The New York Times Profiles a Charming Drug Dealer
Last week The New York Times ran a sympathetic, lighthearted profile of an illegal drug dealer: Lonnie Warner, a.k.a. Lonnie Loosie, who sells black-market cigarettes on Eighth Avenue in midtown Manhattan. Warner gets the cigarettes from smugglers who buy them in Virginia and other low-tax states. He sells them in Manhattan, where a legal pack costs $12.50 or so, for 75 cents each. A dollar will get you two, and a pack costs $8. Warner can turn a profit while giving his customers a 36 percent discount thanks to the punitively high cigarette taxes in New York City, which total $6.86 a pack: $1.50 city, $4.35 state, and $1.01 federal. "The tax went up," he tells the Times, "and we started selling 10 times as much." In other words, Warner is taking advantage of a business opportunity created by the government, like any other drug dealer. Yet there he is smiling on the front page of The New York Times, which depicts him as an industrious entrepreneur and charming neighborhood fixture:
Over many court appearances, Mr. Warner has made a favorable impression on the lawyers in Midtown Community Court, who know him as Lonnie Loosie and consider him better company than the typical misdemeanor defendant.
"There are people who are known bad guys, and then there's him," said Russell S. Novack, the Legal Aid lawyer who represents many of Midtown's hustlers, prostitutes, shoplifters and public drunks. "He's like the goodwill ambassador of Eighth Avenue. And when he comes into court, he says hello to everybody."
The Times does note that Warner "spent about two decades in New Jersey prisons for a series of armed robberies" but attributes those crimes to a crack habit he has kicked. Today he brags, apparently without irony, that "we don't allow people to sell drugs on this block."
It is hard to imagine a pot, cocaine, or heroin retailer getting similarly friendly treatment from a major news outlet. Unlike tobacco, of course, those drugs are addictive and dangerous.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I get the point of your last paragraph, Jacob. However, it is still refreshing to see the NYT, of all papers, actually portraying this guy as industrious as opposed to an evil, tax-dodging, carcer-creating menace to teh childruns.
Of course, I haven't made it over to the their Opinion page yet, where I imagine he is being cast as some right-wing villain by Krugnuts and the Gang.
Yeah, I can't imagine that the editors can be too happy about this, since it's yet another illustration of the futility of just raising taxes.
futility? most smokers just pay the $12 per pack in nyc. many hipsters however buy bugler or topps & roll their own which is way cheaper
Shit. The hipsters are rolling their own, so now I've got to quit.
I figured they's all be smoking Parliament's cause they're so fucking cool, like Charles Estevez.
If they are really smoking bugler or topps they are doing it wrong. That stuff is nasty.
While they drink fucking Pabst.
There is no low to which a fucking hipster will not travel.
What's the purpose of the tax, and is that purpose being achieved? Smokers are buying their smokes on the black market (as in the article) which means they're not quitting smoking and the tax take is less than its creators projected (since their static projections never take into account that people who are being taxed change their behavior).
What's the purpose of the tax,
To make the nannies feel better.
and is that purpose being achieved?
For now, probably. They'll have to raise it soon to keep the rush, though.
What's the purpose of the tax, and is that purpose being achieved?
To punish those who are mindlessly obedient to progressive authority. It seems to be working. We need more taxes like this.
He's black. You know if he were white he would be The Devil. Me, I think he's a hero either way, but I'm not giving props to the NYT because I know why they wrote this piece.
Of course, I haven't made it over to the their Opinion page yet, where I imagine he is being cast as some right-wing villain by Krugnuts and the Gang.
Nah, this dude's black, and probably not a Republican. So he's safe from the searing heat of the Krugtron.
As far as I can tell, this man is a true American hero.
Say it in a Sean Hannity voice for the full effect.
Were I able to actually reproduce that voice, I would off myself for the good of humanity.
Why just not use the voice? Of course if you are really determined.....
Well played, sandfish.
LOL
+++
a little sad
better company than the typical misdemeanor defendant.
Misdemeanor? This man is STEALING FROM THE GOVERNMENT.
May I suggest we hoist him on our shoulders for the celebration of free enterprise?
Seconded.
May I further suggest that we provide him with beautiful womenz? Preferabbly of every color and ethnicity?
To all of you: +++
I hope the city doesn't bring the hammer down on him now because of the article.
We wouldn't dream of it...as far as you know.
It looks like they already are based on the comments of the people in the courts.
I wonder, though. What crime is it in selling someone a smoke for $.75? Is it worth the police resources to have someone stand there and ticket him every time he makes a deal? At $125,000 a year for the cop, I doubt it.
Of course, Bloomberg can't stand the thought of someone circumventing his draconian system of law and order, so this guy will probably end up getting run over by a city snowplow in June in a *cough* accident *cough*.
Is it worth the police resources to have someone stand there and ticket him
Since when has that ever mattered?
If NYPD cared about shit like that, they wouldn't be shaking down kids for having a joint on them.
The Po-Po is too busy Swat-Raiding a pot-house.
He'll have plenty of time to avoid the snowplow seeing as how they'd take a couple hours to get started and miss out of laziness.
That's what has me scratching my head. It's pretty much guaranteed that the city will do precisely what you hoped against.
WRONG! Bloomberg facilitated this whole thing so he can track back to the source in Virginia.
As Johnny McEnroe is fond of exclaiming, "YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS"!
Tulpa, whither your faith in our glorious public sector actors? The folks who provide us with the wonderful "order" which inheres in societies with the common sense to monopolize the administration of justice.
Justice administration is not monopolized in the world of organzied crime... but your average mafia don doesn't react too well to people who don't pay him the standard cut selling drugs in his territory.
Frankly, I'd rather be sitting in a New York City courtroom charged with illegal tobacco sales than in a Brooklyn warehouse with my balls inside a pair of garden clippers. How about you?
Under your hypothetical, yes, given what I know, I would be with you.
However, in keeping with the facts set forth in your hypothetical, the only reason you would be inside that Brooklyn warehouse with your balls inside a pair of garden clippers, is because of the WOD.
Hence, once again, you are making my point.
P.S. Perhaps mafia don might, just a litte bit, be somewhat, kind of, anachronistic? La Cosa Who?
But, Black Dynamite, I sell drugs in the community!
Black Dynamite, the best blacplotation movie in the last 30 years.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Black_Dynamite
"The worst thing about these dealers getting children addicted to this new smack, is that these children are ORPHANS?. And orphans don't have parents."
Actually, I forgot this quote which is better:
"You diabolical dick shrinkin' motherfuckers!
Cigarette smuggling and gas tanker hijacking:
The 21st century's answer to bootlegging.
He's black.
All industrious entrepreneurs in the Times are.
Usually they're a happily singing woman with a rag on her head and no shoes on stirring a giant pot in the street of some third-world disaster area, selling family-recipe stew to her displaced neighbors shuffling by, but they're always* black.
*Sometimes they're an Arab guy with an illegal food cart white people like, but in the Times, Arabs are black.
*Sometimes they're an Arab guy with an illegal food cart white people like, but in the Times, Arabs are black.
I think they call them sand African-Americans in the Times, to be fair.
I see what you did there.
Funny, I assumed he was the white guy in the photo.
I'm setting up on the other corner with some incadescent light bulbs when the time is right...
That's fine as long as you don't try to horn in on my McDonald's toy concession down the block and my foie gras stand across from the Sears Tower in Chicago.
I can offer you a slice of the trans-fat market.
I love to think of the internal conflicts experienced by the ultra-liberal tobacco nazis who read the article.
I assume there's no internal conflict unless he's making "too much" money doing it. Then it's evil.
the internal conflicts experienced by the ultra-liberal tobacco nazis
What internal conflicts?
"OMG He's killing teh Poor Peoples!!! AND stealing from teh government!! Burn him!!!"
That guy doesn't even have a Certificate of Cleanliness from the health Inspector, I'll bet.
SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING. *narrows eyes stalwartly*
*narrows eyes stalwartly*
---------
MWAHAHAHA!
I always stop in VA to pick up a few extra packs when heading to NY, to make friends. Based on outside-the-bar conversations, smuggling is quite common in Midtown, Chinatown and Greenpoint (Brooklyn/LIC).
How is this smuggling, anyway? Does NYC claim it's illegal to possess a cigarette pack in NYC that doesn't have its tax stamp? If I live in Jersey and commute to the city every day with my Jersey smokes in my pocket am I committing a crime?
If you don't report bringing those cigs into the state, and pay the appropriate tax differential, yes it is. Sad but true.
If I live in Jersey and commute to the city every day with my Jersey smokes in my pocket am I committing a crime?
Actually, I think its only illegal to sell cigarettes in New York without the New York tax stamp.
The NYC webpage has this delightful insight into the magical thinking of Statists and nannies:
There is no such thing as "tax-free cigarettes" in New York.
Oh, but I think there are.
Nice grammar on the NYC site.
Thank you Reason for making the appropriate tie-ins with high cigarette taxes and the Drug War.
This guy is a scam master. Each cig in a legal pack is only 62 cents and here he is selling them for 75. Genius.
Sounds like the perfect running mate for Trump then.
i knew this guy who worked for BATFE who loved ot drive his supervisor crazy. He would buy cigs in canada and walk around the office displaying the pack (w/o the tax stamp of course).
People take this cig shit seriously.
Fwiw, the studies I have read claim that cigarette smokers actually save the People (tm) money, since they die younger, don't collect as much SS, medical benefits, etc. ... thus, from a strictly utilitarian stance, ...