Help Reason Win the Battle For "Free Minds and Free Markets"!
We're not looking for 300 Spartans—hey, we're libertarians, fer chrissakes, we fight like Spartans for what we believe in, but we also like the good life and we want everyone to participate fully in civic life—but we are looking for 500 new donors to help fund Reason's efforts to make the case for "Free Minds and Free Markets" to bigger and bigger and more influential audiences.
As a magazine, Reason has been around for 41 years. We've supplemented the "kick-ass, no-holds-barred" print edition with a kick-ass, no-holds-barred website (and blog!) and, even more recently, with a kick-ass, no-holds-barred video site.
The threads that run so true through all these activities (including
Reason Foundation, the nonprofit that publishes all the above and runs a great policy think thank) is a principled case for maximum freedom and liberty in all areas of human activity; a dedication to inquiry and ideas; and an uncompromising commitment to producing the most interesting, provocative, honest, and good journalism around.
And, of course, pictures of lobster girl and hunky free-market congressmen stranded on desert islands.
My colleague Matt Welch made his video pitch to you earlier today. To paraphrase Johnny Cash at San Quentin, I'm gonna play that one again.
These are rotten economic times, the product to a large degree of awful government policies dating back at least to the start of this so-far-miserable 21st century. These are perilous times for civil liberties, for lifestyle freedom, for international trade, for you-name-it. One thing that you've been able to depend on since 1968 is that the folks at Reason have got your back. Year after year, month after month, day after day, we're out in the public square telling folks why capitalism is good and central control is bad, why freedom of speech rocks and regulation sucks eggs, why drug legalization, open borders, pluralism, transhumanism, low taxes, and more would make us richer, smarter, stronger. The bigger Reason in all its iterations gets, the bigger those arguments get.
Please support our efforts by making a (tax-deductible!) donation now. For a hundred clams, you get to pick between two great Reason books, Radicals for Capitalism and Everyone Is Stupid Except For Me. For lesser amounts, you get less swag and for higher amounts, you get more (click on the link above for a full listing). You'll be helping us to keep putting the mag you dig, the website you love, and videos like the one below. And you'll be helping to make the rest of the 21st century better than its first decade.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Very nice presentation of what you do and why you guys do it.
I tell you what – I’ll let you get a 10% cut of the profits that the Popes made from the sale of indulgences between 1568 and today.
Martin Luther was anti free-market nutjob.
I’m thinking you didn’t get the joke.
10% of zero is zero. The Church banned the sale of indulgences in 1567.
Just like the government banned the sale of marijuana decades ago?
All they accomplished was to create a black market in indulgences which provides a steady profit stream for lawless, violent organizations.
Mad Max, I got the joke just fine. I was suggesting that the ban was a result of Luther railing against them. Luther was therefore anti free-market. I believe sir that it was you that missed the joke.
I subscribed for 10 years. Does that count for anything? Or is it like Public Radio, when you’re only as good as your last contribution, then you stink like Nina Cokieheimer’s thong?
Uh, drink?
And I’ll be contributing tomorrow. I get paid tonight. I think you guys do a great job. And I love this site.
I really think you need to stay on message with this campaign. Lobster Girl Forever!
His boobs are almost as big as Lobster Girls, yet somehow not as compelling.
Man, nobody even mentioned Lobster Girl in this post and you guys are still commenting on her assets. Apparently Lobster Girl’s bust casts a long shadow on this blog.
and hunky free-market congressmen stranded on desert islands.
I thought Matt just took off his glasses at one of those DC theme bars.
You’ll get $25 out of me this year. I’ll probably divert my annual donation from Cato to Reason in the future though. You’re a rowdier bunch.
Rowdy, indeed. Like Coors-swilling sports fans for liberty.
That’s not really a fair comparison. Reason is a magazine, not a think tank. Now if you compare the Reason Foundation to CATO, I’d bet they’re equally stuffy.
“Please support our efforts by making a (tax-deductible!) donation now.”
How do we feel about this?
Dirty.
reason.com and despair.com need to collaborate on a line of government bashing merchandise with catchy slogans.
…profit.
Does asking for donations completely negate the past few weeks of Ayn Rand love?
Just asking…
They would have to take a stimulus payment to negate all that love.
We can only hope.
No. A donation is a voluntary (without quotes) transaction. If they sent Nick Gillespie over to your house to beat the crap out of you if you don’t donate, that would be another matter.
Obviously she thought it should be legal to give to charity, but I think the point was that Rand opposed charitable giving from a philosophical standpoint.
Where did she say or right that?
Sorry, I left off a W. I think this may be due to trauma from the last administration. Either that or it has been too long since I saw I’s a mad, mad, mad, mad world.
Nick wouldn’t hurt a fly!
Flies don’t take up server space and processing power with their brainless comments and then refuse to donate.
Matt’s promise of “rewards I cannot legally disclose on television” for a $1000 donation may not be as effective given that a certain former writer specializing in Burmese matters has moved on.
But there’s lobster girl. And perhaps as Christmas gets closer, we might get the pillow girl!
Pillow girl is the erotic equivalent of coal in the stocking.
Finally, some love for those of us who prefer Flake’s boobs to the lobster chick’s.
+1
Is a “policy think thank” a think tank of which Bawny Fraank is a member.
Ha ha. Someone donated under the name “END THREADED COMMENTS” but it got truncated so they look like a retard.
That is too fu
I’m too cheap to donate precious fiat money, but I’ll let you have this crude mockup of a retro cover that could really bring in the new subscribers.
Nice work, you.
…producing the most interesting, provocative, honest, and good journalism around.
Which is why we desperately need donations to keep this thing afloat. Anybody interested in buying land in Florida?
Because I can (probably NSFW):
lobster girl
Lobster girl photoshop:
http://img200.imageshack.us/im…..rlplus.jpg
Another lobster girl photoshop:
http://img200.imageshack.us/im…..rlplus.jpg
Cute!
I don’t even have $25 to spare right now.
Well, no doubt about it, free markets like totally rock! Always have!
RT
http://www.ultimate-privacy.cz.tc