Federal Court Strikes Down Louisiana’s “Nonsensical...Economic Protectionism”

In October 2012 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit issued a humiliating rebuke to the Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors. At issue was the board’s requirement that only licensed funeral directors be permitted to sell caskets within the state, a rule that applied even to those individuals who only made and sold caskets and never once came in contact with a dead body as part of their work, such as the monks of St. Joseph Abbey, who brought suit with the help of the Institute for Justice. “The great deference due state economic regulation does not demand judicial blindness to the history of a challenged rule or the context of its adoption, nor does it require courts to accept nonsensical explanations for naked transfers of wealth,” the 5th Circuit declared. Furthermore, because “it is unclear whether, under Louisiana law, the State Board has authority to regulate casket sales in and of themselves when such sales are not incidental to the seller’s provision of any other funeral services,” the 5th Circuit asked the Louisiana Supreme Court to determine if the state had been acting illegally under state law all along. If that turned out to be the case, then the 5th Circuit would let the law die in state court. But if it was not, then the 5th Circuit would rule against the board under the U.S. Constitution. Either way, the licensing law would be finished.

This saga finally came to a conclusion yesterday. Because the Louisiana Supreme Court “has declined our request to clarify this statute’s meaning,” the 5th Circuit was left with no choice but to strike down the “nonsensical” regulation. “That Louisiana does not even require a casket for burial, does not impose requirements for their construction or design, does not require a casket to be sealed before burial, and does not require funeral directors to have any special expertise in caskets,” the 5th Circuit declared, “leads us to conclude that no rational relationship exists between public health and safety and limiting intrastate sales of caskets to funeral establishments.”

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

  • The Late P Brooks||

    But what if there was a nail sticking out, or a splinter? That dead person would be in agony for all eternity.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Can we at least require the eternal resting vessels be zombie-proof? WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE UNDEAD?

  • The Late P Brooks||

    Speaking of economic protectionism, this morning Bloomberg was reporting on a group of US steel manufacturers lobbying Congress for protection against the evil slanty-eyed steel makers flooding our sacred shores with price-competitive steel.

    The head of Nucor was on, whining about "America" this, and "America" that. If I had Nucor shares, I'd sell them. The guy is a blithering idiot.

  • Aresen||

    The steel industry is the biggest bunch of protectionist whores in just about any country you care to name.

    In Canada, the federal and provincial governments have poured billions into 'saving' the steel industry, which continues to fail.

  • LTC(ret) John||

    Aresen, I was trying to think of any industry that was more protectionist and whiny about it....came up blank. Steel wins.

  • Skyhawk||

    How about the political industry?

  • Rights-Minimalist Autocrat||

    If the Institute for Justice was a woman, I would totally want her to have my babies.

  • Tim||

    Are you kidding me? Let's recall that Dracula was able to move his posse to London in smuggled Romanian coffins. Why are you guys pro vampire?

  • entropy||

    Stop legislating morality. I don't like vampires either but that doesn't mean we should ban them.

  • Aresen||

    One down, 50 billion stupid regulations to go.

  • entropy||

    Dur bur ah terk er jerbs!

  • Zeb||

    Good. I especially like to see the funeral industry get a slap like this. Fucking parasites.

  • Juice||

    nor does it require courts to accept nonsensical explanations for naked transfers of wealth

    I cannot believe those words came from a federal court.

  • Aresen||

    At least any federal court of the last 80 years.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.