The Manhattan Institute is hosting an interesting debate on the subject "Criminalizing Corporate Conduct: How Far Is Too Far?" John Hasnas takes the radical position that there "is no justification for criminalizing any corporate conduct" (as opposed to criminalizing the conduct of individual corporate employees). Mike Seigel presents the contrary point of view (or, in his words, "I disagree with just about everything John has said so far"). Much of the discussion focuses on a favorite topic of intra-libertarian debate: the nature of the corporate form itself. You can read the whole thing here, checking back for further entries as they're posted.
A Professor Tried To End a Flirty Email Exchange With a Young Woman. Then She Threatened to Blackmail Him.
When the grad student threatened to publicize their embarrassing correspondence, he reported her. But the university decided he was the villain.
Teen activists are righteously angry—but righteous anger does not produce sound public policy.
The Inspector General Report Is a Huge Blow to the FBI's Credibility. Why Is It Being Treated Like Vindication?
The government's surveillance of Carter Page might not have been improperly motivated, but it was still seriously flawed.
Plus: the foundations bankrolling bad tech policy, they is the word of the year, and more...