Brian Doherty | August 24, 2007
Aaron Russo died today of cancer. Russo sought (but did not win, after coming in first on the first two ballots) the 2004 Libertarian Party presidential nomination. He was writer and director of the controversial, conspiratorial movie America: From Freedom to Fascism, aiming at the income tax system and the Federal Reserve.
Details at Steve Gordon's blog.
IMDB results detailing Russo's career as a Hollywood film producer.
My account of the 2004 LP convention and Russo's efforts there.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Aaron Russo was a great guy. Freedom to Fascism is a must
see.
He'll be missed.
I had just watched his documentary on the Federal Reserve System when I was shocked to discover he was on the "Recent Deaths" in Wikipedia. I guess it was confirmed. My condolences to family and friends of Russo.
I just watched "Freedom to Fascism", it is a must see for every Libertarian. God bless you Mr. Russo, you have reinforced my love of liberty.
Aaron Russo was a good family friend my kids loved him dearly and my husband worked on his campaign staff he will be missed very much.
xyz,
Fuck off and/or go join the Phelps crew. I'm sure they are looking
for funeral hecklers.
No matter your opinion of Mr. Russo, this post thread is not the
place.
If the Russo family is reading, I'm sorry about my tone @ 1:23. My heart is with you, and I hope that you find some comfort in knowing that Aaron was a center point for many in the libertarian movement. He was bigger than life, and he will remain so.
Such sad news. I hope that the fact that Aaron was such a
champion of liberty helps bring comfort to his family and
friends.
A fitting way to tribute this hero is to watch his America: From
Freedom to Fascism. It's shocking, frightening, and maddening. But
it's also solid, well argued, and compelling.
I met Aaron when he was here in Denver for the screenings of the
movie. After the film, I asked him what I could do to help. He
answered that I should work to bring an end to the Federal Reserve,
and to the income tax. Those are both worthy goals. He also
implored me and everyone else, for the sake of our liberty, to
refuse a National ID card. You have my word, Aaron.
RIP
I just bought "Freedom to Fascism." This is very tragic
news.
Requiscat en Pace, Aaron!
How odd. Today I had the chance to meet Bernard "Liberty Dollar"
von Nothaus at a lunchtime gathering that was going on near my
work. At one point in the conversation, Aaron Russo's name was
mentioned -- the first time I had heard that name or thought about
the man in months. We talked for a few minutes about what a great
movie Trading Places was. And just a few hours later I learned of
Russo's passing this very day.
Now I'll finally have to see AFTF, I guess. It's the least I can
do.
I met Aaron Russo twice; once at the WTP Conference in D.C. where he brought the crowd to their feet, and later in Tucson, AZ at a showing of AFTF. He was always smiling and was an ebullient advocate of Liberty. Godspeed, Aaron Russo. Thank you for bringing us closer to our goal of Freedom.
Met him once, briefly. I got no dog in the intra-LP squabbling but he seemed like a committed, sincere guy. RIP.
No quotes from "The Rose" yet?
Someday I should write up the faintly weird tale of
Liberty's interview with Russo. Weird more for Bill
Bradford's role in it than for Russo's.
Way back when, Russo was a Kennedy Democrat; I think it was Waco
that radicalized him. He was wrong about a lot of things, but he
was a sincere believer in individual liberty. RIP.
For the record, I don't know who xyz is. It's not another handle of mine (I don't have any others).
Aaron had a special relationship with Nevada, in that he tried
to win the 1998 Republican Gubernatorial primary.
He fought the Republican state machine, which was backing a
University Regent, and lifetime political operative named Kenny
Guinn. Aaron fought hard, running a Ron Paul type grassroots
campaign. He almost pulled it off. He promised to be a very
federalist governor, and confront the Feds over the Yucca Mountain
nuclear waste site on 10th Amendment grounds, and on medical
marijuana, and federal title to the Nevada public lands.
Unfortunately, the Republicans nominated Guin, who in his second
term raised taxes in Nevada with an end run around the Nevada
Constitution.
I led the Nevada Delegation to the 2000 LP convention, and we
supported Aaron all the way. Even then, however, there were
questions about his health.
Whatever you think about his politics, or his sometimes abrasive
Brooklyn NY persona, deep down he was a warm human being and a
friend of liberty and to all those who support liberty. RIP. Aaron.
We will miss you.
This is very sad news. I just received America:From Freedom to Fascism in the mail today, and am looking forward to watching it. In a world where lovers of individual liberty seem to be shrinking, Aaron was unapologetic about his beliefs. Whether right or wrong about everything he was willing to stand up and fight. We need more men like Aaron and less Obamas, Clintons, Bushes and Giulianis. I'm not holding my breath. My sincere condolences go out to Aaron's family and friends. May he rest in peace.
We loved you man, your a true patriot and a friend to everyone
who loves freedom.
Sincerely
Keith Crawford
Dr Ron Paul for President in 2008
He was wrong about a lot of things, but he was a sincere
believer in individual liberty.
Yeah, faith, not facts is what counts.
Facts Refute Filmmaker's Assertions on Income Tax in
'America'
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
Published: July 31, 2006 (NY Times)
The film was not on the program at Cannes, however, not even for
screenings made under the festival's aegis without being in the
awards competition. Mr. Russo, the film's director, writer and
producer, just set up an inflatable screen on a beach. Photographs
posted at one of Mr. Russo's Web sites depict an audience of fewer
than 50 people spread out on a platform on the sand.
Hyping films with fanciful claims is nothing new in Hollywood. But
examination of the assertions in Mr. Russo's documentary, which
purports to expose "two frauds" perpetrated by the federal
government, taxing wages and creating the Federal Reserve to coin
money, shows that they too collapse under the weight of fact.
Still, at free showings the film has drawn long lines of people
eager to watch a documentary that feeds on the estrangement many
Americans feel from their government, especially those who believe
they played by the rules and yet see their finances strained or
broken. Many of the reviews in major newspapers have accepted as
having some factual basis the film's main contention, that the
government illegally extracts income taxes, even though every court
that has ever ruled on these issues has upheld the
constitutionality of the income tax.
The film's appeal, Mr. Russo said during a phone interview last
week, is not left or right, but concentrated among those who see
the United States evolving into a police state ruled by an
oligarchy that has tricked Americans into paying taxes.
Not mentioned in the film is that Mr. Russo has more than $2
million of tax liens filed against him by the Internal Revenue
Service, California and New York for unpaid federal and state
taxes. Mr. Russo declined to discuss the liens, saying they were
not relevant to his film.
Early in the film Mr. Russo, the narrator, asserts that every
president since Woodrow Wilson and every member of Congress has
perpetrated a hoax to tax people's wages and issue them dubious
currency. All of the federal income tax revenue, the film says,
goes to these bankers to pay interest on the national debt, even
though by the broadest measure the federal government's interest
payments are less than 40 percent of the individual income taxes,
according to an examination of every federal budget since
1995.
The film opens by calling the 16th Amendment and its subsequent
income tax and the Federal Reserve the product of a "silent coup
d'état" in 1913 by "international bankers." In the style of
low-budget television documentaries, photographs appear on screen
of J. P. Morgan, Paul Warburg and John D. Rockefeller.
The documentary includes interviews with a host of people who are
presented as experts, scholars and whistle-blowers. All deny the
legitimacy of the income-tax laws, including Irwin Schiff, now
serving his third prison term for tax crimes.
The cornerstone of Mr. Russo's case is whether any law requires
Americans to pay income taxes on wages.
Near the film's beginning Mr. Russo says, and others appear on
screen asserting, that the Internal Revenue Service has refused
every request to show any law making Americans liable for an income
tax on their wages.
Yet among those thanked in the credits for their help in making the
film is Anthony Burke, an I.R.S. spokesman. Mr. Burke said that
when Mr. Russo called him asking what law required the payment of
income taxes on wages, he sent Mr. Russo a link to documents,
including Title 26 of the United States Code, citing the specific
sections that require income taxes be paid on wages. Title 26 says
on its face that it is law enacted by Congress, but Mr. Russo
denied this fact.
"Title 26," Mr. Russo said in an interview last week, "is not the
law, it is I.R.S. regulations and to be a law it has to be passed
by Congress." Mr. Russo added that he had studied the matter
closely and was confident that he had the facts.
Arguments made in court that the income tax is invalid are so
baseless that Congress has authorized fines of $25,000 for anyone
who makes them. But even though the penalty was quintupled, from
$5,000, it has not deterred those who assert this and other claims
that Congress and the courts deemed "frivolous arguments."
The film also states repeatedly that people are tricked into paying
income taxes because no law makes them liable for taxes. The tax
code uses the word impose, whose definition includes the concept of
liability, courts have held in published decisions.
The film includes the voice of this reporter, off camera, asking
the I.R.S. commissioner, Mark W. Everson, to answer protesters
outside the Treasury building who wanted to know what law makes
them liable for taxes. Mr. Everson then makes rambling comments
without, as the film notes, answering the question.
Mr. Russo also said that "Congress has no authority to tax people's
labor." Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution begins with the
phrase "The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect
taxes."
Only three limitations are placed on that power, none of which bars
a tax on wages. One limitation, however, was a requirement that
taxes be "apportioned among the several states."
The 16th Amendment repealed apportionment, but Mr. Russo says in
the film that the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified and
thus a tax on wages is unconstitutional. This claim has been made
in various forms by thousands of tax protesters since 1913, and so
far their batting average with the courts is .000.
To buttress the claim that the 16th Amendment is invalid, the film
displays a quotation from a federal district judge, James C. Fox.
But the transcript from which the judge's words were taken shows
that while he spoke those words, they were in the context of laying
out issues and that the conclusion he reached was the opposite of
the words quoted.
Judge Fox, the transcript shows, concluded that no court would
accept any argument that the 16th Amendment was not properly
ratified and therefore invalid.
The film includes a brief interview with Sheldon Cohen, who was
I.R.S. commissioner in the Johnson administration. Mr. Cohen said
Mr. Russo used editing that " twists my views" to create a false
impression. Mr. Russo said he considered the assertion
laughable.
Mr. Russo was Bette Midler's manager for seven years early in his
career and has produced music as well as films. He also sought the
Libertarian Party nomination for president in 2004 but dropped out
because of ill health.
Despite hundreds and perhaps thousands of tax protesters going to
prison, and many more losing their homes and life savings, the
movement appears today to be more widespread than ever.
"The tax protest movement is like a cult," said J J MacNab, a
Maryland insurance analyst who is writing a book about protesters
and who has sat through six trials of people prosecuted for
refusing to pay taxes under the theories espoused by Mr. Russo's
film.
One tax protester featured in the film, Irwin Schiff of Las Vegas,
is now serving his third prison sentence after being convicted of
tax evasion crimes. Mr. Schiff introduced into his criminal case
the notes of his psychiatrist, who wrote that Mr. Schiff was a
successful tax shelter salesman until a con artist ripped him and
his clients off. The psychiatrist concluded that Mr. Schiff became
delusional, believing he alone could properly interpret the tax
code, as a way to avoid acknowledging reality.
Later, one of Mr. Schiff's confederates, who was also later
convicted and sent to prison, sent e-mail messages to supporters
saying that the psychiatrist's notes were introduced as part of a
ruse to help Mr. Schiff escape prosecution.
Ms. MacNab, who has testified before Congress, said that at each of
the trials prosecutors showed how the accused took out of context
sections of the law and court decisions while ignoring other
sections, including those shown to them by I.R.S. agents.
"People who are drawn into this movement just refuse to acknowledge
facts that show their beliefs have no basis in fact," she said.
"Most of them have failed, their business has failed, their
marriage has failed, and instead of taking responsibility for it
they want to blame the government."
Correction: Aug. 3, 2006
An article in The Arts on Monday about assertions regarding the
income tax made in the documentary "America: From Freedom to
Fascism" misstated the political experience of the film's director,
Aaron Russo, who ran for the Libertarian Party presidential
nomination in 2004. He finished second in the voting at the party's
national convention; he did not drop out for health reasons.
"Arguments made in court that the income tax is invalid are so
baseless that Congress has authorized fines of $25,000 for anyone
who makes them."
Of course Congress would want to pass such a law like that whether
or not the arguments are "baseless". Members of congress want to
get paid.
Why are people still going for that stuff instead of concentrating on the acknowledged legal ways that are available for everybody to reduce their tax liabilities?
Arguments made in court that the income tax is invalid are
so baseless that Congress has authorized fines of $25,000 for
anyone who makes them.
Wow, that's a sign of confidence.
There was a time when my church found the arguments that the Earth
moved around the Sun, and not vice versa, so ill-founded that it
forbade Galileo from publicly making them.
Yeah, faith, not facts is what counts.
Russo was wrong about certain environmental issues, the
constitutionality of the income tax, and alternative health, among
other topics. And the facts of those issues certainly do count. But
this isn't really the proper place to get into that. If you ever
grow up, Edward, you might understand why.
But this is the place to praise Russo's goofy conspiracy theories? I'm just responding to the dimwits who post nonsense here. If you ever grow up, Jesse, you might find a different line of work. The demands of a propagandist and apologist are obviously at variance with your inflated self image.
One final comment--this wouldn't be appropriate at Russo's memorial service--the cause of liberty is never served by fanatical devotion to falsehood and half-truths.
Reverend Walker,
What page are we on in the hymnal? Is there a lunch after the
burial?
Jesse,
I stand by "dimwits" and "nonsense," terms that are hardly out of
keeping with the general tone of the discourse here. But "inflated
self image" is off the mark. It is rather a kind of
disingenuousness in promoting a figure like Russo to the masses, as
it were, while hastening to make it clear that you know Russo was a
crackpot. You, sir, lack the courage of your pretend
convictions.
Please continue to follow the brilliantly evil money trail directly to the Rothschilds, The Bank of England, Kuhn & Loeb and the other war profiteers that hate real patriots like Aaron Russo. Now that we've taken the Red pill what's next?
Thanks, Ben, for providing an example of a dmiwit posting nonsense. Russo's legacy. I rest my case.
As a committed 3rd party person- love the spirit and patriotism
of Aaron Russo and just so happens "trading places" one of family
favorites.
Question to readers- Now that Karl Rove has some time on his hands
- is it possible he goes around the "net" planting hateful comments
to distract us from purpose?
Just to look in your eyes again....Thank you, Aaron for the opportunities you gave me, the faith you had in me when I did not have it myself; the love you gave to me and to my family. You always made me want to be a better person. For that I will always be grateful. Kindred spirit, until we meet again....
We lost a great man.
Being a part of the NWO, and very familiar with their operations, I
told my husband recently that Aaron will be probably assassinated
soon. I did not expect it so soon.
Can someone post more details, as to how Aaron died?
WE HAVE SO MANY TRAITORS IN OUR GOVERNMENT
THERE IS NOTHING TO DO
JUST WAIT FOR BUSH TO ATTACK IRAN
AND WW3
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it
cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less
formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the
traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly
whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls
of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he
speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face
and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in
the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works
secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the
city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.
A murder is less to fear."
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245