October 21, 2010
In the late 1990s, after a public backlash
against the use of civil asset forfeiture to take money and
property from innocent people, seven states passed laws assigning
all proceeds from such forfeitures to public schools or the general
fund instead of police departments and prosecutors’ offices. The
idea was to reduce the incentive to seize assets from innocent
owners and to target people based on the value of their property
instead of the seriousness of their crimes. Senior Editor Radley
Balko points out that Indiana’s law would be more effective if it
weren’t ignored.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245