Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Train Propaganda Sure to Win Your Heart

Tim Cavanaugh | 3.17.2011 1:59 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Las Vegas Railway Express, Inc., entrepreneurs behind the "X" Train, thought I'd be interested in their choo-choo Photoshop greeting card [pdf]. And they were right!

The company is looking to crank up the old Desert Wind line from L.A. to Vegas, and that nineties "X" fits right in with the plan. X Train would eschew the flash and mirrors of high speed rail for classic classiest class.

Las Vegas Railway (currently trading at 14 cents a share) knows how to sell the weird but irresistible glamour of trains. The musical site promises that celebrity chef Rick Moonen will cook for a variety of onboard restaurants, bars and lounges. Business travelers will make fast work of the five-hour trip with the help of WiFi and corporate cars. And light one up for freedom: "Finally, we feel there is an underappreciated market of those who choose to smoke, and we will have several cars designated for them."

And will the public benefit? You betcha: "Reconnecting passenger train service from Los Angeles to Las Vegas will add needed incremental revenue to Las Vegas, assist in its growth strategy, and significantly add tax revenue for the current and future developmental projects the city wants to pursue."

But X Train's pdf photo-proem is the real winner. Who wouldn't want to enter this mashup of Kinkadian coziness, found images of trains, and clunkily phrased motivationals? With this kind of craftsmanship, you know you'll be safe riding the X Train!

The X Train's business plan is hard to follow, though the company's decision to get out of its previous line in buying non-performing mortgages will allow it to focus on core competencies. But it's facing stiff competition on the Los Angeles-Las Vegas route. The high-speed Desert Xpress aims to make the trip in 90 minutes. And the confusingly named Z-Train has the same business plan as the X Train. 

What keeps all this vaporware rolling through the public imagination? It's all right there in the greeting card. The more outlandish the train idea, the more people will dream of gliding past spectacular vistas, sipping Aviations in a stately observation car. It's the mind-clouding magic of trains. 

But why doesn't anybody get excited about bringing back the dirigible? You can cruise the Bay Area in a blimp, finally use that return ticket on the Hindenburg, travel lighter than air and faster than sound. If the future belongs to a type of vehicle that last seemed modern in Captain Nemo's time, can't it at least be one of the cool ones? 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Nick Gillespie on Fox Business' Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano Tonight, 8PM ET

Tim Cavanaugh
PoliticsPolicyEconomicsBusiness and IndustryTrainsLos Angeles
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (48)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Zombie Progressive   14 years ago

    TTRAAAIIINNNSSSS!! TTRRAAIIINNSS!!! MUST HAVE TTRRAAAIIINNSSS!!!

    1. Zombie Tony   14 years ago

      TRAAIIINNSSS!!!! TRAAIINNSSS!! NEEEED TRAAIIINNNSSS!!

  2. Zombie Choad   14 years ago

    TRAAAIIINNSSS!!! TRAAAIIINNSSS!!!

  3. Zombie Tony   14 years ago

    TRAAIIINNSSSZZZZ!!! NEEEEDD TRAIIINNNSSS!!!

  4. Zombie Tony   14 years ago

    TRAAAAIINNSSS!!! TRAAAAAIIINNSSS!

  5. Zombie Max   14 years ago

    TRAAAIIINNNSSSS!!! TTRRAAAIIINNNSSSS!!!

    1. heller   14 years ago

      +1

    2. Snark 101   14 years ago

      C-

  6. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

    I would actually take the LA - Vegas train if it were reasonably priced and took less time than driving.

    I would pay any amount of money and tolerate a fiery crashing death to ride the LA - Vegas dirigible.

    1. kwais   14 years ago

      Yah, me too.
      I actually don't have any problem with trains, I like them.
      I just don't think the government should subsidize them. But I also don't think government should subsidize cars.

  7. puma pas cher   14 years ago

    hhhh

  8. chaussures air max   14 years ago

    see

  9. Ted S.   14 years ago

    Is it just that it's very early in the morning, or did I see no Supertrain references?

    Boo. Hiss.

    1. John   14 years ago

      Or how about a Big Bus reference?

      1. kwais   14 years ago

        Bang Bus?

      2. John Beck   14 years ago

        "You know why they call me shoulders ?"

  10. NotSure   14 years ago

    Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but my guess is that the distance from Las Angeles to Las Vegas is about the same as the very South of Germany to very the North of Germany. In Germany it obviously is more viable to run trains (that does not mean they are big profitable ventures though). America and China are so big, and America also has a relative low population density, how on earth are these viable in these countries then ?

    1. John   14 years ago

      Not quite. It is 265 miles from LA to Vegas. It is about 430 from Munich to Hamberg.

    2. kwais   14 years ago

      Didn't the pioneers of this country build railways across the country?

      Sand Diego to NY would be a cool ride, if the train was cool enough.

      1. Fatty Bolger   14 years ago

        You can do that now, if you really want to.

      2. John   14 years ago

        Yes they did. And they made a lot of money when their only competition was a wagon train or a clipper ship around the horn. Once cars and airplanes came around however they were not so popular.

      3. Montani Semper Liberi   14 years ago

        The transportation options were somewhat limited in those days what with no automobiles or airplanes.

  11. Tommy   14 years ago

    If this particular train does not pick my pocket or break by leg, then what difference is it to me?

    1. Tommy   14 years ago

      Or my leg, for that matter.

      1. wylie   14 years ago

        dang, i thought you were pushing for Flintstones tech.

  12. Mango Punch   14 years ago

    Even if stupid (for the gov't to be involved in) TRIANS are cool... anyone notice that slides 3 and 18 were the same view in different seasons? I guess they ran out of cool views of trains... Also the X-Train is ugly.

  13. Mensan   14 years ago

    "...sipping Aviations in a stately observation car."

    Win The Future does that mean? Is Aviation a brand of beverage that I've never heard of?

    1. wylie   14 years ago

      My guess.

      1. Mensan   14 years ago

        Thank you. I really had no idea what Cavanaugh was talking about.

  14. Matrix   14 years ago

    I'm all for a privately funded high speed rail from LA to Vegas. Ever see the traffic on I-15 on Friday and Sunday? Horrendous!

  15. Fatty Bolger   14 years ago

    China's 1.3 billion people have fewer than a 100 million cars. Compare that to the US, which has 250 million cars for 300 million people. Almost every adult in this country has a car, and our highway system is extremely well developed. Of course trains make more sense for China than the US. Even if they tripled the number of cars (and roads to support them) in the next 10 years, a huge number of people would still not have ready access to one.

    1. adam   14 years ago

      They also make more sense in china since it's still developing its urban centers. The US developed them decades ago- it makes no sense for people in suburban type cities like houston or la to take public transport and intercity trains since they need cars anyway. If the urban centers are designed around public transport and intercity trains, then they can make some sense.

  16. Mr Whipple???   14 years ago

    Send those fuckers over to Jersey, and I'll show them how well the Philly to AC train (Gambler's Express) is working out. But hey, if a private company wants to do it, with no help from the government, except for granting the permits, then go for it, Dudes.

    1. Tim Cavanaugh   14 years ago

      How well does the Gambler's Express work? The Gambler's Express was a famous public ambition back when I was a kid. Is it in use? I didn't even know anything had happened with it. (There should be ready rights of way, given how it was Pitney's Folly wot built A.C. in the fustest place.)

  17. Spoonman.   14 years ago

    If a private company builds a passenger rail line and makes a profit, do progressives' heads explode?

    1. JoshInHB   14 years ago

      Yes, because they are obviously oppressing the people.

      Oh and they're kkkorporashuns.

      1. Progressive   14 years ago

        Profit bad, self-sacrifice good.
        Repeat.

  18. Montani Semper Liberi   14 years ago

    Please tell me they serve Mountain Dew on the X (for EXTREME) Train.

    1. Celebrity Chef Rick Moonen   14 years ago

      Philistine!

  19. Trespassers W   14 years ago

    Even the worst "greeting cards" have the decency to stop after two pages. This monstrosity hammers its message (?) home for another 21 pages.

  20. grog   14 years ago

    Weird to see snark about train propaganda right after _Atlas Shrugged: Part One of Thirty Six_ (27 of those will be the musical, all singing, all dancing cabaret version of The Speech) came out.

    I know why conservatives hate trains - they let poor people be mobile. Why do libertarians?

    1. DesigNate   14 years ago

      We don't hate trains per se. Just government subsidization of them.

  21. Brian Miller   14 years ago

    I ride Amtrak intercity service regularly, and recently saw Amtrak's pro-"high speed rail" propaganda.

    Amtrak claims the Northeast Corridor already has high speed rail (in the form of its Acela line) and it wants to bring that same technology to such heavily traveled corridors as Buffalo to Syracuse and Cleveland-Toledo-Detroit.

    Even if people DID travel regularly on those routes, consider how Amtrak defines "high speed."

    A regular old "regional" Amtrak train takes one from Philly to New York City in one hour and 12 minutes, on average, and costs about $50. A "high speed Acela" train takes one from Philly to New York City in one hour and 4 minutes -- shaving off just eight minutes! And it costs $280 per ticket, too. That $230 difference, if applied across an hour, would mean you'd have to earn over $1,700 an hour just to make the "high speed" rail worth the investment.

    Total boondoggle from start to finish.

  22. Fake Name   14 years ago

    Those pictures at http://apps.attainresponse.com.....613515.pdf are beautiful. Wish I could get some of them (without the text) to use as wallpapers

  23. sounds real good   14 years ago

    Seems to be directed at international tourists...uses the British spelling "colour."

  24. Sydney Limo Company   14 years ago

    Sydney Limo Company offer a wide range of Limousine covering the beautifull Sydney Nsw ,Australia ALL OCCASIONS are catered for incuding Wedding,Airport Transfers,Business trip,Corporate Hire or Pleasure. Sydney Limo Company & Sydney Hire cars is the smart way to travel with your parking,luggage and navigation requirment all taken care of  . Champane drink Chocolate and flower are on offer as extra's .Part of the Sydney Limo Group of Company,with award winning service throughout Sydney. A full spectrum of vehicles with Concierge level Chauffeurs that know the right way to go ! Our own wheels in Sydney with great affiliates across the Australia and around the world ! mission : Simlicity at its best...Sydney Limousine Company  offersa feel good experience tailored through the eyes of our clients, while providing safe and relible ground transportation. We micro-mange our services so you don't have to! Sydney Limo,Town cars,Corporate cars,Hybrid Vehicles,Buses,SUV's and all forms of Sydney Chauffeur Driven Transportation,

    Sydney Limousine,Sydney Airport Limo,Limousine Hire Sydney,Limo Services,Limousine

  25. shamsher   13 years ago

    i like it

  26. airport cars   13 years ago

    Thanks a lot for sharing this excellent post! Really very informative and valuable. Keep update this bog!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!