Nothing egregious, but sentences strung together in a way that even my bad diction can't manage.
I never complain about paraphrasing. As you can probably tell, my time is quite valuable.
That's some grade-A speachifying right there. I wonder who wrote it?
Jerry Brown writes it next year and then sends it back to himself via the Santa Cruz wormhole that opens in March, 2012.
Might well have been my old landlord, Jim Lorenz.
I have the same mural painted on the side of my 77 Vandura.
"Always-interesting," indeed. Sometimes he talks great sense, and at other times... not so much. I recall seeing an interview with him on MTV in the early '80s in which he explained that the high cost of college was due to a plot to keep minorities out.
It would have worked, too, if hadn't been for those meddling kids!