Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

California's Highest-Paid State Employee Is a Doctor No One Trusts to Treat Patients

Matt Welch | 7.13.2011 7:56 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

I had atypically nice things to say about my former employer, the L.A. Times, in a recent book review. Partly because of stories like this, from today:

The highest-paid state employee in California last year, a prison surgeon who took home $777,423, has a history of mental illness, was fired once for alleged incompetence and has not been allowed to treat an inmate for six years because medical supervisors don't trust his clinical skills.

Since July 2005, Dr. Jeffrey Rohlfing has mostly been locked out of his job — on paid leave or fired or fighting his termination — at High Desert State Prison in Susanville, state records show. When he has been allowed inside the facility, he has been relegated to reviewing paper medical histories, what prison doctors call "mailroom" duty.

Rohlfing's $235,740 base pay, typical in California's corrections system, accounted for about a third of his income last year. The rest of the money was back pay for more than two years when he did no work for the state while appealing his termination. A supervisor had determined that Rohlfing provided substandard care for two patients, according to state Personnel Board records.

Rohlfing won that case before the board and was rehired and assigned to "mailroom" work in late 2009.

"We want taxpayers to know we had no choice in this," said Nancy Kincaid, spokeswoman for the court-appointed receiver in charge of California's inmate healthcare.

Want to begin addressing state budget woes? Heck, do you want to stop the incessant reminders by publications such as the one you're reading that public-sector compensation does not pass the rationality test? Then fix the system that produces this.

Link via the Twitter feed of Charles Ornstein. Steven Greenhut's classic Reason piece on California public sector employees here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Plane Truth

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyGovernment SpendingCriminal JusticeGovernment employees
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (53)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sarcasmic   15 years ago

    I demand alt-text!

  2. Aqua Buddha   15 years ago

    Can we drink at demands for alt-text?

    1. Bee Tagger   15 years ago

      Less asking, more drinking

    2. sarcasmic   15 years ago

      You need a reason to drink?

      Pathetic.

      1. Otto   15 years ago

        Look at his handle. He probably doesn't need to drink, even at 8:13 ET.

  3. Abdul   15 years ago

    The system works! If you fail at getting away with crime, shouldn't you get a doctor who fails at practicing medicine?

  4. Enjoy Every Sandwich   15 years ago

    C'mon Lefties! Time to tell us why Cali taxpayers should be delighted to pay higher taxes so that this dipstick can be paid $235K a year to shuffle papers.

    1. Calif. Lefty on Truth Serum   15 years ago

      We'll pay any price to keep the underclass far away from Fisherman's Wharf.

      1. Rhywun   15 years ago

        There's a public housing project a couple blocks away - apparently they're not paying enough.

        1. Audrey the Liberal   15 years ago

          From what I understand, actual San Franciscans rarely go anywhere near Fisherman's Wharf. I could be wrong though.

    2. db   15 years ago

      Seriously, what's the problem here? He has an advanced degree, which is all the qualification anyone needs to acquire and retain a high paying government job for life.

  5. Tim   15 years ago

    Put the lime in the coconut and drink it all down.

  6. MNG   15 years ago

    It's pretty messed up, but the 777 figure is because he got three years of salary in the latest year because he won his appeal that kept him from working for the previous two.

    The central thing here is there is likely a contract which does not allow him to be fired without a showing of certain cause, and that has not been met. Contracts can be a bitch like that. Look at the Ovitz debacle with Disney that cost them waaaay more money, it was a contract that forced them to put up with and then buy off Ovitz.

    1. sarcasmic   15 years ago

      I thought the 777 was your mom's chmod.

      1. MNG   15 years ago

        The wit with this one! Brings back fond memories of middle school it does.

        1. Cyto   15 years ago

          You were running chmod in middle school? I assumed you were older than that...

    2. Tim   15 years ago

      Think about it, they don't think this guy is qualified to give Charles Manson an aspirin-but they can't fire him. Time to re-negotiate those contracts.

      1. MNG   15 years ago

        The problem is that if you get rid of systems that require cause to be shown you get systems that give power to administrators that are also state employees to hire and fire at whim. That can produce some pretty terribe cases too.

        1. Tim   15 years ago

          Of course, prison systems don't exactly attract the finest professionals.

          1. Tim   15 years ago

            ...so they probably tried to offer sweet deals just to get people in the door.

          2. MNG   15 years ago

            Tru dat. The clientele is only a little better than that for Wal-Mart.

          3. Apogee   15 years ago

            prison systems don't exactly attract the finest professionals.

            Wrong. Prison systems pay full credits for medical services - they could actually save quite a bit of money if they negotiated - but they don't.

        2. Invisible Finger   15 years ago

          The problem is that if you get rid of systems that require cause to be shown you get systems that give power to administrators that are also state employees to hire and fire at whim.

          You mean, the way it used to be back when the state governments were leveraged at a 1:1 ratio?

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder   15 years ago

      The difference being that the private sector has largely learned from their mistakes in the area of employment contracts. The government has no intention of doing so.

      1. MNG   15 years ago

        What are you talking about? Things like the Ovitz debacle (which was not ancient history) are not uncommon.

        1. Apogee   15 years ago

          What's common, however, is the conflation of costs to Disney (and their shareholders) with costs to taxpayers.

          Disney (not exactly the most spendthrift of companies) can go out of business if it continues to make these mistakes.

          Gubmint - well, we'll see.

    4. Ice Nine   15 years ago

      Shouldn't we be able to go to Sacramento tomorrow and fire people who write and sign such contracts...or put them in a gibbet, maybe.

  7. Jerry   15 years ago

    At least he won't show up in the unemployment statistics.

    1. MNG   15 years ago

      It's a job saved!

  8. P Brooks   15 years ago

    fix the system that produces this.

    Easy.

    We just* make them "at will" employees.

    *I crack myself up.

  9. MNG   15 years ago

    " make them "at will" employees"

    Power to the police chiefs, wardens and school principals!

    What could go wrong?

    1. Otto   15 years ago

      Well, at the very least, the school principals might learn to not be assholes, b/c they want to attract the best teachers possible.

      But that would require a slightly different school "system".

    2. R C Dean   15 years ago

      What could go wrong?

      Dunno, but I'm willing to find out if it would be worse than what we have now.

      Don't let the terrible be the enemy of the bad, MNG.

    3. Shocked   15 years ago

      You mean like the community not putting up with police cheifs, wardens and principals for firing competent people at will? Or getting fired by their boss for that?

      You are admitting that government leaders can not be trusted so that everything they do has to be dictated by contract.

    4. Sean L.   15 years ago

      lol.. but..

      I guess its better 10 useless paper-pushers at $200k each stay employed than 1 innocent be fired.

  10. P Brooks   15 years ago

    if you get rid of systems that require cause to be shown you get systems that give power to administrators that are also state employees to hire and fire at whim.

    And?

  11. SugarFree   15 years ago

    He only has the power you give him.

  12. P Brooks   15 years ago

    What the fuck makes you believe these people are "owed" lifetime employment?

    1. osob   14 years ago

      This is exactly soviet communism.

  13. P Brooks   15 years ago

    That's true, and I'm already worn out from re-reading the tag team Fearless Fosdick comments.

  14. Eric S.   15 years ago

    Huh? Rick Neuheisel makes $1.25 million per year, which, last I checked, was more than $777K. Ben Howland and Jeff Tedford make even more.

  15. Gaia   15 years ago

    Then fix the system that produces this.

    How the fuck am I supposed to do that?

    The fucked up electorate in this state would elect Charly Manson, Jeffrey Dahmer and Ugo Chavez is they had Ds after their name.

    1. Rhywun   15 years ago

      ^ This. Though I would lay the blame less on the "fucked up electorate" and more on fucked up elections - especially the grip on power that Party 1 and Party 2 have helped each maintain over the last century or so.

  16. GSL   15 years ago

    "We want taxpayers to know we had no choice in this," said Nancy Kincaid, spokeswoman for the court-appointed receiver in charge of California's inmate healthcare.

    Um, actually not, Nancy. You could credibly claim this if Rohlfing was an isolated case. Come talk to us when you aren't paying hundreds of other medical professionals similar money.

  17. Middle Age Crazy   15 years ago

    Then fix the system that produces this.

    Allright Matt, props to the LA Times for basic coverage, but they didn't finish the job. Who is on this Personnel Board? What did they have to say for themselves? What rules/contracts bind them? Who wrote those rules? All this could have been in one paragraph at the end.

    Often public officials make chicken-shit decisions because they don't think anyone's watching. Sometimes all it takes for the system to work is for a journalist to do a good job.

  18. Invisible Finger   15 years ago

    Aren't the head coaches of UCLA's sports teams state employees? I have a hard time believing none of them make more than this doctor.

    1. Apogee   15 years ago

      Sports teams also sell quite a bit of merchandise, along with garnering huge donations from Alumni.

      From here: "the UCLA Athletic Department is self-sufficient: public moneys don't pay for the athletic program."

      1. michaelmoore   15 years ago

        That doesn't mean they're not state employees. Even if you earn for your company as much (if not more) than you make for them (or, in this case, the state), you still get your paychecks from the company with one of the officer's signatures on it. Hence, employee.

  19. B. Cayenne Bird   15 years ago

    If anyone knows of any other highly paid state employees working in prison mailrooms, please email me at rightor1@yahoo.com. I can't believe how many bureaucrats including Jerry Brown are pretending that they didn't know about this situation with Dr. Rohlfing. Here he is collecting all that money and he put his wife out on the street, refusing to settle with her, abused her and the state employees knew the situation and did nothing. Jerry Brown holds no one accountable for abusing the prisoners. We need a governor who isn't owned by the CCPOA, please join the campaign Liberals To Recall Jerry Brown, http://www.facebook.com/Li?beralsToRecallJerryBrown

  20. Mary   15 years ago

    @Cayenne Bird: I did not see the part about abusing his wife and putting her out in the street in the article. Wassup with that? Making crap up?

  21. nora weber   15 years ago

    I drove Kristi Rohlfing, reportedly this doctor's wife back to Fresno from a Sacramento Rally a couple of years ago. She said she tried to report his actions to prison officials, and all she got was retaliation. I dropped her off at a house in Fresno where she said she was staying with some relatives. If this is the same doctor you should talk to his x-wife her stories would really curl your hair, and the prison officials knew it, and supported his actions.

    Robert Sillen the first Federal Receiver appointed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson in San Francisco told me, standing outside the Federal Court House, "at least half the prison doctors should be in prison". Call Robert Sillen for more details. He tried to fire many of the prison docs. and got stopped by the prison officials.

  22. Stick   15 years ago

    I did a combat first aid course in the army. Maybe I could get a job there.

  23. scarpe Nike Store   14 years ago

    is good

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Company Behind the 'Steroid Olympics' Wants To Make Enhanced Pro Athletes Mainstream—and Amateurs, Too

Jason Russell | 1.13.2026 11:15 AM

Will Iran Fall?

Liz Wolfe | 1.13.2026 9:30 AM

No, ICE Agents Do Not Have 'Absolute Immunity' From State Prosecution

Damon Root | 1.13.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Foraging Foul Play

Charles Oliver | 1.13.2026 4:00 AM

Video Shows Border Patrol Threaten Legal Observer in Key Largo for Following Him

C.J. Ciaramella | 1.12.2026 5:06 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks