Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Yet Another Dispatch From the Budgepocalypse Lookout Post

Peter Suderman | 2.4.2010 7:29 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The first sentence from the Congressional Budget Office's hot-off-the-presses Monthly Budget Review:

The federal government incurred a budget deficit of $434 billion in the first four months of fiscal year 2010, CBO estimates, almost $40 billion more than the shortfall recorded in the same period last year.

The CBO uses the word "unsustainable" for a reason. If Roland Emmerich directed a movie about the budget, I'm guessing this is what the first act would look like.

(Via Jon Henke's Twitter feed.)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Curious Statistic of the Day

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

PoliticsBudget
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (31)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

    Can you give that to me in per-hour units? Or maybe how close to the sun a stack of dollar bills that size would reach?

    1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

      I figured it out. In billion dollar bills it's this high.

      1. heller   16 years ago

        LOL

      2. Joe M   16 years ago

        You really should give credit to Xeones for that one.

        1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

          I dutifully convey credit to Xeones for that one and thank you for mentioning where I read it before.

          1. heller   16 years ago

            I retract my LOL because of plagiarism.

  2. Bergholt Stuttley Johnson   16 years ago

    The CBO uses the word "unsustainable" for a reason.

    They're racists?

    1. Rich   16 years ago

      LOL

  3. Fist of Etiquette   16 years ago

    The CBO estimates in past tense.

    1. Joe M   16 years ago

      FY2010 for the Federal government started on Oct. 1st, 2009, I believe.

      1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

        Correct

      2. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

        IF(MONTH>9,YEAR+1,YEAR)

        Something like that for returning federal FY in your favorite system, IIRC.

      3. Fist of Etiquette   16 years ago

        No, what I found strange is CBO put out a report without actual numbers, but now that I think about the sheer size of the federal budget, I doubt the numbers from last year are anything but estimates.

        1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

          You should have seen it in the days befor Donald Reagan.

          Fed checks were IBM punch cards and expendetures were revised over decades.

  4. Warty   16 years ago

    I wish Chony were here to tell us how we didn't care about deficits when Bush was in charge. Come back, Chony.

    1. BeesInTheBrain   16 years ago

      Bush was in charge? source?

      1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

        He had to be in charge since Rove murdered Washington for everything to be his fault.

    2. Episiarch   16 years ago

      Summoning only works with DONDEROOO, Warty, now that LoneMoron got himself banned. Which I highly disapprove of, by the way. How can I write more installments of Lonewacko: the Novel without him coming around? I'm sure not going to his site.

      1. Warty   16 years ago

        I'm not sorry. And you're not my dad.

        1. Episiarch   16 years ago

          Episiarch: Why do you disappoint me? [Warty starts crying] Second by second, you waste my time.

          NutraSweet: Episiarch, lets just have some fun out here, okay?
          Episiarch: Why? He sucks. C'mon Sucky, before you ruin the entirety of my future.

          NutraSweet: Episiarch--

          Episiarch: The only reason God doesn't erase you from the face of the Earth, Warty, is because you amuse him somehow.

          1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

            You guy(s) are fag.

            1. heller   16 years ago

              I don't think the are allows the s to be optional...

            2. heller   16 years ago

              Nevermind, it doesn't make sense either way.

  5. Kevin   16 years ago

    This cycle of spending, borrowing, and printing more currency will not end in the foreseeable future. Even if the Republicans take Congress later this year, this pattern will continue.

    The Republican voters including the misguided tea party activist are getting ready to place another batch of Big Government, Statist Republicans back in charge (i.e. Kirk, McCain, etc).

    I am already hearing the same whining as in 2008. That is "We got to hold our nose and vote for Fill in the Blank." Pathetic! There are more than two parties to choose from on most ballots. If not, write someone's name in.

    Hey Tea Party Activists & Conservatives! How is that whole taking over the Republican Party thing working out for you?

    1. Brandybuck   16 years ago

      How is that whole taking over the Republican Party thing working out for you?

      It sucks. But at least I can hold my head a bit higher than those fauxtarians who supported Obama.

  6. Homer   16 years ago

    It's tragic 'cause it's true.

    Whoo-Hoo!

  7. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Unsustainable means please stop now.

    1. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

      Not unless it is a safeword.

  8. RG   16 years ago

    We're gonna need a bigger boat.

  9. BakedPenguin   16 years ago

    If Roland Emmerich directed a movie about the budget...

    ...it would suck as much as the actual budget does. Also, if anyone was going to make a budget-based movie, I see Jim Jarmusch doing it. His movies are all about lack of communication (transparency!), and as slow and tedious as reading the actual budget would be.

    1. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

      BP,

      True story--I dated a woman a while back who dated Jarmusch at Northwestern. Yes, she would have been an older woman, since I'm a good 15 years or so younger than he is.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Comic: It's Mercy Otis Warren vs. The Blockheads

Peter Bagge | From the February/March 2026 issue

DHS Says Venezuela Is Safe for Migrants To 'Go Home' to After Maduro's Capture. These Venezuelans Disagree.

Autumn Billings | 1.9.2026 5:53 PM

Video of the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Does Not Resolve the Issue of Whether It Was Legally Justified

Jacob Sullum | 1.9.2026 4:00 PM

No Other Choice Is a Dark Satire of Capitalism and Masculinity

Peter Suderman | 1.9.2026 10:20 AM

Only Time Will Tell

Liz Wolfe | 1.9.2026 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks