Chilling Her Softly
The secret silencing of a pain treatment activist
By speaking out in defense of a Kansas doctor and nurse accused of running a "pill mill," pain treatment activist Siobhan Reynolds annoyed the federal prosecutor assigned to the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Tanya Treadway was so angry that in April 2008 she sought a court order telling Reynolds to shut up. Concluding that such an order would be an unconstitutional prior restraint of speech, U.S. District Judge Monti Belot said no.
But by the time Belot sentenced the defendants, Stephen and Linda Schneider, last October, he was so irritated by Reynolds' advocacy that he could not contain himself. He said he hoped the harsh sentences—three decades each—would "curtail or stop the activities of the Bozo the Clown outfit known as the Pain [Relief] Network, a ship of fools if there ever was one."
Reynolds, who founded the Pain Relief Network (PRN) in 2003 to highlight the chilling effect of drug law enforcement on the practice of medicine, evidently has a talent for getting under the skin of people in power. But that is not a crime. By treating it as such, Treadway used grand jury secrecy to cloak an unconstitutional vendetta.
After Treadway failed to obtain a gag order silencing Reynolds, she instigated a grand jury investigation of her for obstruction of justice, obtaining subpoenas that demanded material related to PRN's activism. Reynolds unsuccessfully challenged Treadway's fishing expedition on First Amendment grounds, and last November the Supreme Court declined to hear her appeal. Perhaps the Court was impressed by the reasoning of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. We can't judge for ourselves, because the appeals court's decision is sealed, like almost every other document related to Reynolds' case.
The extraordinary secrecy is far broader than necessary to protect the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings, extending even to a friend-of-the-court brief, based entirely on publicly available information, that was filed in December 2009 by the Institute for Justice and the Reason Foundation, the organization that publishes this magazine. Furthermore, one of the main justifications for grand jury secrecy—that it protects innocent people who are investigated but never charged—does not apply in a case like this, where the target of the investigation wants transparency and the government is trying to hide what it's doing.
In a brief supporting Reynolds' Supreme Court petition, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press questioned the 10th Circuit's decision to "order the complete sealing of a record in which the facts are already publicly known and the traditional grounds for secrecy carry no force." It also urged the Court to clarify the limits that the First Amendment imposes on grand jury subpoenas and the standards for distinguishing a "good faith" investigation from a vindictive campaign of intimidation.
"A strong case can be made that the government tried to silence Siobhan Reynolds' speech not because it suspected her of any criminal wrongdoing but because the prosecution found her troublesome," the group said. "The government should not be able to frighten citizens into refraining from exercising their First Amendment rights of expression, advocacy and association by threatening them with compulsory process—at least not without first satisfying a heightened standard of scrutiny."
Reynolds resisted the subpoenas until contempt-of-court fines exhausted her resources and left her organization "in ruins." In December she announced that PRN was shutting down "because pressure from the US Department of Justice has made it impossible for us to function." She says "the Supreme Court has decided to participate in the establishment of secret courts that fleece and abuse dissenters at the whim of a disgruntled prosecutor." Such abuse of the grand jury process turns what is supposed to be a bulwark against arbitrary government power into an instrument of repression.
Senior Editor Jacob Sullum is a nationally syndicated columnist.
© Copyright 2010 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Makes you miss George W. Bush, doesn't it? At least GW persecuted actual and potential terrorists, but with Obama in command, it's innocent people like this woman who come under the boot of Obama's SS.
Shariah4America: The Muslim Extremist Extravaganza - July 4th, Washington, DC. http://libertarians4freedom.bl.....ready.html
Now that you mention it, it does smell a bit like a subtler Ruby Ridge...
I never thought about that, Hooha. The story of Ruby Ridge is quite tragic, that poor man was shot because he wouldn't rat out his buddies.
They weren't even his buddies. The feds wanted him to infiltrate a supposedly very dangerous oranizaton and snitch, in exchange for not charging him with a crime they lured him into committing.
Which crime would that be, the keeping or the bearing of arms? Even if those constitutionally protected rights WERE crimes, why did his son and wife deserve to die?
Science help you if you or anyone you know ever get in the way of a government snowjob.
They had to convince him several times (and paid him IIRC $300) to saw off and sell a shotgun, 1/4" (about 0.6cm) shorter than was permissible under law, then used the threat of prosecution to force him to infiltrate the Aryan Nations, a group he and his wife (both white separatists) had ideological differences with. Reason wrote a terrific piece on the raid when it happened; it should be available in the archives.
His 13 year old son and unarmed wife (unless you count having a baby in your arms as a lethal weapon) were murdered by the Feds. I think that is even worse.
http://reason.com/blog/2011/12.....reynolds-d
"Pain Patient Advocate Siobhan Reynolds Dies in Plane Crash"
Does it STILL feel "subtle"?
Ian
Huh? It was Bush's federal prosecutor, Treadway, that instigated all of this. It was Bush and his God-fearing Drug Warriors that want to prevent us from ever doing what he himself did. And there are certainly more Republican appointees to SCotUS, that punted on this, than Obama-ites.
I guess Republican dick just tastes better to some people.
Makes you miss George W. Bush, doesn't it?
There must be some incredibly subtle sarcasm in there somewhere, given that it was his federal prosecutor and his administration's Drug Warriors that were all over this.
Is there a way Reason readers can do something about this? Who can I write to? What can I do?
You can bend over and take it, zoltan. Bend over and take it... so sayeth the highest court in the land.
You can get Anonymous or some random gang of leakers to "acquire" the sealed documents and make them available. Short of that, only the obvious.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....29056.html
Anonymous is a bit busy shutting down the Koch Bros. for "being big evil corporations, fighting the democratic process", completely unlike the Democrats who fled the state.
Ya know, that jsut doesnt seem to make any sense at all dude. None.
http://www.complete-privacy.eu.tc
http://m.xkcd.com/810/
The entire argument that taking the risk of leaving innocent people in pain is justified if we are preventing other people from abusing drugs is barbaric and disgusting. I have little sympathy with most junkies (although they can be good company), and little but contempt for the typical pusher, but the prosecutors who pursue pain doctors deserve to be literally crucified.
And, yes, I have read up on that form of execution. I do have some idea of just how terrifying and painful it must have been. These scum prosecutors deserve it.
+1x10000000
There are other pain treatment activist groups out there and I'm ashamed of them for not sticking up for Reynolds and her group. The sealed reason/IJ amicus brief is out there, google it. We need more leakers, more docs from this case. We need more people in the media to speak up about this, reason magazine is the only place that has been consistently following this REALLY important story.
I know what the government is trying to do, the government is trying to foment demonstrations across the nation against atrocities such as this, in the hope they can direct those demonstrations into a popular uprising they can then finagle into a socialist revolution that will remake America.
At least that's the sensible alternative, what the government is more likely up to can only be considered strange and deranged.
Be careful when you attribute to evil intent that which can be explained as incompetence.
From what I've seen of the world, stupidity is common and evil is rare.
As someone who has witnessed a relative with chronic pain for more than a decade, I find the legal obstruction of help and complete lack of compassion as troublesome as what comes off as a personal vendetta rather than professional behavior. Thank you for bringing this to light. is there a place to donate to help with legal fees?
AFAICT the best thing for a pain patient in the USA who isn't getting enough drugs is to get them illicitly and so qualify as an "addict" for methadone maintenance.
Not so much a reply to the substance of your comment (so far as I can understand it), but I just wanted to say: TIWYGFPULTRDCYKWIAS?
The Internets, how the fuck do they work?
Or you could read my site
Robert, they could also call the cops on themselves if they manage to actually get pain medication, and get a prison sentence.
Then they can get more medication than they would have on the outside.
Happy to have found this post.Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed! Keep
curt
why bother with this lady judge? Who made you creator? Legalize pain medication already!
realy?
Jacob, you really need to get an interview with this lady to dispel the lingering doubt that she might really be a wackadoo that drove the court crazy with nonsense. Yes, I know that's still not a good reason for her treatment, but an interview would make it easier to spam this story out.
I second this. Definitely need an interview from this woman. Get Reason.tv to do something seriously important for once.
still busy fucking saving Cleveland
Even fucking won't save Cleveland.
no shit
Yet another case where medical freedom, in this case freedom of speech, is severely curtailed by government. There is probably no freedom so directly relevant to our lives - literally - that has been so severely and ruthlessly squashed by government.
I dont think those guys have a clue to whats going on out there. Seriously.
complete-privacy.eu.tc
O.K., how does one pronounce the Irish name "Siobhan?"
Way I've heard it most is like Shuh-BAHN.
I believe in English it's Shuh-VAWN. In Irish it's more like She-WAHN.
Shee-von is the English pronunciation as well as the gaelic.
Gaelic phonics are a trip to say the least...my dog is named siofra (Shee-fruh) and my cat aiofa (EE-Fuh)
Thank you
Thank you
Thank you
Thank you
Whoa...since when did you guys start doing game commentary?
thank u
thank u
savasvasv
savasvasv
December she announced that PRN was shutting down "because pressure from the US Department
exhausted her resources and left her organization "in ruins." In December she announced