How Scientific American's Departing Editor Helped Degrade Science
When magazines like Scientific American are run by ideologues producing biased dreck, it only makes it more difficult to defend the institution of science itself.
When magazines like Scientific American are run by ideologues producing biased dreck, it only makes it more difficult to defend the institution of science itself.
Join Zach Weissmueller and Liz Wolfe every Thursday as they uncover facts and expose realities that the government and the media would rather not talk about.
"It would help if we could regulate social media," said The View's Sara Haines.
The punch line: It was a panel on the dangers of misinformation.
Trump criticized Liz Cheney's interventionism. He did not say she should "go before a firing squad."
The change in official warnings and news coverage reflects the dearth of evidence that malicious pranksters are trying to dose trick-or-treaters.
More than presidential politics or #AnticipatoryObedience, economics is to blame (or thank) for the long, slow death of a publishing anachronism.
Someone did allegedly threaten first responders, but the panic may have done more damage.
News organizations lack the courage and "moral clarity" to be transparent about their political leanings.
Media hysteria and overzealous governments have led many to believe that childhood independence is a form of abuse.
The pouncing isn't the point.
The former president's authoritarian tendencies are alarming enough without inventing new outrages.
"Michigan's D.E.I. expansion has coincided with an explosion in campus conflict over race and gender," notes The New York Times.
Plus: How will the editors vote in the presidential election?
Despite the outrage from woke staffers, Ta-Nehisi Coates is hardly upset about the interview.
Journalists should be interested in interrogating this contradiction, should the 2024 presidential candidate continue giving interviews.
The would-be vice president is wrong to say that misinformation lacks First Amendment protection.
His ideas would leave us poorer and less free.
Trump and Vance should stop blaming Democratic rhetoric (and vice versa).
The co-host of Gutfeld! talks about how everyone should reject binary thinking.
Either fact-check both candidates or don't bother.
"A couple million times a year, people use guns defensively," says economist and author John Lott.
Former NPR and Slate fixture Mike Pesca discusses media meltdowns, objectivity vs. moral clarity, and whether we are better or worse off now that media gatekeepers have less influence.
The Democratic nominee has favored policing online speech. Would a future Harris administration defend free expression?
Some politicians and environmentalists want to tear down Snake River dams in Washington state, even though they generate tons of electricity.
Will the liars and hacks who covered up Biden's cognitive decline face any consequences?
Beware the Thierry Bretons of the world.
Plus: RFK Jr. thrown off the N.Y. ballot, Ukraine advances into Russia, and more...
Kamala Harris' veep should learn something about the First Amendment.
Fact check: Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is the leader of the Socialist Party.
Plus: Possible Fed rate cutting, a study in AI semiotics, and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors about Project 2025.
Axios reporter Alex Thompson discusses Joe Biden's exit and the rise of Kamala Harris on Just Asking Questions.
Vibes are not the same thing as votes.
Yes, J.D. Vance likes J.R.R. Tolkien. So do most people.
Growth of regulation slowed under former President Trump, but it still increased.
How a single photograph transformed Trump into a mythical leader for some critics and supporters alike.
Plus: Is Biden fit to be president today, let alone stand for reelection?
Biden's bullseye comment was no more dangerous than Sarah Palin's crosshairs.
Plus: How Biden's handlers influenced journalists, nepo baby COVID-19 hysteria, NYC's war on shampoo bottles, and more...
Dave Weigel discusses Biden's decline and the possibility of replacing him on Just Asking Questions.
The president's defenders had private concerns. But publicly? Gaslighting.
Even if EcoHealth's "basic research" in Wuhan didn't cause the pandemic, it certainly failed in its mission to stop it.
I wrote for the .com culture site in its heyday. I don't mourn its disappearance.
Plus: A listener asks whether Bruce Springsteen's song Born in the U.S.A is actually patriotic.