Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Science & Technology

Is Googlezon Upon Us?

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 4.18.2008 8:08 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Two headlines from DrudgeReport this morning:

BOOM: GOOGLE 1Q profit climbs 30%; tops analyst views…

SHOCK: NEW YORK TIMES POSTS LOSS; worst period 'company and newspaper industry have seen'…

Perhaps the long-predicted Googlezon media apocalypse will be here sooner than you think:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Friday Funnies

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

Science & TechnologyInternet
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Taktix?   17 years ago

    Iz all up in ur marketz shaar, takin' all ur reeders...

  2. Jake Boone   17 years ago

    This is clearly Warren's fault.

  3. VM   17 years ago

    Jake Boone is a man of class, style, and grace.

    ooh - we're not doing that any more.

    hrumph
    [ambles off]

  4. Daniel Reeves   17 years ago

    SHOCK: NEW YORK TIMES POSTS LOSS; worst period 'company ... [has] seen'

    Coffee and good news: a good way to kick off the day!

  5. Anonymoose.   17 years ago

    The Google headline is slightly misleading. Google's profits are up after being down last quarter. So really, they're back on track.

  6. dbcooper   17 years ago

    SHOCK: NEW YORK TIMES POSTS LOSS; worst period 'company ... [has] seen'

    Coffee and good news: a good way to kick off the day!

    Ah, but will the stuffwhitepeople like guy use for material if they have to cut back.

  7. Jake Boone   17 years ago

    Jake Boone is a man of class, style, and grace.

    Lies! All lies!

  8. Rhywun   17 years ago

    1. I call BS on "changes that purposefully reduced the volume of commercial" at Google. I have seen their search results become much more commercial recently, with paid results sometimes taking up most of the first page.

    2. I read the second headline as referring to the "New York Post"--oh well, I'll take either.

  9. Gilbert Martin   17 years ago

    Saw a story posted on MSN Money last night that said the two Google co-founders made about $2 billion each in an hour on the stock price move in after hours trading.

    They've made a lot more this morning in regular trading.

    Of course the stock is still considerably lower than it's all time high,

  10. Anonymoose.   17 years ago

    Of course the stock is still considerably lower than it's all time high,

    And still considerably overpriced.

  11. Rhywun   17 years ago

    Google is basically Bubble 2.0 all by itself. Everybody is so thrilled to find something that can make money online, they're throwing all their money at it.

  12. Gene Berkman   17 years ago

    The profitability of Google is impressive, all the more so when so many companies are losing money. 8 National store chains are in bankruptcy, Borders Book Group is in trouble, Citigroup lost money this quarter etc. So bravo to Google for survining President Bush.

  13. lannychiu   17 years ago

    Yeah but the google co founders both lost about 8 billion earlier this year when the stock fell by 40%. Not that they aren't hugely wealthy.

    I could never invest in the company, simply because the owners are in the constant process of liquidating their positions. I sort of get why a Bill Gates would do it, after his company has already grown huge. But with a fast grower like Google I get very concerned.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Texas Bans Delta-8 THC, Which Is Only Popular Because of Prohibition

Joe Lancaster | 5.23.2025 3:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!