This Week in Innocence
In 1985, then-19-year-old, openly gay Bernard Baran was convicted of molesting children at a day care center in Massachusetts. His conviction came at the height of the day care sex abuse panic that took off in the early 1980s.
Police began investigating Baran after a couple who also served as narcotics informants sent their son to the center, learned of Baran, then reported him, telling police they "didn't want no homo" watching their child.
After serving 21 years in prison, during which he was beaten and sexually assaulted by other inmates, Baran has finally been cleared of the charges. His defense team found videotapes in which children at the center tell investigators Baran never touched them. Other children who did say he abused them appear to have been coerced. The tapes were never turned over to Baran's attorneys.
…in June 2004, Baran got a new legal team, courtesy of a local advocacy group. And the missing videotaped interviews were finally found in an evidence room, filed with tapes of drunken-driving arrests.
Appellate attorney John Swomley watched them all. "It was like, 'Oh, my God,'" he said.
In one, a 6-year-old boy is being questioned. "The kid keeps saying over and over, 'Where's my prize? You promised me a prize! I want my prize now!'" Swomley said.
In others, children say Baran never touched their private parts. In some, children said he did, often after being repeatedly asked the same question until it is answered affirmatively, according to Swomley.
The trial prosecutor had only shown an edited tape of the latter interviews, Swomley said.
Baran isn't sure if he's going to sue. Frankly, it would be nice to see Baran's prosecutor do some time.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Baran isn't sure if he's going to sue.
Good lord, why not?
Frankly, it would be nice to see Baran's prosecutor do some time.
I think 63 years would be about right (21 trebled).
RC,
Maybe he doesnt think the people of Mass should pay for the prosecutor's actions?
Baran isn't sure if he's going to sue.
Good lord, why not?
I don't blame him for not wanting to revisit past trauma, even though it might lead to justice.
I also don't blame him if he decides to go Punisher all over the evil, evil shitclowns that put him away for so long.
Given the minor-witness coercion, if it's properly prosecuted, his own suit should be a drop in the bucket.
The whole day-care child abusers hysteria shows that we're no more wise than our forbearers who engaged in bouts of witchcraft hysteria.
Can't wait for the next one to come around.
If the people of Massachusetts pay maybe they won't let shit like this go on and require more accountability.
It would suck having that bad shitty of a 1/4 of your life. Rehashing the worst 1/4 of your life would suck more. Can't blame him for that.
If I locked a guy in a cage for 21 years and sent burly felons in to rape him every few days, how long would I spend in jail? That's what should happen to the prosecutor.
If I locked a guy in a cage for 21 years and sent burly felons in to rape him every few days, how long would I spend in jail?
I dunno, how much time do prosecutors get these days?
So who was the prosecutor in this case and what's he up to these days?
Goddamnit Balko. It's Monday for Apollo's sake.
If I had a dollar for every time I've heard some faux christian down here say," they don't reproduce kids, they recruit 'em." In Fucking Sunday School! God grant me the serenity to beat these hypocrites with a ball peen hammer.
The whole day-care child abusers hysteria shows that we're no more wise than our forbearers who engaged in bouts of witchcraft hysteria.
Both were in Mass. I say the problem can be localized.
Can't wait for the next one to come around.
TEH CORPORASHUNS!
robc - "the people" cannot have it both ways. They reap the benefits of the criminal justice system, they also pay the costs.
Too bad for them.
That prosecutor should kill himself.
"I also don't blame him if he decides to go Punisher all over the evil, evil shitclowns that put him away for so long."
You know, more and more I think that one of the things this world needs is a good wave of incredibly vicious vigilantism. Of course, it'd probably not work out the way I'm thinking but hey, one can hope that shitbags get dealt with in some way.
one can hope that shitbags get dealt with in some way.
The reason we have a justice system is so I'm not tyrranized by some idiot's misconception of "shitbag". That's part of the way the Articles of Confederation and Constitution protected us both from each other and the government they set up.
Frankly, it would be nice to see Baran's prosecutor do some time.
HAHAHAHAHAHA, right. Like this would ever happen. The day a prosecutor does time is the day hell freezes over.
I didn't say he SHOULD go vigilante all over everybody's ass. But if he did, i'd understand.
You know, more and more I think that one of the things this world needs is a good wave of incredibly vicious vigilantism
Not so clever now. Are you? Punk.
Prosecutors framing innocent people?
Nothing new, and as usual will go completely unpunished. Hell the guy may get promoted.
I think the people should pay for what the prosecutor did to this guy. The people gave him the power to ruin someone's life. Oh, and the prosecutor and informants who lied should all get at least 21 years of ass-rape prison.
No, this hysteria was nationwide. There was a big case in North Carolina. Janet Reno also got her start at fame prosecuting these types of day care abuse cases, too. "Recovered memories" and badgering little kids until they say that they were abused were common in far too many places.
I'm thinking every get out of fail free card should come with a free shooting spree at the court house card.
Maybe we could get some honesty up in that bitch. If for nothing more than the fear of being shot.
"The reason we have a justice system is so I'm not tyrranized by some idiot's misconception of "shitbag". That's part of the way the Articles of Confederation and Constitution protected us both from each other and the government they set up."
That's the way it was intended. Would you say that it worked that way for Baran? I wouldn't.
We're not gonna start giving away get out of fail free cards to reason trolls, are we?
Would you say that it worked that way for Baran?
It hasn't worked that way in a long time. My point is that restoring the system is a realistic alternative to vigilante justice, and quite a bit easier to argue in court if the judge isn't a useful idiot (I can't vouch for the possibility that will be the case).
You got me Sucralose. Morrison's run on Doom Patrol is one of my favorites. I'm not looking forward to what Giffen is going to do with them now. Hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised.
You know who else is a fucking scumbag?
The AP reporter who wrote the piece Radley linked to.
Obviously the name[s] of the people on the prosecution team that either framed or railroaded this guy are known. Why aren't they in the article?
The only way they don't end up in the article is if the AP reporter made the conscious decision to exclude them.
What the fuck is up with that, asshole?
Kyle Jordan,
I have three copies of that issue. Once we move into a place big enough for me to have an office, I'm going to frame the entire issue in UV glass and decorate.
I'm thinking every get out of fail free card should come with a free shooting spree at the court house card.
Its the Law!
What is the history of public floggings in America? Any chance we can bring those back? Those prosecutors need to sit in some kind of stockade for a while and think about what they did.
While I think we all enjoy a good flogging, I'd take just having them in stocks for people to throw rotten fruit at and dogs/drunks to piss on.
"Can't wait for the next one to come around."
Transfats.
Obviously the name[s] of the people on the prosecution team that either framed or railroaded this guy are known. Why aren't they in the article?
Excellent question, Fluffy.
"The prosecutor, Jane Q. Shitbag, now a partner at Scumbag, Dirtbag, and Douche, refused comment. The investigators conducting the interrogations of teh childrens, Amos R. Assclown and Julia A. Smythe-Snivers, have retired on full pensions and could not be reached at their Caribbean vacation homes."
Sweet'n'Low, they might enjoy the getting-peed-on part too much.
While I think we all enjoy a good flogging, I'd take just having them in stocks for people to throw rotten fruit at and dogs/drunks to piss on.
No, this is a perfect opportunity to use the rape stand I keep in my front yard.
Fluffy, you want to know what's worse?
That's the current District Attorney, Mr. Capeless.
The motherfucking prosecutor is now a Massachusetts judge.
http://www.mass.gov/courts/courtsandjudges/judgesandjudicialofficers/fordd.html
So it's beneath the AP reporter's notice that this prosecutor isn't dead or in some nursing home somewhere, but still sits in judgment of the people of Massachusetts?
This looks like a job for Radley. He needs the Haynes treatment.
"It hasn't worked that way in a long time. My point is that restoring the system is a realistic alternative to vigilante justice, and quite a bit easier to argue in court if the judge isn't a useful idiot (I can't vouch for the possibility that will be the case)."
I agree with what you wrote.
My point wasn't to advocate vigilante justice. It was to state that there's a part of me, which seemingly gets bigger and bigger with time, that wants to see people who easily, and sadly in some cases gleefully, trample on the rights of others pay for what they've done.
I'm not at the point of advocating for vigilante justice. Yet. In all honesty, it's one of the most disheartening things to me to see how frequently every day people can and have been harmed by actions like in this case.
The motherfucking prosecutor is now a Massachusetts judge.
I sometimes wonder whether people like this have any remorse whatsoever about destroying people's lives. And then I realize that they can't or they'd have quit or offed themselves a long time ago.
Most of the stories Radley posts could be titled, "Vigilante Justice" IMO.
Do we treat adults with the mental capacity of a 6 year old with the same credibility as we do actual 6 year olds on the witness stand?
You know who else is a fucking scumbag?
The AP reporter who wrote the piece Radley linked to.
Obviously the name[s] of the people on the prosecution team that either framed or railroaded this guy are known. Why aren't they in the article?
The only way they don't end up in the article is if the AP reporter made the conscious decision to exclude them.
What the fuck is up with that, asshole?
Damn, that's good Fluffy.
Frankly, it would be nice to see Baran's prosecutor do some time.
Keeping perps in jail costs society a lot of money, but if that's what it takes to ensure that the prosecutor is regularly "beaten and sexually assaulted," then it's a price that must be paid.
I have an idea.
Someone, I'm busy, should create a dangerous government worker website. It will show you if people like the prosecutor live near you. The website should explicitly state that these people should not be approached as they could imprison or even kill you.
It would work just like the awesome sex offender websites. Business owners, contractors, and food servers, would then have a choice about who they choose to interact with.
Too tired to rant. Just I agree with the collective wisdom of the assembled Reasonoids. The prosecutor in this case should be prosecuted himself.
Did you all notice where the initial witch accusations came from?
That's right. Members of the historically reliable and trustworthy group known as "narcotics informants".
WTF? Suing's easy. If it were me, I'd be agonizing over whether to use hollowpoints or FMJ.
Any chance we can bring [public floggings] back?
Uh, possibly.
The interrogation of minors is a major point of contention with me. I had first hand experience on several occasions as a minor, really I was just misunderstood. The worst being New Rome Ohio holding me for 7 hours trying to get me to confess to attempted robbery. For standing on a sidewalk looking into an impound lot at a friends wrecked car. I think I told the 2 cops that were tag teaming me to fuck off at least 1000 times. I walked, guy I was with semi confessed to use being there to get the drivers purse. Which she asked us to get if we could gain access to the car. They spun that into a attempted burglary or burglary or something that put him on probation.
Did I mention fuck the police?
The treatment of minors as a whole, and regardless of what side of the law they are on, in the system is atrocious.
If it were me, I'd be agonizing over whether to use hollowpoints or FMJ.
Its a tough call.
Gaping exit wounds and near-certain death, or a higher likelihood of crippling injury and a life of pain?
Read my shitty book.
I'm not at the point of advocating for vigilante justice.
I am. The system, as shown here and other places time and again, is seriously FUBARed. Corrupt gummint officials rarely are punished for their obvious and blatant malfeasance.
Time to let the citizenry have a whack at balancing the scales in these situations.
If it were me, I'd be agonizing over whether to use hollowpoints or FMJ.
I'm thinking a return to the idea of the small arms flechette would be in order.
Can we also pass a law that says that they can't be within 2,500 feet of any governmental building?
The motherfucking prosecutor is now a Massachusetts judge.
Hey, no conscious. He'd fit in perfect.
Gaping exit wounds and near-certain death, or a higher likelihood of crippling injury and a life of pain?
Kneecaps are generally the way to go for crippling, painful, and debilitating. A couple of .223's in each asscheek, on the other hand, that's just plain funny.
FTA:
If that's his concern about suing, then he should sue, and donate the proceeds to the Innocence Project. Would be a great way to ensure such a thing.
"19-year-old, openly gay Bernard Baran was convicted of molesting children"
Well what did he expect? That's like a super obese person getting a job at a candy store. Even if she doesn't eat a single gummy bear, people are going to have suspicions.
Well what did he expect? That's like a super obese person getting a job at a candy store. Even if she doesn't eat a single gummy bear, people are going to have suspicions.
Actually, the two are absolutely nothing alike, and "people" having suspicions just proves the uninformed stupidity of "people".
hmmm --dude,
You almost got caught in the wheels of New Rome justice? You were lucky.
That's like a super obese person getting a job at a candy store. Even if she doesn't eat a single gummy bear, people are going to have suspicions.
Actually, the two are absolutely nothing alike.
You peddle this line of bullshit despite all the evidence that all fat guys everywhere repeatedly rape candy if given the chance.
Your cultural relativism sickens me.
Since the prosecution's entire motivation seems to have been triggered by a shrieking chorus of "won't somebody think of the children," then did it ever dawn on anyone that coercing kids into affirming completely fictionalized accounts of sexual assault might be a form of...oh, I don't know. What's the term I'm looking for here?
I'm more into warm apple pie myself.
"Your cultural relativism sickens me."
It was sarcasm.
Well it looks like paddling is on the way out for kids, so it's probably a non-starter for adults.
Heh, I think he was being sarcastic, too.
I would sue but not demand money, instead only demand the police and prosecutor involved in suppressing evidence be raped daily for 21 years. That is only fair, right?
Was this in Salem, Mass?
Frankly, it would be nice to see Baran's prosecutor do some time.
Frankly, jail time isn't enough for these people.
"I sometimes wonder whether people like this have any remorse whatsoever about destroying people's lives."
No.
Seriously -- NO.
Many prosecutors deem themselves stars of the Law And Order show. Even when you prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that they have prosecuted the wrong person (and get acquittal across the board on retrial), they will never ever admit that they made an error that transformed an innocent person's life.
Quite the contrary: They will loudly proclaim that they are "satisified" that they got the right person and continue to declare their victim's guilt.
Many prosecutors suffer from very serious psychological pathology. I am really not overstating matters.
I would sue but not demand money, instead only demand the police and prosecutor involved in suppressing evidence be raped daily for 21 years. That is only fair, right?
Fairness requires that the prosecutors and police also get regular beatings while they're in jail, just as Baran did.
"Frankly, it would be nice to see Baran's prosecutor do some time. "
Nothing less than execution is called for here. The prosecutors and all that knew the evidence was false should be hung by the neck in public.
But that will never happen.
Fairness requires that the prosecutors and police also get regular beatings while they're in jail, just as Baran did.
If you ever actually managed to get a prosecutor in jail, the thing would pretty much take care of itself.
Many prosecutors suffer from very serious psychological pathology. I am really not overstating matters.
Let me try to make an excuse for the lack of remorse on the part of prosecutors whose convictions have been overturned: I think it's hard to find people who can zealously pursue a conviction and subsequently admit that they were wrong.
I'm not sure I have the moral character to do that. How many people have the combination of talent and fiber? Few.
Which is yet another reason why we need to liberalize our laws; I suspect we have too high a case load for our gene pool to prosecute fairly.
Larry's comments are reasonable, of course. We are talking about people here. They presumably have all the faults that come with the design.
But reading/watching reporting on various exoneration suggests to me that some of these people are invoking full blown psychological defense mechanisms.
From a need to always be right? To avoid the guilt? Out of pure, unmitigated self-aggrandizement? Because it would derail their political ambition? Because they really believe that "finality" is more important than innocence?
None of these motives are terribly sympathetic, and a few are really ugly.
I just don't get it, and I don't know what to say.
Seems to me that a man who's been exonerated after decades in prison would also have very strong slander case against a scumbag dick-waving prosecutor like Capeless who takes a cheap shot like that.
I hope Balko keeps an eye on that asshole. He sure doesn't sound like a straight-arrow lawman to me.
-jcr
They will loudly proclaim that they are "satisified" that they got the right person and continue to declare their victim's guilt.
I forget. Did Nifong ever admit that he was a witch-hunter, even after he got disbarred?
-jcr
So it's beneath the AP reporter's notice that this prosecutor isn't dead or in some nursing home somewhere, but still sits in judgment of the people of Massachusetts?
Is that an elected position? If so, I'll make a contribution to whoever runs against him.
-jcr
Point 1: This case does not make up even the tiniest tip of this particular iceberg - which is one among many.
Point 2: StupendousMan wrote:
"Someone, I'm busy, should create a dangerous government worker website. It will show you if people like the prosecutor live near you. The website should explicitly state that these people should not be approached as they could imprison or even kill you."
I wholeheartedly agree.
Point 3: It is times like this that I hope that nutjob Jonathan Edwards was right, and that there is an angry god available who is salivating at the thought of punishing such loathsome creatures for eternity - but even so, that would be too good for them.
We appreciate what appears to be mostly an outpouring of support for remedying the injustice done to Bernard Baran. All of us want to see that such an injustice not occur again. Please understand that we, his lawyers, are going to do what we can to both compensate Mr. Baran and send a stern message to the perpetrators of this injustice and those who might seek to emulate them.
Many of us recognize, unfortunately, that injustices like this one occur all the time in our system of criminal justice. Many, if not most of these wrongful convictions go unremedied. When one is poor, the likelihood of obtaining such a remedy is minimal.
Mr. Baran was fortunate to have the assistance of an organization called the National Center for Reason and Justice (http://www.ncrj.org) which accepts donations to fund innocence cases where there is no DNA.
Without their assistance much of our work would not have been possible. Those interested in learning more can contact their website above or the site http://www.freebaran.org. Those interested in reading the complete appellate decision which helped Mr. Baran finally win his freedom can do so at my website http://www.jswomley.com. Don't skip the footnotes.
John G. Swomley
Swomley & Associates
Boston, MA