Criminal Justice

The Case of Henry Moses: Another Dr. Hayne Debacle


Henry Moses was convicted in 2003 of murdering his wife Derinda. He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. I should start by saying that Moses was by no means a sympathetic defendant. On two occasions, he plead guilty to misdemeanor domestic abuse. He and his wife were chronic alcoholics. Theirs is a pretty sad story. But the evidence that Henry Moses killed his wife is spare at best. The prosecution's case rested almost entirely on the testimony of Dr. Steven Hayne, a medical examiner whose credibility has since come under fire from his peers, the national and Mississippi chapters of the Innocence Projects, and yours truly.

Two doctors testified in opposition to Hayne at trial, including the two hospital doctors who attended to Mrs. Moses after she was admitted. Dr. Leroy Riddick, the former state medical examiner for Alabama, also testified in opposition to Hayne after being asked by the defense to review Hayne's autopsy.

I recently asked another doctor, Dr. Harry Bonnell, to look over Dr. Hayne's autopsy, as well as Dr. Riddick's review of it. Bonnell is a reputable forensic pathologist who serves on the ethics committee of the National Association of Medical Examiners. You can view his CV here. Bonnell has also been asked to review one of Hayne autopsies in the past. You can view one of those reviews here (pdf) 

Bonnell told me he "completely" agrees with Dr. Riddick's assessment of Dr. Hayne's autopsy. He described Hayne's errors in Derinda Moses autopsy as "very egregious," and concluded, "Mr. Moses needs the state or the Innocence Project to get him out of prison."

Here's what happened:

On December 22, 2000, Henry and Derinda Moses checked into a motel in anticipation of a weeklong alcohol bender. According to Moses' trial testimony, after a few days, Derinda Moses began throwing up and convulsing. On December 26th, he brought her to the emergency room. According to court records, she was unresponsive. Soon, her organs began to fail, and a few days later, she died.

The hospital physicians determined—and maintained at trial—that Derinda Moses died of acetaminophen poisoning, which was exacerbated by her alcoholism. She had taken a considerable but unspecified amount of Tylenol over the previous few days days, in part to deal with the effects of the alcoholism, but also because she'd recently been in a car accident which required hip surgery. She used a walker to get around, which combined with her alcoholism, caused frequent falls.

Derinda Moses' family didn't like her husband—most would say with good reason. They testified at trial that they believe he killed her. But they had no evidence of that at the time of her death. The state would turn to Hayne for the evidence. Hayne was asked to perform the autopsy. As is often the case, he asked Dr. Michael West to assist him.

Hayne testified that in his autopsy he found an 11-inch section of Derinda Moses' bowel that had turned necrotic (essentially, it was dead). He said this is what caused her death. He then testified that he believed that "blunt force trauma" caused the damage to her bowel. Hayne's exact words: "She died of blunt force trauma producing injury to the bowel and to the peritoneal lining, ultimately dying from shock." Hayne was next asked if he had determined the manner of death. He had, he said.

"With reasonable medical certainty, I came to the conclusion it was homicide, sir," he said. He later elaborated that the cause of death was "blunt force trauma, purposely inflicted." He theorized that the murder weapon might have been a shoe or a fist, but that he couldn't say for sure.

It was from this testimony that Moses was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. There was no murder weapon. There were no witnesses. Moses' character flaws and Hayne's testimony are all there was.

The problem with Hayne's diagnosis is that there were no corresponding bruises on Derinda Moses' body where she should have been struck to cause the damage to her bowel. There was also no "path of damage" connecting the external portion of her body where the blow would have had to have landed through her body to her bowel. Dr. Riddick testified that you rarely if ever see a bruised bowel in adults, because there's nothing hard for the bowel to be trapped against.  If a blow to the outside of Mrs. Moses' body caused the injury to her bowel, there should have been extensive internal and external damage. A CAT scan showed no such damage.

According to Dr. Riddick's review of Hayne's autopsy, Hayne also neglected to photograph Mrs. Moses' bowel, another egregious oversight, given that his testimony was that the bowel was not only the cause of death, but evidence of homicide. In fact, the prosecutor in the case tried to impeach Dr. Riddick's testimony by noting that only Hayne had actually seen the body firsthand—Riddick only reviewed Hayne's notes. This of course is because prosecutors typically don't want anyone but Hayne viewing a body. But that Hayne was indeed the only doctor to perform an autopsy on Moses makes his failure to adequately photograph Derinda Moses' internal injuries all the more troubling. If you're the only one who's going to see the body, you should be extra careful to document everything, particularly those portions of the body you plan to testify are evidence of murder.

Hayne's sloppiness was also evident in other areas of the Moses autopsy. Hayne failed to notice Derinda Moses' surgical scar from hip surgery she'd had just a couple of months prior to her death, an oversight Dr. Bonnell again classified as egregious. In fact, Hayne not only failed to notice the surgery, he explicity wrote that "no evidence of acute medical intervention is appreciated" for the area of her body that had been operated on. He also failed to notice any sign of injury or healing in her ribs, which she also fractured in the accident. This too should have been apparent.

More troubling, Dr. Riddick testified that he found in a tissue sample that approximately 80 percent of Derinda Moses' liver cells were dead—a finding consistent with the diagnosis of Dr. Riddick and the two hospital physicians. Dr. Bonnell says that kind of liver damage should have been readily apparent to Hayne when he conducted his autopsy. It apparently wasn't. In fact, Hayne listed Mrs. Moses' liver and several other organs as being "unremarkable."

Hayne also testified that before he performed the autopsy on Derinda Moses, he spoke with the coroner in the case, as well as two police officers, something he does regularly. This isn't uncommon, but experts I've spoken with say it's problematic. Ideally, a medical examiner shouldn't hear the state's theory about what happened before conducting an autopsy. Of course, Hayne's critics say he talks to prosecutors for precisely the opposite reason—to make sure his diagnosis matches the authorities' theories about what happened.

One other thing Hayne didn't do is review Derinda Moses' medical history before reaching his conclusion about how she died. Dr. Riddick and the hospital physicians did review her history. They saw her history of alcoholism. And all of them concluded that Moses' death was an accident, not a homicide.

In its review of the Moses case, the Mississippi Court of Appeals seemed to acknowledge that the prosecution hadn't assembled the strongest of cases. But they refrained from questioning the jury's verdict, in large part because they found enough in Dr. Hayne's testimony to support the jury's verdict.

Regardless of what one may think of Mr. Moses as a person, four doctors believe he is not guilty killing his wife, and that Dr. Hayne's homicide diagnorsis was incorrect. Like Devin Bennett and Jeffrey Havard, however, there's no DNA test that could conclusively determine Mr. Moses' guilt or innocence. It's not a matter of who killed Derinda Moses, it's a matter of whether or not she was killed at all. It's in these types of cases that it's especially important that forensic experts be carefully screened by courts. It's in these types of cases that someone like Hayne can be particularly damaging.

NEXT: Michael Young Handled the Weekend Political Thread...

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “It’s time to bar Hayne from testifying or performing autopsies again..”

    Surely we can do better than that. His medical license should be pulled. He should do federal jail time for perjury or gross negligence and wanton disregard.

    But what can you expect from a government monopoly? And people argue with David Friedman that anarchocapitalism can’t work because it can’t guarantee justice…

  2. Two doctors testified against Hayne at trial, including the two hospital doctors who attended to Mrs. Moses after she was admitted, as well as Dr. Leroy Riddick, the former state medical examiner for Alabama, whom the defense asked to review Hayne’s autopsy.

    Leaving aside the witch doctor Hayne, it seems to me that the jury wasn’t too quick on the uptake. Reasonable doubt is the standard for acquittal. How did they reach a different conclusion?

    The opinion I hold of my fellow citizen’s intelligence continues its downward trend.

  3. If Hayne is not a direct employee of the state, I think he would not enjoy sovereign immunity.

    Can’t he be sued? Or better yet, can’t a class action suit be filed against him?

  4. Argh. That’s pretty awful.

    I can’t help thinking that if we weren’t wasting massive resources on consensual “crimes,” we could get actual crimes prosecuted more competently.

  5. J sub D,

    My guess would be voir dire. I’m starting to get the impression that matters more than the actual evidence in most cases.

  6. And people argue with David Friedman that anarchocapitalism can’t work because it can’t guarantee justice…

    Jeez…the anarchos always gotta plug their friggin’ hobby horse.

  7. Ayn_Randian | April 13, 2008, 9:29pm | #

    And people argue with David Friedman that anarchocapitalism can’t work because it can’t guarantee justice…

    Jeez…the anarchos always gotta plug their friggin’ hobby horse.

    Before you get to ride the pony, you gotta shovel a lot of horseshit.

  8. J sub D:
    If you ever get pulled into Jury Duty, you realize the sad truth. The 12 people (plus alternates) sitting on a Jury are the people who are too damned stupid to get out of it.

    Personally, I’m just scared as hell that I know more about medicine then Dr. Hayne… and I wouldn’t be qualified to testify in front of a court about anything related to medicine.


  9. You don’t have to be stupid to get out of jury duty, sometimes you only have to tell the truth. I was being questioned for jury duty on a rape/kidnap case when the prosecutor asked me what my profession was. When I told him I was an engineer he immediately used one of his peremptories to get rid of me. The amusing thing is this happened in Silicon Valley, where engineers are kind of hard to avoid.

  10. First of all, I’m shocked that Hayne isn’t in jail yet. If we haven’t heard enough at this point to conclude that Hayne is morally bankrupt and that anyone who gets services from him is morally bankrupt, I don’t know what more it will take. Second, there’s got to be a better way to handle jury selection. The system is biased to select those most easily manipulated.

  11. Bob Smith:

    I got called to Jury Duty once… one of the cases that I had to sit in the courtroom for was (as we called it) the Whiny Bitch vs. the Doctor’s Insurance. It was a case of someone in high school getting injured, getting surgery, and then getting re-injured again. His parents were the lawyers suing for malpractice. Living in Cleveland, it means that 50%+ of the people called for jury duty worked for one of the hospitals in the area (since we have almost no other industry).

    I was amused by the lawyers for another case (a date rape) being really confused by both my BeerAdvocate shirt and my Modern Drunkard Magazine shirt…

    As I was stuck there for five days, I kept getting tempted to just stand up and shout, “Jury nullification”, just so they would send me home.


  12. Nephilium,

    That you for giving me the perfect idea. Soon, available to all, will be my jury duty t-shirts which proudly exclaim “I am smarter than you, Your Honor”

    I expect these will sell like the proverbial hotcakes.

  13. One has to wonder why a journalist of Radley Balko’s caliber would exercise such impressive diligence in this case, but not take the time to determine how biased Jamie Kirchik’s coverage of the Ron Paul newsletter story was or how out of context the quotes were before parroting the spin.

  14. Way off topic (I think perhaps maybe), but I thought reasonoids would be interested in this article on how economic problems in Cuba affected health in Cuba:

    The gist is probably old hat for many here, but it’s interesting nonetheless.

  15. Hayne will soon, I hope, be on trial himself for perjury and gross professional incompetence.

  16. It is impossible to look at a body and not notice a two month old hip surgery scar. Even if you are only spending an hour or two per autopsy, as Hayne must doing. Keep the stories coming, Radley, we need to get these guys in jail and get their victims out.

  17. In fact, Hayne listed Mrs. Moses’ liver and several other organs as being “unremarkable.”
    I should write a calm, erudite post on this, but all I can think here is, “Are you FUCKING KIDDING ME?!” The death of 80% of the liver’s cells is very fucking remarkable. What’s more, that (and, to a lesser extent) the necrotic bowel are absolutely consistent with the acetaminophen poisoning. Acetaminophen is hard on the liver, and that side effect is amplified by alcohol and pre-existing liver conditions. Although I am not a doctor, the bowel damage strikes me as consistent with multiple organ failure and acid/base imbalances that would accompany acetaminophen poisoning.
    Acetaminophen poisoning can (and does) occur when the drug bioaccumulates. What’s more, a massive overdose takes several days to do it’s worst, and by the time the liver toxicity is present, there’s very little that can be done.

  18. “””There was no murder weapon. There were no witnesses. Moses’ character flaws and Hayne’s testimony are all there was.”””

    Yet they convicted. They almost always convict. Radley, where are the cases when the jury aquits after Haynes testifies? Just curious.

    I’m starting to get the impression that the people are the problem. Hayne’s testimony is just an excuse to convict. Maybe it makes them feel good about their believe that if you’re arrested, you’re guilty.

  19. and juries don’t think the prosecution will lie to them. The government doesn’t lie, y’all know that.

  20. J sub D | April 13, 2008, 8:34pm | #
    Leaving aside the witch doctor Hayne, it seems to me that the jury wasn’t too quick on the uptake. Reasonable doubt is the standard for acquittal. How did they reach a different conclusion?

    We found out about a year after the trial that the jury didn’t have a satisfactory explanation as to the cause of Dorinda’s hyperthermia and according to one juror (a friend of a friend of a friend…) that was the main reason the jury found Clif (Henry Clifton Moses) guilty.

    Which I realize, doesn’t answer your question. I’ve never understood the verdict.

    As for Dr Haynes… I am dancing with joy.

  21. With many new announcement about the wizard of oz movies in the news, you might want to consider starting to obtain Wizard of Oz book series either as collectible or investment at

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.