Criminal Justice

Neighborhood Watch

Private policing in Chicago

|

What do you do when a city is too cash-strapped to pay for adequate policing, yet residents of a community are willing to pay for extra security? If you're Chicago, you consider giving private security guards the authority to issue tickets for littering, graffiti, parking violations, and other minor infractions.

Chicago Alderman Anthony Beale and John Pope have proposed granting limited police power to the Total Security Management company of Oakbrook Terrace. Beale says the ordinance would provide police with extra help and give the community more control over its own safety, and a supportive Mayor Richard Daley told the Chicago Sun-Times that "In an economic crisis…sometimes you have to think outside of the box." Daley and Police Superintendent Jody Weis have been feuding over contract negotiations with Fraternal Order of Police, which opposes private policing on grounds that untrained personnel exacerbate confrontations.

Over the past 14 years, many communities such as Oakbrook Terrace have paid to supplement local police forces. "We saw the instant result in which their presence helped the community," counters Beale. "They had a presence in areas where the police were already stretched thin. They filled these gaps, which improved the quality of life for the residents." So far, private security guards have the power to temporarily detain people for illegal activity but little more. "Mall police are armed to make sure people are safe," says Beale. Total Security Management officers "are policing my business district. It's no different."

Advertisement

NEXT: The Prehistory of Porn Prosecution

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I’m sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won’t get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there’s more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I’m not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It’s just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight…the Bible’s books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on…the Bible’s books were written by people with very different mindsets.

  2. My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I’m sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.