Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Fear of a Gray Planet

Brian Doherty | 1.16.2008 11:46 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Megan McArdle has a perspicacious piece in the new Atlantic on the likely economic and cultural effects of the aging of America's population. You ought to read it in full, but for a potted summary: likely slowdown in macro economic growth statistics as more Americans' needs shift from goods (where productivity growth is strong) to services (where it isn't).

She gently debunks the somewhat common fear of a huge stock market crash as the aging Boomers start selling off the stocks they've socked their savings in for decades. But she does think that double digit yearly stock market index growth is very unlikely down the line.

The implicit advice to the young? Go into geriatric medicine. Implicit advice to America? We'll need more immigrant service workers. (Paging Kerry Howley.) Implicit rebuke to aging Americans? You maybe shoulda thought about having more kids. (Paging Bryan Caplan.) And expect to see more graying heads in service occupations, as many Boomers didn't save enough to sustain them through their increasing golden years, and they'll have to keep working past standard "retirement" age, and Social Security won't sustain them. Nor will it bankrupt the Republic, in her reading--though Medicare just might.

Read the whole thing. It ends with a pleasing "life will go on, and still be sweet" tone, despite the possibly scary-sounding economic and cultural shifts she discusses.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Dodging Baseball's Speed Limits

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

PolicyEconomicsCulturePrintSocial Security
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (51)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John   17 years ago

    I read today where the US fertility rate has risen to 2.4, which is above replacement. If that is the case, doesn't that mean the US is going to age a lot less than predicted? Also, I think some of the birth dearth is due to a lag that resulted in this generation waiting longer to have children. The normal birthrates expected when people hit their 20s aren't happening now until people hit their 30s creating an apparent birth dearth when those people are in their 20s. Some of the growth in fertility is due to high fertility Hispanic immigrants, but not all. Even non-Hispanic whites now have a fertility rate slightly above two. The fertility rate in this country seems to be rising, which I think puts a lot of those "old America" predictions in jeopardy.

  2. Episiarch   17 years ago

    Can we stop calling them "boomers" and start calling them "narcissistic parasitic assholes", which is much more accurate?

  3. Bingo   17 years ago

    If America becomes like that small town she described, you are going to see a lot of young people move out (just like that small town she described).

    Because fuck serving statist narcissistic geriatric assholes for a living.

  4. Cesar   17 years ago

    We're the most fertile country in the developed world and you're worried about aging?

  5. Cesar   17 years ago

    It should be added (as John has noted above) even if you included only non-hispanic whites, we'd still the most fertile in the developed world.

    I don't know whats slowing Europe's growth, but it doesn't seem to effect us here.

  6. Pig Mannix   17 years ago

    If America becomes like that small town she described, you are going to see a lot of young people move out (just like that small town she described).

    Given that this phenomena occurring throughout the western world, where are they gonna move?

    The places where fertility is increasing don't exactly have the allure of the Big City. Sub-Sahara Africa, anyone?

  7. Pig Mannix, Aspiring Geriatric   17 years ago

    Make that "is occurring" - damn! I can't seem to make a post anymore without dropping at least one word...

  8. J sub D   17 years ago

    Can we stop calling them "boomers" and start calling them "narcissistic parasitic assholes", which is much more accurate?

    I've been called worse.

  9. James Ard   17 years ago

    I forsee the loosening of chicken restrictions setting us up for a world saving bout with the bird flu.

  10. Pig Mannix, Aspiring Geriatric   17 years ago

    I don't know whats slowing Europe's growth, but it doesn't seem to effect us here.

    You're not going to like this much, but I suspect religious participation and values plays a bit a role here. The groups in this country that are growing tend to be the ones that are most religiously active.

    Europe, being largely secular, doesn't have those incentives.

    From a purely materialistic viewpoint, reproduction doesn't make a lot of sense...

  11. Pig Mannix, Aspiring G   17 years ago

    goddammit....

  12. Cesar   17 years ago

    You're not going to like this much, but I suspect religious participation and values plays a bit a role here. The groups in this country that are growing tend to be the ones that are most religiously active.

    Maybe, but I think lower population density plays a role. You can't have a lot of kids unless you have a big house, and if you live in a place like Amsterdam were a shoebox can go for $200,000 you won't have many kids.

    This seems to hold up because Scandinavia, believe it or not, has higher fertility--along with lower population density--than the rest of Europe. This despite record low church attendance.

  13. James Ard   17 years ago

    Pig, I'm an athiest but I had four kids in the hopes that I could maintain my materialistic ways into my old age.

  14. James Ard   17 years ago

    Not to mention the greatist engine of our materialistic culture is the rugrat.

  15. Cesar   17 years ago

    Let me be clear that I'm not saying explosive fertility is a good thing. But going below replacement rate isn't, either, unless you're China or India.

    Slightly above replacement rate--slow, steady growth--seems about right.

  16. brotherben   17 years ago

    maybe a geriatric merkin store...

  17. John   17 years ago

    MR. MCQUIRE
    Ben - I just want to say two words to you - just two words

    BEN
    Yes, sir.

    MR. MCQUIRE
    Are you listening?

    BEN
    Yes I am.

    MR. MCQUIRE
    (gravely)
    Old Hippies

    They look at each other for a moment.

    BEN
    Exactly how do you mean?

    MR. MCQUIRE
    There is a great future in old hippies.

    Think about it. Will you think
    about it?

    BEN
    Yes, I will.

    MR. MCQUIRE
    Okay. Enough said. That's a deal.

  18. de stijl   17 years ago

    It takes a nation of whippersnappers to hold us back.

  19. Brian   17 years ago

    I don't see why having more kids is good for your finances per se. Sure, they might support you in your old age, but that's far from guaranteed, and if you saved the money that you would have spent raising them, you could support yourself. There are plenty of reasons to have kids, but economically speaking they're a poor investment.

  20. Matt J   17 years ago

    Is it too late to implement Carousel?

  21. hale   17 years ago

    You're not going to like this much, but I suspect religious participation and values plays a bit a role here. The groups in this country that are growing tend to be the ones that are most religiously active.

    This is admittedly a pretty cracky, Anton Wilson-esque speculation, but I wonder sometimes if this feat isn't something secular culture could learn to emulate in time.

    Part of the root of humanist fear of religion in the modern, Western world is, I suspect, based on a misunderstanding of religious attitudes toward sexuality. There are doubtless religious theorists who actually are anti-sex, but for the most part, religious sexual morality is simply rooted in a societal structure that is alien to the urban secular humanist - the social structure of the agrarian town, which was for most of history the basic substructure of civilization itself.

    Agrarian mores aren't actually anti-sex (as any medieval scholar could explain at length), they just connect sex with reproduction in a way that's weird to someone raised in contemporary society - particularly in Anglophone countries, where the world of children and family are widely understood to be irreconcilable at a fundamental moral level with the existence of adult sexuality.

    A lot of adults today profess not to want kids because they're an economic burden (which they are), or because they "don't like kids"; I suspect that in many cases, the root of the very emotional objection to the raising of offspring is the notion that childbirth represents the boundary between youth and individuality and bland, sexless seniority.

    Whereas I don't think there is necessarily a fundamental conflict between family and what urban, secular adults want out of life, only between broad modes of living based on value-sets taken for granted in American society. I would be happy to explain how I believe this shortchanges children as well, but that issue falls outside the scope of this particular speculation, so: another time.

  22. Fluffy   17 years ago

    The Medicare bomb is the scary one, because it coincides with other ticking bombs:

    1. Massive numbers of doctors and RN's are themselves baby boomers, and will begin to retire.

    2. We haven't been producing medical professionals domestically at replacement rates, but have plugged the gap by importing medical professionals from east Asia and the subcontinent. That flow will slow to a trickle and then stop as those societies grow wealthy enough to pay their doctors to stay put.

    3. One way that the Medicare crisis will be dealt with is by stiffing providers by slashing reimbursement rates.

    The combination of 1-3 has the potential to turn our hospitals into medical ghost towns that will look like the last chapters of a medical Atlas Shrugged. The steps our government is likely to take in response to such a crisis are not pleasant to think about.

  23. James Ard   17 years ago

    Brian, on an individual basis kids probably are a poor investment. But overall, the economy and thus individuals benefits from the stimulus of diaper, food, toy and electronic manufacturing. Our standard of living as compared to the lower fertility nations shows as much.

  24. Brandybuck   17 years ago

    Making a distinction between manfacturing and service sectors is a mistake. This is a relic of the bad economics of the 1930's. Goods are not superior to services.

    Do we want our economy devoted to producing cheap plastic doodads, or engaged in software engineering, genetic research, and cutting edge medicine? The former are goods, the latter are services. I don't know about you, but the latter sounds like a more vibrant economy.

  25. James Ard   17 years ago

    Brandybuck, Until you have to fight a war. Anyway your economy would result in the boomers living forever, which can't help the situation.

  26. James B.   17 years ago

    I commented on Megan's blog that she shouldn't be looking at Italy for the future but Japan.

    In 15-20 years we will have personal care robots that can bathe, feed and otherwise care for seniors. Combine that with cars that drive themselves allowing for automatic deliveries from Wal-mart and Food Lion and the productivity increases we will be seeing in these sectors will be staggering.

  27. Thomas Paine\'s Goiter   17 years ago

    What do the Ron Paul newsletters say about this topic?
    ----------
    Matt Welch is a vile racist.

  28. Thomas Paine\'s Goiter   17 years ago

    Can we stop calling them "boomers" and start calling them "narcissistic parasitic assholes", which is much more accurate?

    You rule, es.

    ----------

    Matt Welch is a vile racist.

  29. ChrisO   17 years ago

    I'm sorry Dave, I can't change your adult diaper.

  30. stubby   17 years ago

    Episiarch - I already do, sir - I already do.

    Hale: that's very interesting and I think you're on to something.

  31. John   17 years ago

    I think you are right James B. Also, I think information technology will be better adapted to the medical profession allowing doctors to be more productive. All of course assuming some well meaning do gooder doesn't come and enforce socialism on the medical sector and freeze technology at current levels in the name of fairness.

  32. LarryA   17 years ago

    I don't see why having more kids is good for your finances per se. Sure, they might support you in your old age, but that's far from guaranteed, and if you saved the money that you would have spent raising them, you could support yourself. There are plenty of reasons to have kids, but economically speaking they're a poor investment.

    Only on a micro level. You personally will be better off financially if you hoard the resources you would have spent raising children. But on a macro level, if too many people copy you you'll end up in a society where there aren't enough workers to produce what you hope your savings will purchase.

    Besides, no kids>>no grandkids. You have to spend your golden years playing with dogs and cats.

  33. Reinmoose   17 years ago

    Sorry if this is a repeat, but I haven't had a chance to read all of the comments yet.

    Couldn't we just send all the old people to India to be taken care of?

  34. jasno   17 years ago

    But what about the robots?

  35. stubby   17 years ago

    I think anyone who wants to outsource their old people to India should be allowed to. We are keeping our old people, and caring for them, because they help us take care of the kids and we can't afford nannies.

  36. Sam Grove   17 years ago

    Aren't we going to turn all the drudge work over to robots?

    Aren't we going to fix the aging problem medically?

    Hey! Where's the future?

  37. hale   17 years ago

    Sam Grove,

    I don't think the idea of a robot-driven economy is remotely a ludicrous fantasy. I think it's both a plausible and desirable outcome, and one that would improve society in a number of immediate ways.

    Having said that, I'd still argue that the earliest point at which it should be permissible to count on a particular outcome for policy purposes is when it is some working model has been constructed. So far, neither the wholesale divestment of human labor to technology nor a cure for aging have been demonstrated in any tangible way.

    Oh well. The future is apparently later.

  38. dhex   17 years ago

    hale: i think you're onto something as well.

  39. John   17 years ago

    Hale,

    I am all for it as well. Where the hell is my robot prostitute?

  40. Jake Boone   17 years ago

    John,

    Here you go.

    (Note: sexual use may result in chafing)

  41. TrickyVic   17 years ago

    """I am all for it as well. Where the hell is my robot prostitute?"""

    Irobot is currently working on an attachment for its roomba vacumn cleaners for just that purpose. They also have a version for their military bots that can kill level an enemy compound and satisfy a company of Marines on a single charge.

  42. TrickyVic   17 years ago

    Strike the word kill.

  43. GILMORE   17 years ago

    i have some comments on the Boomer piece in the atlantic (having done lots of forecasting on the economic impact of future demographic changes)... but they're not all that big a deal. The short of it is that we need immigrants. They make babies. We need their babies.

    ..to make rejuvination medicine from... bwooo ha ha haha ha ha!!

    ahem. Kidding.

    Anyhoos, the more interesting libertarian red meat in the Atlantic this month was the article "First, Kill All the School Boards"... about public education failures in America.

    Sounds good from the title, but if you read it, it boils into an argument for getting rid of all localized variance, and having one big ol federal mass-education program like the Germans and the Japs.

    The boomer thing is kinda a mixed bag, and doesnt have a whole lot of obvious take aways. Other than our healthcare system is going to get even more expensive. Most of which will come out of young, healthy people's paychecks.

    "Welcome to the Monkey House" is a really good book. It almost makes you think of Vonnegut as sorta libertarianish.

  44. John   17 years ago

    Jake,

    I was thinking more along the lines of a young Melanie Griffith in Blade Runner.

  45. Todd Fletcher   17 years ago

    Countdown to November 2019 and the arrival of my standard pleasure model.

  46. de stijl   17 years ago

    I was thinking more along the lines of a young Melanie Griffith in Blade Runner.

    Or Daryl Hannah in Cherry 2000 ;-}

  47. NeonCat93   17 years ago

    What is the immigration debate but a bunch of old people yelling "Get the hell off my lawn!"?

  48. Doug Dante   17 years ago

    "The implicit advice to the young? Go into geriatric medicine."

    Don't do it!

    With government interference, a large and growing market does not guarantee high wages.

    As a doctor, you can only fix one arthritic knee at a time.

    Who pays for this when you're retired? Some government health plan.

    What's their number one goal going to be? Offer services while keeping down costs.

    How much are they going to pay you?
    As little as possible.

    Go into plastic surgery instead.

  49. Xboy   17 years ago

    "Making a distinction between manfacturing and service sectors is a mistake. This is a relic of the bad economics of the 1930's. Goods are not superior to services."

    Megan McArdle was not making a value judgment, Brandybuck, and the distinction she made is valid -- it's easier to increase productivity in manufacturing goods than in providing services.

    As for robot servants and cars that drive themselves -- people have been predicting these things for over 50 years. Don't hold your breath.

  50. LarryA   17 years ago

    Do we want our economy devoted to producing cheap plastic doodads, or engaged in software engineering, genetic research, and cutting edge medicine? The former are goods, the latter are services.

    Really? Software is a product. It comes on CDs in boxes, or computer downloads. Genetic research leads to GM products. Cutting edge medicine produces procedures like in-vitro fertilization and products like artificial skin.

    "Services" includes everything from the clerk who sells you the software to the physician who places the artificial skin.

  51. Robert Thorn   17 years ago

    "Can we stop calling them "boomers" and start calling them "narcissistic parasitic assholes..."

    Jeez, if I'd have known what was going to happen, I'd have asked my parents to have me at a different time. Oh, wait.

    Good thing no one had to take care of you when you were a helpless child, 'cause that would have been "for the children".

    Self-centered buttplug.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

America's Credit Is Falling—and the Government Is Still Digging Deeper Into Debt

Veronique de Rugy | 5.22.2025 12:13 AM

A Federal Judge Says New Mexico Cops Reasonably Killed an Innocent Man at the Wrong House

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 6:00 PM

Supreme Court Orders Maine Legislator Censured for Social Media Post Must Get Voting Rights Back

Emma Camp | 5.21.2025 4:30 PM

The GOP Tax Bill Will Add $2.3 Trillion to the Deficit, CBO Says

Eric Boehm | 5.21.2025 4:10 PM

A Judge Blocked Apple From Collecting These Commissions

Jack Nicastro | 5.21.2025 3:52 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!